ML13017A002
| ML13017A002 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/2012 |
| From: | Heacock D Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO) |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 12-208H | |
| Download: ML13017A002 (497) | |
Text
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 November 27, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. 12-208H Attention: Document Control Desk NL&OSA/DC RO Washington, DC 20555 Docket Nos. 50-280/281 License Nos. DPR-32/37 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS I AND 2 REPORT IN RESPONSE TO MARCH 12. 2012 INFORMATION REQUEST REGARDING SEISMIC ASPECTS OF RECOMMENDATION 2.3 On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued, "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(0 Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Seismic Recommendation 2.3 requires licensees to conduct seismic walkdowns at their plants to identify and address plant specific degraded, nonconforming, or unanalyzed conditions such that the nuclear power plant can respond to external events.
For Seismic Recommendation 2.3, Enclosure 3 of the letter states that within 180 days of the NRC's endorsement of the walkdown process, each licensee will submit its final response. The response should include a list of any areas that are unable to be inspected due to inaccessibility and a -schedule for when the walkdowns will be completed.
In a letter dated May 31, 2012, the NRC endorsed EPRI 1025286, "Seismic Walkdown Guidance: For Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3:
Seismic," which Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion) used to conduct its seismic walkdowns for Surry Power Station (Surry) Units 1 and 2. Attachment 1, on the attached compact disc, provides the walkdown report as Dominion's response to Seismic Recommendation 2.3 for Surry Units 1 and 2, and includes the results of seismic walkdowns completed as of November 10, 2012. Attachment 2 provides a list of items for which inspection, could not be completed due to inaccessibility and a schedule of when the walkdowns for these items will be completed. A supplemental submittal will be provided to the NRC with the results of the deferred seismic walkdowns for Surry Units 1 and 2 by August 31, 2014.
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Page 2 of 3 If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Gary D. Miller at (804) 273-2771.
Sincerely, President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company NCyI L. MULL Notary Public MyCommsonwet ofV My Commission 140542 Expires May 31. 2014 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ))
COUNTY OF HENRICO )
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by David A. Heacock, who is President and Chief Nuclear Officer of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He has affirmed before me that he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that company, and that the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief. 7W Acknowledged before me this -;_zday of ,eK 2012.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public Commitments made in this letter:
- 1. Seismic walkdowns that could not be completed due to inaccessibility will be completed as indicated in Attachment 2, Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 and a supplemental submittal will be provided for Surry Units 1 and 2 by August 31, 2014.
Attachments:
- 1. Surry Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 2. List of Inaccessible Items
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Page 3 of 3 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Regional Administrator Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 K. R. Cotton Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Dr. V. Sreenivas Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 08 G-9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 ATTACHMENT I (See attached compact disc)
SURRY SEISMIC WALKDOWN
SUMMARY
REPORT VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS I AND 2
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 ATTACHMENT 2 LIST OF INACCESSIBLE ITEMS VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS I AND 2
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Response to Seismic for Recommendation 2.3 Attachment 2, Page 1 of 4 Table 3-1: Unit I Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule 1-IA-PCV-101 PORV Backup Air Containment Fall outage 2013 1-RC-PCV- Pressurizer PORV Containment Fall outage 2013 1455C ________
