NL-13-130, Indian Point, Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Rev. 24, Chapter 14 - Figure 14.0-1 Through Figure 14.1-67

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML13291A342)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Indian Point, Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Rev. 24, Chapter 14 - Figure 14.0-1 Through Figure 14.1-67
ML13291A342
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/2013
From:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-130
Download: ML13291A342 (56)


Text

TOO I I I T I / I 90 I I -I j I :i::: l ...... a:: f I Q 80 ::B I 7 -I I < ...... Cl 70 ...... I I.I.. I 0 .... 60 z I.I.I u I a:: I.a.I Q,, 50 -I z 0 -.... 40 a:: ...., I vt .z ->-30 .... I -> -.... 20 u I < IU << UJ / 0 I -f/ I I I I I I I T 0 1 % 3 t Tl"E FRO" ROD RELEASE (SEC) INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14.0-1 REACTIVITY INSERTION vs TIME FOR REACTOR TRIP MIC. No. 1999MC3969 I REV. No. 17A

'--0 -1 10 :::J :z: -2 ;o .._._ _____

0 5 f5 20 25 30 (Seconds)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRITICAL CONDITION NUCLEAR POWER vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-1 REV. No. 19

.a ,7 ---0 c .E 0 6 :z: --0 c 0 :;::::; .5 <.> E' LL --.4 ....... 0 (1) ::r:: .3 .2 .1 0 5 (\ 10 15 20 25 30 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRITICAL CONDITION HEAT FLUX vs TIME, AVG. CHANNEL UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-2 REV. No. 19 uel Center I ine empe atu e ei Ave age emoera ure 2500 ......------------------. (J) 1500 !..... ::J ....., 0 !..... g_ 1000 E (J) f-(J) 500 ::J LL.. 0 ! 0 1' I \ ! ! ' \ \ \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (Seconds)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRITICAL CONDITION FUEL AVERAGE TEMPERATURE vs TIME AT HOT SPOT UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-3 I REV. No. 19 750 ""'O ..2 600 (._) 550 t=-----___J 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 (Seconds)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA WITHDRAWAL FROM A SUBCRITICAL CONDITION CLAD INNER TEMPERATURE vs TIME AT HOT SPOT UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-4 REV. No. 19 04-'--'--'--r--'---'--'--r--'--'---'-r----'--'--r--'--

...........

--f 0 2 4 6 8 10 (SECONDS) 1.2-.--------------------.

1.1 0 .. 9 .8 6 .5 4 I 0 2 8 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA BANK WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM REACTIVITY F'EEDBACK (70 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE). NUCLEAR POWER ANO CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14. 1-5 IREV. No. 19 2320 ......------------------., a::: w 2300 2280 2260 i::::::! 2240 a::: ::::> (/) (/) 2220 CL 0 2 4 6 8 10 (SECONDS)

---1170 Q5 ..£1: 0 8 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA BANK WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM REACTIVITY FEEDBACK (70 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE), PRESSURIZER PRESSURE ANO WATER VOLUME vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14. 1-6 IREV. No. 19

.--. 576-.-------------------, w_ I v ID g, 574 572-1-----

570 4 3.5 3 25 2 15 0 2 8 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA BANK WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM REACTIVITY I FEEDBACK (70 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE). CORE WATER AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-7 REV. No. 19 1.2......-----------------

0 c:: .8 .Q u .6 .___, 0:::: L.i..J .4 Q.. .2-_J (.) :::> z I) 20 60 80 100 120 140 160 TIME (SECONDS) 1.2 1.1 ..--.. 0 c: .E 1 0 z 0 .9 c:: .Q u .8 0 '-1--iS .6 :r: 5 .4 0 20 40 120 140 160 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA BANK WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM REACTIVITY FEEDBACK (1 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE), NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-8 I REV. No. 19 w 0:: :::> (./') 2300 0:: 0.... ffi 2250 r....i 0:: :::> (./') 2200 0:: 0.... w ::?: 3 1400 0:: w !;;;: 1300 3:: 0:: w r....i 5 1200 (./') (./') w 0:: 0.... 1100 -L-_..__...,......:._.___;-,-"--.,...."--"-r-"--'--r-'--_._,--.,..--------i 0 20 40 50 80 100 120 140 160 (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA BANK WITHDRAWAL f'ROM f'ULL POWER WITH MINIMUM REACTIVITY FEEDBACK (1 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE). PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND WATER VOLUME vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14. 1-9 I REV. No. 19

