ML13177A177

Comment (129) of Richard W. Weiskopf Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point, Unit 3

ML13177A177
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	06/03/2013
From:	Weiskopf R W - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00129, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13177A177 (1)

Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES A' 1D DIRECTIVES BRANCH PUBLIC SUBMISSION f25 AM 9:36 Docket: NRC-2013-0063 REOFIVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No.Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0119 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 As of: June 25, 2013 Received:

June 03, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85pc-48hs Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Submission Type: Web 3; Extension of Public Comment Submitter Information Name: Richard W. Weiskopf 7< F-- 9 0 2/Address: 5031 Onondaga Road ",%Syracuse, New York, 13215 General Comment Public safety should come first! Not the preference of the nuclear industry.

Entergy should be required to comply totally with the fire regulations set forth by the NRC. It is disgraceful that Entergy is allowed to be below standard in this respect. This risk of fire has been know for a very long time. No more extensions!

Nuclear energy is dangerous and not clean energy or sustainable.

There is no solution to the radioactive waste problem. Nuclear plants should be phased out and we need to change to alternative energy such as wind, solar, geothermal.

ýs~a U Ni 2)w e 6&' 14 ,E-9/DJ ` 11-0,7L-63 hts/w fms vc Dtde4 .0C/2p 0 https ://www.fdms .gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=090000648 1308 8e4&for...

06f25/2013