|
---|
Category:Legal-Motion
MONTHYEARML15251A6782015-09-0404 September 2015 Motion for Leave to Intervene by First Energy Nuclear Operating Company ML15132A5152015-05-12012 May 2015 Certificate of Service of Beyond Nuclear Reply to Oppositions to Motion to Admit New Contention ML15128A2912015-05-0808 May 2015 Beyond Nuclear'S Motion to Amend Nepa Placeholder Contention in License Renewal Proceeding for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant ML15132A1972015-05-0808 May 2015 Certificate of Service for Beyond Nuclear'S Motion to Amend NEPA Placeholder Contention, Filed May 8, 2015 ML15128A2982015-05-0808 May 2015 Reply by Beyond Nuclear, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Seed Coalition and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy to Oppositions by Applicants and NRC Staff to Motions to Admit New Contentions ML15112B2012015-04-22022 April 2015 Beyond Nuclear'S Hearing Request and Motion to Intervene ML15112B1992015-04-22022 April 2015 Beyond Nuclear Motion to Reopen Record of License Renewal Proceeding ML15112B2022015-04-22022 April 2015 Standing Declaration of Victoria Clemons ML15065A2222015-03-0606 March 2015 FENOC Motion for Clarification Regarding Termination of Proceeding ML14364A4052014-12-30030 December 2014 Intervenors' Second Motion to Supplement Contention No. 7 on Worsening Shield Building Cracking and Inadequate Amps in Shield Building Monitoring Program ML14335A7802014-12-0101 December 2014 Joint Proposed Corrections to the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on November 12, 2014 ML14315A0492014-11-11011 November 2014 Notice of Filing of Riley Email (Exhibit a to Contention No. 7) ML14311A9892014-11-0707 November 2014 Petitioners and Intervenors Consolidated Reply to Answers to Petitions to Suspend Final Reactor Licensing Decisions, Motions to Admit a New Contention, and Motions to Reopen the Record ML14255A0302014-09-12012 September 2014 Erratum to Intervenors' Motion to Amend and Supplement Contention No. 7 on Worsening Shield Building Cracking and Inadequate AMPs in Shield Monitoring Program ML14252A8982014-09-0909 September 2014 Unopposed Motion to Establish Consolidated Briefing Schedule for Proposed Contention 7 Admissibility Filings ML14251A6092014-09-0808 September 2014 Intervenors Motion to Amend and Supplement Contention No. 7 on Worsening Shield Building Cracking and Inadequate AMPs in Shield Building Monitoring Program ML14245A6562014-09-0202 September 2014 Intervenors' Motion for Admission of Contention No. 7 on Worsening Shield Building Cracking and Inadequate Amps in Shield Building Monitoring Program ML14144A0002014-05-23023 May 2014 Intervenors' Reply in Support of Motion for Admission of Contention No. 6 on Shield Building Concrete Void, Cracking and Broken Rebar Problems ML14112A0072014-04-21021 April 2014 Motion for Admission of Contention No. 6 on Shield Building Concrete Void, Cracking and Broken Rebar Problems ML14112A0082014-04-15015 April 2014 Exhibit 7 - Request for Additional Information (Rai), April 15, 2014 ML14113A0012014-04-14014 April 2014 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Victoria Clemons ML14058A6822014-02-27027 February 2014 Certificate of Service of Petition to Suspend ML14058A6832014-02-27027 February 2014 Petition to Suspend Reactor Licensing Decisions and Reactor Re-Licensing Decisions Pending Completion of Rulemaking Proceeding Regarding Environmental Impacts of High-Density Pool Storage of Spent Fuel and Mitigation Measures ML14112A0092014-02-19019 February 2014 Exhibit 1 - Preliminary Notice of Event or Occurrence, February 19, 2014 ML14112A0032014-02-15015 February 2014 Exhibit 2 - Toledo Blade Article, Davis-Besse Had Air Gap in Shield Building, February 15, 2014 ML13277A7252013-10-0303 October 2013 Intervenors' Memorandum in Opposition to 'Fenoc'S Petition for Certification of Waste Confidence-Related Question to the Commission Pursuant to 10CFR2.323(f)(2).' ML13266A4322013-09-23023 September 2013 Fenoc'S Petition for Certification of Waste Confidence-Related Question to the Commission Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Section 2.32.