ML13170A262

Comment (95) of Michele Johnson Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3; Extension of Public Comment Period

ML13170A262
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/30/2013
From:	Mary Johnson - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00095
Download: ML13170A262 (1)

Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH USNRC As of: June 11, 2013 Received:

May 30, 2013 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION juN Pm 4:o8 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85mf-k84r Comments Due: June 03, 20 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RECEIVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0084 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 13 Submitter Information Name: Mlchele Johnson Address: 2764 Hedwig Drive Yorktown Heights, NY, 10598 General Comment The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=0900006481301513

&for... 06/11/2013