ML13165A045

Comment (47) of Edward Butler Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point Unit 3

ML13165A045
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/29/2013
From:	Butler E - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00047, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13165A045 (1)

Text

Paye 1 of I RULEB ý, iiA' DL ,TIVES As of: June 05, 2013 Received:

May 29, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSION

-5 PH 1 19 Status: PendingPost PUBL C S B MIS IO NTracking No. 1jx-851z-5utq Comments Due: June 03, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RFOFI\!ED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0037 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 13ý 7)ýý)-Submitter Information 26<Name: Edward Butler Address: New York, 10021 General Comment Comment on NRC-2013-0063:

NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment. NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900006481 2ffb65&for...

06/05/2013