ML15113A009
| ML15113A009 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/2015 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| Download: ML15113A009 (4) | |
Text
1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:
Caputo, Charles [ccapu90@entergy.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:38 PM To:
Green, Kimberly
Subject:
FW: NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2 Please see below in red From: Green, Kimberly [1]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 4:28 PM To: Caputo, Charles
Subject:
NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2
- Charlie, To answer your question about our accounting of commitments on Slide 7, heres what I put together for our staff.
Kim March 2012 inspection (April 2012 inspection report):
Commitments Reviewed and Determined to be Completed:
28 29 34 36 Commitments Needing Additional Inspection:
2 3
May 2013 inspection (July 2013 inspection report):
Commitments Reviewed and Determined to be Completed:
1 2
3 4
5 7
8 9
10 12 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22
2 24 25 30 31 35 37 38 41 42 44 45 46 Commitments Needing Additional Inspection:
6 13 19 23 26 27 33 40 43 47 48 September 2013 inspection (September 2013 inspection report):
Commitments Reviewed and Determined to be Completed:
6 13 19 23 26 27 33 40 43 48 Commitments Needing Additional Inspection:
47 (because Entergy changed the completion date) Your slide # 26 say 47 was deleted, same as the commitment list in the SER?
Additional Notes:
The Region determined that Commitments 11, 32, and 39 do not apply to IP2.
For Commitments 41 and 42, the Region reviewed Entergys commitment implementation plan. The implementation dates for them are 9/28/2023, and prior to March 2024, respectively. This is mentioned in the July 2013 inspection report.
Commitment 47 was subsequently deleted because Entergy determined that it did not need to submit a plant-specific evaluation, and the staff agreed. Jeff Poehler mentions this during his presentation.
3 So, if my math is correct:
There are 50 commitments listed in Appendix A to SSER2, 3 were deleted (11, 39, and 47) = 47; 1 does not apply to IP2 (32) = 46; Commitments 49 and 50 were added after the inspections and have not been inspected by the Region yet = 44 According to the September 2013 Inspection Report, the Region concluded that Entergy had made sufficient progress to complete our review of 44 commitments.
Please let me know if I missed something.
Kim
Hearing Identifier:
IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:
5100 Mail Envelope Properties (432A906424A7104D858749AC8A2D41C552DFDDA9)
Subject:
FW: NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2 Sent Date:
4/22/2015 5:37:35 PM Received Date:
4/22/2015 5:37:39 PM From:
Caputo, Charles Created By:
ccapu90@entergy.com Recipients:
"Green, Kimberly" <Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
jdcxmetsp004.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2415 4/22/2015 5:37:39 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: