ML13070A041
| ML13070A041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05523694 |
| Issue date: | 07/18/2012 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 55-23694-SP | |
| Download: ML13070A041 (2) | |
Text
From:
Muller, David Sent:
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:39 AM To:
Jackson, Donald Cc:
McHale, John
Subject:
RE: Heard You On The Phone.....How Goes It??
My review hasnt started yet, although I have reviewed my notes on the flip chart pages. Still catching up on a few things, plus 2 weeks in Chattanooga for training. But we took good notes so I expect things to go fairly well. My plan is to:
- 1. Review our review of the errors the applicant contested and see which rating factors (RFs) the errors should be assigned to. This is what we did in Atlanta, and I dont plan on deviating much at all with how we came out (I think I have maybe one or two question marks).
- 2. Review the errors the applicant did not contest but that were documented by Region II in the original individual examination (grade) report. Hopefully, nothing will change here (and I am a bit hesitant to change things the applicant did NOT contest), and the errors and the RFs assigned by Region II were appropriate.
- 3. Once all the errors have been assigned to RFs, determine if the affected RF score is a 2 or a
- 1. Three errors in a RF is a score of 1; two errors in a RF score will likely result in a score of 2 because I am thinking that the applicant likely did something correct in that RF elsewhere during the simulator exam. I will figure this out by looking at the overall scenario content (D-1s and D-2s) for all the scenarios the applicant did and which crew positions the applicant was in, plus whatever else I can glean from my notes from Atlanta and any info provided by Region II.
- 4. Compute the final scores in each competency based on the RF scores and determine an overall pass/fail. At this point I will let you know how things came out. I will also talk to my management to see what I (we) should do about all the errors that Region II did not choose to document in the original individual examination report, i.e., the x marks on that table.
- 5. If we are to consider the the x marks on that table we will likely need to discuss these like we did in Atlanta after we become familiar with what the x marks are; i.e., is it really an error and what RF(s) it should be assigned to.
- 6. Write it up!
Sounds easy, right?
Dave From: Jackson, Donald Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:32 PM To: Muller, David
Subject:
Heard You On The Phone.....How Goes It??
I am in office this week, and Mon/Tues next week. Then I am on A/L 7/25-31. Please let me know how your review is going on Vogtle OP exam. I reviewed the new material, and see little change with where we ended up, but you are key as you have the official tally.
VR DON J