ML14140A115

04 Draft Outline Comments

ML14140A115
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	04/02/2014
From:	Chris Steely Operations Branch IV
To:	Entergy Operations
laura hurley
References
Download: ML14140A115 (3)

Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: Waterford First Exam Date: 4/2/2014 Written Exam Outline (1/8/14)

Comment Resolution 1 None - NRC generated 2

3 4

5 Administrative JPM Outline (1/8/14)

Comment Resolution 1 None 2

3 4

5 Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (1/8/14)

Comment Resolution RO 301-2 needs to annotate that there ES-301-2 for RO revised to reflect 3 EN JPMs 1

are 3 EN JPMs into the count table.

There are 7 low power JPMs. Seems Count verified accurate like a high number but is ok per 301-2.

2 Please verify these are all done at <5%

power and that this is not just a miscount.

SRO 301-2 needs to annotate that there ES-301-2 for SRO-I revised to reflect 2 EN 3

are 2 EN JPMs into the count table. JPMs All three alternate path JPMs for the Only in plant JPM that is Alternate Path is P2 Upgrade are in the CR. An Upgrade which is Safety Function 6. S6 (which is also applicant who knows that they are Safety Function 6) must be administered in limited to a max of three can then the Simulator JPMs due to requirement of 1 4

surmise that none of the In Plant JPMs new Alternate Path JPM. Not allowed to will be alternate path. Consider having overlap Safety Functions from the in plant to them perform one of the three in the the CR systems on SRO-U. No change plant to prevent predictability. made.

5 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)

Comment Resolution S1 E2 - TS call made in this event. D1 event descriptions (page 1) updated with Please include the applicable TS number specific Tech Spec number for all D-1s 1

in the D1 event description for this and all evens in all scenarios.

S1 E4 is marked as Component bean. S1 E4 updated to M-ALL 2 This is actually a Major event as it leads to the trip. (1021, App. D, pg. 9)

S1 E7 listed as Major. This is a S1 E7 updated to C-ATC, C-SRO 3 Component bean as it is not the initiating failure that leads to the reactor trip.

Critical Tasks for all scenarios - Include D1 event descriptions (page 1) updated to in the event description on the D1 the include specific task and performance criteria 4 parameter that must be met AND by for all critical tasks what time in order to successfully complete the CT.

S2 E2 - Loss of Letdown? This is Letdown is not lost on this event. Letdown 5 becoming somewhat predictable. goes to minimum, but extended recovery time Please look at replacing. is not needed.

6 No EOP contingency procedures used Contingency procedure is utilized in scenario in Scenario 1. Refer to 1021, App.D, pg 3 as part of the scenario set.

10 - Look at replacing an event with a contingency procedure 7 No EOP contingency procedures used Contingency procedure is utilized in scenario in Scenario 2. Refer to 1021, App.D, pg 3 as part of the scenario set.

10 - Look at replacing an event with a contingency procedure 8 S3 E4 is Letdown lost? If so, does it Letdown is not lost.

need to be recovered before moving to next event?

9 S3 E5 and E6 are the same event as S3 E5 updated to C-ATC, M-ALL.

the RCP failure necessitates a reactor S3 E6 remained M-ALL trip and thus constitutes the Major. S3 has 2 Majors following this revision Place the LOCA into this event as a subsequent action of the trip. The failure of CS-125A can be counted as its own event if there are required operator actions in order to correct.

10 S2 E7 Loss of CCW requires securing JPM sequence of events are different from RCPs. JPM S3 requires securing scenario sequence of events. This is due to RCPs. This looks very similar requiring the different requirements to secure RCPs in one to be changed. the normal operating procedures vice the EOPs.

11 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1

General Outline Comments (Date)

Comment Resolution What facility document defines the critical No facility document. Methodology is to use 1 tasks in the scenarios? CE critical task statements with approval through Operations management.

Ensure correction of Quantitative ES-301-5 updated with changes from Attributes table for all scenarios with bean comments 2, 3, & 9 from simulator section 2

changes. Also ES-301-5, Transient and above.

Event Checklist will need to be corrected.

Scenario 3 is low power scenario (no No response needed 3

response needed)

On all D1s annotate which eventsare D1 event descriptions (page 1) updated to Abnormal to alleviate any confusion in the include an (A) next to each event which 4

bean count. utilizes an off normal procedure response to denote an abnormal event.

Please state exactly what the Dominant DAS detail incorporated in the paragraph Accident Sequence is in the D1 and how write ups in the D1s.

5 it is measured to assure successful completion as a CT.

Add up events for watch stations and total Total number of events tallied for each 6

up into Total column on ES-301-5 position for all 3 scenarios. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Rev 1