LR-N14-0237, Compliance with March 12, 2012 NRC Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) and Responses to Request for Additional Information for Salem Units 1 and 2
| ML15016A015 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/15/2015 |
| From: | Jamila Perry Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EA-12-051, LR-N14-0237 | |
| Download: ML15016A015 (29) | |
Text
PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038-0236 Order EA-12-051 LR-N14-0237 JAN 1 5 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311
Subject:
Salem Generating Station Unit 1 Compliance with March 12, 2012 NRC Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) and Responses to Requests for Additional Information for Salem Units 1 and 2
References:
- 1. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, " Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," dated March 12, 2012
- 2. NRC Letter, "Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 -
Interim Staff Evaluation And Request For Additional Information Regarding The Overall Integrated Plan For Implementation Of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (TAC N OS. MF0913 AND MF0914)," dated October 17, 2013 On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Order EA-12-05 1 (Reference 1), Attachment 2 of which establishes requirements for reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFPLI) for operating reactors and construction permit holders. PSEG has installed a primary and backup channel of SFPLI in response to NRC Order EA-12-051. Attachment 1 provides a summary of Salem Unit 1 compliance with the requirements of Attachment 2 to NRC Order EA-12-051 in accordance with Condition IV.C.3 of the Order. Attachment 2 provides Salem Unit 1 and 2 responses to NRC requests for additional information in Reference 2. The responses in Attachment 2 include information previously provided to the NRC staff as part of the SFPLI audit process, with updated information consistent with implementation of NRC Order E A-12-051 at Salem Unit 1.
JAN 1 5 2015 Order EA-12-051 LR-N 1 4-0237 Page 2 There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Brian Thomas at 856-339-2022.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on __ f..£-/_l_IJ+/-_0_/_fl (Date)
Sincerely, 1_£ F .
Jonn F. Perry Vice President - Salem
____ (/
Attachment 1 - Salem Unit 1 Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051 Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation Attachment 2 -Salem Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Response to Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order E A- 1 2-051 "Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation" cc: Mr. William Dean, Director of Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Daniel Dorman, Administrator, Region I, NRC Ms. Carleen Sanders-Parker, Project Manager, NRC Mr. John Boska, Project Manager, NRC NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Salem Mr. Patrick Mulligan, Manager IV, NJBNE Salem Commitment Tracking Coordinator PSEG Corporate Commitment Coordinator
JAN 1.5 2015 Order EA-12-051 LR-N14-0237 Page 3 (The bee list should not be submitted as part of the DCD submittal- remove this page prior to submittal and make the bee distribution accordingly) bee: President and Chief Nuclear Officer Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Vice President - Salem Vice President, Operations Support Director - Nuclear Oversight Director - Regulatory Affairs Plant Manager - Salem Manager - Regulatory Assurance - Salem Senior Project Manager -Fukushima Site Improvements Project Manager - Licensing Document Control
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 1 Salem Unit 1 Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051 Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 1 Salem Unit 1 Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051 Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation Order Requirement "All licensees identified in Attachment 1 to this Order shall have a reliable indication of the water level in associated spent fuel storage pools capable of supporting identification of the following pool water level conditions by trained personnel: (1) level that is adequate to support operation of the normal fuel pool cooling system, (2) level that is adequate to provide substantial radiation shielding for a person standing on the spent fuel pool operating deck, and (3) level where fuel remains covered and actions to implement make-up water addition should no longer be deferred."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance Salem Unit 1 has installed instrumentation to provide reliable indication of spent fuel pool (SFP) water level. The instrument range encompasses the three levels cited above in the Order requirement.
Order Requirement
- 1. "The spent fuel pool level instrumentation shall include the following design features:"
1.1 " Instruments: The instrumentation shall consist of a permanent, fixed primary instrument channel and a backup instrument channel. The backup instrument channel may be fixed or portable. Portable instruments shall have capabilities that enhance the ability of trained personnel to monitor spent fuel pool water level under conditions that restrict direct personnel access to the pool, such as partial structural damage, high radiation levels, or heat and humidity from a boiling pool."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The spent fuel pool level instrumentation (SFPLI) consists of a primary and backup channel, both of which are permanent, fixed instrument channels.
Page 1 of 4
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 1 Order Requirement 1.2 "Arrangement: The spent fuel pool level instrument channels shall be arranged in a manner that provides reasonable protection of the level indication function against missiles that may result from damage to the structure over the spent fuel pool. This protection may be provided by locating the primary instrument channel and fixed portions of the backup instrument channel, if applicable, to maintain instrument channel separation within the spent fuel pool area, and to utilize inherent shielding from missiles provided by existing recesses and corners in the spent fuel pool structure."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI is provided with reasonable protection from missiles that may result from damage to the structure over the SFP. Protection is provided by separation and inherent protection within the Seismic Class I Fuel Handling Building (FH B).
Order Requirement 1.3 "Mounting: Installed instrument channel equipment within the spent fuel pool shall be mounted to retain its design configuration during and following the maximum seismic ground motion considered in the design of the spent fuel pool structure."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI mounting has been designed using the Salem Generating Station (SGS) criteria for Seismic Category 1 components.
Order Requirement 1.4 "Qualification: The primary and backup instrument channels shall be reliable at temperature, humidity, and radiation levels consistent with the spent fuel pool water at saturation conditions for an extended period. This reliability shall be established through use of an augmented quality assurance process (e.g., a process similar to that applied to the site fire protection program)."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI is designed to provide reliable operation at temperature, humidity and radiation levels consistent with beyond design basis ( BO B) conditions using the NRC-endorsed guidance of N EI 12-02, and is subject to the SGS augmented quality process.
Page 2 of 4
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 1 Order Requirement 1.5 "Independence: The primary instrument channel shall be independent of the backup instrument channel."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance Each SFPL I channel is independent of the other, consisting of separate sensor probes and electronics packages.
Order Requirement 1.6 "Power supplies: Permanently installed instrumentation channels shall each be powered by a separate power supply. Permanently installed and portable instrumentation channels shall provide for power connections from sources independent of the plant ac and de power distribution systems, such as portable generators or replaceable batteries. Onsite generators used as an alternate power source and replaceable batteries used for instrument channel power shall have sufficient capacity to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI primary and backup channels are permanently installed and powered from separate power supplies. Each channel is powered from a separate vital instrument bus with uninterruptible power supply ( UPS ). Each channel has replaceable battery backup in the event of a loss of vital instrument bus or UPS. The SFP level instrument system provides at least seven days of battery life assuming typical use and accounting for postulated post-event environmental conditions.