1-DA-TV-100A Containment Sump Dsch Trip Valve Containment Fall outage 2013 1-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Fall outage 2013 151 B 1-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Fall outage 2013 151 E 1-SI-MOV-1865V Accumulator Outlet Containment Fall outage 2013 I1865A __AUntSrieBidnFaloag20 1-VS-AC-I MCR AC Unit Service Building Fall outage 2013 I-VS-AC-7 Relay Room AC Unit Service Building Fall outage 2013 1-EP-DB-1-IA EE/120V VITAL AC 1-IA ESGR Fall outage 2013 1-EP-DB-I-IA BUS (RED) 1-EP-DB- EE/120V SEMI-VITAL AC Control Room Fall outage 2013 1SVB1 BUS 1-FW-FT-1OOA AFW Flow Transmitter Containment Fall outage 2013 1-IA-PS-103B PORV Backup Air Pressure Containment Fall outage 2013 Switch 1-1A-PS-104B PORV Backup Air Bottle Containment Fall outage 2013 Pressure Switch 1-SI-TK-1C SI Accumulator Containment Fall outage 2013 1-CW-PNL-1B* Canal Level Relay Panel ESGR Fall outage 2013 1-EP-MCC- Emergency MCC Cable Vault Fall outage 2013 1H1-2N*
1-EP-MCC- MCC for Chiller 4A ESGR Fall outage 2013 1KI*
1-EP-MCC-IH- MCC for Chiller 4E MER 5 Fall outage 2013 1B*
1-EP-TRAN- 4160-480V Service ESOR Fall outage 2013 1J*, Transformer 1-EP-XFRM- 480-120V Semi-Vital Control Room. Fall outage 2013 1SVB1-2* Transformer I -HT-T-2B3* Heat Tracing Transformer Auxiliary Fall outage 2013 I-EPD-DCS- EE/1 25V VITAL DC SUB ESGR Fall outage 2013 1A-SUB* PNL 1A I
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Response to Seismic for Recommendation 2.3 Attachment 2, Page 2 of 4 Table 3-1: Unit I Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule 1-MS-BC-I*
_____Charger MSTV App R SOV Battery Control Room Fall outage 2013 1-MS-BC-2* MSTV App R SOV Battery ESGR Fall outage 2013 Charger 1-EE-BC-EG1* EDG 1 Battery Charger EDG 1 Room Fall outage 2013 1-SW-CAB-3C* Emergency SW Pump Relay Cabinet ESPH Fall outage 2013 1-CW-PNL-1A* Canal Level Relay Panel Cable Vault Fall outage 2013
- CONTROL ROOM 1-EP-CS-100* CHILLER TRAN SWITCH Service Building Fall outage 2013
- Walkdown inspection complete with the exception of access to electrical cabinet internally mounted items.
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Response to Seismic for Recommendation 2.3 Attachment 2, Page 3 of 4 Table 3-2: Unit 2 Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule S/G A Blowdown 2-BD-TV-200A Containment Isolation Containment Spring outage 2014 2-IA-PCV-201 PORV Backup Air Containment Spring outage 2014 2-RC-PCV- Pressurize PORV Containment Spring outage 2014 2455C 2-DA-TV-200A Containment Sump Dsch Containment Spring outage 2014 Trip Valve 2-VS-AC-6 ESGR Air Handler ESGR Spring outage 2014 2-VS-AC-7 ESGR Air Handler ESGR Spring outage 2014 2-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Spring outage 2014 251 B 2-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Spring outage 2014 251 E 2-SI-MOV- Accumulator Outlet. Containment Spring outage 2014 2865A EE/120V VITAL AC 2-4A 2-EP-DB-2-IA BUS (RED) ESGR Spring outage 2014 2-EP-DB- EE/120V SEMI-VITAL AC Control Room Spring outage 2014 2SVB1 BUS.
2-FW-FT-200A AFW Flow Transmitter Containment Spring outage 2014 2-IA-PS-203B PORV Backup Air Pressure Containment Spring outage 2014 Switch 2-IA-PS-204B PORV Backup Air Bottle Containment Spring outage 2014 Pressure Switch 2-SI-TK-IC SI Accumulator Containment Spring outage 2014 2-EP-MCC- 2H Emergency MCC EDG 2 Room Spring outage 2014 2H1-1A*
CONTROL ROOM 2-EP-CS-200* CHILLER 4B TRANSFER ESGR Spring outage 2014 SWITCH 2-EP-MCC- Emergency MCC Cable Vault Spring outage 2014 2H1-2N* _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2-EP-MCC- MCC for Chiller 4B ESGR Spring outage 2014 2K1*
2-EP-TRAN- 4160-480V Service ESGR Spring outage 2014 2J* Transformer 2-EP-XFRM- 480-120V Semi-Vital Bus Control Room Spring outage 2014 2SVB1-2* I I
Serial No. 12-208H Docket Nos. 50-280/281 Response to Seismic for Recommendation 2.3 Attachment 2, Page 4 of 4 Table 3-2: Unit 2 Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule 2-EP-UPS-2A-1* EE/UPS 2A1 ESGR Spring outage 2014 2-EPD-DCS- EE/ 25V VITAL DC SUB ESGR Spring outage 2014 2A-SUB* PNL 2A 2-EP-UPS-2B- EE/UPS 2B2 ESGR Spring outage 2014 2*
2-MS-BC-2* MSTV App R SOV Battery ESGR Spring outage 2014 Charger ESGRSprigotage201 2-EE-BC-EG2* EDG 2 Battery Charger EDG 2 Room Spring outage 2014 2-CW-PNL-1A* Canal Level Relay Panel ESGR Spring outage 2014 "k"
vvakdown inispectin co plete wln the exceptuio of -acess to electrica, cabineL imemally mounted items.