(f)(2) ML14112A0042013-09-20020 September 2013 Exhibit 6 - Preliminary Notice of Event or Occurrence, September 20, 2013 ML13192A2842013-07-11011 July 2013 Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company'S Answer Supporting the NRC Staff'S Motion to Strike Portions of Petitioners Reply ML13192A5052013-07-11011 July 2013 Petitioners' Reply in Opposition to NRC Staff Motion to Strike ML13190A2162013-07-0808 July 2013 Petitioners' Reply in Opposition to FENOC 'Motion to Strike' ML13182A4792013-07-0101 July 2013 NRC Staff Motion to Strike Portions of Joint Petitioners Reply or, in the Alternative, for Leave to Reply ML13179A4032013-06-28028 June 2013 Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company'S Motion to Strike Portions of Petitioners' Reply ML13173A0012013-06-21021 June 2013 Petitioners' Reply in Support of Petition to Intervene and for an Adjudicatory Public Hearing of FENOC License Amendment Request ML14112A0062013-05-20020 May 2013 Exhibit 8 - Expert Witness Report of Arnold Gundersen, 50-246-LA ML12334A2602012-11-29029 November 2012 Joint Proposed Corrections to the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on November 5-6, 2012 ML12304A0652012-10-30030 October 2012 Motion to File Intervenors' Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB Order Granting Fenoc'S Motion to Strike Nunc Pro Tunc ML12297A3532012-10-22022 October 2012 Intervenors' Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB Order Granting Fenoc'S Motion to Strike Intervenors' Reply in Opposition to Firstenergy'S Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 (SAMA Analysis-Source Terms) ML12278A0402012-10-0404 October 2012 Intervenors' Response in Opposition to Fenoc'S Motion to Strike 'Intervenors' Reply in Opposition to Firstenergy'S Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 (SAMA Analysis - Source Terms).' ML12268A3762012-09-24024 September 2012 Fenoc'S Motion to Strike Intervenors' Reply in Opposition to Firstenergy'S Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 (SAMA Analysis - Source Terms). ML12258A7772012-09-14014 September 2012 Intervenors' Reply in Opposition to 'Firstenergy'S Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 (Sama Analysis - Source Terms).' ML12237B1972012-08-24024 August 2012 Intervenors' Combined Reply to NRC and FENOC Answers to Inervenors' Third and Fourth Motions to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking) Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Contain2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notic2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Con2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor ML12230A0032012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-49 Through B-50) ML12230A0022012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-44 Through B-48) ML12230A0012012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-39 Through B-43) ML12230A0002012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Response (B-33 Through B-38) ML12229A5872012-08-16016 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix III: NRC FOIA Responses (B-24 Through B-26) 2015-09-04
[Table view] Category:Legal-Exhibit
MONTHYEARML14112A0082014-04-15015 April 2014 Exhibit 7 - Request for Additional Information (Rai), April 15, 2014 ML14113A0012014-04-14014 April 2014 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Victoria Clemons ML14112A0092014-02-19019 February 2014 Exhibit 1 - Preliminary Notice of Event or Occurrence, February 19, 2014 ML14112A0032014-02-15015 February 2014 Exhibit 2 - Toledo Blade Article, Davis-Besse Had Air Gap in Shield Building, February 15, 2014 ML14112A0042013-09-20020 September 2013 Exhibit 6 - Preliminary Notice of Event or Occurrence, September 20, 2013 ML14112A0062013-05-20020 May 2013 Exhibit 8 - Expert Witness Report of Arnold Gundersen, 50-246-LA ML12340A7292012-08-20020 August 2012 Official Exhibit - ENT000551-00-BD01 - Letter from B. Harris, NRC Project Manager, to B. Allen, FENOC, Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station - Batch 3 (May 2, 2011) ML1036200592010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-NREL: Dynamic Maps, Gis Data, and Analysis Tools - Solar Maps ML1036200352010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-GLWC Regional Transmission Wind Workgroup Workplan, January 2010-June 2011 ML1036200532010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Exhibit 55-World PV Module Production (MW) - Data from PV News April of Each Year (1988 - 2009) ML1036200512010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Exhibit 48-By 2050 Solar Power Could End U.S. Dependence on Foreign Oil and Slash Greenhouse Gas Emissions ML1036200782010-12-28028 December 2010 2009/05/31-The Eastern Massachusetts Sea Breeze Study ML1036200422010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-By 2050 Solar Power Could End U.S. Dependence on Foreign Oil and Slash Greenhouse Gas Emissions ML1036200412010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-GLWC Environmental Planning, Siting and Permitting Workgroup June 11, 2009 Breakout Session Summary ML1036200762010-12-28028 December 2010 2005/12/31-NUREG/CR-6572, Rev. 1, BNL-NUREG-52534-R1, Kalinin VVER-1000 Nuclear Power Station Unit 1, PRA, Procedure Guides for a Probabilistic Risk Assessment ML1036200362010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-GLWC Wind Atlas Workgroup Workplan, January 2010 - June 2011 