ML15119A306

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML15119A306
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/2015
From: Bryant R
NextEra Energy Seabrook
To: David Silk
Operations Branch I
Shared Package
ML14254A318 List:
References
TAC U01915
Download: ML15119A306 (18)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:

s~s.h fr)J<._ Date of Examination: 3k.)-3///~ Developed by: Written - Facility ~NRC D II Operating - Facility E:'(' NRC D Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials -180

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) (J--j -120

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) ~ -120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) vrd -120

4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) ~JA_ [-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] ~ {-75}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ub ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) {-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility ~ licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and ¢j scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) -30

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ul ES-202) -14

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; 0d-ES-202)

-14

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review

~~µ (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

~ ~ -7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor uj_

(C.2.i; C.3.h) -7

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed

~ with facility licensee (C.3.k) -7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions

~ distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. ES-201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination: Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1.
a.

Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. .a; A";\\ ~ w R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with RI~ //"'" ~

I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T ~ f~ LI"" t'll T C. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. E N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

f1 ~ f.t.... L ", ~

2.
a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number

  1. b ty'"'- ~

of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, s and major transients. I M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u

and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule ~ v- ~ L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated I T from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative ~ ~ R

c.

r-- and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.
a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form ~.IP {)' ~ T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form ~~ lJ' ~ (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations C. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ~ //- ~ of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered .1~ ~

a.

l~: 7 lJV' in the appropriate exam sections. G

  • ~Afb v I~

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. lf>>ls //' ~ E C. R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

~~ //"' ~ A !11~ oQ)._ L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

//\\..

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). l/J.)£ V'- ~ , ~ t Priyed Jtre/~87, 4? .~.ate 1

a. Author IZ zc'"//11 i::&ilpb r::f-Y'Q

~ I =

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~~~

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)

(

d. NRC Supervisor I [7[lY Note:
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines

1era EN~f3~Y...@. NU~ MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT (Page 1 of 2) The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of and unrestricted access to Exam Sensitive Material.

1. Pre-Examination (Review TR-AA-220-1002, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired speciali e knowledge about the,?.()/ J- 'Z-0/ ~./..0/ / /Vf(C & XfrVJ examination scheduled for the date(s) of "J Z'3 15- "f. / I~ as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons w o have not been authorized by the Exam Project Manager. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of examination administration. I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

2. Post-Examination
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

To the best of my knowled e, did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of 3 t3 1 .1-z. 1 >1 1 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination. PRINTED NAME 'RQ/,.:tilh f3ryt;4..J 7 JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY L~Xlm __ Adh<T' ~v-l I:)C.o..-.. 'Av -t-k~.,,.. SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE s/1tt I 1'1 ~fa, fr' __ th.i/1v. ~/11/rt fCJGla orm 1~/tiJ_f p.q, t rr 1FA*"'"",,r£t.,<c<L '"kf<! ~' ~,c ~b\\r_03cv ~cr;/1'-t G,, ~.r SW~ r y

  • ,'1~ H- }J(A~;- fro) :\\t }1ffr1~

\\MifJ ~ TR-AA-220-1002-F01, Revision 0

era"' EN~f3~X~ MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT (Page 2 of 2) PRINTED NAME

7.

CoU<SLA~ E' C~L e Sii:N

8.

t#.*c:Aµ, f J./<Anf..er.

9.

Nit-~' o{~ ~ -1~ e be ~s.e 1 0. C,~r\\ !>~ '?eo.c."'-. 11. cJtlc..k.1L -:mirL JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY I... u::rRlJCTl.2 R. /R Wl EFlJ l<e-.c,J*r ~r.J.r /~/.-Jju J '5.esc\\o< oe('n"\\.'(J I Vctli de;\\~--- 'Se-1\\lot ~~( oer... ~ /v.. t*i>Jre,r SuJ,DY l.t;MJor fJ(M~ /~t;J~u I SIGNATURE (1) ~~~ ~I DATE SIGNATURE (2) 1):i-;)~ ~z;z ~-?~ ;/i.;/r ~~ 1/1z/J-s /-'fA.LJ~ JJ!/J2

12. (_ "";.~ ?do l~O"\\

1~\\0C !legc£6 ~\\A~~ ~ ~ l/t'Llll"

  • -~,,~ Jf ~
13. j?4;J11ZL. :S(iote8 f.,rz~c.r*u.IL oP1UArvi<_ ( V-il.1 D-"ITCJ.<.. __
14. j- \\Jes"<Tas
15. A*, Jr~.