Dominion Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic November, 2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Executive Summary On March 12, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued requests for information pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) related to the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) recommendations. Enclosure 3 of the NRC's 50.54(f) letter requested utilities to provide information related to NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, as amended by the Staff Requirements Memoranda (SRMs) associated with SECY-11-0124 and SECY-11-0137. The nuclear power industry and the NRC cooperatively developed guidelines and procedures to perform the seismic walkdowns. The resulting EPRI Report No. 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic (EPRI 1025286) provides guidance and procedures for performing the seismic walkdowns.
Dominion followed the EPRI 1025286 guidance in developing the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL), performing the Surry Power Station (SPS) seismic walkdowns and developing the submittal report. Seismic walkdowns of accessible items have been completed. Some items included on the SWEL were not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection.
Walkdowns for these items are planned to be completed by the end of the next scheduled refueling outage (Fall 2013 for Unit 1 and Spring 2014 for Unit 2). A revised Summary Report will be issued following completion of the seismic walkdowns.
By completing and documenting the requested seismic walkdowns for SPS, Dominion has met the objectives of the NRC request for information related to NTTF Recommendation 2.3:
Seismic. Potentially adverse conditions identified during the completed seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys were submitted as Condition Reports (CRs) in the SPS corrective action program (CAP). To date, no significant issues have been identified that challenged the SPS seismic licensing or design basis as a result of the walkdowns.
ii
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Surry Power Station Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table of Contents SECTION PAGE Executive Sum m ary ...................................................................................................................... ii Background .................................................................................................................................. iv 1.0 Seism ic Licensing Basis Sum m ary ................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 Personnel Q ualifications Sum m ary ................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Equipm ent Selection .................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Seism ic W alkdowns ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Licensing Basis Evaluations ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.4 IPEEE Review ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.5 Peer Review ................................................................................................................ 2-1 3.0 SSC Selection ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Results ......................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Inaccessible Item s ....................................................................................................... 3-5 4.0 Seism ic W alkdow ns and Area W alk-Bys ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 Licensing Basis Evaluation ............................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Sum m ary of Evaluations .............................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Plant Modifications ...................................................................................................... 5-1 6.0 IPEEE Vulnerabilities ...................................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 Peer Review Sum m ary ................................................................................................... 7-1 8.0 References ...................................................................................................................... 8-1 Appendix A - Personnel Qualifications (4 pages)
Appendix B - Seismic Walkdown Equipment Lists (SWEL) and Area Walk-By Lists (40 pages)
Appendix C - Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (153 pages)
Appendix D - Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (147 pages)
Appendix E - Unit 1 Area Walk-by Checklists (67 pages)
Appendix F - Unit 2 Area Walk-by Checklists (47 pages) iii
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
Background
Following the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant resulting from the March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and subsequent tsunami, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) in response to Commission direction. The NTTF was tasked with conducting a review of NRC regulations and processes and determining if the NRC should make additional improvements.
A set of recommendations made by the task force was included in a report provided to the Commission. Although the NRC concluded that continued plant operation did not pose an imminent risk to public health and safety, the Commission directed the NRC staff (in the Staff Requirements Memoranda (SRM) to SECY-1 1-0093) to determine those recommendations that should be implemented without unnecessary delay. In SECY-11-0124, the NRC staff identified the NTTF recommendations that should be implemented without delay, including the development of information requests to be made under 10 CFR 50.54(f).
The NRC issued the requests for information pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) on March 12, 2012 related to the following NTTF recommendations (Reference 1):
" Recommendation 2.1: Seismic
- Recommendation 2.1: Flooding
- Recommendation 2.3: Seismic
- Recommendation 2.3: Flooding
- Recommendation 9.3: Emergency Preparedness of the NRC's 50.54(f) letter addressed providing information related to NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, as amended by the SRMs associated with SECY-1 1-0124 and SECY-11-0137. Enclosure 3 requested that licensees:
- 1. Develop a methodology and acceptance criteria for seismic walkdowns to be endorsed by the NRC staff,
- 2. Perform seismic walkdowns using the NRC-endorsed walkdown methodology,
- 3. Identify and address degraded, nonconforming, or unanalyzed conditions through a corrective action program, and
- 4. Verify the adequacy of licensee monitoring and maintenance procedures.
