ML13183A322
| ML13183A322 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook |
| Issue date: | 07/02/2013 |
| From: | Jack Giessner Reactor Projects Region 3 Branch 4 |
| To: | Weber L Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML13183A322 (7) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 July 2, 2013 Mr. Larry Weber Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION (PI&R) INSPECTION AT D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT
Dear Mr. Weber:
This letter is to request information to support our biennial PI&R inspection beginning August 26, 2013, at your D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Baseline Inspection Procedure 71152.
Experience has shown that these inspections are extremely resource intensive both for the NRC inspectors and the utility staff. In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a list of documents required for the inspection.
The documents requested are copies of condition reports and lists of information necessary to ensure the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. The information should be provided in CD-ROM or other electronic means and should be ready for NRC review by August 12, 2013. Mr. Jay Lennartz, the Lead Inspector, will contact your staff to determine the best method of providing the requested information.
If there are any questions about the material requested, or the inspection in general, please do not hesitate to call or e-mail Mr. Lennartz at 630-829-9806 or Jay.Lennartz@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011.
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.
L. Weber In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
John B. Giessner, Chief Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-315; 50-316 License No. DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosure:
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServTM
1 Enclosure Requested Information for a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection NOTE: Unless otherwise specified, the timeframe for requested information is from May 21, 2011, until the data request is completed.
- 1. Copies of current procedures associated with the corrective action program (CAP). This should include procedures related to: 1) corrective action process; 2) operating experience program; 3) employee concerns program; 4) self-assessment program; 5) maintenance rule program; 6) operability determination process; 7) degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20); 8) system health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs; 9) operational decision making (ODMI) process.
- 2. A listing of the top 10 risk-significant systems, components, and operator manual actions.
- 3. Scheduled date/time/location of all CAP implementation meetings such as action request (AR) screening meetings, corrective action review board meetings, etc.
- 4. List of current control room deficiencies and operator workarounds, sorted by priority, with a brief description and corresponding AR and/or work order number.
- 5. A data table (or similar format) showing the total number of ARs generated in 2011 and 2012 sorted by department (i.e. operations, engineering, security, etc.).
- 6. Copy of the latest corrective action program statistics such as the number of ARs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, backlog, corrective action timeliness and others as may be available.
- 7. A list of currently installed temporary modifications. Include reference to associated AR and/or work order documents.
- 8. A list of current Maintenance Rule a(1) systems. The list should contain a reference to the associated AR; level of evaluation (root cause, apparent cause etc.); and status of corrective actions.
- 10. A chronological list of Licensee Event Reports and status.
- 12. A list of all other QA audits completed in 2012 and 2013 with a brief description of areas where findings requiring corrective actions were identified.
- 13. A chronological list of department/site self-assessments completed in 2012 and 2013.
Include reference to associated AR, brief description where findings were identified, and date completed.
2 Enclosure
- 14. A copy of assessments or evaluations (internal or external) regarding site/department safety-culture.
- 15. A list of degraded / non-conforming conditions. Include associated AR number, brief description, system affected, the date initiated, and date closed or projected closeout date.
- 16. Separate lists of all open and closed ARs sorted by priority, with the following information:
number; priority; title; and date initiated. The ARs should be grouped by the initiating department (operations, maintenance, engineering, radiation protection, emergency preparedness, and security).
- 17. A list of outstanding corrective actions, sorted by priority, with a brief description, initiating date and due date. The list should be grouped by the responsible department.
- 18. A list of completed root, apparent, and common cause evaluations sorted by type of evaluation. Include AR number, a brief description of the issue and the status of corrective actions.
- 19. A list of effectiveness reviews with a brief description of areas where findings were identified.
- 20. A list of ARs generated as a result of identified trends. The list should be sorted by priority and have the following information: number, title, date initiated, status and initiating department.
- 21. A list of ARs for issues (findings, violations etc.) documented in NRC inspection reports.
Please provide the AR number, title, date initiated, and status.
- 22. A list of ARs associated with NRC identified issues. Include the AR number, title, date initiated and status.
- 23. A list of ARs associated with licensee identified violations that have been documented in NRC inspection reports. Include the AR number, title, date initiated and status.
- 24. List, including the status, of ARs generated to evaluate industry and NRC operating experience (OE), and NRC generic communications (information notices, generic letters, etc). Also include a copy of the most recent audit and/or effectiveness review regarding the operating experience program.
- 25. A list of ARs, sorted by date initiated, associated with mechanical maintenance rework issues since July 2008. Include AR number, title, type of evaluation (i.e. cause evaluation, apparent cause evaluation, etc.), and status.
- 26. A list of ARs, sorted by date initiated, associated with control of supplemental work force/contract worker issues since July 2008. Include AR number, title, type of evaluation, (i.e. cause evaluation, apparent cause evaluation, etc.), responsible department and status.
3 Enclosure Documents requested to be available as printed copies on-site during the inspection:
- a. A list of issues brought to the ECP/Ombudsman and the actions taken for resolution.
- b. The current organization chart and phone listing.
- c. Self-assessments and associated ARs generated as a result of preparing for this inspection.
Documents to be made available as needed:
- b. Technical Specifications
- c. The QA manual Other:
Please be prepared to provide an overview of your CAP to the inspectors on the first or second day of the inspection. Also, because the inspectors will require computer access to the CAP database while on site, please include a computer demonstration of how to access the CAP documents.
L. Weber In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
John B. Giessner, Chief Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-315; 50-316 License No. DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosure:
Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServTM DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\DRPIII\\COOK\\DC Cook PIR info request 2013.docx Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII NAME JLennartz:kh JGiessner DATE 07/02/13 0702/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Letter to L. Weber from J. Giessner dated July 2, 2013.
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION (PI&R) INSPECTION AT D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT DISTRIBUTION:
Vivian Campbell RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource RidsNrrPMDCCook Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Steven Orth Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak ROPassessment.Resource@nrc.gov