...J Ferm:" I, S67-..o / V'<l:J~ ~~r c~O V"-1: J.,i-u-*

16. 11M lZossu.. tJok
17. N1 l.~"xs. w~~

~Ro I VALt~TDe 59 f.. I t/lrt-IOK'i1"11..._

s2-e
18.

)~*""es w~bbr ~

19. ~J,os-f ~~

Sf\\() / iJ.\\LilcAr<>C-

20.

{ [lClffllZ i'.y(9W;f <;f1A Vfr~t/J!Jnh ~ c/' NOTES: TR-AA-220-1002-F01, Revision 0 DATE NOTE ~ri1. 1h)r 3)gj;') "8/2;1/15

c_

" ~ 'f&J£ 'f I ii I t( - Lj)n/IJ-I/~ "::v3(-[ ( '1/IPjjj'

IJr-~>(Tera" EN~!j~Y~ ./~c NUCLEAR

7.
8.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

PRINTED NAME NOTES: TR-AA-220-1002-F01, Revision 0 MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY CRO LoT J\\Jf.7~'-/rS<Jt(. CKa. v 5>> c e..o (Page 2 of 2) SIGNATURE (2) NOTE

1 NEXTera* 1 IENEAGY@ I [~7"'\\ j-*-*-***-**-*--------n!1l.. __, ______. _______ __ UMITEO SECURITY AGREEMENT (Page 1 of2) ,---------1 The Umited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of, without unrestricted access to, Exam Sensitive Material.

1. Pre-Examination (Review TR-AA-220-1002, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements) l acknowledge that [have acquired specialized know\\e,dge about the ;2.0iS **,..&z!S.5&f/Jf?t/t:ik J..c.>;$.T.. "JRC *'ZYAr.//

examination scheduled for the date(s) of 3)2.S/is - 4/ 1/ J> as of the date of my signature. I agree that I \\Nill not knowingly divu[ge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by the Exam Project Manager. l understand that I am not to instruct or provide perfonnance feedback to those individuals scheduied to be administered this examination from this date until completion of examination administration. i also understand that I am not to evaluate incfividuafs scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented !n procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. ( ~--- Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with &NY examinee-urmrmmpletion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/9r enforcement action against the facility licens£-e or me.

2. Post-Examinstion To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of ?./z.,,f; r b ~/>1 hr From the date that I entered into this security agreement until completion of examination administration, r did not instruct, evat1uate, or pfOVide performance feedback to those individua!s who were administered this examination.

JOB TJTLE/ RESPONS!BfUTY SIGNATURE (i) DATE S~RE (2)

1. G.o(~cl:> GAubiN<:;

'\\)""' °K<*,c~c.<" ~ !d.1J \\ r2(1a/19 ;;, /, ~ ~- \\?:..... l. ll ~,......,.<<..... \\'--- '¥-.Ml,...,..v =. c.. 11 k I ~.r, """""~

  • ~t tf,y

?,... ~ ~- IAJ ']OMy.e-- ~ __ ~ tZ,V( fv....J Jf/1I /!fJllt!!.d A""T'4"r A NOTE PRJNTED NAME

5.
6.

TR-AA-220.*1002-F02, Revision 0

i**.. :1*******>:.-rera"* ENE,E3.Q.X3_. NUCLEAR LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT (Page 1 of 2) c Cl CrT The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of, without unrestricted access to, Exam Sensitive Material.