ML1036200752010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Ohio-Annual Average Wind Speed at 80 M ML1036200602010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-A Solar Grand Plan - by 2050 Solar Power Could End U.S. Dependence on Foreign Oil and Slash Greenhouse Gas Emissions ML1036200612010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Production Cost Modeling for High Levels of Photovoltaics Penetration ML1036200622010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Emissions from Photovoltaic Life Cycles ML1036200632010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-4928.64 Electric Distribution Utility to Provide Electricity from Alternative Energy Resources ML1036200642010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-NREL: Dynamic Maps, Gis Data, and Analysis Tools - Solar Maps ML1036200652010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Greentechmedia Web Page ML1036200662010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Ohio Senate Bill 221 Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard ML1036200672010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Rooftop Photovoltaics Market Penetration Scenarios ML1036200692010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Notes from Davis Besse Re-Licensing Community Hearing ML1036200702010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Davis Besse Map, 50-Mile Radius ML1036200792010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Use of Risk Measures in Design and Licensing of Future Reactors ML1036200332010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/23-Exhibit 36. Introductory Page About the Ohio Wind Working Group (Owwg) ML1036200302010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Exhibit Wind Farm Development in the State of Ohio ML1036200812010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Exhibit 17 - Licensed to Kill: How the Nuclear Power Industry Destroys Endangered Marine Wildlife and Ocean Habitat to Save Money ML1036200772010-12-28028 December 2010 2008/02/24-Survey of Costs Arising from Potential Radionuclide Scattering Events ML1036200022010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Exhibit 12. Offshore Wind in the Atlantic. Growing Momentum for Jobs, Energy Independence, Clean Air, and Wildlife Protection ML1036200042010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Exhibit 4. Ohio'S First Commercial Wind Farm ML1036200212010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Wind Resource of Ohio, Mean Annual Wind Speed at 100 Meters ML1036200112010-12-28028 December 2010 2007/03/28-Exhibit 18. Chernobyl-Based Birds Avoid Radioactive Nests ML1036200802010-12-28028 December 2010 2005/04/28-Economic Consequences of Rad/Nuc Attack: Cleanup Standards Significantly Affect Cost ML1036200202010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Wind Resource of Ohio Mean Annual Power Density at 100 Meters ML1036200152010-12-28028 December 2010 2010/12/28-Electric Power from Offshore Wind Via Synoptic-scale Interconnection ML1036104092010-12-27027 December 2010 2010/12/27-Energy Policy, Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power: a Critical Survey ML1036200732010-12-27027 December 2010 2010/12/27-Exhibit 69-Ohio Lakes, Rivers and Water Resources ML1036200722010-12-27027 December 2010 2010/12/27-Exhibit 70-Cuyahoga Valley National Park (U.S. National Park Service) ML1036200502010-12-27027 December 2010 2010/12/27-Exhibit 57-Stephen O'Rourke - PV Status and Pathways ML1036200452010-12-26026 December 2010 2010/12/26-Bosman Delft Blauw Decorative Tile W/Stand (Delft Blue Handpainted Holland) at Djp ML1036200442010-12-26026 December 2010 2010/12/26-Windmill on Montmartre by Vincent Van Gogh ML1036200402010-12-26026 December 2010 2010/12/26-Governor Granholm Signs Executive Order Creating Great Lakes Wind Council ML1036204902010-12-24024 December 2010 2010/12/24-Exhibit 23 - European Countries Unite to Invest $40 Billion in Huge Off-Shore Renewable Energy Super-Grid ML1036104102010-12-24024 December 2010 2010/12/24-Ohio Wind Map and Resource Potential ML1036200192010-12-23023 December 2010 2010/12/23-US Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis ML1036104162010-12-23023 December 2010 2010/12/23-Photographer's Preface 2014-04-15
[Table view] |
Text
Exhibit 2 Toledo Blade article, Davis-Besse Had Air Gap in Shield Building, February 15, 2014
Davis-Besse had air gap in shield building - Toledo Blade http://www.toledoblade.com/Energy/2014/02/15/Davis-Besse-had-air-...
Davis-Besse had air gap in shield building FirstEnergy found flaw while replacing 2 steam generators BY TOM HENRY BLADE STAFF WRITER OAK HARBOR, Ohio Nobody knows why, but there apparently was a problem sealing up Davis-Besse nuclear power plants shield building after the plants worn-out reactor head was replaced in fall 2011.
