ML13170A153
| ML13170A153 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/29/2013 |
| From: | Temple M - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00069 | |
| Download: ML13170A153 (1) | |
Text
Di RULES 4,0D DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of: June 11, 2013 Received: May 29, 2013 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION Z013 juj PM 3 4 1 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85m3-zcv0 Comments Due: June 03, 20 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RECFI\\VED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document: NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0058 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 1 of 1 13 Submitter Information Name: Michele Temple Address:
42-26 69th street Woodside, NY, 11377 7
General Comment The NRC's purpose is to protect and serve the public. Safety comes first.
Instead of serving the public, the NRC has granted dangerous exemptions to public safety to Entergy.
The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.
The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption,
-including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation. At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.
The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=0900006481300237&for... 06/11/2013