ML13241A481
| ML13241A481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/07/2013 |
| From: | Peterson J Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 24843, 50-247-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-286-LR | |
| Download: ML13241A481 (10) | |
Text
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #:
Identified:
Admitted:
Withdrawn:
Rejected:
Stricken:
Other:
ENT000613-00-BD01 8/20/2013 8/20/2013 1------
ot.'" COMAf/,s,s/O i
I.
1-o
~
~
{,
~
"'.$JJ..1.S07J'r'~
ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI I REV. 1 Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 15 OF 15 General Visual Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.3 PIPE/TANK BASE MATERIAL VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 2 Note: Any inspection photographs or videos should be included with the inspection report.
LinelTank 10 & Name:
3-SI-161-3, 3-Sf-161-4 1 3-in Sf Line 161 Work Order: 279577-02 System: Safety: Injection Base Material:
Location: IP3 NW WHUT PIT Thickness:
Previously Coated? Yes [ 1 No [Xl Backfill Contains Rocks? Yes [ 1 No [Xl Backfill Contains Other Objects? Yes [ 1 (circle one, Internal/tank or External/pipe) 1. Any Cracking?
- 2.
Any Rust?
- 3.
Any Corrosion?
- 4.
Any Flaking or Scaling?
No [Xl 304 SS Inspection Date: 5/14/2013 0.216" Inspector: J. Peterson
==
Description:==
==
Description:==
Note Yes [l No [Xl __________ _
Yes [ 1 No[Xl __________ _
Yes [l No [Xl __________ _
Yes [l No [Xl __________ _
- 5.
Any Mechanical Damage?
Yes [l No [Xl ___________ _
- 6.
Any Nicks, Gouges, Pitting or Arc Strikes?
Yes [l No [Xl ___________ _
- 7.
Any Tubercles (if Internal Inspection)
NIA [Xl Yes [l No [ 1 ___________ _
- 8.
Any MIC (if Internal Inspection)
NIA [Xl Yes [l No [ 1 ___ _______ _
- 9.
Any Indication of Selective Leaching?
- 10. Other?
Any yes answer requires a CR to be initiated Yes [l No [Xl __________ _
Yes [l No [Xl __________ _
General Appearance: A portion of the 3-inch Safety: Injection line 161 (SIP return to the RWST) was excavated and visually: inspected. The total length of the Safety: Injection line inspected was at least 16 ft.
The exposed piping was in good condition. No damage noted.
Degradation Found? Yes [l No [Xl Further Evaluation Required? Yes [l No [Xl Comments: Some discoloration exists along with what seems to be a light coating of concrete potentially:
from original construction. Even though no anomalies were found on this pipe still recommend performing UT thickness readings in selected sections of the pipe to verify: that wall thickness is within the acceptance criteria. Photos and sketch attached. Ref: Drawings 9321 - 26313.
ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MUL TI I REV. 1 Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 15 OF 15 General Visual Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.3 PIPE/TANK BASE MATERIAL VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 Degradation Location:
Straight Pipe [ ]
Fitting [ ]
Weld [ ]
Position of leak (Le., 6 o'clock) -'-N=/A--'--____________________ _
CR Required? Yes []
No [X]
CR No. _________________ _
Date: 06/07/2013 Program Owner or Qualified Designee: Una Cossio-Gonzalez
" 'II I
'I' II
" l~
IP3Aerial View, A 15 ft (N*S) x 20 ft (E*WI x 8 ft (deep) excavation (grade is at apprax. EI. 54 ft) uncover too following lille5:
1, 6*irx:h WD Line 252 (RWST overtk>w to WHUTI 2,
3*irx:h SI Line 161 (SIP return to the RWST) 3, 12*ioch SI Line 161 (RWST to Cont. Spray Pumps) 4, IS*ioch SI Line 155 (RWSTto RHR Pumps) 5, IS*ioch outer pipe containing 6~nGh STM Lille 561 and 2*inch COND Line 678
Reference:
Drawing 9321-F-26323
~t.. tiL."'"
110-. ~'M"."
"-Inch WD LIne 252 {RWST WHUn