ML15113A008
| ML15113A008 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/2015 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| Download: ML15113A008 (4) | |
Text
1 IPRenewal NPEmails From:
Caputo, Charles [ccapu90@entergy.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:51 PM To:
Green, Kimberly
Subject:
RE: NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2 Sorry I see you have that in your counting later on From: Caputo, Charles Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:38 PM To: 'Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov'
Subject:
FW: NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2 Please see below in red From: Green, Kimberly [1]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 4:28 PM To: Caputo, Charles
Subject:
NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2
- Charlie, To answer your question about our accounting of commitments on Slide 7, heres what I put together for our staff.
Kim March 2012 inspection (April 2012 inspection report):
Commitments Reviewed and Determined to be Completed:
28 29 34 36 Commitments Needing Additional Inspection:
2 3
May 2013 inspection (July 2013 inspection report):
Commitments Reviewed and Determined to be Completed:
1 2
3 4
5 7
8 9
10 12 14
2 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 24 25 30 31 35 37 38 41 42 44 45 46 Commitments Needing Additional Inspection:
6 13 19 23 26 27 33 40 43 47 48 September 2013 inspection (September 2013 inspection report):
Commitments Reviewed and Determined to be Completed:
6 13 19 23 26 27 33 40 43 48 Commitments Needing Additional Inspection:
47 (because Entergy changed the completion date) Your slide # 26 say 47 was deleted, same as the commitment list in the SER?
Additional Notes:
The Region determined that Commitments 11, 32, and 39 do not apply to IP2.
3 For Commitments 41 and 42, the Region reviewed Entergys commitment implementation plan. The implementation dates for them are 9/28/2023, and prior to March 2024, respectively. This is mentioned in the July 2013 inspection report.
Commitment 47 was subsequently deleted because Entergy determined that it did not need to submit a plant-specific evaluation, and the staff agreed. Jeff Poehler mentions this during his presentation.
So, if my math is correct:
There are 50 commitments listed in Appendix A to SSER2, 3 were deleted (11, 39, and 47) = 47; 1 does not apply to IP2 (32) = 46; Commitments 49 and 50 were added after the inspections and have not been inspected by the Region yet = 44 According to the September 2013 Inspection Report, the Region concluded that Entergy had made sufficient progress to complete our review of 44 commitments.
Please let me know if I missed something.
Kim
Hearing Identifier:
IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:
5099 Mail Envelope Properties (432A906424A7104D858749AC8A2D41C552DFDDC2)
Subject:
RE: NRC's accounting of Commitment Completion for IP2 Sent Date:
4/22/2015 5:50:54 PM Received Date:
4/22/2015 5:51:50 PM From:
Caputo, Charles Created By:
ccapu90@entergy.com Recipients:
"Green, Kimberly" <Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
jdcxmetsp004.etrsouth.corp.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2641 4/22/2015 5:51:50 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: