ML13163A455
| ML13163A455 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/29/2013 |
| From: | Mangini R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00018 | |
| Download: ML13163A455 (1) | |
Text
T)a 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES ur" BRANCH As of: May 31, 2013 Received: May 29, 2013 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 2013 MAY 31 PH 4: 25 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-851w-b~xt Comments Due: June 03, 201 Submission Type: Web I~o e,=RECEFIVED Docket: NRC-20 13-0063 RE EIE Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document: NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0008 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 13 J-/ / 7 " /--3 Submitter Information Name: Richard Mangini Address:
163 Chatfield Road Bronxville, NY, 10708
- e1-z /-, 2j Gene'al Comment I live within the "Peak Injury Zone" of Indian Point. It is not a good feeling. I was 11 years old when I visited Indian Point on a class trip soon after it opened. That was 51 years ago. That the government continues to allow nuclear reactors to operate in such a densely populated region is ridiculous especially given the plant's poor maintenance record. Nuclear power in general is not safe, cheap or environmentally sound; Indian Point is a serious accident waiting to happen. My question is will the NRC or Entergy reimburse me for the market value of my property when something does happen?
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812ff3f6&for...
05/31/2013