Order Requirement 1 .7 "Accuracy: The instrument channels shall maintain their designed accuracy following a power interruption or change in power source without recalibration."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI channels maintain their accuracy following the transition from normal AC power to the battery backup, as demonstrated by power interruption testing.
Order Requirement 1 .8 "Testing: The instrument channel design shall provide for routine testing and calibration."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPL I design supports routine testing and calibration.
Page 3 of 4
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 1 Order Requirement 1.9 "Display: Trained personnel shall be able to monitor the spent fuel pool water level from the control room, alternate shutdown panel, or other appropriate and accessible location. The display shall provide on-demand or continuous indication of spent fuel pool water level."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI primary and back-up instrument channel displays are located in the Auxiliary Building Relay Room, which is located one elevation below the Main Control Room (MCR) and is easily accessible. The SFPLI is designed to provide continuous or on-demand indication of SFP water level.
Order Requirement
- 2. "The spent fuel pool instrumentation shall be maintained available and reliable through appropriate development and implementation of the following programs:"
- 2. 1 "Training: Personnel shall be trained in the use and the provision of alternate power to the primary and backup instrument channels."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance SGS personnel participated in training provided by the SFPLI vendor, and applied the systematic approach to training for operations, maintenance and technical staff.
Order Requirement 2.2 "Procedures: Procedures shall be established and maintained for the testing, calibration, and use of the primary and backup spent fuel pool instrument channels."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI is subject to SGS procedures and processes for the testing, calibration, and use of the primary and backup channels.
Order Requirement 2.3 "Testing and Calibration: Processes shall be established and maintained for scheduling and implementing necessary testing and calibration of the primary and backup spent fuel pool level instrument channels to maintain the instrument channels at the design accuracy."
Salem Unit 1 Compliance The SFPLI primary and backup channels are subject to SGS preventive maintenance (PM) processes for scheduling and implementing testing and calibration activities to maintain the channels at their design accuracy.
Page 4 of 4
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 2 Salem Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Response to Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051 "Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation"
LR-N14-0237 SGS Units 1 and 2 Response to Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Section 3.2 Spent Fuel Pool Water Levels Background to RAI #1 The ISE states, in part, The NRC staff notes that the licensee provided information indicating that the selection of Level 1 at 124 ft. 8 in. is the level at which reliable suction loss occurs. The staff also notes that the licensee stated that the current elevation for Level 1 is greater than the level where the NPSHA equals NPSHR, which is sufficient for ensuring NPSH for the coolant pumps. However, the licensee did not provide the basis for its assertion that 124 ft. 8 in. represents an elevation that is greater than the elevation corresponding to the 16ft. of net positive suction head required at saturated conditions for these pumps.
The staff has identified this request as:
RAI#1 Please provide the elevation obtained as a result of the NPSHA calculation derived from Reference 8 to the August 12, 2013, letter (S-C-SF-MDC-1040- "NPSH for Spent Fuel Pool Pumps - SF [spent fuel] System (Salem 1 and 2)").
PSEG Response to RAI #1 For Salem Generating Station (SGS) Units 1 and 2, the selection of level 1 is based on the level at which reliable suction loss occurs due to uncovering of the coolant suction pipe. The centerline of the spent fuel pool (SFP) cooling pump suction pipe where it enters the pool is at elevation 124 ft. 8 in. and the centerline of the pump suction is at elevation 85 ft. 6 1/4 in. This represents a static head of 39 ft. 1 3/4 in. At saturated conditions, with SFP water level at centerline of the suction pipe, the lowest available NPSH (NPSHA) is calculated to be 25.1 ft., which is greater than the minimum required NPSH (NPSHR) of 16 ft. as specified by the pump manufacturer.
1 of 20
LR-N14-0237 Section 3.4 Design Features: Arrangement Background to RAI #2 The ISE states, in part, The licensee's proposed location of the primary and backup level instruments for both of its SFPs appears to be consistent with the guidance.
In its letter dated August 12, 2013, the licensee provided a figure RAI-2, "Salem Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Level Sketch Plan View," depicting the approximate locations for both the primary and backup channel level sensors and the routing of the cables from the SFP to the Main Control Room (MCR). The licensee stated in this letter that Salem Unit 1 is similar to Unit 2. Based on the review of this figure, the NRC staff has concerns regarding the routing of these two channels in accordance with the guidance on channel separation as described in NEI 12-02. The routing of the cables within one corner of the SFP area appears to be in close proximity to one another. The staff has identified this request as:
RAI#2 Please provide additional information describing how the proposed arrangement of the SFP instrumentation and routing of the cabling between the level instruments, the electronics, and the displays in the MCR meets the Order requirement to arrange the SFP level instrument channels in a manner that provides reasonable protection of the level indication function against missiles that may result from damage to the structure over the SFP.
PSEG Response to RAI#2 The Salem Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Level Sketch Plan View provided in the SGS RAI Response letter dated August 12, 2013 (Reference 1), depicts the approximate locations for both the primary and back-up level probes. For SGS Units 1 and 2, both the primary and backup channels will be physically separated in accordance with the guidelines provided in N EI 12-02 Revision 1. Specifically, the probes will be in different locations of the SFP and separated by a distance comparable to the shortest side of the pool.
The design utilizes standard Salem separation criteria for safety related instruments by following the requirements of SGS Units 1 and 2 "Technical Standard for Physical Separation Requirements (Electrical)" (Reference 2). The interconnecting cables for the primary and backup channel that extend from the sensor toward the location of the electronics enclosure are installed by routing the cables in separate conduit to a location in the SFP area that allows transitioning from the SFP operating deck to existing conduit embedded in the fuel handling floor concrete. For SGS Units 1 and 2, each Fuel Handling Building is a Seismic Class I structure designed to withstand seismic, flooding and wind events and, therefore will inherently provide reasonable protection against external missiles. Additionally, Seismic 11/1 criteria are applied to components in the Fuel Handling Buildings, providing reasonable protection from internal missiles. The cable will be attached to existing Seismic Class I mounting brackets using Seismic Class I supports (not shown on the sketch provided in the August 12, 2013 letter). The cable is 2 of 20
LR-N14-0237 routed in conduit along a concrete wall directly below Seismic Class I ductwork which provides an additional layer of physical protection.
