ML13333C068

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Evaluations of Safeguards Licensing Performance of SALP Reviews for 830601-840831 for San Onofre & 830101-840630 for Diablo Canyon
ML13333C068
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, San Onofre, 05000000
Issue date: 08/20/1984
From: Mccorkle G
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Bishop T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
NUDOCS 8409100023
Download: ML13333C068 (3)


Text

/4 01UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CEIVED WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

1. r

~98i AUG 24 AM l: i2 SGPR:CEG 50-206/361/362 Etlog 50-275/323 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Tom Bishop, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects H FILEcon Region V FROM:

George W. McCorkle, Chief Power Reactor SG Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP)

SAN ONOFRE, DIABLO CANYON, NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Enclosed are our evaluations of the litensee/applicant's performance for the safeguards licensing portion of the SALP reviews for the subject sites during the period June 1, 1983 through August 31, 1984 for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station and January 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984 for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant.

Geor e W. McCorkle, Chief Power Reactor SG Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards, NMSS

Enclosures:

As stated cc:

C. Thomas, NRR w/all encl.

H. Rood, LB #3 w/encl. 1 B. Buckley, NRR w/encl. 2 8409100023 840820 PDR ADOCK 05000O26 P

POR

50-206/361/362 ENCLOSURE 1 SALP INPUT EVALUATION SAN ONOFRE SAFEGUARDS REVIEW Criteria Category

1. Management Involvement and Control in Assuring Quality 1

There is consistent evidence of prior planning and assignment of priorities. Corporate management is frequently involved in site activities. Reviews are thorough and technically sound.

2. Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety 1

Standpoint Approaches are technically sound and thorough in almost all cases. A clear understanding of the issues is demon strated.

3. Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives 2

Responses are technically sound and generally timely.

4. Enforcement History N/A
5. Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events N/A
6. Staffing (Including Management) 1 Positions are identified, authorities and responsibilities are well defined.
7. Training and Qualification Effectiveness 1

The safeguards training and qualification plan and pro cedures contribute to a well defined secuity program.

50-275/323 ENCLOSURE 2 SALP INPUT EVALUATION DIABLO CANYON SAFEGUARDS REVIEW Criteria Category 1..

Management Involvement and Control in Assuring Quality 1

The applicant has provided consistent evidence of prior planning and assignment of priorities. Decision making is consistently at a level that ensures adequate management review.

2. Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety 1

Standpoint The applicant has provided technically sound, timely, and thorough approaches in a almost all cases.

3. Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives 1

The applicant provides timely, acceptable resolutions of issues initially in most cases.

4. Enforcement History N/A
5. Reporting of Reportable Events N/A
6. Staffing (Including Management) 1 Positi6ns are identified, authorities and responsibilities are well defined.
7. Training and Qualiffiation Effectiveness 1

The safeguards training and qualification plan and pro cedures contribute to a well defined security program.