ML13165A047
| ML13165A047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/29/2013 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| 78FR26662 00049, NRC-2013-0063 | |
| Download: ML13165A047 (1) | |
Text
Paue 1 nf 1 RULES K i L)* O CTIVES As of: June 05, 2013 Received: May 29, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSIONN -5 19 Status: PendingPost PUBL C SU M ISTracking No. ljx-851z-c10f Comments Due: June 03, 20 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RFCFIV\\ED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period V*
A 13 Document: NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0039 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 7<fLy Submitter Information General Comment You get paid by me and other taxpayers. Any chance you could represent us?
If you want to sell us out and work for the nuclear companies, quit your job and I am sure they will give you one.
Deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.
Do a proper Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation. At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.
You should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812ffb92&for...
06/05/2013