ML13170A286
| ML13170A286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/2013 |
| From: | Jennifer Ramos - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00108 | |
| Download: ML13170A286 (1) | |
Text
Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH PUBLIC SUBMISSION03 JuN, I I PN 4: 09 Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RECEIVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No.
Period Document: NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0097 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 As of. June 11, 2013 Received: May 31, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85n4-eyp4 Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Submission Type: Web 3; Extension of Public Comment Submitter Information 677/c9i9 /3 Name: Joann Ramos Address:
Iselin, NJ, 08830 7g5-/z~*~~ 6~ZL~6 e~Z, General Comment Safety should come first, and the NRC should serve the public, not Entergy. Instead of enforcing its own safety regulations, the NRC regularly grants exemptions from them, in order to avoid "burdening" the nuclear industry with excessive regulation.
The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation. At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.
The regulations were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl) https://www. fdms. gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=09000064813 04b65&for... 06/11/2013