|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARIR 05000483/20233012023-11-0909 November 2023 NRC Examination Report 05000483-2023301 ML23305A0942023-10-0202 October 2023 10-CW-2023-09 Post-Exam Submittal ML23319A3902023-09-20020 September 2023 11-CW-2023-09 Public Forms ML23240A7572023-08-31031 August 2023 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000483/2023301 IR 05000483/20223012022-04-12012 April 2022 NRC Examination Report 05000483/2022301 ML22081A1292022-02-23023 February 2022 CW-2022-02-Post Exam Comments ML22105A0022022-02-23023 February 2022 CW-2022-02-Public Forms ML21067A5392021-03-0808 March 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000483/2022301 ML20276A1522020-09-0909 September 2020 1-CW-2020-08 Draft Outlines ML20276A1532020-09-0909 September 2020 2-CW-2020-08 Draft Outline Comments ML20276A1552020-09-0909 September 2020 4-CW-2020-08 Written Exam Comments Final 8-25-2020 ML20276A1542020-09-0909 September 2020 3-CW-2020-08 Draft Written Exam ML20276A1582020-09-0909 September 2020 7-CW-2020-08 Outlines Final ML20276A1562020-09-0909 September 2020 5-CW-2020-08 Draft Operating Test ML20276A1572020-09-0909 September 2020 6-CW-2020-08 Operating Test Comments - Final BC Comments.Pdf ML20276A1592020-09-0909 September 2020 8-CW-2020-08 Written Exam Final ML20276A1602020-09-0909 September 2020 9-CW-2020-08 Operating Test - Final ML20276A1362020-09-0909 September 2020 10-CW-2020-08 Post-Exam Comments ML20276A1372020-09-0909 September 2020 11-CW-2020-08 Public Forms ML19011A3712019-01-10010 January 2019 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2019 ML18143B4542018-04-25025 April 2018 Operator Licensing Examination Data ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17270A1662017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Op Test Comments ES-301-7 ML17270A1672017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Op Test ML17270A1682017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Outline Comments ML17270A1692017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Outlines ML17270A1702017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Draft Written Exam Comments ES-401-9 ML17270A1712017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Written Exam ML17270A1722017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-FINAL Op Test ML17270A1732017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-FINAL Outlines ML17270A1742017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Final Written Exam ML17270A1752017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Post Exam Comments ML17296A0262017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Public Forms ML17118A1822017-04-17017 April 2017 Submittal of NRC Form 536 Operator Licensing Examination Data ML17058A0822017-02-27027 February 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000483/2017301 ML17013A5482017-01-13013 January 2017 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2017 ML16196A2392016-06-28028 June 2016 Submittal of Operator Licensing Examination Data ML16158A4692016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Final Outlines ML16179A1772016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Public Forms ML16158A4782016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Post-Examination Analysis and Comments ML16158A4752016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Final Operating Test ML16158A4632016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Operating Test Comments ML16158A4612016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Operating Test ML16158A4602016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Written Examination Comments ML16158A4532016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Outline Comments ML16158A4572016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Written Examination ML16158A4492016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Outlines ML16139A3282016-05-18018 May 2016 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000483/2016301 ML16089A0712016-03-29029 March 2016 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results for March 9, 2016 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 2023-09-20
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARIR 05000483/20233012023-11-0909 November 2023 NRC Examination Report 05000483-2023301 ML23305A0942023-10-0202 October 2023 10-CW-2023-09 Post-Exam Submittal ML23319A3902023-09-20020 September 2023 11-CW-2023-09 Public Forms ML23240A7572023-08-31031 August 2023 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000483/2023301 IR 05000483/20223012022-04-12012 April 2022 NRC Examination Report 05000483/2022301 ML22081A1292022-02-23023 February 2022 CW-2022-02-Post Exam Comments ML22105A0022022-02-23023 February 2022 CW-2022-02-Public Forms ML20276A1522020-09-0909 September 2020 1-CW-2020-08 Draft Outlines ML20276A1532020-09-0909 September 2020 2-CW-2020-08 Draft Outline Comments ML20276A1552020-09-0909 September 2020 4-CW-2020-08 Written Exam Comments Final 8-25-2020 ML20276A1542020-09-0909 September 2020 3-CW-2020-08 Draft Written Exam ML20276A1582020-09-0909 September 2020 7-CW-2020-08 Outlines Final ML20276A1562020-09-0909 September 2020 5-CW-2020-08 Draft Operating Test ML20276A1572020-09-0909 September 2020 6-CW-2020-08 Operating Test Comments - Final BC Comments.Pdf ML20276A1592020-09-0909 September 2020 8-CW-2020-08 Written Exam Final ML20276A1602020-09-0909 September 2020 9-CW-2020-08 Operating Test - Final ML20276A1362020-09-0909 September 2020 10-CW-2020-08 Post-Exam Comments ML20276A1372020-09-0909 September 2020 11-CW-2020-08 Public Forms ML18143B4542018-04-25025 April 2018 Operator Licensing Examination Data ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17270A1662017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Op Test Comments ES-301-7 ML17270A1672017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Op