ML13260A077

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report - General Electric (GE) Hitachi Nuclear Energy - Sbm Type Manual Switch
ML13260A077
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/2013
From: Polson K
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML13260A077 (4)


Text

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Decatur, Alabama 35609-2000 September 12, 2013 10 CFR 21.21 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-68 NRC Docket No. 50-296

Subject:

10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report - General Electric (GE) Hitachi Nuclear Energy - SBM Type Manual Switch The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) recently identified that the manual hand switch for Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System I Suppression Pool Isolation Valve, failed to operate as expected (i.e., spring return to center). Additionally, it was identified that a new hand switch, which was procured as a replacement, also had the same failure. Corrective Action Program documents were written to document the failure of the SBM Type Manual Switches and to require performance of an engineering evaluation of the condition. It was concluded that this condition has the potential to constitute a reportable condition pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 21, "Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance," and as such, requires additional evaluation.

The TVA is working with GE Hitachi (GEH) to determine the cause of failure of the SBM Manual Switches. At this time, GEH has not determined that a defect exists. If GEH determines that a defect exists, they will perform a 10 CFR Part 21 evaluation within 60 days of their determination. The enclosure to this letter provides information required by 10 CFR Part 21.21(a)(2) for the interim report of this condition.

There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this letter. Should you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact J. E. Emens, Jr., Nuclear Site Licensing Manager, at (256) 729-2636.

Respectfully, K. J. Poison Vice President SE/q

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 September 12, 2013

Enclosure:

10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report - General Electric (GE) Hitachi Nuclear Energy - SBM Type Manual Switch cc (w/ Enclosure):

NRC Regional Administrator - Region II NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Enclosure Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 3 10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report General Electric (GE) Hitachi Nuclear Energy -

SBM Type Manual Switch

10 CFR Part 21 Interim Report - General Electric (GE) Hitachi Nuclear Energy - SBM Type Manual Switch Name and Address of the Individual Making the Interim Report Mr. K. J. PoIson Vice President Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority Post Office Box 2000 Decatur, Alabama 35609-2000 Identification of the facility, the activity, or basic component supplied for such facility or such activity within the United States which fails to comply or contains a defect (under evaluation)

On July 14, 2013, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) identified that the manual hand switch for the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System I Suppression Pool Isolation Valve, at the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant failed to operate as expected (i.e., spring return to center). Additionally, it was identified that a new hand switch, which was procured as a replacement, also had the same failure.

Identification of the firm constructing the facility or supplying the basic component which fails to comply or contains a defect (under evaluation)

GE - HITACHI Nuclear Energy 3901 Castle Hayne Rd Wilmington, NC 28401 Description of the Deviation or Failure to Comply that is being Evaluated Hand switch for the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System I Suppression Pool Isolation Valve was replaced, but failed the post maintenance testing because the manual switch failed to operate as expected (i.e., spring return to center). A new manual switch was ordered, but upon inspection, it was determined to have the same failure.

Evaluation Status The manual switches are being returned to GE Hitachi (GEH) to determine if a defect exists. If the switches are determined to be defective, GEH will perform a 10 CFR Part 21 evaluation.

Date on which Evaluation will be Completed If GEH determines that the manual switches are defective, they will perform a 10 CFR Part 21 evaluation within 60 days of their determination.

1