ML15287A450

2015 Dresden Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-3

ML15287A450
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	04/30/2015
From:	Randy Baker Operations Branch III
To:	Exelon Generation Co
References
Download: ML15287A450 (1)

Text

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

.. - ~* Date of Examination : 4/6/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance , safety function distribution) . /l/(. }jJ M

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination . Ct. $ '?DB

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a) .

Cl(. rA *~

~-¥~

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. '/<. r-& w

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. (R' $ ~Jj

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA -- -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following , as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1and2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution , bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201 -2.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Pr~edN~~ /~ Date

a. Author Charles Kolotka / {;- ~ J* S ..!~

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Ed Burns / &4J. C~ Z-5-15

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) \:'.f\!Vl:lf'\L ~l'\\<1- fL T2 ~ G C\. --?::--,,.~"

d. NRC Supervi sor "" M' RtrC'~fcM~ ~/t';->~t. ~ ~

~~lbHs /'V V ~

I NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

'tti i...p\1...\.... \; i:Rq>i ~u. \1., \:t~ ::>r~ ~'tt ~ '<Pll.\ iM\-r W IV \!" !b . !/b /IS ..

°¥"1::'¥--U'.'\L\... \Jf"f?,l'f'( '(H.W:>,~*i~ ~ib\......> &f' \....;>P,I. T\\il'--l ~'1-P..*v-.'1'-' I'\\'""-' - ~'I\:) ~ft,;/!'(

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

.. - ~* Date of Examination : 4/6/2015 Operating Test Number: 2015-301 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance , safety function distribution) . /l/(. }jJ M

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination . Ct. $ '?DB

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a) .

Cl(. rA *~

~-¥~

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. '/<. r-& w

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. (R' $ ~Jj

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA -- -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following , as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1and2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution , bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201 -2.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Pr~edN~~ /~ Date

a. Author Charles Kolotka / {;- ~ J* S ..!~

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Ed Burns / &4J. C~ Z-5-15

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) \:'.f\!Vl:lf'\L ~l'\\<1- fL T2 ~ G C\. --?::--,,.~"

d. NRC Supervi sor "" M' RtrC'~fcM~ ~/t';->~t. ~ ~

~~lbHs /'V V ~

I NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

'tti i...p\1...\.... \; i:Rq>i ~u. \1., \:t~ ::>r~ ~'tt ~ '<Pll.\ iM\-r W IV \!" !b . !/b /IS ..

°¥"1::'¥--U'.'\L\... \Jf"f?,l'f'( '(H.W:>,~*i~ ~ib\......> &f' \....;>P,I. T\\il'--l ~'1-P..*v-.'1'-' I'\\'""-' - ~'I\:) ~ft,;/!'(

ES-301, Page 24 of 27