ML13177A169

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (119) of Richard Vultaggio Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point, Unit 3
ML13177A169
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/2013
From: Vultaggio R
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00119, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13177A169 (1)


Text

RULES AND DIRECTIVES 3PANCH U .SMNRC Page 1 of 1 2013 JUN 25 AM 9:31 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: June 25, 2013 Received:

June 02, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85og-tvzf Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Q.mh T.. rn" .' Jae .R E (,' EVl %a D 00 %IYI l .7 F .%Docket: NRC-2013-0063 Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0108 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 Submitter Information Name: Richard Vultaggio Address: 220 Stage Rd Vestal, NY, General Comment The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago'SL{NS dr 2-wýTe,*&A z oflLTo/3 4`410do r- /'uL-O3 fld d-/ 1pr&ILy QeI https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481306c8d&for...

06/25/2013