,.-... 595....-----------------

w_ I as g, 590 ..:;:::...

a:::: CD z: Cl 3 2.5 2 1.5 20 40 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 TIME (SECONDS) 60 80 100 120 140 160 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UNCONTROLLED RCCA BANK WITHDRAWAL FROM FULL POWER WITH MINIMUM REACTIVITY FEEDBACK (1 pcm/sec WITHDRAWAL RATE). CORE WATER AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-10 I REV. No. 19

--Minimum Feedbcck ----Mox\rrH.;m Feedback 2.2 -....---------------------, 2 1.6 -1 10 I / I , / / --'-.. "'HIGH NEUTRON OT.& T TRIP .,._____,'...____., __ FLUX TRIP ' \ \\I \ I II ' 0 I 2 10 10 10 Reactivity Addition Rate [pcm/second]

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 MINIMUM DNBR VERSUS REACTIVITY INSERTION RATE, ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM 100 PERCENT POWER UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-11 l REV. No. 19

§§ = = --Mir:M<..H'r!

Feedback ----Maximum F'eedbock 2.4 ...-----------------

2.3 2.2 2.1 2 1.9 ;.a 1.7 1.5 1-5 1.4 OfoTTRIP t .... I ', I I I ..._ I '-I 'I HIGH NEUTRON FLUX TRIP 18 1d Reactivity Addition Rate (pcm/second]

J 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 MINIMUM DNBR VERSUS REACTIVITY INSERTION RATE, ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM 60 PERCENT POWER UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-12 I REV. No. 19

--M'lnimum ;."eedbock ----MOXil"r\um FeedbOCK 2.4 ...------------------..

2.3 2.2 2.1 = 2 = 1.9 c::: :=§ 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 -* 10 OTL\TTRIP I j\ __ -' HIGH NEUTRON FLUX TRIP 18 1d 1& 16 Reactivity Addition Rate [pcm/second]

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 MINIMUM DNBR VERSUS REACTIVITY INSERTION RATE, ROD WITHDRAWAL FROM 10 PERCENT POWER UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-13 I REV. No. 19 1.2 0 6 .4 .2 0 0 50 100 150 1.2 .......---------------------.

0 .s 6 .4 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 DROPPED ROD INCIDENT MANUAL ROD CONTROL NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX AT BOL (SMALL NEGATIVE MTC) FOR DROPPED RCCA OF WORTH -400 PCM UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-14 I REV. No. 19 520 0 50 100 150 200 Time 620 LL 600 580 560 540 520 500 0 50 JOQ 200 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 DROPPED ROD INCIDENT MANUAL ROD CONTROL CORE AVERAGE ANO VESSEL INLET TEMPERATURE AT BOL (SMALL NEGATIVE MTC) FOR DROPPED RCCA OF WORTH -400 PCM UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-15 I REV. No. 19 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 DROPPED ROD INCIDENT MANUAL ROD CONTROL PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AT BOL {SMALL NEGATIVE MTC) FOR DROPPED RCCA OF WORTH -400 PCM 1_-_1_6_.__R_EV_._N_o_._19__, I 1 0 .6 I_,_ .___, .4 .2 0 0 50 100 200 1.2 ...,----------------------.., 0 .8 6 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 DROPPED ROD INCIDENT MANUAL ROD CONTROL NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT fLUX AT EOL (LARGE NEGATIVE MTC) FOR DROPPED RCCA OF WORTH -400 PCM UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-17 I REV. No. 19

. I INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 DROPPED ROD INCIDENT MANUAL ROD CONTROL CORE AVERAGE AND VESSEL INLET TEMPERATURE AT EOL (LARGE NEGATIVE MTC) FOR DROPPED RCCA OF WORTH -400 PCM UFSAR FIGURE 14. 1-18 REV. No. 19 2600------------------., INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 DROPPED ROD INCIDENT MANUAL ROD CONTROL PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AT EOL (LARGE NEGATIVE MTC) FOR DROPPED RCCA OF WORTH -400 PCM UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-19 REV. No. 19