The nuclear power industry and the NRC agreed to cooperate in the development of guidelines and procedures to perform the seismic walkdowns. The resulting EPRI Report No. 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic (EPRI 1025286) (Reference 2) provides guidance and procedures for performing the seismic walkdowns. The guidance addresses selection of personnel, selection of a sample of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that represent a diversity of component types and ensures inclusion of components from critical systems and functions as described in the NRC's 50.54(f) letter, conduct of the walkdowns, evaluations against the plant seismic licensing basis, and reporting requirements. EPRI 1025286 also includes checklists to be used by the seismic walkdown engineers for seismic evaluations.
iv
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report The guidance contained in EPRI 1025286 was developed to meet NRC's objectives, and in a letter dated May 31, 2012 (Reference 3), the NRC confirmed that the EPRI 1025286 guidance directs licensees to perform walkdowns in a manner that will address Requested Information Items 1.a through 1.g in the 50.54(f) letter. The NRC staff also confirmed that Section 8, "Submittal Report," of the EPRI 1025286 guidance outlines the appropriate information to be submitted in response to Requested Information Items 2.a through 2.f. of Enclosure 3 of the 50.54(f) letter.
Dominion used the EPRI 1025286 guidance in developing and performing the seismic walkdowns at Surry Power Station (SPS) in response to the NRC's 50.54(f) letter. In addition, Dominion followed the EPRI 1025286 Section 8 guidance for the development of this Report.
The Report includes seismic walkdown information for both Surry Units 1 and 2, consistent with previous submittals in response to NRC Generic Letters 88-20, Supplement 4 and 5, Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities and 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46. Seismic walkdown equipment lists and walkdown results are provided on a unit-specific basis within the Report.
v
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 1.0 Seismic Licensing Basis Summary The seismic licensing basis for SPS is documented in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) (Reference 4). Class I structures, systems and components are designed to resist seismic forces. This design is based on two separate seismic criteria: the operating basis earthquake (OBE) and the design basis earthquake (DBE). The design ground motion is based on the seismicity and geologic conditions at the site. Design ground response spectra used in the design of safety related SSCs are developed for the OBE and the DBE conditions. The earthquake producing the maximum vibratory ground acceleration at the site is designated the DBE. The DBE is often referred to as the Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE). The Design Basis Earthquake is the postulated earthquake that produces the maximum vibratory ground motion that the nuclear power generating station is designed to withstand without functional impairment of those features necessary to shut down the reactor, maintain the station in a safe condition, and prevent undue risk to the health and safety of the public.
For SPS, the earthquake producing a maximum horizontal ground acceleration of 0.15g has been designated as the DBE and a maximum horizontal ground acceleration of 0.07g has been designated the OBE.
For the OBE, Class I structures and equipment are designed to withstand a maximum horizontal ground acceleration of 7% of gravity. Vertical acceleration is taken as being two-thirds of horizontal, assumed acting simultaneously and in proper phase to be additive to loads or stresses from horizontal motions.
For the DBE, Class I structures and equipment are designed based on a maximum horizontal ground acceleration of 15% of gravity. The vertical motion is taken to be two-thirds of the horizontal motion, with the two acting simultaneously.
In 1991, the NRC issued Generic Letter (GL) 88-20, Supplement 4, which requested licensees to perform an Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for severe accident vulnerabilities in accordance with the guidelines provided in NUREG-1407. In 1997, Dominion submitted a summary report of the results of the IPEEE program (Reference 5). In addition, Dominion indicated that the IPEEE program would be integrated with the Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 program to reduce duplicative examination and review efforts. SPS adopted the methodology in the Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Evaluation of Nuclear Plant Equipment as an alternative means for seismic design and verification of existing, modified, new and replacement equipment. UFSAR Section 15A.3.2 discusses the earthquake experience-based method developed for USI A-46 for seismic verification of equipment.
Codes, standards, and methods related to the design of structures and components for SPS can be found in UFSAR Sections 1.4.2, 15.2 and Appendix 15A.
1-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 2.0 Personnel Qualifications Summary A summary of the requirements, as outlined in the EPRI 1025286 (Reference 2), for different seismic walkdown activities is provided as follows.
2.1 Equipment Selection Personnel responsible for equipment selection should have knowledge of plant operations, plant documentation, and associated SSCs. They should have the capability to select a broad distribution of SSCs for the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL). The Equipment Selection Personnel should also have knowledge of the IPEEE program.
Equipment Selection Personnel: Kurt Rowland, Matthew Winter, supported by licensed plant operations, and design and systems engineering personnel.
