ML14241A245
| ML14241A245 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Aerotest |
| Issue date: | 08/28/2014 |
| From: | Amitava Ghosh NRC/OGC |
| To: | Hawkens E Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-228-LT, ASLBP 14-931-01-LT-BD01, RAS 26417 | |
| Download: ML14241A245 (5) | |
Text
orman UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 28, 2014 E. Roy Hawkens, Presiding Officer Chief Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
Docket No. 50-228-LT License No. R-98 Re: Addition to Joint Proposed Transcript Corrections
Dear Judge Hawkens:
On August 22, 2014, the parties in this matter filed a Joint Proposed Transcript Corrections.
Since that date, we have discovered one additional correction that should have been included in the August 22 filing. Specifically, at page 134, line 1, in testimony given by Ms. Lian, the word only should be changed to early.
I have appended an amended Attachment 1, NRC Staff Hearing Transcript Errata Sheet, from the August 22, 2014 filing to this letter, reflecting the addition.
The parties have consulted and there is no objection to this proposed transcript correction. The parties respectfully request that the transcript be revised to incorporate this correction.
Sincerely,
/Signed (electronically) by/
Anita Ghosh Counsel for NRC Staff
ATTACHMENT 1 NRC STAFF HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing Page Line Now Reads Should Read Witness/Speaker 59 12 initial rebuttal, statements of position initial and rebuttal statements of position Ms. Ghosh 60 15 or security risk. or security risk. Ms. Ghosh 60 18 license transfer application. license transfer application. Ms. Ghosh 63 15 Companies Companies Ms. Ghosh 63 17 denial; that denial and that Ms. Ghosh 64 1 denial. They're noted denial, were noted Ms. Ghosh 64 1 form formed Ms. Ghosh 65 14 liability, no funds liability and no funds Ms. Ghosh 70 10 substantial substantive Ms. Ghosh 75 10 (No audible response). Correct. Mr. Anderson 89 5 The Companies question that The Companies question the Judge Hawkens 123 14 questions direction of questions directed to Judge Hawkens 125 19-20 Not business, not Aerotest, Not for a business like Aerotest, Ms. Lian 126 19 custom behavior analysis customer behavior analysis Ms. Lian 126 20 comparative competitor Ms. Lian 129 23 wasnt was Ms. Lian 130 3 issues issue is Ms. Lian 130 3 has to be had to be Ms. Lian 130 4 shut down two years at a time shut down for two years at the time Ms. Lian 131 2 to run the operator to run and operate the Ms. Lian 132 22 the closing of the projection, the closing of the transaction, Ms. Lian 133 2 believes believed Ms. Lian 133 3 believe believed Ms. Lian 133 4 funding after funding until after Ms. Lian 134 1 companys Companies Ms. Lian
ATTACHMENT 1 NRC STAFF HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing 134 1 only early Ms. Lian 134 4 funding. That will funding that will Ms. Lian 134 23 underlying assumption the underlying assumption is the Ms. Lian 134 24 return, the fact return. The fact Ms. Lian 135 3 inspires ??? Judge Hawkens 139 3 include included Ms. Lian 139 17 research revenue Ms. Lian 139 22 theres some the sum Ms. Lian 142 8 put projected Ms. Lian 143 3 position it not an position that it is not an Judge Hawkens 144 20 a change or changing Ms. Lian 145 5 provide anything your decision provide anything in your decision Judge Hawkens 146 9 comparative competitive Ms. Lian 149 2 custom cost and Ms. Simmons 151 11 opt-in customers top-ten customers Judge Hawkens 154 1 alternatives alternative Ms. Simmons 159 22 operating has operating and has Ms. Lian 160 21 condition has used Commission has used Judge Hawkens 162 1 they can throw upon they can bestow upon Judge Hawkens 165 10 but why is not but why is it not Judge Hawkens 170 18 core down, core, down, Mr. Adams 176 6 application, you have drafted application, could you have drafted Judge Hawkens 177 3 on the good plate on the grid plate Mr. Adams 183 12 fail? fail. Mr. Adams 187 2 giving given Mr. Adams 2
ATTACHMENT 1 NRC STAFF HEARING TRANSCRIPT ERRATA SHEET In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, Inc.
(Aerotest Radiography and Research Reactor)
Docket No. 50-228-LT ASLBP No. 14-931-01-LT-BD01 August 12, 2014 Evidentiary Hearing 195 21 stated their version to stated their aversion to Judge Hawkens 197 2 warn, standby warm standby Dr. Slaughter 197 22 wouldnt be considerably less would be considerably less Dr. Slaughter 201 19 that we could have determined a time that we could have determined at that time Ms. Lian 202 11 founding agreement funding agreement Ms. Lian 209 14 final qualification requirements financial qualification requirements Ms. Ghosh 212 19 reasonable unreasonable Ms. Ghosh 214 23 casking companies casting companies Ms. Harshaw 215 1 I have worked with sandy NRAY in the I have worked with Sandy and Ray Ms. Harshaw 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
AEROTEST OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-228-LR
)
(Aerotest Radiography and Research )
Reactor) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Addition to Joint Proposed Transcript Corrections, dated August 28, 2013, have been served upon the Electronic Information Exchange, in the above-captioned proceedings, this 28th day of August.
/Signed (electronically) by/
Anita Ghosh Counsel for NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O15-H21 Washington, DC 20555 Telephone: (301) 415-4113 E-mail: Anita.Ghosh@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 28th day of August, 2013