GO2-14-100, License Amendment Request for Revised Cyber Security Plan Implementation Date
| ML14188C091 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/2014 |
| From: | Javorik A Energy Northwest |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GO2-14-100, TAC ME4381 | |
| Download: ML14188C091 (9) | |
Text
SICUJT RELATED INFORMATION -WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CPR 2.390 a& ý91kddffi~t AmAlex L Javordk P.O. Box 9W8 PE04 R&&4~nd WA 9936OG6 Ph. 509-3774855 F.509-37-2354 June 25, 2014 G02-14-100 S1. OCeFR 50.90 U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
c COLUMBIA GENERATING STATrONM DOCKET NO. 0-397
.~, *.;....., LICENSE AMENDMENT. REQUEST FOR REVISED CYBER SECURITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DATE .
References : 1. Letter dated March 31; 2011- from D.-K. Atkinson (Energy Northwest) to NRC:, "Response to Request for Additional Information~and
'Supplement tothe Cyber Security Plan for Columbia Generating Station ...
'2. Letter dated July.2y75 2011,from M. C. Thadani (NRC) to M. E.
'Reddemann (Energy NIohWest), TColumbla Generating Station -
Issuanceof Amendmenit Re: Approval of Cyber Security Plan (TAC No. ME4381) 4 ". *
" . : 4 .: 4, .
Dear Sir or Madam:
. ' . 4 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Energy Northwest hereby requests a license amendment to revise'the Columbia Generating Station (Columbia) Cyber Security Plan (CSP)
Implementation date.
By Reference 1, Energy Northwest transmitted a proposed CSP and associated Implementation Schedule for Columbia. By Reference 2, the NRC transmitted Amendment No. 222 to the Columbia Facility Operating License which approved the Columbia CSP and Implementation Schedule. Energy Northwest has determined that the Implementation date specified in that Implementation Schedule should be revised.
As-stipulated by the NRC in Reference 2, changes -tothe Implementation Schedule require NRC approval pursuant to 1.0 CFR.50.90.
-SECU~rTY-RELATDi6 PORM~tO~WlbO[ PROM OUBUC WkSL0iSURE IN,ACCO AC ,WitI1.60 4.. ýATT I 7O THIS T CONTAINS SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION. UPON REMOVAL OF ATTACHMENT 1, THIS LETTER IS UNCONTROLLED. S-0 OL_
pOkk
5OWUTV ""EDAh IOITO - Wmiwow MINIE 116 CFO 2390 ULI:EMS MUi*NOUSOATSRIMS FOR MIlSSO CYSEIR ECUriF 1FUU IWL2USWATION0 Page 2of 3 Attachment I to this lter provides an evaluation of the proposed change to the C$P Implementation Schedule. Attachmtet 1 contains se*urity relatsd Irnomation. Energy Northwest requests tha Attacmt 1 withheld from publf disclose In accordance with 10 CFR 2390. Attacmnt 2 provides an evalualasMma to h ther ft proposed amendment involves a Owig Woa hazard cnsidaion pursuant to 10 CFA 60.92, and an envlronmenlal evaluakin pursuant 1o 10 C 51.22. Afteohmnt 3 provides the affected ip d o CouMa ReneWe Facifty Opewnra Lice maatd to show the proposed change. Atachm# t 4 provie the aced pgs of tw lioense with fth proposed change inorporatd.
Energy Northwest reques NMC a vv d of the propoel mend wftn one year of the date of this MtWtr to sutpot assoiated changes In pmnning and scheduling.
Energy Northwest r4quests a 30-fty Inplemrntatton perod following NRC approval.
Inaccordance with 10 CMA 50.91, Energy Northwest Is no" t1he tae of Washington of this amendment request by transmitn a copy of is left aind attachments, except for Attachment I, to the designated SUM Official.
In Reference 1, Enmwy Northwest mtwtad the CVP If ronatlon Schedule milestone dates as reguataoy commitments. In Referene 2, the NRC stated that changes to the NRC-approved CSP Implementation Schedt" would require prior NRC approval pursuant to 10 CFA 50.90. Accordingly, ft CSP Inwlemention Schedule Is now considered to be an objiklon rathr than a roguatory commitment. This letWer and its enclosures contain no new or other modified regulatory commitments. If there are any questions or 0f Add~ttonal Information Is needed, please contact Ms. L L. Williams, Licensing Supervisor, at 509,377-8148.
perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct.