Test ML17270A1682017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Outline Comments ML17270A1692017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Outlines ML17270A1702017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Draft Written Exam Comments ES-401-9 ML17270A1712017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-DRAFT Written Exam ML17270A1722017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-FINAL Op Test ML17270A1732017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-FINAL Outlines ML17270A1742017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Final Written Exam ML17270A1752017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Post Exam Comments ML17296A0262017-09-20020 September 2017 2017-09-Public Forms ML17118A1822017-04-17017 April 2017 Submittal of NRC Form 536 Operator Licensing Examination Data ML17058A0822017-02-27027 February 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000483/2017301 ML16196A2392016-06-28028 June 2016 Submittal of Operator Licensing Examination Data ML16158A4492016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Outlines ML16158A4532016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Outline Comments ML16158A4572016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Written Examination ML16158A4602016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Written Examination Comments ML16158A4612016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Operating Test ML16158A4632016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Draft Operating Test Comments ML16158A4692016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Final Outlines ML16158A4752016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Final Operating Test ML16158A4782016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Post-Examination Analysis and Comments ML16179A1772016-06-0101 June 2016 2016-06 Public Forms ML16139A3282016-05-18018 May 2016 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000483/2016301 ML16089A0712016-03-29029 March 2016 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results for March 9, 2016 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15140A1262015-05-18018 May 2015 2015-05-FINAL Written Exam ML15146A0482015-05-18018 May 2015 2015-05-Public Forms ML15140A2892015-05-18018 May 2015 2015-05-Draft Written Exam Comments Rev 1 2023-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
CW - 2013 - 03 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS ADMIN JPMS
- 4. Job Content
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.
Errors 5.
JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation U/E/S (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia (See below for instructions)
Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link RO (A1)
RO (A2)
RO (A3)
RO (A4)
SRO (A5) See attached comments.
SRO (A6)
SRO (A7)
SRO (A8)
SRO (A9)
Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
- The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
- The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
- All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
- Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
- Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column.
- 7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 1 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
CW - 2013 - 03 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS CONTROL ROOM/IN-PLANT SYSTEMS JPMS
- 4. Job Content
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.
Errors 5.
JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia U/E/S (D/S) (1-5) (See below for instructions)
Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 See attached comments.
S7 S8 P1 P2 P3 Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
$ The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
$ The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
$ All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
$ Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
$ Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column.
- 7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 2 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
CW - 2013 - 03 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS SCENARIOS Scenario 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
- 10. Explanation (See below for instructions)
Set ES TS Crit IC Pred TL L/C Eff U/E/S 1
2 See attached comments.
3 4
Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating test scenario sets. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. ES: ES-301 checklists 4, 5, & 6 satisfied.
- 2. TS: Set includes SRO TS actions for each SRO, with required actions explicitly detailed.
- 3. Crit: Each manipulation or evolution has explicit success criteria documented in Form ES-D-2.
- 4. IC: Out of service equipment and other initial conditions reasonably consistent between scenarios and not predictive of scenario events and actions.
- 5. Pred: Scenario sequence and other factors avoid predictability issues.
- 6. TL: Time line constructed, including event and process triggered conditions, such that scenario can run without routine examiner cuing.
- 7. L/C: Length and complexity for each scenario in the set is reasonable for the crew mix being examined, such that all applicants have reasonably similar exposure and events are needed for evaluation purposes.
- 8. Eff: Sequence of events is reasonably efficient for examination purposes, especially with respect to long delays or interactions.
- 9. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, rate the scenario set as (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory.
- 10. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column.
- 11. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 3 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process