ML13165A029

Comment (31) of Dorothy Nusbaum Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point Unit 3

ML13165A029
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	05/29/2013
From:	Nusbaum D - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00031
Download: ML13165A029 (1)

Text

n --RULES AND DIRECTIVES rage BRANCH As of: June 05, 2013 Received:

May 29, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISS1-PM

4. 18 Status: PendingPost PUBLI SUBM S46 racking No. ljx-851x-mogk Comments Due: June 03, 20 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 R F I\ED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0021 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 1 of 1 13 Submitter Information 52'7/ ~7~/~ ~ ~Name: Dorothy Nusbaum Address: 1619 East 36 Street Brooklyn, New York, 11234 I General Comment The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?object~d=09000064812ff9ad&for...

06/05/2013