Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARGNRO-2013/00032, Entergy’S Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2013-04-26026 April 2013 Entergy’S Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Response to RAI L-PI-13-038, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2013-04-29029 April 2013 Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Response to RAI L-2013-265, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident - 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Sites2013-09-0909 September 2013 Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident - 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Sites Project stage: Response to RAI LR-N13-0206, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident.2013-09-10010 September 2013 Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident. Project stage: Response to RAI L-PI-13-088, NSPMs Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident- 1.5 Year Response for CEUS2013-09-12012 September 2013 NSPMs Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident- 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Si Project stage: Response to RAI GNRO-2013/00068, Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Site2013-09-12012 September 2013 Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident 1.5 Year Response for CEUS Site Project stage: Response to RAI GNRO-2014/00025, Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 50 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal2014-03-12012 March 2014 Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 50 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal RBG-47453, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2014-03-26026 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Request L-PI-14-028, PINGP Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2014-03-27027 March 2014 PINGP Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Response to RAI CP-201400324, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(0 Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2014-03-27027 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(0 Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Request HNP-14-035, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC 10 CFR 50.54(f) Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.32014-03-27027 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC 10 CFR 50.54(f) Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 Project stage: Request L-2014-085, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2014-03-27027 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Project stage: Response to RAI LR-N14-0035, PSEG Nuclear LLCs Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites) Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima.2014-03-28028 March 2014 PSEG Nuclear LLCs Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites) Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima. Project stage: Response to RAI L-2014-089, Florida Power & Light (FPL) Seismic Hazard & Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Acc2014-03-31031 March 2014 Florida Power & Light (FPL) Seismic Hazard & Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accid Project stage: Request RS-14-072, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights Project stage: Response to RAI GNRO-2014/00027, Entergy Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi2014-03-31031 March 2014 Entergy Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Project stage: Response to RAI RS-14-069, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near- Project stage: Response to RAI ML14092A4142014-03-31031 March 2014 Response to March 12, 2012 Information Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (CEUS Sites) for Recommendation 2.1 Project stage: Request L-MT-14-035, Interim Evaluation in Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the2014-04-0303 April 2014 Interim Evaluation in Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Project stage: Response to RAI ML14111A1472014-05-0909 May 2014 Seismic Screening and Prioritization Results Regarding Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Seismic Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights Project stage: Approval ML14168A0722014-06-18018 June 2014 Acceptance of Requested Action Regarding Relief Request RR-10, to ASME Section XI Code Requirement Subparagraph IWA-2441 (B) Project stage: Acceptance Review ML15029A4992015-01-12012 January 2015 Notice of Withdrawal of Relief Request (RR)-10 for Expanded Applicability for Use of ASME Code Case N-532-4 Project stage: Withdrawal 2014-03-26
[Table View] |
Text
Xcel Energy@
APR 29 2013 u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306 Renewed License Nos. DPR-42 and DPR-60 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch, MN 55089 L-PI-13-038 10 CFR 50.54(f)
PINGP's Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)
Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident
References:
- 1.
NRC Letter, "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," dated March 12,2012, ADAMS Accession No. ML12056A046.
- 2.
Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 38, Tuesday, February 26,2013, pp. 13097-13099.
- 3.
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) letter to NRC, "Proposed Path Forward for NTTF Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Reevaluations," dated April 9, 2013, ADAMS Accession No. ML13101A379.
- 4.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report Number 1025287, "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID) for the Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic," dated November 2012, ADAMS Accession No. ML12333A170.
- 5.
NSPM Letter to NRC, "PINGP 90-Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," dated June 11,2012.
On March 12,2012, the NRC Staff issued Reference 1 to all NRC power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 1 of Reference 1 contains specific Requested Actions, Requested Information, and
Document Control Desk Page 2 Required Responses associated with Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1, Seismic Evaluations. Enclosure 1 of Reference 1 states that within 60 days of the date of the NRC's issuance of guidance on screening and prioritization criteria, and the implementation details of the risk assessment, each licensee is requested to submit: (1) its intention to follow the NRC-developed guidance, or (2) an alternative approach, including acceptance criteria. On February 26, 2013 an NRC Staff letter was published in the Federal Register (Reference 2) endorsing EPRI-1025287, "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID) for the Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic," dated November 2012 (Reference 4), with clarifications described in the Reference 2 Notice.
In accordance with Reference 2, this letter provides the required 60-day response to NTTF Recommendation 2.1, Seismic Evaluations, for the Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Xcel Energy (NSPM), on behalf of the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP). NSPM intends to follow the NRC endorsed Reference 4 guidance as the approach for developing the NTTF Recommendation 2.1 seismic risk evaluation and the augmented approach guidance described in Reference 3, if the reevaluated seismic hazard is not bounded by the current design basis.
Additionally, in Reference 5, NSPM indicated that once the developed guidance was issued, it would assess whether it can meet the submittal deadlines for the seismic risk evaluation and take appropriate regulatory action. As provided in Reference 5, NSPM is submitting this letter to address the submittal deadlines for the seismic risk evaluation.
NSPM will complete the following actions per the schedule provided in Attachment 2 of Reference 3.
- 1) Submit the information identified in Items 3.a and 3.b for base case velocity profile and the description of subsurface materials and properties in Section 4 of Reference 4.
- 2) Submit the remaining information described in Section 4 of Reference 4.
If there are any questions or if additional information is needed, please contact Ms.
Jennie Eckholt, Licensing Engineer, at 612-330-5788.
Document Control Desk Page 3 Summary of Commitments This letter proposes the following new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.
Regulatory Commitments Due Date 1
NSPM will submit the information identified in Items 3.a and September 12,2013 3.b for base case velocity profile and the description of subsurface materials and properties in Section 4 of EPRI Report 1025287.
2 NSPM will submit the remaining information described in March 31,2014 Section 4 of EPRI Report 1025287.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on y P 03 James. Lynch Site Vice President, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company - Minnesota cc:
Administrator, Region "I, USNRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), USNRC NRR Project Manager, PINGP, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, PINGP, USNRC