Section 3.5 Design Features: Mounting Background to RAI #3 The ISE states, in part, The NRC staff notes that the licensee's final design is not available for review and that the licensee will provide further information during the August 2014, six-month Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) update. The staff has identified these requests as:
RAI#3 Please provide the following:
a) The design criteria that will be used to estimate the total loading on the mounting device(s), including static weight loads and dynamic loads. Describe the methodology that will be used to estimate the total loading, inclusive of design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
b) A description of the manner in which the level sensor (and stilling well, if appropriate) will be attached to the refueling floor and/or other support structures for each planned point of attachment of the probe assembly. Indicate in a schematic the portions of the level sensor that will serve as points of attachment for mechanical/mounting or electrical connections.
c) A description of the manner by which the mechanical connections will attach the level instrument to permanent SFP structures so as to support the level sensor assembly.
PSEG Response to RAI#3 a) The design criteria used to estimate total loading, including static and dynamic loads are the SGS safety related design basis for Seismic Category I components in accordance with PSEG Technical Standard "Salem Structural Design Criteria" (Reference 3). The SGS Units 1 and 2 Structural Design Criteria provide both the criteria and the methodology used for determining total loading. The loading on the probe mount and probe body includes both seismic and hydrodynamic loading by utilizing seismic response spectra that bound SGS design maximum seismic loads applicable to the installed locations. The static weight load is accounted for in the analytical model performed by the instrument vendor using the methodology provided in IEEE 344-2004.
3 of 20
LR-N 14-0237 b) Each level sensor will be mounted to a support structure that is designed to Seismic Category 1 requirements. Salem is using the Mohr EFP-IL design, which does not include a stilling well. The support structure will be anchored to the concrete curb around the SFP above the refueling deck as shown in Figure 1. The anchorage of the level probe mount is analyzed for Seismic Category I requirements in accordance with the SGS Units 1 and 2 structural design criteria (Reference 3), and documented in SGS calculation 6S0-2345 (Reference 4) .
c) The level sensor is designed to be attached near its upper end to the Seismic Category I support structure designed specifically to fit the SGS Unit 1 and 2 SFPs as shown in Figure 1.
4 of 20
LR-N14-0237 Attachment 2
%;'HOLE FOR %* BOLT
!TYP. 41 EXISTING RAJL ASSEMBL'I l' DIA. HOLE FOR PROBE:,---+-
EL.l331-0' f'. lilt
__l
- l'f= !l i i ol" ( i-*ii --1 I
EL. 1321-11 MOUNTING PLATE DElAIL I* 1 1
\ l.f::: lu:::
0*
0 I !!i:<l; i!!I
- UNT lNG PLATE 1 111
'"1
'1lrl :...-rt- ' LINER PLATE II BACKER PLATE DElAIL ll!k---::.fJ1* :
12 REO'Dl L:f---= I
!! ! i i
- e:.:. .(j0"o "Ao0o.o l J,I 1:
,t,-to o .. 1 0 6 0
0 II lj I
- Level Sensor Probe EL.l2'l1-21 IHl LEVEL ALARM!
+-- !!
1-r--,_,_
Seismic Category 1 ________
Attachment Point I I ' II Support Structure
_E._E-!_IOL- ---t-- - L - --------
1 I'I I I
r-----------
EL.l2B1-211LOW LEVEL ALARM> I 0 o, ii 1 o 01 , II r.*.j 1 ii I" o
- <J I I' "
"ol ii lI JI i. II ::
EL.l241-B1 ILEVEL II
! ! ii T
1 I I i
i i
I I il EL.II41-II ILEVEL 21
T------------ , i II 1 1 I
1 I
1 II ii
- ;_- VENDOR SUPPUED
!! PROBE ASSE11!1..Y EL.l041-11%' (LEVEL 31 I I i i T , I SECTION ..E-r*
Figure 1 - Typical Mounting Sketch (Not to scale)
Ref: PSEG Drawing 606366 5 of 20
LR-N14-0237 Background to RAI #4 and#5 The ISE states, in part, In addition, the staff plans to verify the results of the licensee's seismic testing and analysis when it is completed based on the licensee's response to the following RAI.
RAI#4 For RA I 3(a) above, please provide the analyses used to verify the design criteria and methodology for seismic testing of the SFP instrumentation and the electronics units, including, design basis maximum seismic loads and the hydrodynamic loads that could result from pool sloshing or other effects that could accompany such seismic forces.
RAI#5 For each of the mounting attachments required to attach SFP Level equipment to plant structures, please describe the design inputs, and the methodology that was used to qualify the structural integrity of the affected structures/equipment.
PSEG Response to RAI #4 The seismic qualification of the probe has been performed by analysis and testing in accordance with IEEE 344-2004. The results of the analysis and testing are provided by the vendor in their Level Probe Assembly Seismic Analysis Report (Reference 5). The analysis performed in Reference 5 utilized an ANSYS finite element model to dynamically analyze the response of the probe to seismic loads and to determine the loads that will be transmitted to the probe mounting. A detailed computational SFP hydrodynamic model using the GOTH IC computational fluid dynamics code was also used to determine the hydrodynamic loading from pool sloshing.
The electronics and battery packages have been tested to Seismic Category I requirements in accordance with IEEE 344-2004. The spectra used for this testing are substantially greater than the spectra for the Auxiliary Building Relay Room where these packages are installed. The test results are presented in the vendor EFP-IL SFPI System Seismic Test Report (Reference 6).
PSEG Response to RAI #5 For each mounting attachment required to affix SFP Level equipment to plant structures, the seismic response spectra bounding the SGS design maximum seismic loads applicable to the installed locations are used as the design input to perform the analysis.
The SFP level probe assembly is supported by a bracket bolted to the edge of the SFP.
