ML15260A902

Notification of Inspection and Request for Information for NRC Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection

ML15260A902
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/17/2015
From:	Masters A Reactor Projects Branch 7
To:	Gayheart C Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
Download: ML15260A902 (8)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 September 17, 2015 Cheryl A. Gayheart, Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant 7388 North State Highway 95 Columbia, AL 36319

SUBJECT:

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT- NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION

Dear Mrs. Gayheart:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a problem identification and resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, during the weeks of November 2-6 and 16-20, 2015. The inspection will be led by Mr. Ryan Taylor, a Senior Project Inspector. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, issued January 1, 2015.

The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensees Corrective Action Program (CAP) complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.

On September 14, 2015, Mr. Taylor confirmed, with Mr. Greg Bell of your staff, arrangements for an information gathering site visit and the two-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:

• Inspection team preparation week: October 26 - 30, 2015

• Onsite weeks: November 2-6 and 16-20, 2015 The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the inspection. Please have the referenced information available prior to October 21, 2015. Contact Mr. Taylor with any questions concerning the requested information. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.

If additional documents are needed, they will be requested when identified. Prior to the onsite inspection, Mr. Taylor will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details: availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and other applicable information.

C. Gayheart 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Ryan Taylor at (404) 997-4630.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony D. Masters, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.: 50-348 and 50-364 License Nos.: NPF-2 and NPF-8

Enclosure:

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION cc: Distribution via Listserv PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011.

PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

__ ________ X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE X FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE RCT1 ADM2 NAME R. Taylor A. Masters DATE 9/17/2015 9/16/2015 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO C. Gayheart 3 Letter to Cheryl A. Gayheart from Anthony D. Masters dated September 14, 2015

SUBJECT:

JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT- NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION DISTRIBUTION:

OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMFarley Resource

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION (November 2-6 and 16-20, 2015)

A. Documents Needed Prior to the Information Gathering Visit Note: Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since June 24, 2013. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format.

If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate alternate ways to provide the information.

1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. This should include procedures related to:

a) Corrective action process b) Cause evaluation c) Operating experience program d) Employee concerns program e) Self-assessment program f) Maintenance rule program and implementing procedures g) Operability determination process h) Degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20) i) System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs j) Preventive maintenance deferral and condition report (CR) extension process If any of the procedures requested above were revised after June 24, 2013, please provide copies of all revisions.

2. List of top ten risk significant systems, top ten risk significant components for each one of the top ten risk significant systems, and top ten risk significant operator manual actions. Copies of system health reports, system design basis documents, and system description information for the top ten risk significant systems.

3. List of all CRs initiated including the following information for each CR:

a) CR Number b) Brief, but complete problem description c) Priority or level d) Affected system e) Affected component f) Responsible plant department g) Current CR completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)

Enclosure

2 CR # Problem Priority System Component Org Status CR A RHR Pump 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open 000123 failed flow PMP-A criteria per SR 5.0.5.4

4. List of outstanding corrective actions including the following information for each action:

a) Corrective action number b) Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc) c) Brief, but complete corrective action description d) Associated CR number e) Corrective action initiation date f) Number of Extensions g) Corrective action due date h) Completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)

Corrective Type Description CR Initiation Extensions Due Status Action # Date Date CA00034 CAPR Revise 00058 01/05/11 2 06/15/11 Closed Procedure NGK-003-4585

5. List of control room deficiencies with a brief description and corresponding CR and/or work order (WO) number.

6. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens with a brief description and corresponding CR number.

7. List of all currently extended or overdue CRs, sorted by initiation date, with the following information:

a) CR Number b) Priority or Significance c) CR title and short description

8. List of all CRs that have been voided or cancelled. Please provide the following information for each CR:

a) CR Number b) Brief, but complete problem description c) Reason voided or cancelled

3

9. List of all structures, systems, and components (SSCs) which were classified as (a)(1) in accordance with the Maintenance Rule since June 24, 2013. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1):

a) Date of classification in (a)(1) b) Reason for being placed in (a)(1) c) Planned actions and their status

10. List of Maintenance Preventable Functional Failures (MPFF) of risk significant systems.

Please include actions completed and current status.

11. List of corrective maintenance work orders. Please include the following information for each work order:

a) WO number b) Brief, but complete work description d) Affected system and components e) Date of initiation f) Due date (or completed date)

If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below)

Work Description System Component Initiation Due Status Order # Date Date WO01345 Replace breaker SI 2A-SI-PMP, 01/05/08 03/15/09 Closed 2A-BKR-08-BB4 BKR-08-BB4 for 2A SI Pump.

12. Corrective action closeout packages, including CRs with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee Identified Violations (LIV). Please include a cross reference linking NRC finding numbers and LIVs to the appropriate CR numbers.

13. Corrective action closeout packages, including CR with description of corrective actions, for all licensee event reports (LER) issued. Please include a cross reference linking LER numbers to the appropriate CR numbers.

14. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.)

and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.,) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability. Please include the reference number (e.g. CR #) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned OE information.

15. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments issued, including the last two audits/assessments of the corrective action program.

4

16. Copies of all department self-assessments for those programs related to the Corrective Action Program (e.g. Operating Experience, Maintenance Rule, etc)

17. Copy of the most recent integrated plant trend report, departmental trend report(s), and corrective action trend report, including any human performance and equipment reliability trends. Copy of any adverse trends in equipment, processes, procedures, or programs.

18. Copy of the latest Corrective Action Program statistics (if exists) such as the number of CRs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, and others as may be available.

19. Copies of any minutes of meetings by the offsite safety review boards/groups. In addition, please provide a list of routine meetings involving the CAP to be held while the team is onsite.

20. List of CRs related to equipment aging issues in the top ten risk significant systems since June 24, 2010, (e.g., system erosion and/or corrosion problems; electronic component aging or obsolescence of circuit boards, power supplies, relays, etc.;

environmental qualification). Please provide the following information for each CR:

a) CR number b) Priority c) CR problem description

21. If performed, please provide any recent self-assessment of the site safety culture.

22. Copies of corrective action program documents related to cross-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self-assessments, safety review committee or other oversight methods.

23. List of all root and apparent cause evaluations with a brief description.

24. Copy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment importance measures report, if available.

25. System Health Reports, system design basis documents, and system description information for the top ten risk significant systems.