1. Pre-Examination (Review TR-AA-220-1002, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the /iO/ S

  • Ao I S LV 11 tJR..C

~~~ ""'1 examination scheduled forthe date(s) of ?/2~/> - 4/,/15. as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons whb have not been authorized by the Exam Project Manager. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of examination administration. I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

2. Post-Examination
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

To the best o.f m kn9wle e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of ~ *z.:~ H-P, 3 Ji s. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination. JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME RESPONSIBILITY K'<-H pofl..hAtJtdt 511, cS Jf e~1 ~.4- }1t:UJt/- .:r~ ~ 1f Lv;;. 1JiiH; G1 !~Iv' ~re /'/ t"N"'f"Jtl. J1111r (j,,~ If Ii ~\\.. ~ "'"[?(l~J-c~o __Jl'~'io~---- DATE ~4~ ~ TR-AA-220-1002-F02, Revision 0 I_

,era ENsBQ.X:a NUCLEAR

7.
8.
9.

PRINTED NAME }Alt~t- )W+, () il/iu ll" IA.I' r /11/uci:. 6{zr5tl1b 1P£

10.

Er:(.. rt.. '/"'tt' LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT (Page 2 of 2) JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY ~*~ \\Jcil '~~ ~/Z(') ffRAI A \\£,_;(,., /)IR s:::rr5I<_ Auf\\ / f"ro'ie."J.. ~v"r SIGNATURE (1) DATE rzl*~/i--t 1i/J1/N 1M..d,, J /?. ,, C:::/ '9/l"{ l/N6"46,q ,. r - r r r II lMr/1-I ._I,/f rn -f,-;;~~7:H.Zct2-Zz:r~~""--- ~ !~ ifqfJ5~~--

11.

M.,,+-t Lcr.rro.b.£e Sf2c 'lo..\\:c\\.oA~r

- ~Y'

@"":,".'I -1 DATE NOTE 3l~l1f' __ 1L111tr __ Jlr N[_ L/.l.1,:-- 1'/JH/1.r --

12. l.Uuetf!n Li/;7i/Jh

? LtlNI 7~ct+-

13. :M,.;~~sa; j/vl?C :z?c6
14. Z10<f ;U/\\/lt.!1'6 tfi.

£1J:.C"t1Z<CtAIV I

15. -:J&ne K'r?AINKI-/

Lo c. T Af/.4ucrk/L 1--~)*1~ ~~~~!iL¥4-"~~~~;1. ~~~- ~-

16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
  1. b:!:>

TR-AA-220-1002-F02, Revision 0

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit : SEABROOK Date of Examination: 2015 Operatin Test Number:

1. General Criteria
a.
b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a licants at the desi nated license level.

a.
b.
2. Walk-Through Criteria Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.

Initials a b* rli: Date ..ll.9~L..!~:..=:!..!l..J..._...f__~~~::....:.....:..:::..:.__,~:_i::--.., I~\\ 1 s

a.

Author

b.

Facility Reviewer(*) ~1'1/P 3/,/5 I I 3/12/,5

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d.

NRC Supervisor NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Exam: 2015 Scenario Numbers: A/ B IC Operating Test No.: QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#-

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out ~ 17- ~ of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. I~ (/L. ~

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event J}- the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) //16 //'-- the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario I~ (;?'. ~ without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. I~ ufL-r~

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain ~ c.---'- jJ)_ complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. ~ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. ~ ~ Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered. /jj ~ ~

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator ~ performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated -416 v-to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. V'-' r}!1 All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 ~ {/'- ~ (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events ~ c/'- ~ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. 46 v- ~ Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 61 6 /5 ~ v-JJ

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/ 2 /2 IM //- ~~(

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 2/ 3 /2 I~ //'-- ~ '

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1/ 1 /1 wg v- ~~~

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/ 3 /3 t~rf6 v- ~

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1/ 0 /1 ~ ~ ir I~,

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2/ 2 /2 116 r.r-- "1r-)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Seabrook Date of Exam: March 2015 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios p v p E 1 2 3 4 Back-up T M L N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I I T N c s A B s A B s A B s A B T I A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A M N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p L u T p M(*) E R I u M RX 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 A s NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T l/C 2,3,5, 2,5 3,6 2,3,4, 2,3 4,6,7 2,3,4 2,4 2,3 2,3,4, 3,4,6 2,7 E 2 2 2 R 6 6,7 6,7 MAJ 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 TS 2 2,3,4 2,4 3,4 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 SRO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 1-1 ~ l/C 2,5 2,3,4, 2,3 9 4 4 2 6,7 MAJ 4 5 5 3 2 2 1 TS 2,3,4 3 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 SRO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 1-2 l/C 2,3,5, 2,3 2,3,4 9 4 4 2 ~ 6 MAJ 4 5 5 3 2 2 1 TS 2 2,4 3 0 2 2 SRO RX 1 1-3 1 1 1 0 ~ NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 l/C 2,5 2,3,4, 2,3 9 4 4 2 6,7 MAJ 4 5 5 3 2 2 1 TS 2,3,4 3 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Seabrook Date of Exam: March 2015 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios p v p E 1 2 3 4 Back-up T M L N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I I T N c s A B s A B s A B s A B T I A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A M N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p L u T p M(*) E R I u RX 0 1 1 0 SRO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 U-1 l/C 2,3,5, 2,3,4 7 4 4 2 ~ 6 MAJ 4 5 2 2 2 1 TS 2 2,4 3 0 2 2 RX 0 1 1 0 SRO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 U-2 l/C 2,3,5, 2,3,4, 