.2 0 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS) 1.2.....------------------i 0 2 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ONE PUMP OUT OF FOUR NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-20 I REV. No. 19 31: 9 750 .... Su-zi.s -111 700 w'-

8 ....... .;. l5 ..... 650 600 0 2 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS}

1.2 31: 9 .8 :zo :::>Z ;;Ji.. .fi go Q..Z oe 98 .4 oe !J-.2 .... 0 0 2 4 6 8 1() TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ONE PUMP OUT OF FOUR TOTAL CORE FLOW AND FAULTED LOOP FLOW vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14. 1 -21 I REV. No. 19

5 2 0 2 4 6 10 2 TIME (SECONDS) 4 6 TIME (SECONDS) 8 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ONE PUMP OUT OF FOUR PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-22 I REV. No. 19 1.2.....-----------------, O-+-'--'---'-+---'-J--+-...1.-"-'--+_._-'--t-_.__._...._., 0 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS) 1.2-.------------------, .2 0 2 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS}

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FOUR PUMP LOSS OF FLOW -UNDERVOLTAGE NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-23 I REV. No. 19 800 700 !3u-500 zu.i -en u.i';;)-o::t: 8 ...... 500 g 400 300 0 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS) 1.2 9,...,. .8 23 0::0 tiz ::EL>. 3o .6 §?5 n.-gti .4 .:IE .2 0 ll 2 4 & 8 10 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FOUR PUMP LOSS OF FLOW -UNDERVOLTAGE TOTAL CORE FLOW AND RCS LOOP FLOW VS TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-24 I REV. No. 19

0 D 2 6 TIME (SECONDS) 4 6 TIME {SECONDS) 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FOUR PUMP LOSS OF FLOW -UNDERVOLTAGE PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-25 I REV. No. 19 1.2 ......--------------------, TIME (SECONDS) % .s :i XO .6 1-0 Ai .!:!::. .2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FOUR PUMP LOSS OF FLOW -UNDERFREOUENCY NUCLEAR POWER AND HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-26 I REV. No. 19 800 700 :;;-: g 600 r.... SB' 500 :z: II.I 4()0 8--e 300 200 100 0 2 4 8 10 TIME (SECONDS) 1.2 31: g.--.

.8 (.)_ :::l!:z: 3:5 .6 .4 .2 I) 0 2 4 6 8 10 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FOUR PUMP LOSS OF FLOW -UNOERFREQUENCY TOTAL CORE FLOW AND RCS LOOP FLOW vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-27 I REV. No. 19

0 2 3 2 0 2 4 6 TIME (SECONDS) 4 6 TIME (SECONDS) 8 10 B INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FOUR PUMP LOSS OF FLOW -UNDERFREOUENCY PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-28 I REV. No. 19 u t ca 1=-i I&. M u! in IM la. -G.2 0 0 1100 --w IE u I DOO -21{W -0

  • 4 * ,, ... (SttaiDS) 4
  • 1! 'TIME: (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOCKED ROTOR NUCLEAR POWER AND RCS PRESSURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-29 REV. No. 22

  • I) 11WE'. {S!:CtlNl:IS) 4 Iii Tl WE: (SE:C()MD$)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOCKED ROTOR TOTAL CORE FLOW AND FAULTED LOOP FLOW vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-30 REV. No. 22

0 f 6 llM£

'O INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOCKED ROTOR FUEL CLAD INNER TEMPERATURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-30A REV. No. 22

,--..., 1.2 0 c: .E 0 z: 0 c: 8l 0 :.;:::; <.> 0 '-.61 L.J... -.......,, 0::: w 3: .4 -0 a... 0::: i:5 .2 _J u :::::> z: 0 0 \ 20 40 60 TIME (SECONDS) 80 100 2500 w s 2300 (/) (/) w g::: 2200 a::: w 2100 :::::> I (/) (/) 2000 a...

