ML15156A696

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Assessment Meeting Open House Handout
ML15156A696
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/2015
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML15156A696 (7)


Text

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 11, 2015 2014 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III

Our Mission The NRC Regulates To license and regulate the

  • Nuclear reactors commercial power reactors, research and test reactors, new reactor designs nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and
  • Nuclear materials nuclear reactor fuel, radioactive materials special nuclear materials to for medical, industrial, and academic use ensure adequate protection of public health and safety,
  • Nuclear waste - transportation, storage and disposal of promote the common nuclear material and waste, decommissioning of nuclear defense and security, and facilities protect the environment.
  • Nuclear security - physical security of nuclear facilities and materials from sabotage or attacks 2 3 What We Dont Do Some Nuclear Facts
  • Regulate nuclear weapons, military reactors,
  • 99 nuclear power plants supply or space vehicle reactors about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.
  • Nuclear materials are used in
  • Own or operate nuclear power plants medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.
  • Nuclear materials are widely used in
  • Regulate some radioactive materials, such as industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, Xrays and naturally occurring radon radiography devices, and irradiators.

4 5 1

NRC Performance Goals How We Regulate Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials 6 7 6

Regulatory Framework Reactor Oversight Process Strategic NRCs Safety Performance Areas Mission Safety Cornerstones Strategic Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Results Results Performance Areas Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Cornerstones Action Matrix Cross-Cutting Areas Regulatory Response Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment 8 Problem Identification & Resolution 9

2

Significance Threshold Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Performance Indicators Green Baseline Inspection White Requires additional NRC oversight Green White Yellow Red Yellow Requires more NRC oversight Red Requires most NRC oversight Increasing Safety Significance Inspection Findings Inspection Findings Green Very low safety issue Green White Yellow Red White Low to moderate safety issue Yellow Substantial safety issue Increasing Safety Significance Red High safety issue 10 11 11 Action Matrix Columns Industry-Wide Performance 5 01 As of 12/31/2014 Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Degraded Performance 14 Licensee Response Regulatory Response Increasing Degraded Cornerstone

  • Safety Significance Multiple/Repetitive
  • Inspection Degraded Cornerstone
  • Management Involvement Unacceptable
  • Regulatory Action IMC 0350 Process 80 12 13 3

Industry-Wide Inspection Findings Industry-Wide Performance Indicators Finding data current as of 1/31/2015 Calendar Year Calendar Year 2014 data 2014 data Green 703 Green 6740 White 16 White 16 Yellow 0 Yellow 3 Red 0 Red 0 14 15 NRC Annual Assessment Summary NRC Inspection Activities DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station DavisBesse 2014 2014 7041 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the Oversight Process activities station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment. 3390 inspector hours of direct inspection activity DavisBesse was in the Licensee Response Column of the 628 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant NRCs Action Matrix for the first two quarters of 2014 operating status DavisBesse transitioned to the Regulatory Response 1621 inspector hours of preparation for and Column in third quarter of 2014 due to a Greaterthan Green violation associated with the Physical Protection documentation of inspection activities cornerstone 1402 hours0.0162 days <br />0.389 hours <br />0.00232 weeks <br />5.33461e-4 months <br /> for other Reactor Oversight Process No Substantive CrossCutting Issues were identified elements (e.g., assessments and communications) 16 17 16 17 4

NRC Inspection Activities DavisBesse PIs and Findings DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station January 1 through December 31, 2014 2014 2 resident inspectors on site - residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and performed daily plant All Green Performance Indicators walkthroughs 25 other NRC inspectors participated in various 13 Green/Severity Level IV inspections Inspection Findings 3 major team inspections 1 GreaterthanGreen Inspection Triennial Heat Sink Inspection Finding Modifications/50.59 Inspection Steam Generator Replacement Inspection 18 19 18 19 NRC Inspection Findings NRC Inspection Plans for 2015 Some Examples of 2014 Green Findings DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station NRC Plans Baseline Inspections and Supplemental Inspections for 2015. This includes the following Repair work priority did not support timely repair of major team inspections issues with control room annunciators Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Failure to identify and correct a void area in the process (completed in April) concrete of the shield building Component Design Basis (completed first Unqualified procedures used for ultrasonic quarter) examination of shield building reinforcing bars Emergency Planning Exercise and Performance Fire watch individual did not make required visual Indicator verification (completed second quarter) observation of a room due to difficulties with the Initial Licensed Operator Examinations (third rooms door quarter) 20 21 20 21 5

DavisBesse Shield Building (SB) Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident In 2013, indications of crack growth were identified

  • Actions in response to Japan Nuclear by licensee during scheduled bore hole examinations Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan Possibility of continued crack growth is being info.html addressed by licensees SB longterm monitoring program
  • Mailbox for comments on staff actions:

Reestablishment of SB licensing basis to accept JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov laminar cracking will require a license amendment

  • Office of Public Affairs Point of

Contact:

Using conservative calculations, the licensee showed that the SB remains capable to perform its design OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 3014158200 safety functions with laminar cracks 23 22 23 NRC Social Media Additional Questions?

Channels NRC Representatives Sr. Public Affairs Officer: Viktoria Mitlyng 6308299662