ML13163A437

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (9) of Judy Allen Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point Unit 3
ML13163A437
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/2013
From: Allen J
- No Known Affiliation
To: Bladey C K
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00009, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13163A437 (2)


Text

RULES !-, ") DtIlECTIVES Judy Allen 24 Seifert Lane Putnam Valley, NY 10579 2013 JN -3 P14 3: I 0 845 528-6643 June 3, 2013 RF ....ED Fax to RADB at 1.301.492.3446 Attention:

Cindy Bladey j_'7i, /-Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB)Office of Administration TWB-05-BOI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms. Bladey:

With regard to the fire safety exemption the NRC granted to Entergy and the Indian Point Energy Center in 2007, 1 believe the NRC violates the Appendix R Defense in Depth by considering this fire safety exemption.

Also the NRC produced an unlawful Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) analysis.

The exemption isn't legal or authorized by law. The NRC did not do an Environmental Impact Statement.

THE NRC NEEDS TO DO A FULL Environmental Impact Study.Since the NRC continually assures us at public meetings that the health and safety of US citizens is its main concern, it would be derelict in its stated duty if it grants the fire safety exemption.

Further, the NRC must comply with NEPA requirements regarding foreseeable terrorist acts, as I understand that Indian Point may be the nation's #I terrorist target. The US was totally taken by surprise on 9/11 and none of us wants New York City to be an exclusion zone for the next 10,000 years.Recently Common Cause released a report detailing how many millions of dollars Entergy spends on lobbying politicians, contributing to their campaigns, and creating fake "grassroots" groups to campaign for relicensing.

This is in addition to the money they're spending on the protracted court case to avoid fixing the cables. What disturbs me most is that Entergy could have spent the same money on replacing the defective insulation.

It is totally irresponsible

-and bad business practice -to endanger 20 million people instead of FIXING THE PROBLEM!It is the NRC's responsibility to make sure the public is not endangered.

The exemption endangers the public health, safety, defense and security.

Do the right thing: increase safety, don't reduce it.Do NOT grant the fire safety exemption.

Thank you.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add=

Gallagher, Carol From: Sent: To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Judy Allen <judya814@comcast.net>

Monday, June 03, 2013 2:55 PM Gallagher, Carol Indian Point letter NRC letter 6-13.pdf Dear Ms. Gallagher

-Thanks for your help in getting this over to Cindy Bladey today.Appreciate it!Judy Allen 24 Seifert Lane Putnam Valley, NY 10579 845 528-6643 H 914 382-1193 C I