SGS calculation 6S0-2345 (Reference 4) demonstrates that the mounting configuration is structurally adequate to meet seismic design requirements, including structural adequacy of the bracket when subjected to seismic and hydrodynamic loads. The electronics, power supply enclosure, and battery boxes are column mounted and the mounting is shown to be structurally adequate in SGS calculation 6S0-2346 (Reference 7).
6 of 20
LR-N14-0237 Section 3.6 Design Features: Qualifications
- 3. 6. 2 Post Event Conditions Background to RAI#6 The ISE states, in part, The NRC staff has concerns with the licensee's lack of information regarding radiological conditions where the instrument and its electronic components are going to be installed.
The staff has identified this request as:
RAI#6 Please provide a description of the specific method or combination of methods that will be used to demonstrate the reliability of the permanently installed equipment under BOB radiation conditions. Also, please provide analysis of the maximum expected radiological conditions (dose rate and total integrated dose) to which the equipment located within the Auxiliary Building will be exposed.
PSEG Response to RAI#6 A radiation dose rate analysis was performed to support the radiological assessment requirements defined by NEI 12-02 for the SFP area (Reference 8). The results of the analysis provided dose rates and integrated doses for seven days post-event with SFP water level at NEI 12-02 level 3. The analysis also provided dose rates and integrated doses for 40-year normal operation. The 7-day integrated doses were based on the 1 00-hour old shutdown core inventories (spent fuel sources) as defined in NEI 12-02.
The results from the dose rate analysis (dose rate and total integrated dose) were used as the design criteria supplied to the vendor as part of the PSEG Procurement Specification (Reference 9). Information supplied from the vendor in a material qualification report (Reference 10) was compared to the radiation conditions provided in the dose rate analysis and used as the basis to demonstrate reliability of the permanently installed equipment located in the SFP and surrounding area under the BOB radiation conditions.
The electronic equipment will be mounted within the Auxiliary Building Relay Room which is located one elevation below the Main Control Room; this location is also below the elevation of the operating deck in the Fuel Handling area. The maximum post-event dose rates and integrated doses for the SGS postulated Design Basis Accidents (DBA) are assumed to bound any BOB post-event radiation levels (dose rate and total integrated dose) due to the inherent shielding provided from the structures (concrete floors and walls) between the Fuel Handling Building and the Auxiliary Building Relay Room. The maximum post DBA dose rate of 4.64 rad/hr and total integrated dose of 380 rad is used as the design criteria for the equipment located in the relay room per Table A of the SGS Environmental Design Criteria (Reference 11) The SFP level instrumentation (SFPLI) electronics utilize Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) components containing Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) devices which have been found to be capable of withstanding ionizing dose radiation levels of up to 1,000 rad as described in EPRI 1021067 "Nuclear Power Plant Equipment Qualification Reference Manual" Revision 1, and discussed in NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.209, "Guidelines for Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Computer Based Instrumentation and Control Systems in Nuclear Power Plants." The 7 of 20
LR-N 1 4-0237 limit of 1,000 rad is used as the basis to demonstrate reliability of the permanently installed electronic equipment located within the Auxiliary Building Relay Room under post-event radiation conditions. With a focus on potential radiation degradation, RG 1.209 indicates that low levels of radiation (< 1000 rads gamma), will not degrade the MOS or integrated circuit family of components. From a hardware standpoint, the radiation susceptibility encompasses the entire electronics of the component, with an emphasis on the weak-link component, in this case both the semi-conductors and the electronics. The SFPLI electronics will be subject to a total integrated dose well below the 1000 rads gamma dose threshold specified in RG 1.209.
Background to RAI #7 The ISE states, in part, While addressing post-event temperature conditions, the licensee stated in its OIP that post-event temperature at sensors and for cabling located above the SFP is assumed to be 212°F. In its letter dated August 12, 2013, the licensee stated that all equipment located in the fuel handling building will be certified for use, by the manufacturer, for survivability under post-event conditions including temperatures of at least 1oooc (212°F). The licensee also stated on this letter that new electronics enclosures will be installed in the Auxiliary Building Relay Room, which is considered a mild environment.
The NRC staff has concerns with the lack of information regarding the ambient temperature in the vicinity where the electronics equipment will be located under normal and worst case postulated conditions. The staff has identified this request as:
RAI#7 Please provide information addressing the maximum expected ambient temperature in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.
PSEG Response to RAI #7 The electronic equipment will be mounted within the Auxiliary Building Relay Room which is located one elevation below the Main Control Room. The Auxiliary Building Relay Room is classified as a mild environment in accordance with SGS Environmental Design Criteria (Reference 11). The maximum temperatures for SGS postulated BOB conditions in which there is no ac power available to run heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system were calculated utilizing GOTHIC computational code and documented in Vendor Technical Document (VTD) 903061, Attachment A, "Salem Unit 1 and 2 Control Room GOTHIC Model Run to 7 Days," (Reference 12). The maximum expected ambient temperature in the room where the electronics will be located is not expected to exceed 100° F within three days of an Extended Loss of AC Power (ELAP) event and is not expected to exceed 116° F within seven days of an ELAP.
Information supplied in a system temperature and humidity test report provided by the vendor (Reference 13) was compared to the temperatures resulting from the postulated BOB calculation and used as the basis to demonstrate reliability of the permanently 8 of 20
LR-N14-0237 installed electronic equipment located within the Auxiliary Building Relay Room under the BOB post-event temperature conditions.
Background to RAI #8 The ISE states, in part, In its OIP, the licensee stated that post-event humidity in the fuel pool floor area near and above the SFP is assumed to be 100°/o with condensing steam. In its letter dated August 12, 2013, the licensee stated that all equipment located in the fuel handling building will be certified for use, by the manufacturer, for survivability under post-event conditions including 100 percent condensing atmosphere. Additionally, the licensee stated in this letter that the electronic enclosures will be qualified by the manufacturer for use at temperatures, humidity and integrated radiation doses consistent with other electronic devices containing digital components and located in mild environments. The NRC staff has concerns with the lack of information regarding whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under the expected humidity condition. The staff has identified this request as:
RAI#8 Please provide information indicating the maximum expected relative humidity in the room in which the sensor electronics will be located under BOB conditions, in which there is no ac power available to run HVAC systems, and whether the sensor electronics is capable of continuously performing its required functions under this expected humidity condition.
