ML14314A302

NRC Form 699 - Conversation Record - Conversation Re Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) Exemption, Request for Additional Information (RAI) Discussion

ML14314A302
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear, Holtec
Issue date:	11/10/2014
From:	William Allen, Balwant Singal, Jorge Solis Division of Spent Fuel Management
To:	Brooke Clark, Lomax D, Manzione K, Anthony Palmer, Pyle S Entergy Corp, Holtec
Allen W
References
Download: ML14314A302 (2)

Text

NRC FORM 699 ...,.** -.**., U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE (03*2013) f~ i

~ ~~*

.... ..... / CONVERSATION RECORD II /I 0/2014 NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT VVITH YOU DATE OF CONTACT TYPE OF CONVERSATION D E -MAIL

!See below 11 /5/20 14 0 TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER D INCOMING (888) 447-9 153 0 OUTGOING ORGANIZATIO N DOCKET NUMBER(S)

Nuclear Regul atory Commission ( 1RC) 72-1040, 72- 13, 50-313, 50-368 LICENSE NUMBER(S) CONTROL NUMBER(S)

N/ A SUBJECT A rkansas uclear One Request for Additi onal Information (RAI) Discussion

SUMMARY

Entergy (l icensee): tephenie Pyle, Bob Clark, A lan Palmer and Don Lomax Hol tec: K im Manzione, A brar Mohammed and Debu Mita-Maj umdar N RC parti cipants: Chris Al len. Jorge olis and Balwant ingal A copy of the RA ts were provided both to Entergy and to lloltec prior to the teleconference which commenced at approximately 2 P.

M. Eastern tandard Time. Entergy began the conversati on by explaining that the purpose for providing the bulk water temperature in the 111-TRAC annulus was to show that the canister was in a stable condition. The RC acknow ledged thi s, but emphasized that, because the fuel had been declared damaged, the canister was in a condition not analyzed in the Ill- TORM Final Safety Analysis Repon (F A R). Therefore, it was still necessary to provide information which showed that the analyses discussed in the F A R bounded the current cani tcr configuration. Consequently, Entergy committed to providing information w hich showed the current canister configuration was bounded by the F A R analyses.

Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)

Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Chris A llen SIGNATURE ,

C'ff~

NRC FORM 699 (03*2013)

Page 1 of

NRC FORM 699 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (03-2013)

CONVERSATION RECORD (continued)

SUMMARY

(Contmued from page 1)

In discussing mou ehole blockage, lloltec stated that natural convection now w ithin the basket was re tricted to the semi-circular ponion of the mou ehole a discussed in F A R Chapter I I. R taffexpres ed confu ion ince F AR Chapter II discu sed accidents and off-norm al conditions. l lowever, ll oltec elaborated that the restricted now discussed in F A R Chapter I I was actually incorporated into the normal condition analyses of F 1\R Chapter 4.

After discussion of the RA Is was complete, Entergy commi tted to providi ng a formal respon e to the i nformation reque t early in the week of ovember 10. The call was concluded at approximately 2:30 P.M. Eastern tandard T i me.

NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) Page 2 of