|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML14002A2622013-12-17017 December 2013 Comment (1) of Rhonda Smith on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Review of the Supplement 48 Final Report to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement on License Renewal of South Texas, Units 1 and 2 ML13072A0722013-02-21021 February 2013 Comment (10) of Mary Sixwomen Blount on Behalf of Apalachicola Band of Creek Indians on Draft SEIS, Preliminary Conclusions ML13071A0592013-02-20020 February 2013 Comment (9) of Debra A. Griffin on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Nuclear License Renewal ML13044A4962013-02-0707 February 2013 Comment (7) of Kenneth Taplett on Behalf of STP Nuclear Operating Company on South Texas Project, Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 48 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal ML13025A3592013-01-21021 January 2013 Comment (5) of Elizabeth Tobin on STP Nuclear Operating Company, South Texas Project; Notice of Availability of Draft Supplement 48 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants ML13025A3572013-01-20020 January 2013 Comment (3) of John Elder on Behalf on Himself on Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Facility Operating License for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML13017A4052013-01-11011 January 2013 Comment (2) of Sonia Santana on South Texas Project Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal ML13030A4452013-01-10010 January 2013 Comment (6) of Javier Loera, on Behalf of Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo, on the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission'S (NRC) Environmental Review of the Effects of Renewing the Operating License for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 (STP) ML12356A2332012-12-20020 December 2012 Comment (1) of Marvin Lewis Suggesting That License Proceeding for South Texas Project Be Stopped Until Waste Confidence Rulemaking Finds in Favor of Concept of Waste Confidence ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012 Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3952012-11-22022 November 2012 Comment (99) of Steve Shuput on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12334A3872012-11-21021 November 2012 Comment (91) of Kenneth Clark on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML11119A0172011-04-26026 April 2011 Comment (57) of Judy Moore on Behalf of Herself Opposing Re-Licensing of South Texas Project Nuclear Reactors ML11119A0102011-04-26026 April 2011 Comment (50) of John Trimble Opposing Re-licensing of South Texas Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2, NRC-2010-0375 ML11119A0162011-04-26026 April 2011 Comment (56) of Unknown Individual Opposing South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application ML11119A0092011-04-20020 April 2011 Comment (61) of Amy Turner on Behalf of Texas Parks and Wildlife, on Proposed License Renewal of the South Texas Project Units I & 2, Matagorda County, Texas ML1110105202011-04-11011 April 2011 Comment (42) of Thomas Nelms Opposing the Re-licensing of the South Texas Project, Unit 1 and 2 ML1110105192011-04-11011 April 2011 Comment (41) of Shannon Jurak Opposing the Re-licensing of the South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML1110105212011-04-0909 April 2011 Comment (43) of Thomas Nehms Opposing the Re-licensing of the South Texas Project Units 1 and 2 ML1110104762011-04-0808 April 2011 Comment (28) of Jenna Findley, Opposing South Texas Project Units 1 & 2, Relicensing, NRC-2010-0375 ML1110104782011-04-0808 April 2011 Comment (30) of Scott & Cyndy Reynolds Opposing Re-Licensing of South Texas Project Nuclear Reactors ML1110104772011-04-0808 April 2011 Comment (29) of Margaret Reed Opposing the Relicensing of the South Texas Project Unit 1 and 2 ML1109600912011-04-0404 April 2011 Comment (18) of Tarek Tonsson Opposing the Re-licensing of South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML1109600902011-04-0404 April 2011 Comment (17) of C.J. Keudell Opposing the Re-licensing of South Texas Projects, Unit 1 & 2 ML1109600992011-04-0404 April 2011 Comment (26) of Eric Lane on Behalf of Self, Opposing South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2, Extending Its License Application Renewal ML11105A0202011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (45) of Maria Hogan on Safety Standards of South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 Be Followed ML1109805032011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (27) of Juan Garza, on Behalf of Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas, on the South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal Application Review ML1109600972011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (24) of Brandi Clark Burton on Behalf of Self Opposing South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2, Extending Its License Application Renewal for Public Safety and Environmental Reasons ML1109600832011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (11) of Kassandra Levay Opposing STP Nuclear Operating Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct the Scoping Process for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML1109600862011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (13) of T. Burns Opposing South Texas Plants, NRC-2010-0375 ML1109600872011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (14) of Jolly J. Clark Opposing the Re-licensing of South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML1109600882011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (15) of Pat Bulla on the Decommissioning of South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Not Re-licensing It ML1109600892011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (16) of William Stout Supporting the Decommissioning of South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 Not Re-licensing It ML1109600922011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (19) of Carol Geiger Opposing the Renewal of South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 Licensing ML1109600932011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (20) of Veryan Thompson Supporting South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 Decommissioning and Denied Its License Application Renewal ML1109600942011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (21) of Robert Singleton Opposing License Extension for South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 ML1109600952011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (22) of Karen Hadden on Behalf of Sustainable Energy & Economic Development