ML13170A314
| ML13170A314 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/30/2013 |
| From: | Frey R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 78FR26662 00072, NRC-2013-0063 | |
| Download: ML13170A314 (1) | |
Text
RULES,
,C',
E Page
)-*
,IHECbTIVE As of: June 11, 2013 Received: May 30, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSION' t
PH 0:
56 Status: PendingPost PUBLC SU MISSOTýTracking No. ljx-85ma-kl op Comments Due: June 03, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 R k-4l\\/FfD Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period 1 of I 13 Document: NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0061 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 g~~ ~eý3Z Submitter Information Name: Robert Frey Address:
876 Palmer Avenue Mamaroneck, NY, 10543 General Comment The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.
The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation. At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.
The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.
There are 50 million people within 40 miles, it does not seem too much to ask the NRC to ba a bit more proactive.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648130037f&for...
06/11/2013