ML13295A452

Issuance of the Core Operating Limits Report for Reload 19, Cycle 20, Rev. 7

ML13295A452
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	10/03/2013
From:	Massaro M Exelon Generation Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CCN: 13-75
Download: ML13295A452 (5)

Text

d Exeton Generation.

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10CFR 2.390 TS 5.6.5.d October 16, 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555-0001 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 3 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-56 NRC Docket No. 50-278

Subject:

Issuance of the Core Operating Limits Report for Reload 19, Cycle 20, Revision 7 Enclosed is a copy of Revision 7 of the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 3 for Reload 19, Cycle 20. Revision 7 of this report incorporates the revised cycle specific parameters resulting from the new core configuration as a result of the PBAPS, Unit 3 refueling outage.

This COLR is being submitted to the NRC as required by the PBAPS, Unit 3 Technical Specifications (TS)

Section 5.6.5.d. Attachment 2 contains information proprietary to Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas. Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas requests that the document be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4). An affidavit supporting this request is contained in Attachment 1. Attachment 2 contains a non-proprietary version of the Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas document.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Dave Foss at (717) 456-4311.

Michael J. Massaro Site Vice President Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station CCN: 13-75 Attachments:

1. Core Operating Limits Report for Reload 19, Cycle 20, Revision 7 Affidavit

2.

Core Operating Limits Report for Reload 19, Cycle 20, Revision 7 (Proprietary Version)

3.

Core Operating Limits Report for Reload 19, Cycle 20, Revision 7 (Non-Proprietary Version) cc:

Regional Administrator, Region I, USNRC (without attachments)

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, PBAPS (without attachments)

Project Manager - PBAPS, USNRC (with attachments)

R. R. Janati, Pennsylvania Bureau of Radiation Protection (without attachments)

S. T. Gray, State of Maryland (without attachments)

ATTACHMENT 1 Core Operating Limits Report for Reload 19, Cycle 20, Revision 7 Affidavit

Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas AFFIDAVIT I, Lukas Trosman, state as follows:

(1) I am Engineering Manager, Reload Design and Analysis, Global Nuclear Fuel -

Americas, LLC (GNF-A), and have been delegated the function of reviewing the information described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.

(2) The information sought to be withheld is contained in GNF-A proprietary report 0000-0153-3109-FBIR-P, Fuel Bundle Information Report for Peach Bottom Unit 3 Reload 19 Cycle 20, Revision 0, July 2013.

GNF-A proprietary information in 0000-0153-3109-FBIR-P, Fuel Bundle Information Report for Peach Bottom Unit 3 Reload 19 Cycle 20, Revision 0, July 2013 is identified by a dotted underline inside double square brackets.

((T.is.sentence.is.an.example...3.1))

Figures and large equation objects are identified with double square brackets before and after the object.

In each case, the superscript notation 13} refers to Paragraph (3) of this affidavit, which provides the basis for the proprietary determination.

(3)

In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner or licensee, GNF-A relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 USC Sec. 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 USC Sec. 1905, and NRC regulations 10 CFR 9.17(a)(4), and 2.390(a)(4) for "trade secrets" (Exemption 4). The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought also qualify under the narrower definition of "trade secret", within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 975 F2d 871 (DC Cir. 1992), and Public Citizen Health Research Group v. FDA, 704 F2d 1280 (DC Cir. 1983).

(4) Some examples of categories of information which fit into the definition of proprietary information are:

a.

Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by GNF-A's competitors without license from GNF-A constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies;

b.

Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product;

c.

Information which reveals aspects of past, present, or future GNF-A customer-funded development plans and programs, resulting in potential products to GNF-A;

d.

Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.

0000-0153-3109-FBIR-P Affidavit Page I of 3

The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs (4)a. and (4)b. above.

(5) To address 10 CFR 2.390 (b) (4), the information sought to be withheld is being submitted to NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by GNF-A, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by GNF-A, no public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties including any required transmittals to NRC, have been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.

Its initial designation as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set forth in paragraphs (6) and (7) following.

(6) Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge, or subject to the terms under which it was licensed to GNF-A. Access to such documents within GNF-A is limited on a "need to know" basis.

(7) The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist or other equivalent authority, by the manager of the cognizant marketing function (or his delegate), and by the Legal Operation, for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation.

Disclosures outside GNF-A are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements.

(8) The information identified in paragraph (2) is classified as proprietary because it contains details of GNF-A's fuel design and licensing methodology.

The development of this methodology, along with the testing, development and approval was achieved at a significant cost to GNF-A.

The development of the fuel design and licensing methodology along with the interpretation and application of the analytical results is derived from an extensive experience database that constitutes a major GNF-A asset.

(9) Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GNF-A's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of GNF-A's comprehensive BWR safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost.

The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation 0000-0153-3109-FBIR-P Affidavit Page 2 of 3

process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.

The research, development, engineering, analytical, and NRC review costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GNF-A.

The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial.

GNF-A's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the GNF-A experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.

The value of this information to GNF-A would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GNF-A of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing and obtaining these very valuable analytical tools.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

Executed on this 30th day of July 2013.

Lukas Trosman Engineering Manager, Reload Design and Analysis Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas, LLC 0000-0153-3109-FBIR-P Affidavit Page 3 of 3