Coalition, Opposing Re-licensing of South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 ML1109600962011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (23) of Alan Alan Apurim Opposing Re-licensing of South Texas Projects, Units 1 & 2 ML1109600982011-04-0101 April 2011 Comment (25) of Carol Geiger on Behalf of Self, Opposing South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2, Extending Its License Application Renewal ML1109600772011-03-31031 March 2011 Comment (5) of Peggy Pryor Opposing South Texas Power Plants ML1109600802011-03-31031 March 2011 Comment (8) of Kamala Platt, Opposing South Texas Project Relicensing ML1109600812011-03-31031 March 2011 Comment (9) of Marion Mlotok Opposing the Renewal of South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 ML1109600822011-03-31031 March 2011 Comment (10) of Karen Seal Opposing the Licensing of the South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML1110105172011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (39) of B. Dunlap & T. Rinehart, Opposing Re-Licensing of South Texas Project Units 1 & 2 ML11119A0202011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (60) of Unknown Individual on Behalf of Self Opposing Relicensing of South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 for Another Additional Twenty Years ML1109600782011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (6) of Eva Esparza Opposing STP Nuclear Operating Company; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct the Scoping Process for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 ML1109600792011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (7) of Darby Riley Regarding Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct the Scoping Process for South Texas Project, Units 1 & 2 ML11119A0132011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (53) of Douglas S. Mcarthur Opposing Re-licensing of the South Texas Project ML1110104792011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (32) of Joy Malacara Opposing Re-Licensing of South Texas Project Units 1 & 2 ML1110105062011-03-30030 March 2011 Comment (33) of Melanie & David Winters, Opposing South Texas Project Units 1 & 2 Relicensing 2013-02-07
[Table view] |
Text
v Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Tribal Council - Javier Loera (War Captain/Trib al Historic and Preservation Officer) E-mail jloeraPi.vdsp-nsn.cov 117 South Old Pueblo Road
- El Paso, Texas 79917 * (915) 859-8ub3
- ue111(915) 497-3876 January 10, 2013
/6t4/ 9A2/ 7 ~'Z Melanie C. Wong, Chief Environmental Review and Guidance
_1U Update Branch
-0 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Regulation mZ 9;~
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
Dear Melanie C. Wong:
This letter is response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissionf's (NRC) environmental review of the effects of renewing the operating license for South Texas Project, Units 1 Ind 2 (STP), located in Matagorda County, Texas; The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo does not have any comments nor does it request consultation on this project due to its location being outside of our Pueblo's Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) area of interest and/or relevance.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment on this proposed undertaking.
Sincerely, Javier Loera War Captain/Tribal Historic and Preservation Officer Ysleta del Sur Pueblo of Texas E-maih jloera:ydsp-nsn.gov Cell phone: (915) 597-3876 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM -03 Add= 7- i (7Z4Y)
_pF REG,,* UNITED STATES
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 18, 2012 Mr. Frank Paiz, Governor Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 119 S. Old Pueblo Rd.
P.O. Box 17579 El Paso, TX 79917
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR LICENSE RENEWAL OF SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Dear Governor Paiz:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducting an environmental review of the effects of renewing the operating license for South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2 (STP). STP is located in Matagorda County-, Texas, and is operated by STP Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC). As part of its review, the NRC has completed a draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for license renewal of STP. . This letter is to inform you and members of your tribe that the draft SEIS for the license renewal of STP is available for public comment.
The NRC staff is distributing the draft SEIS to your tribe for comment, aslwell as to the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe, the Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma, the Comanche iNation of Oklahoma, the Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma, the Apalachicola Band of Creek Indians, the Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas, the Pamaque Clan of Coahuila Y Tejas, the Tap Pilam-COahuiltecan Nation. and the Kickapoo Traditional Council of Texas. The SEIS includes analyses of relevant environmental issues, including potential impacts to historic, archeological, and cultural properties from continued plant operation and refurbishment activities associated with license renewal.
As stated in our letter to your tribe dated February 17, 2011, the NRC is conducting Section 106 consultations in compliance with National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) through the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as outlined in 36 CFR 800.8(c).
In the context of NEPA, the NRC's preliminary determination is that any impact from continued power plant operations and maintenance activities during the license renewal term on historical and archaeological resources located in the area of potential effect would be small. Under the provisions of NHPA, the NRC also determined that historic properties would not be adversely affected by this undertaking (the renewal of the STP operating license). The justification for this conclusion is explained in Section 4.9.6 of the draft SEIS.
As discussed in Section 9.4 of the draft SEIS, the NRC's preliminary recommendation is that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for STP are not great enough to deny the option of license renewal for energy-planning decision-makers. This recommendation is based on (1) the analysis and findings in the GELS; (2) the environmental report' submitted by STPNOC; (3) consultation with Federal, State, Tribal and local agencies;}(4) the NRC's environmental review; and (5) consideration of public comments received during the scoping process.