ML15041A378
| ML15041A378 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/2015 |
| From: | Millen M Point Beach |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| References | |
| NRC-2015-0012 | |
| Download: ML15041A378 (6) | |
Text
February 10, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 2014 Fitness for Duty Performance Data NEXTera ENERGY~
POINT BEACH NRC 2015-0012 10 CFR 26.417 10 CFR 26.717 In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.417 and 26.717 enclosed is the 2014 Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) Program Performance Data for Point Beach Nuclear Plant.
This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.
Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Michael Millen Licensing Manager Enclosures cc:
Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241
FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC 2014 Company Annual Reporting Period Point Beach Nuclear Plant Location Donald C. Popp (920) 755-7756 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) & Alcohol (% BAG)
X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.103 and 26.163 Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Average number with Unescorted Access 627 476 Total: 1103 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Follow-Up 28 0
49 1
For Cause-Observed Behavior 1
1 0
0 For Cause-Post Event 0
0 1
0 Pre-Access 28 0
1074 4
Random 354 0
236 1
Total 411 1
1360 6
During the reporting period of 2014, NextEra Energy Resources (NextEra) Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) conducted 1771 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:
Reporting Period POOLS 2014 Point Beach Nuclear Plant 53.4%
Page 2 of 6
BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS Point Beach Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amp he-Phency-Alcohol Refusal tamines clidine to Test Licensee Employees 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
Contractors 2
1 1
0 0
2 1
Total 2
1 1
0 0
3 1
Management Actions For the reporting period of 2014, seven (7) workers were denied nuclear access after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, one (1) follow-up test was positive, one (1) for-cause observed behavior test was positive, four (4) pre-access tests were positive and one (1) random test was positive. One (1) worker was also denied nuclear access after a refusal to test.
Follow-Up Positive Test One (1) contractor employee tested positive for cocaine. This individual was denied access.
For-Cause Observed Behavior Positive Test One (1) licensee employee tested positive for alcohol. This individual was denied access.
Pre-Access Positive Tests Two (2) contractor employees tested positive for alcohol, one (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana, and one (1) contractor employee tested positive for opiates. All individuals were denied access.
Random Positive Test One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. This individual was denied access.
Refusal to Test One (1) contractor employee was not able to provide a specimen during a pre-access test with no medical explanation. The Medical Review Officer declared this a refusal to test. The individual was permanently denied access.
Additional Comments
- 1.
There were no subversion attempts during the 2014 reporting period.
- 2.
For the 2014 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to PBNP's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.
Page 3 of 6 a I
Reportable Events Point Beach Nuclear Plant had one ( 1) reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period. On February 19, 2014, at 2031 (EST) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (EN 49844) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii).
Page 4 of 6
Facilitv Name
[ Point Beach Daily Work Hours 26.205(d)(1) 8 2014 Work Hour Controls Report Period
~
Operating or on-site directing of the operations of systems as described in 26.4(a)(1) 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I -Annual Fatigue Results Performing health physics or chemistry duties as described in 26.4(a)(2)
Page 5 of6 Performing security duties as described in 26.4(a)(5)
Outage (after day
- 60)
Combined Total
Facility Name Point Beach Facility Name
~
Report Period 12014 C!J Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category-26.203(e)(1 )(iii)
Number of Employees Issued Waivers Operating or on-Performing Performing site directing of health physics duties of a fire Number of Waivers the operations or chemistry brigade member of systems, as duties as as described in described in described in 26.4(a)(3)
- 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11-20 More than 20 Total Number of Employees Issued Waivers 0
0 Most Waivers Provided to a Single individual 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results Summary of Corrective Actions-26.203(e)(2)
I Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:
There were three radiation protection individuals performing maintenance activities (restoring the radiation monitoring system) that required two waivers each. The waivers for each individual was for working greater than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and greater than 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br /> in 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />. All three individuals were working online hours.
Performing maintenance or Performing onsite directing security duties of maintenance as described in as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(4)
I Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:
Not including the three face-to-face fatigue assessments for waivers, there were three fatigue assessments performed during 2014.
(1) Self Declaration (Non-Outage)- A Security Officer self-declared fatigue due to illness. The individual 6
was relieved of duties and sent home for a minimum of 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />.
(2) For Cause (Non-Outage)- A Security Officer did not perform the correct patrol round. The fatigue assessment determined the individual was not as alert as normal and was experiencing a headache. The individual was sent home for a minimum of 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> prior to returning work.
(3) Post-Event (Non-Outage)- A contract worker was delivering tools inside the protected area and hit a junction box with the semi-trailer and caused damage. The fatigue assessment determined the individual was alert.
3 0
==
Conclusions:==
There were six waivers utilized for three individuals. There were three fatigue assessments completed during 2014, while working on-line hours; two of the individuals were sent home and required a 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> 2
break prior to returning to work and one was found alert and continued working.
- Note: For individuals performing the fire brigade duteles, pie sse count them onfy under fire brigsde column. Do not doubftl count these indMdusls.
Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:
There were no corrective actions required based on the use of waivers or fatigue assessments.
Page 6 of 6