0 20 40 60 80 100 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF LOAD WITH PRESSURIZER SPRAY AND PORV, NUCLEAR POWER AND PRESSURIZER PRESSURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-31 I REV. No. 19 595 20 40 60 80 100 TIME (SECONDS) 1700-.------------------, -. 0 *u; 1600 w ::::;;: 1500 §; a::: 1400 ES 1300 N a::: {

I 1100

_._ __ ,.....I _.__*-=--=--=---;I 0 20 40 60 80 100 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF LOAD WITH PRESSURIZER SPRAY AND PORV, AVERAGE COOLANT TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURIZER WATER VOLUME vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-32 I REV. No. 19 3.5 3 0::: §@ 2.5 a 2 1.5 20 40 60 80 100 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF LOAD WITH PRESSURIZER SPRAY AND POWER OPERATED RELIEF VALVES DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-33 I REV. No. 19

<<l TIME --IH' L1a11er Pl cl!f\ijm Prt1$,1,JF


11'Fll:l!l!Jfl'i 40 tl!1 llME (SECONDS)

oo INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF LOAD WITHOUT PRESSURIZER SPRAY AND PORV, NUCLEAR POWER AND PRESSURIZER PRESSURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-37 REV. No. 22 1&Ml 1400 LW :2 :3 f,ID!J 9 ;:> 0::: L.&.J !ZOO 3t Ct:: LW aoo N x :=;i U') V} lOCt::! LW Ct!: a... 00\l .<<J. !ifJ TIME {I 20 4{l M lOO llME f 'Ef.t\NQt'*)

>,,'""' , r ... ). INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF LOAD WITHOUT PRESSURIZER SPRAY AND POWER OPERATED RELIEF VALVES, AVERAGE COOLANT TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURIZER WATER VOLUME vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-38 REV. No. 22 40 61} (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF LOAD WITHOUT PRESSURIZER SPRAY AND POWER OPERATED RELIEF VALVES, STEAM PRESSURE, vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1 -39 REV. No. 22 2400 G:i 2250 N *;;:: ::l (/') (/') (!) ct 0 10 1 10 2 10 (seconds) 3 10

  • 10 1800------------------, _..-.._ (i) 1700 u :0 ::::> 81500 1500 1 .. 1 1300 { 0 JO I iO 2 10 3 10 4 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF NORMAL FEEDWATER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE, HIGH T avg PROGRAM, PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND PRESSURIZER WATER VOLUME vs TIME UFSAR f'IGURE 14.1-43, sht.1 I REV. No. 19

-0 u... ......_,, '--(!.) :;:: 0 o_ I.... 0 (!.) <...> :::> z -0 1.2 '-1 -._ ,.. .8 -1 4 -l .2 0 0 10 1.2 ... 1 -.a -.6 -.4 -:1 n 10 1 10 I 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 Time (seconds)

I I l \ I I 2 3

  • 10 10 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF NORMAL FEEDWATER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-43, sht.2 I REV. No. 19

--HGT LEG ----

LEG SAT RATION 660 620 580 N g-540 .3 --HO LEG ----CO 0 LEG SI\ URAT I ON Time (seconds) 660 620 580 540 -----l 10 2 10 (seconds) l iO

  • 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF NORMAL FEEDWATER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, LOOP 21 AND LOOP 23 TEMPERATURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-43, sht.3IREV.

No. 19 E 0 <I.) (/') C'.J 0.. 0 0 -' 1200 -.-------------------, 800 700 600 0 10 t 10 z 10 Time (seconds)

J 10 4 10 1200-,...----------------.

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF NORMAL FEEDWATER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, STEAM GENERATOR 21 AND STEAM GENERATOR 23 PRESSURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-43, sht.41 REV. No. 19

.....--. 0 :.;:; *c: 0 3: 0 c;: if) (..) a::: 0 _...., 0 ;..-1.2 1 .8 .6 .4 .2 0 0 10 1 10 2 10 Time (seconds) 3 10 4 10 I 2 lO 4 10 (seconds)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF NORMAL FEEDWATER, OFFSITE POWER AVAILABLE, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM ,TOTAL RCS FLOW AND PRESSURIZER RELIEF vs TIME Uf'SAR FIGURE 14.1-43, sht.s I REV. No. 19 1.2 1 -::::;-;i .8 ... 00 a.. :z .6 -00 .4 -.._. .2 -0 0 1.2 1 .8 -2 XO ::::>:z !ti... .6 -'""'o xS .4-LI. "-' .2-0 () -. 50 50 100 15o 200 TIME (SECONDS) 100 150 2lo TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FEEDWATER SYSTEM MALFUNCTION EXCESSIVE FEEOWATER FLOW -HFP CONDITIONS MANUAL ROD CONTROL NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-45, sht.1 I REV. No. 19 TIME (SECONDS) 4 .... 3 2 -