PSEG Response to RAI #8 The electronic equipment will be mounted within the Auxiliary Building Relay Room located one elevation below the Main Control Room. The Auxiliary Building Relay Room is classified as a mild environment in accordance with SGS Environmental Design Criteria (Reference 1 1 ) The maximum post DBA humidity level of 90°/o for the SGS postulated events bound the BOB post-event humidity levels since the maximum humidity in the room where the electronics will be located is not expected to exceed DBA conditions during an ELAP event.
Information supplied in a system temperature and humidity test report provided by the vendor (Reference 13) was compared to a humidity level of 90% and used as the basis to demonstrate reliability of the permanently installed electronic equipment located within the Auxiliary Building Relay Room under the post-event humidity conditions.
9 of 20
LR-N14-0237
- 3. 6. 3 Shock and Vibration Background to RAI #9 The I SE states, in part, The N RC staff notes the resu lts of the testing and/or analysis of the instal led equipment's rel iability under BDB conditions is not currently available for review. As stated by the licensee, the rel iability of the permanently instal led equipment u nder BDB cond itions wi ll be demonstrated by the manufacturer, as specified in the licensee's procu rement specifications. The N RC staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#9 Please provide the results of the testing and/or analysis of the installed eq uipment's reliabil ity under BDB ambient tem perature, humidity, shock, vi bration , and radiation cond itions as specified in the PSEG procurement specification. Provid e the results of your analysis that demonstrates that the vendor's q ual ification testing and analysis envelopes the plant environmental cond itions considered for the specific locations where the eq uipment wil l be installed .
PSEG Response to RAI #9 Temperatu re, humid ity, shock, vibration and rad iation test resu lts are provided in vendor test reports. The results demonstrate that the vendor's q ualification testing and analysis envelopes SGS Units 1 and 2 envi ronmental conditions considered for the specific locations where the eq uipment wil l be instal led . In the Mohr audit report (Reference 1 4),
the N RC identified the test in Moh r document No. 1 -041 0- 1 6 , "Mohr SFP- 1 Level Probe Assem bly Shock and Vibration Test Report" (Reference 1 5) as satisfactory and sufficient to close the open item on shock and vibration.
3 . 6.4 Seismic Reliability Background to RAI #1 0 The ISE states, in part, The N RC staff notes that the licensee plans to demonstrate the reliabi lity of the seismic desig n and instal lation in accordance with the guidance in the ISG . The licensee's planned approach with respect to the seismic reliability of the instrumentation appears to be consistent the g uidance. However, the staff plans to verify the results of the licensee's seism ic test when it is completed . The staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#10 Please provide the resu lts and the basis of you r analysis of the seismic testing results showing that the instru ment performance rel iability, following exposu re to simulated seism ic cond itions representative of the environment anticipated for the SFP structures at SGS, has been adeq uately demonstrated .
1 0 of 20
LR-N14-0237 PSEG Response to RAI#10 The results and basis of the vendor testing and analysis descri bed in PSEG's responses to RAis #3 and #4 show instrument performance reliabil ity following exposure to sim ulated seismic conditions representative of the environment antici pated for the SFP structures at the specific locations where the eq uipment wil l be installed . The vendor testing and analysis bound the SGS seism ic test criteria.
Section 3.7 Design Features: Independence Background to RAI#1 1 The ISE states, in part, The N RC staff has determi ned that the licensee's plan ned implementation of such provisions with respect to independence appears to be consistent with the N E I 1 2-02 , as endorsed by the I SG. The staff also notes that im plementing this design would allow the electrical functional performance of each level measurement channel to be independent of the other channel . If completed as described , this independence would result in a reliable SFP level measu rement. However, the NRC staff plans to review the final electrical power supply desig n information to complete its review. The NRC staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#1 1 Please provide the N RC staff with the final configuration of the power supply sou rce for each channel so that the staff may concl ude that the two channels are independent from a power supply assig nment perspective.
PSEG Response to RAI#1 1 The power supply source for each channel will be provided using separate station 1 1 5-VAC vital instrument buses for both Unit 1 (1 B, 1 C) and Unit 2 (28, 2C) which receive power from independent Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) channels. Each vital instrument bus UPS receives normal power from separate 230-VAC vital power. In the event of a 230-VAC power loss or a UPS malfunction , independent 1 25-VDC vital station battery power will automatically supply power to the UPS's inverter from separate station batteries.
1 1 of 20
LR-N 14-0237 Section 3.8 Design Features: Power Supplies Background to RAI #12 The I SE states, in part, The N RC staff notes that information on system power consumption is not avai lable for review and wi ll be provided to the staff in the August 201 4, six-month O I P update. The staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#12 Please provide the result of the calculation depicting the battery backup d uty cycle req uirements demonstrati ng that its capacity is sufficient to maintain the level indication function until offsite resource availability is reasonably assured .
PSEG Response to RAI#1 2 The SFP level instrument system provides at least seven days of battery l ife assuming typical use and accounting for postulated post-event environmental cond itions. Details of the system battery l ife and d uty cycle testing are provided in the vendor's system battery l ife report ( Reference 1 6).
Section 3.9 Design Features: Accuracy Background to RAI#1 3 The I SE states, in part, The N RC staff notes that add itional information on design accuracy for the SFP instrumentation is not available for review and wi ll be provided to the staff in the Aug ust 201 4, six-month O I P update. The staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#13 Provide the followi ng information :
a) An estimate of the expected instrument chan nel accuracy performance (e.g . , in °/o of span ) u nder both a) normal SFP level cond itions (approxi mately Level 1 or hig her) and b) at the BOB cond itions (i.e . , rad iation , tem peratu re h um idity, post-seism ic and post-shock cond itions) that would be present if the SFP level were at the Level 2 and Level 3 datum poi nts.
b) A description of the methodology that wil l be used for determ i ning the maximum allowed deviation from the instrument channel design accuracy that will be em ployed under normal operating cond itions as an acceptance criterion for a calibration proced ure to flag to o perators and to tech nicians that the channel req uires adjustment to within the normal cond ition desig n accu racy.
