ML13177A174

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (126) of Tricia Bhatia Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point, Unit 3
ML13177A174
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/2013
From: Bhatia T
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00126, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13177A174 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES ERAN H As of: June 25, 2013 Received:

June 03, 2013 Status: PendingPost PUBLIC SUBM ISSION JU, 25 AM 9: 35 Tracking No. ljx-85p9-159e Comments Due: June 03, 20 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 NEro i \t p)Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding ofaPp Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-01 16 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 13 Submitter Information

/1/1c)6 /3 Name: tricia bhatia Address: 156 South 1st Street apt 14 brooklyn, ny, 11211 General Comment The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.LUJJ' (2 4viw~&Y Irte'k ttY(O-4e -7' ftrn,-,013 Ad IcI ýD.PckdfebftQu 6 v0 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064813087cO&for...

06/25/2013