s'o too 1so 200 fl TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FEEDWATER SYSTEM MALFUNCTION EXCESSIVE FEEDWATER FLOW -HFP CONDITIONS MANUAL ROD CONTROL PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND DNBR vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-45, sht.2 j REV. No. 19 80 60 r---' 71:;:' Ji!,. 40 ,.. g-l ..3 ....... 20 I-0 ' I ' ' .G 0 50 100 150 200 TIME (SECONDS}

580 e 570 .i! E! 560 °'i' E!o :---< e 550 -8 540 0 sh 100 !50 200 TIME (SECONDS)

INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 FEEDWATER SYSTEM MALFUNCTION EXCESSIVE FEEOWATER FLOW -HFP CONDITIONS MANUAL ROD CONTROL LOOP DELTA -T, AND CORE Tavg vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-45, sht.3 I REV. No. 19 2360 2340 as *2! 2260 :::> Cf) Cf) 2: 2240 CL 2220 0 10 \ 10 2 10 Time (seconds) l 10 1800 ....--------------------.. Q) 1700 (.) :.0 :::> s 1600 Q.) E :::> g 1500 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ALL AC POWER, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, PRESSURIZER PRESSURE AND PRESSURIZER WATER VOLUME vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-50, sht.1 I REV. No. 19 (seconds) 1.2 1 -0 .a -.6 Lt-...___, x ::i A .2 0 11) 1 l J 4 10 10 10 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ALL AC POWER, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, NUCLEAR POWER AND CORE HEAT FLUX vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-50, sht.2jREV.

No. 19

,.....__ w... --HOT LEG ----COLD LEG SA IJRATiON 660 ----------------------______ _,--, __ ,------------


, _____ ,--<l.> .::;:::, 620 580 1 1'-----------, I !"'

500 -1 1 11 I 1 1 1 11 i " I ,.....__ w... 0 l 2 J 10 10 10 10 Time (seconds)

--HOT EG ----COLD EG SATURATION 4 1() 660 --------------------_________

,--** _,----------------\

______ _ <l.> .::;:::, 620 { 580 -f I \ 1t /... ', ,' 500 I l't Q I 2 l i I 10 10 10 10 r ' ' .ime l seconds; 4 10 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ALL AC POWER TO THE STATION AUXILARIES, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, LOOP 21 AND LOOP 23 TEMPERATURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-50, sht.3 REV. No. 19 i200 " Q'i100 *u; a.. '---/ 1000 I E 900 CJ Q) __, (// -800 C'-l a.. 0 0 700 ......J 600 0 l 2 ,

  • 10 10 10 10 10 Time (seconds) 1200 ('\ 0 1100 I .if.i a. "'-' ::::' 1000 :;;:, en en 900{ Q) } (/) "" 800 I C'-l a. 0 I 0 700 _J 600 '1 ' 0 2 J 4 10 10 10 10 10 r ( d \ l!me ,secon s; INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 LOSS OF ALL AC POWER TO THE STATION AUXILARIES, HIGH Tavg PROGRAM, LOOP 21 AND LOOP 23 STEAM PRESSURE vs TIME UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-50, sht.4 REV. No. 19 16 15 14 13 12 Vl 11 w 0:: ::> 10 ...J < 9 .... 8 l.oJ 7 Q. >-I-6 > V'l 5 LL. 4 0 ci 3 :z: w 2 > 1 j::: j 0 ::> ::::E 86 87 ::::> 88 89 90 91 (,) 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 CALENDAR YEAR ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE
  • ACTUAL DATA SV TYPE 1 FAILURE RATE SLOPE OF ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE = 2.47-06/HR

= [(SY TYPE 1 F.R.) * (OPERATING HOURS)) / (CALENDAR YEARS) = [(2.47E-06/HR)

  • (2.917E+06 HRS)) / (6.42 CAL. YRS.) = 1. l FAIL/CAL.

