ML13157A298
| ML13157A298 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2013 |
| From: | Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Limpias O Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) |
| References | |
| TI-186 IR-13-405 | |
| Download: ML13157A298 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000298/2013405
Text
June 5, 2013
Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear
and Chief Nuclear Officer
Nebraska Public Power District
Cooper Nuclear Station
72676 648A Avenue
Brownville, NE 68321
SUBJECT:
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF TI-186 INSPECTION
(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013405) AND REQUEST FOR
INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Limpias:
From June 25 to June 27, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC)
Region IV office will be onsite to perform the Temporary Instruction (TI)-186, Inspection of
Procedures and Processes for Responding to Potential Aircraft Threats. In order to minimize
the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a
request for documents needed for this inspection. It is important that all of these documents are
up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested
during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection. Also, in order to
demonstrate compliance with TI-186, we ask that you have the necessary staff members
available to the inspection team to assist in any plant walk-throughs, interviews and/or simulator
demonstrations.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. LuAnn Bray of your licensing
organization. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please
contact the lead inspector, Gabriel Apger (Gabriel.Apger@nrc.gov).
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control
number.
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RE G IO N I V
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511
O. Limpias
- 2 -
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document
system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Vincent G. Gaddy, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-298
License: DPR-46
Enclosure:
Inservice Inspection Document Request
cc: Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station
ADAMS: No Yes
SUNSI Review Complete
Reviewer Initials: GWA
Publicly Available
Non-Sensitive
Category A.
Non-publicly Available
Sensitive
KEYWORD: SUNSI Review Complete
OE:OB
C:OB
GApger
VGaddy
/RA/
/RA/
6/4/2013
6/5/2013
- 1 -
Enclosure
TI-186 INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
TO:
LuAnn Bray
Regulatory Affairs, Cooper Nuclear Station
402-825-5587
FROM:
Gabriel Apger
Operations Engineer, NRC RIV
360-403-8178
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT JUNE 25 - 27, 2013, TI-186
INSPECTION, INSPECTION OF PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES FOR
RESPONDING TO POTENTIAL AIRCRAFT THREATS
A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation
activities. Requested materials should be sent either electronically or hardcopy in
order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 17, 2013.
Electronically: Via email (Gabriel.apger@nrc.gov)
and/or
Hardcopy to: Gabriel Apger
18610 Jordan Road
Arlington, WA 98223
Document Request:
Procedure(s) that describe actions taken to address potential aircraft threat
notifications onsite. This may include procedures that operations, security,
emergency preparedness, and health physics staff use.
Plant specific analyses prepared to support the designed actions you have taken to
address this issue in your procedures. Such analyses were described for support of
site actions in the topical Regulatory Guide 1.214 (dated January 2009).
Training materials used to train the various affected groups when contacted with a
potential aircraft threat (licensed operators, operators in training for a license, non-
licensed operators, security, EP, HP, fire brigade, and other support staff, as
examples).
If the site has conducted exercises or drills to evaluate the ability of staff to
implement these procedures in the past, provide any documentation summarizing
the results of these events. If any condition reports came out of the exercises/drills,
provide those as well.