Executed on 7-T ty of Ideare unde 1***/Y.1y Respecffuyj~
A.!..Ja rik Vice President, Engineering Attachments: 1. Evaluation of Proposed Change (Security Related Information)
- 2. No Significant Hazards and Envion-mental Evaluations
- 3. Affected Page of the Columbia Renewed Facility Operating License Ma*ed to Show the Proposed Change
- 4. Affected,Page of the Columbia Renewed Facility Operating License with the Proposed Change hicorporated
1CLWrY A TATSD UMTIM-W W H"tw UNDER I0 c .3 00 LICfMSE AMIOME VVSD ft CUER INCURTY PLSAN RAPLEMMTATI'OM DAlE Page-3 of 3 cC: NRC RIV Regonal mi aor
- NRC NAR erooc MWAnet NRC Senior Resident Inmpector - 068 -
M. A. Jones - BPA - 1390 (w/o Attachment 1) (emnl)
J. 0. Luce -ESFEC (w/o Atachmront 1)(enmrl)
F. F. Cowl" - WWOH (w/o Aahnmewn 1) (wall)
', V.,.-
- -~DI~ - FOr4 - cVssm tlCURWY PLAN lIME1NTATION OADAM ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1of 2 NMO flC*W NA3ANDSPNVIWO MWAiA soft I.TI 1.0 N Pursuant to W0 CA 50.0, "*AP~k m1ow mndmont of kon, cosvau*on permtn, or early aft;pmt fEergy Normso is requesting aft-amsdWn to RVowed FaciNty Operat"gUeom No. NPF-21 for Cvntfti*aeerag Sto*w (CouMba), The propoelios amedmeM w re e1 C r $ocut Pln (CSP)
Implleentatn. date.
The proposed amendment contists of: 1)Aenane to P:ragrash 2.E of ft Columbia Renewed Facility Operat"ng Ucenee,. NP..21, to add a raiermon to fie amlendment issued In responsa to this request, and 2) approva Of a mrid 0apretiOn date for CSP Implementaion Schedule ,;lestone&. Implement tion Sdul MLestn 8 currently requires.ful .'implepnation of-thte Col.moi,(C$P for #A p.Safey, Sourly, and Emergency Preparednes functions no later than Deombvr 31, 2015. Enlorg Northwest proposes io revise the comletion date for ipleom alon Schedule Mlestone 8 to be December 31, 2017.
Energy Northwest has evluated Whether, ormot a*&tn Ahazauds cbn*dation Is Involved with the proposd amendrent by focusin on the three standards sot forth In 10 CFA 50.92, "Issuance of amnenderG,1# asdisWoJ t0Asw: . ,
1.1. otero odskovasinatInrseierbbttr onsour-amil M ux ancie A'vlustolutaa"ad oeva Responso:* No Theoroposed change to the Coauplia CSP ImptWwtattol Schedute is rstrave in nature. This change does not alter any accdent analysis assm*lons, aW any Initators, or aftect the function of lant syrstems or the
, manner in ,ftch systems are operated, maintained, modified, tested, or inspected, Although Implementation of the CSP may require modifications
- involvingdigit$ ;ssets,.the proposed change does affect the nature, function, or configuratm of those modifications, only the timing of their required completion.
Simlarly, the manner in which ethe*aogvftIes involved in CSP Implementation, such as performance of awsowimens, update of existing procedures, preparation of new procedures, and -obnges to, or devokpent of, programs, wilO not be affected; only their rquired completion date. Meaures have or wilt be taken in the irtrim to provide adequate protection of crttcalgital assets.-..
Therefore, fth proposed change does not Invotve a significant Increasein the probability or consequences.of an,accident previously evaluated.
LICENSE AMENqmmDATE9~W~ISP PG. UII WPLEWENTATIOW CYS,;; 6*,MW P1*
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 of 2 1.2. Do the U Qha= Creft1 A A W 91 cftW WVA91 Accidft frmI wnx 929 04doift ankaw~d Response: No The proposed dcWe to th Columbla CSP hoplwameln Schedule Is administrative Innature. The paoposed change does rot add any accident itiators Althugh Irmomstfto of the CSP may altr plant systems or components or the manner In Mich sysm and
- onnnts are opera4d, maintained, modifised tested, or inspedct the propoed dhange Only affects the completion date for such alterallons.
Therefore, the proposed change does not rete the pos*t of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluaeod.
Response: No Rant safety margins are &Stabshedthrough *lWimng wonditions for operation, limiting safety system settings, and safety lifmit spciloed In the Technical Specifications whIch are pat of tefl ilcn, Th prOposed change to the Columbia CSP implenentatioiSchdue is adWMniW~aav In natur In that it only affects the required completion date for certain activities, and does not affect the nature of those activities nor does It affect any safety margins.
Therefore the proposed Change does not involve a reduction In a margin of safety.
Based on the above evalutions, Energy Northwest concludes that the proposed amendment presents no sign9ificWat hafot nder the standards set forth in 10 CFR50.92(c) and, accordingoy, a finding of "no signIficant hazer* consideration" is justified.
2.0 ,
Energy Northwest has evaluated the propoted change and has determined that the change does not Involve (I)a significant tazardt consideration, (ii)a significant change in the typesor signikant ifrease Inthe amount of effluent that may ba rleased offite, or (iii) a significmf Increase In the Individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposmue. Accordingy, the proposed changes meet the elig~iiity criterion for categoical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51 .22(c)(9) and (12). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CMR 51,22(b), an environmental assessment of the proposed change is not required.