YR. INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-62 TRACKING 8-95/96 STOP VALVE (SV) TYPE 1 FAILURES STOP VALVE DISC FAILS MIC. No. 2001MB1537 REV. No. 17 A 5 3 I-::; 2 ,__ 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 CALENDAR YEAR --ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE

  • ACTUAL OAT A SV TYPE 2 FAILURE RATE SLOPE OF ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE = 2.05-07 /HR = ((SV TYPE 2 f.R.) * (OPERATING HOURS)] / (CALENDAR YEARS) = [(Z.OSE-07

/HR} * (2.917E+06 HRS)) / (6.42 CAL. YRS.) = 0.093 FAIL./CAL.

YR. INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-63 TRACKING B-95/96 STOP VALVE (SV) TYPE 2 FAILURES STOP VALVE SPRING FAILS MIC. No. 2001MB1538

!REV. No. 17A

> V'! 5 4 -3 L.... ,

0 I I I I I l I I I I I 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 CALENDAR YEAR ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE

  • ACTUAL OAT A SY TYPE 3 FAILURE RATE = 2.05-07 /HR SLOPE OF ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE = ((SV TYPE 3 F.R.) "' (OPERATING HOURS)] / (CALENDAR YEARS) = ((2.0SE-07

/HR) "' (2.917E+06 HRS)) / (6.42 CAL. YRS.) = 0.093 FAIL/CAL.

YR. INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-64 TRACKING B-95/96 STOP VALVE (SV) TYPE 3 FAILURES STOP VALVE STICKS OPEN MIC. No. 2001MB1539

!REV. No. 17A Vl 11 w 0:: ::i 10 ...J < 9 I.I.. -.t-8 WJ 7 Cl.. >-.... 6 > (.) 5 i..... 4 0 0 3 z w 2 ?:: 1 .... j 0 ::i ::E 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 :::> (.) CALENDAR YEAR ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE

  • ACTUAL OAT A CV TYPE 4 FAILURE RATE SLOPE OF ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE = 1.22-06/HR

= [(CV TYPE 4 F.R.) * (OPERATING HOURS)) / (CALENDAR YEARS) = [(1.22E-06/HR)

  • (3.925E+06 HRS)] / (6.42 CAL. YRS.) = 0.75 FAIL/CAL.

YR. INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14. 1 -65 TRACKING B-95/96 CONTROL VALVE (CV) TYPE 4 FAILURES CONTROL VALVE SPRING BOLT FAILS MIC. No. 2001MB1540 REV. No. 17A

> u 5 4 ,__ 0 z :

86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 CALENDAR YEAR --ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE

  • ACTUAL DATA CV TYPE 5 FAILURE RATE = 1.53-07 /HR SLOPE OF' ANALYSIS FAILURE LINE = [(CV TYPE 5 F.R.) * (OPERATING HOURS)) / (CALENDAR YEARS) = [(1.53E-07

/HR) * (3.92SE+06 HRS)] / (6.42 CAL. YRS.) = 0.094 FAIL./CAL.

YR. INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-66 TRACKING B-95/96 CONTROL VALVE (CV) TYPE 5 FAILURES CONTROL VALVE STICKS OPEN MIC. No. 2001MB1541 I REV. No. 17A 1E Initial Case -* . o::i -:-:. .. ,. '--. WHEN JUSTIRED USING THE APPROPRIATE CURVE, NOMINAL TEST INTERVALS UP TO 3 MONTHS ARE RECOMMENDED.

Turt>Jn* Valve Test Interval (months) ----Curve #1: SlUVeillaoce of stop valve discs occurs every 18 months. Testing of valve freedom of movement oocurs at inteJVals of 1 to 6 months (horizonlal axis). Curve 12: Surveillance of stop valve discs occurs every 24 months. Tt.sting of valve freedom of movement occurs at intervals of 1 to 6 months (horizontal axis).

  • Estimated 3.7E-06/r for 3 month test interval for Curve #2 INDIAN POINT UNIT No. 2 UFSAR FIGURE 14.1-67 ANNUAL FREQUENCY OF DESTRUCTIVE OVERSPEED FOR VARIOUS BB-95/96 TURBINE VALVE TEST INTERVAL (1-0N-1 SV-CV TURBINE / 1 OUT OF 4 STEAM PATHS) MIC. No. 2001MB1542 REV. No. 17A