1 2 of 20
LR-N 14-0237 PSEG Response to RAI #1 3 a) The guidance in N E I 1 2-02 req uires the accuracy for the SFP level indication between levels 1 and 2 is to be better than 1 foot. Between levels 2 and 3 the accuracy is to be better than 3.5 feet. The instrument vendor identified the accuracy as better than +/- 3 inches and that accuracy was demonstrated at the factory acceptance test. The instrument vendor also identified that the presence of boric acid precipitate on the probe's active electrode surfaces above the water level prod uces a fixed measurement error with characteristic lowering of the apparent water level. The worst-case level measurement error due to this effect is estimated to be 2.5 inches.
b ) The maximum al lowable deviation was selected to be wel l within the req uired accuracy wh ile allowi ng tolerance for the vendor's advertised inaccuracy and the potential effect of the boron precipitation .
Background to RAI#1 4 The ISE states, i n part, Further, the N RC staff plans to verify that the chan nels wi ll retain these accu racy performance values following a loss of power and subseq uent restoration of power. The staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#1 4 Please provide analysis verifying that the proposed instrument performance is consistent with these estimated accu racy normal and BDB values. Please demonstrate that the chan nels wil l retain these accu racy performance values fol lowing a loss of power and subseq uent restoration of power.
PSEG Response to RAI#1 4 Power i nterruption testing has been performed on the EFP- I L signal processor and back up battery power sou rce . Test resu lts i ndicate that no deficits were identified with respect to mai ntenance of reliable function, accuracy, or calibration as a result of power interru ption. The resu lts of testing provided evidence of reliable transition from the normal AC power sou rce to the back-up battery without affecting accuracy or calibration.
The resu lts of the tests are provided by the Vendor in thei r EFP-IL SFPI System Power I nterru ption Report ( Reference 1 7).
Section 3.1 0 Design Features: Testing Background to RAI#1 5 The ISE states, in part, The N RC staff notes that the information regarding the ca pabil ity and provisions for the proposed level sensing eq uipment as well as specific periodic testi ng and calibration capabil ities enabling the eq uipment to be tested in-situ; the specific details of the functional and cali bration test prog ram, includ ing freq uencies; and , the specific details of 1 3 of 20
LR-N 14-0237 the preventative maintenance prog ram, includ ing maximum freq uencies is not available for review and wi l l be provided to the staff d u ring the Aug ust 20 1 4, six-month O I P u pdate. The N RC staff has identified this req uest as:
RAI#1 5 Please p rovide the followi ng:
a ) A description of the capability and provisions the proposed level sensing eq uipment will have to enable periodic testing and calibration, includ ing how this capability enables the eq uipment to be tested in-situ.
b) A descri ption of how such testing and calibration will enable the conduct of reg ular channel checks of each independent channel against the other, and against any other permanently-installed spent fuel pool level instrumentation.
c) A descri ption how functional checks wil l be performed and the freq uency at wh ich they wi ll be conducted . Describe how calibration tests will be performed , and the freq uency at which they wil l be conducted . Provide a discussion as to how these survei llances wil l be incorporated into the plant surveil lance program .
d ) A description what preventative maintenance tasks are req uired to be performed during normal operation, and the plan ned maximum surveil lance interval that is necessary to ensure that the channels are fu lly cond itioned to accurately and reliably perform thei r fu nctions when needed .
(This information was previously requested as RAI-8 in NRC letter dated July 11, 2013)
PSEG Response to RAI#1 5 a ) Standard measurement and test eq uipment (M&TE) is used to confirm normal operation of the signal processor using a calibration proced ure provided by the vendor. During planned period ic calibration checks, time-domain reflectometry (TOR) is used to demonstrate the impedance waveform through the transm ission cable and connectors from the signal processor to the probe is unchanged when com pa red with the as-installed configuratio n . During normal operation, the level i nstru ment automatically monitors the integ rity of its level measurement system . All testi ng is performed using i n-situ capability.
b) Reg ular channel checks can be performed by com paring the level measurements d isplayed by the primary and backu p channels d i rectly to each other and to other permanently installed spent fuel pool instrumentation without the use of any measurement and test eq uipment (M&TE). This includes the ability to check the primary and backup displays in the Auxiliary Relay Room against the SFP local indicator dis plays . The level measu rement system logs data that can be reviewed to eval uate consistency of level measurement over time.
c) As descri bed in response to RAI #1 5b, the channel level measurements can be d i rectly compared to each other (e. g . reg ular channel cross comparisons). The two d isplays are installed in close proxi m ity to each other, thereby simplifying the channel checks . Visual observation of the SFP level can be used for diag nostic pu rposes.
1 4 of 20
LR-N 14-0237 Salem Unit 1 has included the SFPLI displays in the Auxiliary Relay Room and MCR in daily plant logs.
d) The following maintenance activities and freq uencies have been identified for the SFPL I :
6-month activities:
o Diag nostics test o Memory test o Battery test o Temperature com pensation test 2-year activities:
o Battery replacement o Memory card replacement o Transmitter Calibration checks (TOR calibration check, probe and transmission cable health checks) o Clock calibration o Visual i nspection of repairable head o Inspect probe tu be for boric acid buildup (can be seen on TOR scans)
These activities have been developed using the PM process and vendor, recommendations, and are subject to change using PSEG's administrative controls.
Section 3.1 1 Design Features: Display Background to RAI #1 6 The ISE states, i n part, The N RC staff reviewed the fig ure i ncluded in the letter dated August 1 2, 201 3, and noted that the primary level instrument and the backup level instrument level indications are to be d isplayed in the M CR. However, in its letter dated August 1 2, 20 1 3, the licensee stated that the electronics enclosure provide both a local d isplay and a retransm itted signal to a remote d isplay located in the main control room . The staff had concerns with the lack of specificity regarding the location of the instrument displays.
The staff has identified this request as:
RAI #1 6 Please provide the following :
a) The specific location for the pri mary and backu p instrument channel display.
b) Please describe the evaluation used to va lidate that the display location can be accessed without unreasonable delay fol lowing a BOB event. I nclude the time ava i lable for personnel to access the display as cred ited in the evaluation, as well as the actual time (e.g., based on wal k-throughs) that it wi ll take for personnel to access the d isplay. Additionally, please include a descri ption of the rad iological and 1 5 of 20
LR-N14-0237 environmental cond itions on the paths personnel might take. Descri be whether the display location remains habitable for radiological, heat and humid ity, and other envi ronmental cond itions followi ng a BOB event. Describe whether personnel are continuously stationed at the d isplay or monitor the display periodically.