LICENSE AMENDMENTEGST FPO EMUD *CYS SC f PLAN SIPLSMENTATION CATE ATTACHMENT $
Afftcte4 Page of the Courrla Renewd FMWly Opa*V Ucen Marked to Show the P*opos ChMarn
, .. . . . .. ,- o
f, D. Exemnlons from certain rquirWen1t of awiftes G, H srid J to10 CFR Part 50, are descoed inMie Sataty EvA* port. Thmexernmptolomaremuoiznd by law and will not endanger fe or property or the ommoon del arid sut wiae oWwwse inthe p*ihIntes Therefore, thm exemtons ane hweyWgraed pumsa to 10 CFR 50.12. With the gwt of tiles ox o t *ft will oplre, to the extent athorz herWin, Incorno ty with Vfe qilcton, a amented, te povisions f the Act, and the rule and reguatIon of the Comm~ssbn.
E. The lensme s*e fully nmnt ad mItain in ~e t O P ISIs of the Commiss*no*o-ped physic security, t*WM antgnd quat41 and edeguards conongencyplens lncl,.ng mendments medprs t to pkn o the MICelaneo Amsntmw i 0d SewaW R me rSI 10 CFR 7&55 (51 FR 27817 wa V 2) nWO to t &aoy of 10 CFR 50.90 Mnd 10 CPR 50.54f). The plan, whc cor~mlns Sefgadspw kdrmlon proected under 10 CFR 7321, Isenited T~olunta Garener ting an Physical Secuit Plum. Irainft and OushlcatlonPlan, Smegards Coont"meny Plan, andx~p ent. Fuel Stop bgen llatioi Plan.*
Snepn Energ Nonthwes shaW full kmplemnwt and maintain ine~ec all provision of the Commomls oved e e ser cu.- plan (CSP), kwkxin aWnem od pwsrant to the authorty of 10 CFR 50.90 ind 10 CFR 50.54(p). The EneW NohWes CSP aNO.i associated Imnplementation $chediJte were epproby Ucns Anedm 222, and the Implementation SchedNo, s A inmet F. Detoled.
G. The kocnsee shall rxtiy VeCommission, as scon as poss"l but no Waer than one hour, of any acidet at this a*ot which col result I an unplanned rae of quantim of fisimn produc*ts in excess of allow" *m for noma Operation eMsWt sd by the Commission.
H. The licensee sha ,we and minttain fndaal ptetn of sxuh type and insuch amounts as the Comission OWI reu..re in sara with Section 170 of the AMi EneW Act of 1954, a afmede to cover pu Nablft clairm Renewed License No. NPF-21 Amendment No. 22-
ucees uunuwr REQUNT FOR NOnien CMecuamw PLA CEATION ATTACHMENT 4 DATE f.
- 1 Affected Page of the Columbia Renewed Facility Operating Ucense wilth the Proposed Chnmge inoorporated
,. .. 3 : * : ..- * .
D. Exemptions from certain requirements of Apondices G, H and J to 10 CFR Part 50, are descr9 In
- e Safety Evaluation Report. These exermn na we atthofiwI by law and will not endanger Wife or propeyty or the common defense nd secuity and wre othsfwis inthe publlc Interest. Therefore, theseoexmptons are hereby granted pumuant to 10 CFR 50.12. With he graningr this exemnpton Ohe facility will opera*, to the extent authorized heren. inconformity with the appication, as aeded, thef pv n of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission.
E. The licensee sh fuiy mlenwt w4 maintain InOee all prosin of the Commission-a Wrovad physical eouft, tain and qua~lcation, and sateg contingency plans incMlu! n in purstuantoprtsns o the MhicelIaeous Aendmen nd Searh Reqhe t rviss bto 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and to the authodty of 10CF 6O.90nd 10 CFR 50o54(p). The plan, which eontains Saeguards Information protectWd under 10 CFR 7,21, is eNOtled:
"Columbia Generating Staton Physical Securit Plan, Traini ng Qualfliation Plan, Saleguards Contigey Plan, ano tndependent Spent Fuel Storage Instaliation Plan.'
Energy Northwest shal futy implement and fmaintan In e allprwovions of the CommissIon-approved cyber security plan (CSP), klndn0 changes made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFA 50.90 and 10 CFR 50,54(p). The Energy Northwest CSP and associated Implementation Schedule were approved by lUcemse Amendment No. 222, and the Implementation Schedule was revised by Ucm* AmbnM NoW..,
F. Deleted, G. The licensee shag notify the Commission, as soon as possi* but not later than one hour, of any accident at this facility which could result Inan unplanned release of quantities of fission products Inexcess of allowable limits for normaW operation established by the Commission.
H. The licensee shall have and maintain financial protection of such type and In such amounts as the Commission shall require Inaccordance with Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, to cover public liability claims.
Renewed License No. NPF-21 Amendment No. ,-