9 4 4 2 ~ 6 6,7 MAJ 4 5 2 2 2 1 TS 2 2,3,4 4 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 R0-1 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 ~ l/C 3,6 2,3 4 4 4 2 MAJ 4 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 R0-2 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 ~ l/C 4,6,7 2,4 5 4 4 2 MAJ 5 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Seabrook Date of Exam: March 2015 Operating Test No.: A E Scenarios p v p E 1 2 3 4 Back-up T M L N CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I I T N c s A B s A B s A B s A B T I A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A M N y 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p 0 c p L u T p M(*) E R I u RX 1 1 1 1 0 R0-3 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 ~ l/C 2,5 4,6,7 5 4 4 2 MAJ 4 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 R0-4 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 ~ l/C 3,6 2,3 IL 4 4 4 2 MAJ 4 5 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 R0-5 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 ~ l/C 3,6 4,6,7 2,4 7 4 4 2 MAJ 4 5 5 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX NOR D l/C MAJ TS Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (l/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one l/C malfunction can be credited toward the two l/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Examination: 2015 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO D RO D SR0-11 x SR0-12 x SR0-13 x SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U1 X Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose 245 235 345 24 235 234 24 23 345 24 234 Events and Conditions 5 5 5 5 Comply With and 124 123 123 12 123 123 12 12 123 12 123 Use Procedures (1) 5 45 5 34 5 45 45 34 5 34 45 56 5 56 Operate Control 124 123 235 12 123 Boards (2) 5 5 45 5 Communicate 124 234 123 12 235 123 12 23 123 12 123 and Interact 5 567 5 34 45 45 45 5 34 45 56 67 56 Demonstrate 234 12 123 23 12 123 Supervisory Ability (3) 567 34 45 45 34 45 56 67 56 Comply With and 234 2 24 23 2 24 Use Tech. Specs. (3) 4 Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Examination: 2105 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS RO D R01 x R02 x R03 x SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U2 X SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 I nterpreUDiagnose 24 235 34 235 45 245 24 456 Events and Conditions 6 67 5 7 Comply With and 123 123 13 123 14 124 12 145 Use Procedures (1) 456 45 46 5 5 5 45 Operate Control 13 235 45 124 12 456 Boards (2) 46 67 5 45 7 Communicate 123 234 13 235 45 124 12 456 and Interact 456 567 46 67 5 45 7 Demonstrate 123 234 Supervisory Ability (3) 456 567 Comply With and 2 234 Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. 3 4

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Examination: 2015 Operating Test No.: APPLICANTS R04 x ROS x RO D RO D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D SRO-U D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 lnterpreUDiagnose 346 235 34 456 245 Events and Conditions 6 7 Comply With and 134 123 13 145 124 Use Procedures (1) 6 5 46 5 Operate Control 134 235 13 456 124 Boards (2) 6 46 7 5 Communicate 134 235 13 456 124 and Interact 6 46 7 5 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: ( 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. 3 4

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Seabrook Date of Exam: March 2015 Exam Level: RO X SROX Initial Item Description a b* c.#

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and aoolicable to the facilitv. .II& .,jv \\1j

2.
a.

NRC K/As are referenced for all questions. (4/? // ~

b.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3.

SRO auestions are aoorooriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 I~ v bl)\\

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions VJ; were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or _the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or _ the examinations were developed independently; or lb)_ x the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or _other (explain) ~ v-

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest 27~ ilJ.- new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only 42/14 610 question distribution(s) at right. ~ ~ l),b if'"' 56%/6 8%/0% 36%/4D"/o

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory C/A exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; ~ the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 30/4 45/21 selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter ~ the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right. 40%/ 16% 60%/ 84% b-.

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers fN> ~ vP-or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9.

Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved bl examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; fi/J rt"' deviations are justified.

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Aooendix B. ~ ;/"" JfJ-

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet. ~ tr ~ ~~~~;mjl zr. ;t5_ie-Date

a. Author RctlPh ihfu_
b. Facility Reviewer(*)

el',-e.. A-~*f I ~ -- ~" v ~

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

.fb v<d 5;fk. / f,.hA A LIVA_ ,,., A 11

d. NRC Regional Supervisor l'1... *~ '.i) l.., ** ~~,,.,,, //Ill f.l(J I I r

} 3.&LI.$ u r-Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Faci* Date of Exam: > '$\\ ~ Exam Level: RO [..61 SRO~ Item Descri tion

1.

Clean answer sheets co ied before

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check > 25% of examinations

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants

a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

a 11/iJ ~ !At f}rP Initials b c ~ ~ ~ VA !))_IF ~ -t/1- ~ ~ r /Ji Date 1/i/t s- ~i~ (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are re uired.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15119A306&oldid=5191665"