(This information was previously requested as RAI-9 in NRC letter dated July 11, 2013)
PSEG Response to RAI#1 6 a ) The primary and back-up instrument channel displays are located in the Auxi liary Building Relay Room whi ch is located one elevation below the Mai n Control Room
( MCR) and is easily accessible.
b) The d isplays can be prom ptly viewed by emergency response staff using a stairwell located immed iately outside the MCR. The display location was selected due to its proxim ity to other equipment that would req uire manual operation or req uire operator actions in support of BDB mitigating strateg ies deployment and im plementation and anticipated BDB m itigating strategy access paths. Rad iological habitability at this location has been evaluated against the SGS Unit 1 and 2 Environmental Design Criteria (Reference 1 1 ) for postulated D BA rad iolog ical events and used as a basis to determ ine radiological cond itions for this location . The esti mated doses obtained from SFP d rain down cond itions at Level 3 ( Reference 8) and exposure to personnel monitoring SFP levels from this location are bounded by the D BA rad iological conditions. Heat and humidity have been evaluated for this location, and the location of the d isplays in the Auxi liary Building Relay Room , one elevation below the MCR, is sufficiently separated from the SFP and therefore heat and humidity from a boiling SFP wi ll not compromise habitability.
Due to the location of the displays, the design can accommodate either period ic or contin uous monitoring based on the req uirements of the i m plementing BOB m itigating strategy. Travel time from the control room to the level displays is less than 5 minutes based on an informal walk through . Rad iolog ical, heat and humidity habitability for the transit route has been evaluated and is not com promised.
Com m unication remains avai lable between the d isplay location and the MCR or other emergency response locations within the power block where decision makers are located .
Section 3.1 2 Programmatic Controls: Training Background to RAI#1 7 The ISE states, i n part, The N RC staff has concerns regard ing the lack of information on the training of personnel for activities such as use of the instrument channels, provisions for alternate power, and cali bration and surveil lance of the SFP instrumentation. Another staff concern is the lack of information on the licensee's approach to training on the use of the SFP instrumentation. The staff has identified this req uest as:
1 6 of 20
LR-N14-0237 RAI #1 7 Please describe the activities for which personnel wi ll be trained, such as use of the i nstru ment channels, provision of alternate power, calibration and surveillance. Describe the approach to training used to identify the population to be trained and determ ined the initial and continuing elements of the req uired training.
PSEG Response t o RAI #1 7 A systematic approach to training (SAT) was used for the new SFPLI eq uipment as part of the PSEG desig n change process . Training of on-site staff by PSEG training personnel was determ ined via SAT for the Operations and Maintenance training populations, i n accordance with the SAT model of Analysis, Desig n , Development, I mplementation, and Eval uation (ADDI E). The Analysis process of SAT identifies the population to be trained and the Desig n process determ ines the i nitial and continu ing e lements of the training . These processes are governed by station approved training procedures as a part of the National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training prog rams. The National Academy for Nuclear Training operates under the auspices of the I nstitute of Nuclear Power Operations ( I N PO).
SGS mai ntenance technicians and supervisory personnel com pleted instructor-led classroom training. The vendor provided "train-the-trainer" training and supporting materials d u ring the development of the mai ntenance training. The focus of training was to prepare person nel for the safe handling , installation, testing , operation, and maintenance activities . The training consists of the following u nits of instruction:
- 1. Theory of operation
- 2. Eq uipment locations
- 3. Com ponents of the instrumentation
- 4. Power supplies (including provisions for alternate power)
- 5. System operation and testi ng Over an 1 1 month period the operators received th ree sessions of training on all elements of FLEX strategies , i nclud ing SFPLI , duri ng the development of the strateg ies and plant design changes. U pon fi nal i nstallation and approval of the SFPLI i nstrumentation and related procedures , operators received just-in-ti me gap training on the final instal led instrumentation and approved proced u res. Specifically, SGS operations personnel , includ ing non-licensed operators , licensed operators , and operations supervisors, received training on the operations and use of SFPLI eq uipment and related proced ures. The training consists of the followi ng un its of instruction :
- 1. Theory of operation
- 2. Eq u ipment locations
- 3. Com ponents of the instrumentation
- 4. Power supplies (including provisions for alternate power)
- 5. System operation and read ings
- 6. Alarm response proced ures and SFPLI related im plementing procedures 1 7 of 20
LR-N14-0237 Section 3.1 3 Programmatic Controls: Procedures Background to RAI #1 8 The ISE states, in part, The NRC staff notes that the information regard ing proced ures for operation (both normal and abnormal response), calibration, testing , maintenance, inspection, and administrative controls associated with the SFP level instrumentation are not available for review and wi l l be provided to the staff during the August 20 1 4, six-month OIP update. The N RC staff has identified this request as:
RAI #1 8 Please provide a l ist of the procedures addressing operation (both normal and abnormal response), calibration, test, mai ntenance, and inspection proced u res that will be developed for use of the SFP instrumentation. The licensee is req uested to include a brief description of the specific techn ical objectives to be achieved within each procedure.
PSEG Response to RAI#1 8 The Salem Unit 1 SFPLI has been instal led using PSEG's design change process and is subject to PSEG procedures and processes to add ress operation (both normal and abnormal response) , calibration , test, maintenance, and inspection. The specific tech nical objectives are addressed as follows:
1 ) O peration ( Both N ormal and Abnormal Response)
Salem Unit 1 control room logs and the primary plant log have been revised to include daily checks of the primary and backu p displays in the Auxil iary Buildi ng Relay Room, and both channel d isplays i n Main Control Room ( M CR). These logs establish a normal range of SFP water levels above NEI 1 2-02 Level 1 value, consistent with normal operation. The logs also establish a maximum deviation of 0.5 ft. between channels and i nclude req u i rements to check battery status ind ication , check for error messages, and initiate corrective actions for u nsatisfactory read ings.