FirstEnergy Corp. notified the Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 11:14 a.m. Friday that the utility discovered an extensive air pocket or gap of concrete in the shield building's inner wall late Thursday night. The discovery was made while the nuclear plant was offline and in the early stages of a $600 million project to replace the The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing plants two original steam generators major pieces of equipment that create steam how FirstEnergy responds to the air pocket in so the plants turbine generator can spin and, thus, make electricity.
Davis-Besses shield building.
THE BLADE Enlarge l Buy This Photo After cutting a hole through the shield building to move the new generators in and take the old ones out, workers noticed a large void on the buildings inner wall.
The flaw runs the 25-foot length of a cut made in fall 2011 when the new reactor head was brought in and the old one was removed, said Jennifer Young, a spokesman for FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.
The void varies in width from six to 12 inches. The depth of it is something less than the 2.5-foot thickness of that mostly concrete-and-steel structure, because there is no evidence of the flaw on the structures exterior, Ms. Young said.
Its probably an air pocket that got in there when the concrete was [last] poured, Ms. Young said.
In its notification to the NRC scheduled to be made public on the agencys Web site (nrc.gov) on Tuesday the utility characterized the structural defect as an unfilled area that is likely due to not completely repouring the shield building wall opening in 2011.
The gap did not affect plant operations.
FirstEnergy engineers are of the belief the gap was not big enough to have compromised the structural integrity of the shield building, which is supposed to protect Davis-Besse especially from outside threats ranging from tornadoes to plane crashes.
We believe it did not impact the buildings ability to meet its function, Ms. Young said.
The NRC is not ready to go that far.
This is something we have certainly not formed any conclusions about, the as-is conditions of the shield building, Viktoria Mitlyng, NRC spokesman, said of the buildings strength. That is the question we expect the company to provide us an answer with, and we will assess it before making a determination.
The federal agency now plans to send more inspectors to the site, to augment its team already assembled there for the steam generator replacement project. Additional manpower will include engineers who specialize in nuclear materials and structures, Ms. Mitlyng said.
She said the investigation is more than anecdotal: FirstEnergy will be sealing up the same structure again once the new steam generators are installed.
FirstEnergy does not want a repeat of what happened, Ms. Young agreed.
The NRC will be reviewing how the plant responds to this, Ms. Mitlyng said.
They will have to address this void before they start up. We will be evaluating how they handle the concrete pouring and the conditions to make sure these conditions do not recur, she said. We need to understand what happened and why and what possible implications there might have been.
Ms. Mitlyng said she was not sure if NRC inspectors were on hand when the concrete was poured in 2011.
1 of 2 4/3/2014 4:32 AM
Davis-Besse had air gap in shield building - Toledo Blade http://www.toledoblade.com/Energy/2014/02/15/Davis-Besse-had-air-...
Davis-Besses planned restart in fall 2011 was delayed until early 2012 because of cracks in the same structure.
FirstEnergy believes those are unrelated to the large void in concrete that was just discovered. Utility engineers previously attributed them to weather impacts from the Blizzard of 78.
The NRC has no reason to believe theyre related.
It doesnt appear to have anything to do with it, Ms. Mitlyng said.
FirstEnergy is having engineers pore over data to see how it occurred to avoid a repeat when the structure is sealed back, Ms.
Young said.
The utility will move forward with replacing the plants two original steam generators in tandem with its investigation into the missing concrete.
Steam generators are like heat exchangers, and are among the biggest and among the most important pieces of plant equipment. They create super-intense steam that spins the turbine generator that makes electricity.
The original steam generators still work, but needed to be replaced to keep the plant viable. The utility hopes to get a 20-year extension and keep Davis-Besse operating through April, 2037.
FirstEnergy cut within the same footprint to begin the process of replacing the steam generators, Ms. Young said.
Some of the shield buildings rebar needs to be replaced. It appears to have been damaged by the cut made through the wall, she said.
Theres a high level of confidence [the rebar damage] was a direct result of the hydro cut, Ms. Young said.
The concrete and steel are cut with a high-pressure water drill to minimize damage. A quarter-inch steel form was left in place as backing to further help minimize damage from the cut, Ms. Young said.
There is a 4-foot gap of air space between the reactor's primary containment a solid, 1.5-inch-thick canister of carbon steel and the outer shell.
Davis-Besse is one of two Ohio nuclear plants. It is located in Ottawa County, 35 miles east of Toledo and along the Lake Erie shoreline. The other plant is the Perry station east of Cleveland, also along Lake Erie.
Both are owned and operated by Akron-based First-Energy.
Contact Tom Henry at: thenry@theblade.com or 419-724-6079.
Copyright 2014 The Blade. All rights reserved. This material may not be copied or distributed without permission.
2 of 2 4/3/2014 4:32 AM