For operator response to abnormal cond itions, the Salem U nit 1 alarm response proced ure for SFP level alarms associated with other SFP level instrumentation has been revised to provide d i rection to the operator to check SFP level using the SFPLI d isplays in the Main Control Room or the Auxi liary Building Relay Room . Guideline SC. O P-AM .TSC-0008, "Emergency Fill to Spent Fuel Pool , " which addresses NRC Ord er EA-02-026 Section B . 5 . b m itigating strategies, has been revised to include a precaution agai nst using radios in the vicinity of the SFP to avoid potentially adverse effects of electromag netic interference (EM I ) on the SFPL I .
2 ) Calibration PSEG has vendor documents that include g uidance for preventive and corrective mai ntenance of the SFPLI . These documents are available to PSEG personnel and are approved for use at Salem Unit 1 .
1 8 of 20
LR-N14-0237 The SFPL I is included in the PSEG PM process, wh ich includes instrument calibration based on vendor recommendations.
- 3) Test Testing of the SFPL I electronics and batteries are incl uded in the SFPLI PM process.
- 4) Maintenance PM process administrative controls are applicable to the Salem Unit 1 SFPL I . PM activities i ncl ude testi ng , calibration, replacement (e.g . , batteries and memory cards) and visual inspection of the probe and head .
Corrective maintenance administrative controls a re also applicable to the Salem Unit 1 SFPL I . This incl udes ad ministrative controls developed to determine corrective actions and com pensatory measures to address the unavailabil ity of SFPLI and FLEX eq uipment.
- 5) I nspection SFPL I inspections of the sensor probe tube and repai rable head and are part of the PM process. Vendor documents include g uidance for perform ing i nspections as PM activities or as needed to s upport corrective mai ntenance .
Section 3.1 4 Programmatic Controls: Testing and Calibration Background to RAI #1 9 The ISE states, i n part, The N RC staff notes that further information regarding the testi ng and calibration of the eq ui pment associated with the SFP level instrumentation is not available for review and will be provided to the staff d u ring the Aug ust 201 4, six-month OIP u pdate . The staff has identified these req uests as :
RAI #1 9 Please provide a description of the preventive mai ntenance, testing and calibration prog ram , and the provisions associated with out of service or inoperable equi pment i ncluding out of service ti mes and com pensatory actions.
PSEG Response to RAI #1 9 The SFP level i nstrument channel mai ntenance and testing program req uirements to ensure desig n and system read iness are establ ished in accordance with PSEG process and proced u res, with consideration of vendor recommendations. The prog ram ensures appropriate testi ng , channel checks, functional checks , periodic calibration and maintenance are performed .
Both the primary and backup SFP level instrument channels incorporate permanently insta lled eq u i pment with no reliance on portable post-event eq uipment or installation req u i rements. The eq u ipment is relatively sim ple and robust and is provided u nder 1 9 of 20
LR-N14-0237 augmented q uality req uirements. Permanent installation cou pled with stocki ng of adeq uate spare parts reasonably diminishes the likeli hood of a single channel being out of service greater than 90 days, and greatly reduces the likelihood that both channels would be out of service for an extended period of time.
Provisions associated with out of service or inoperable eq uipment including o ut of service times and compensatory actions are in accordance with N E I 1 2-02 Section 4.3, "Testi ng and Cali bration ."
References:
1 ) PSEG letter LR-N 1 3-0 1 56 dated August 1 2, 20 1 3, "PSEG N uclear LLC's Response to Req uest for Add itional I nformation for the Salem Generating Station's Overall I ntegrated Plan in Response to March 1 2, 20 1 2 Com mission Order Mod ifying Licenses with Regard to Req u i rements for Rel iable Spent Fuel Pool I nstrumentation (Order Number EA- 1 2-05 1 )" (ADAMS Accession No. M L 1 3225A363)
- 2) PSEG Technical Standard SC. DE-TS.ZZ-2032(0), "Salem Technical Standard Physical Separation Req uirements ( Electrical )"
- 3) PSEG Technical Standard SC. DE-TS.ZZ-420 1 (0), "Salem Structural Design Criteria"
- 4) PSEG Calculation 6S0-2345, " I nstrument Mounting for Spent Fuel Pool Level I nstrumentation Mod ification"
- 5) Vendor Technical Document (VTD) 432306 Volume 1 9, 1 -041 0 "Mohr SFP-1 Level Probe Assembly Seismic Analysis Report"
- 6) VTD 432306 Volume 1 0, 1 -041 0 "Mohr EFP- I L SF PI System Seismic Test Report"
- 7) PSEG Calcu lation 6S0-2346 , "Conduit and Electronic Box Supports for Spent Fuel Pool Level I nstrumentation Mod ification"
- 8) VTD 4323 1 5 Volume 1 , SL-0 1 2006 - "NEI 1 2-02 Spent Fuel Pool Doses" 9 ) PSEG Specification A-5-SF-EC-CDS-051 7, "Spent Fuel Pool Level I nstrumentation Detailed Specification" 1 0) VTD 432306 Volume 7, 1 -041 0-2, " Mohr SFP- 1 Level Probe Assembly Materials Qualificatio n Report" 1 1 ) PSEG Calcu lation S-C-ZZ-SDC- 1 41 9(0), "Salem Generati ng Station Environmental Desig n Criteria" 1 2) VTD 90306 1 Attachment A, "Salem U nit 1 and 2 Control Room GOTH I C Model Run to 7 Days,"
1 3) VTD 432306 Volume 6 , 1 -04 1 0 "Mohr EFP- I L SFP I System Tem perature and Humid ity Test Report" 1 4) N RC Letter dated Aug ust 27, 20 1 4, "Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2-Report for the Onsite Audit of Mohr Regarding I mplementation of Reliable Spent Fuel Pool I nstru mentation Related to Order EA-1 2-05 1 (TAC NOS. M F076 1 AN D M F0762)"
(ADAMS Accession No. ML14216A362 )
1 5) VTD 432306 Volume 1 7, 1 -041 0- 1 6, "MOHR SFP- 1 Level Probe Assem bly Shock and Vibration Test Report" 1 6) VTD 432306 Volume 1 1 , 1 -041 0 " Mohr EFP- I L SFPI System Battery Life Report" 1 7) VTD 432306 Volume 1 3 , 1 -041 0- 1 0 - "Mohr EFP- I L SFPI System Power I nterruption Report" 20 of 20