2.2 Seismic Walkdowns The seismic walkdown engineers (SWEs) should have a degree in mechanical or civil/structural engineering, or equivalent; and experience in seismic engineering as it applies to nuclear power plants. In addition, the SWEs must successfully complete one of the following two training courses: NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Training Course or SQUG Walkdown Training Course.
SWEs: Ellery Baker, Larry Cullivan, Jr., William Gallagher, Sr., David Germano, Kevin McGuire, Daniel J. Vasquez, Tim Wattleworth, Matthew Winter 2.3 Licensing Basis Evaluations All potentially adverse seismic conditions were documented and evaluated within the corrective action program (CAP); no licensing basis evaluations of potentially adverse seismic conditions were performed outside of the corrective action program defined by plant procedures 2.4 IPEEE Review Reviewers should have adequate engineering experience to review and understand the results of the IPEEE program.
IPEEE Reviewer: Kurt Rowland, Daniel J. Vasquez 2.5 Peer Review The peer review team should consist of a minimum of two individuals, one of whom has seismic engineering experience as it applies to nuclear power plants.
Peer Reviewers: Marc Hotchkiss (Team Lead), Leo Nadeau Appendix A provides the qualifications of the personnel involved in performing the seismic walkdown activities at SPS.
2-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 3.0 SSC Selection 3.1 Purpose This section describes the process used to develop the seismic walkdown equipment list (SWEL) and documents the resulting SWEL and Area Walk-by Lists, in response to NRC's 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012 (Reference 1). The SWEL was developed using the guidance provided in the EPRI 1025286 (Reference 2) and defines the scope of the seismic walkdowns.
3.2 Methodology EPRI 1025286, Section 3, Selection of SSCs, describes the process to be used to identify items to be included on a SWEL. In general, the SWEL is comprised of two groups of items. The first is a sample of components from the seismic safe shutdown equipment list (SSEL). The other is a sample of components associated with the spent fuel pool. These lists are designated as SWEL 1 and SWEL 2, respectively. SWEL 1 and SWEL 2 are combined to form the SWEL, which defines the overall scope of equipment used as input to the seismic walkdowns. A SWEL is generated for each unit. Additional information regarding the process used to develop the SWEL is provided below.
SWEL 1 Development The base equipment list used as a starting point for development of the SWEL 1 list for each unit was a combination of the SSEL developed to address NRC Generic Letter 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 and the SSEL developed to address NRC Generic Letter 88-20, Supplements 4 and 5, Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE)for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities.
The development of the SSEL included consideration of the following four safety functions:
- Reactor reactivity control
" Reactor coolant pressure control
- Reactor coolant inventory control
- Decay heat removal Consistent with the guidance in the EPRI 1025286, the SSEL was reviewed for items that support the following safety function:
- Containment function SWEL 1 was developed by applying the following five sample selection attributes, defined in the EPRI 1025286, to the SSEL. The required sample size for SWEL 1 was 90 to 120 items. The method of application for each attribute is summarized below:
- 1. A variety of types of systems. Sample items were selected to represent a broad range of frontline and support systems included on the SSEL.
3-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 2. Major new and replacement equipment. A review of the equipment on the SSEL was performed by experienced system engineers, design engineers, and plant operators to identify major new or replacement equipment installed within the last 15 years, consistent with EPRI 1025286 guidance. These items were identified for inclusion in the selection of the samples for SWEL 1.
- 3. A variety of types of equipment. At least one item from each of the classes of equipment listed in EPRI 1025286, Appendix B, Classes of Equipment was included on SWEL 1 to provide a sample selection of a variety of equipment types. Where no items were listed on the SSEL for a specific class of equipment, no items in that equipment class were selected for SWEL 1.
- 4. A variety of environments. Sample items were selected from different locations in the plant to include various environments (hot, cold, dry, wet) and inside and outside installations.
- 5. Equipment enhanced due to vulnerabilities identified during the IPEEE program. The USI A-46 and IPEEE program documentation was reviewed to determine equipment that had been modified or otherwise enhanced to reduce IPEEE vulnerabilities. These items were identified for inclusion in the selection of the sample for SWEL 1.
For each item on SWEL 1, the applicable supported safety function(s) were determined as a confirmation that the five safety functions are adequately represented. In addition, risk significant items on the SWEL 1 list were identified from a review of the Probability Risk Assessment (PRA) Risk Analysis notebooks. This information was reviewed by PRA subject matter experts as confirmation that risk insights are adequately considered in the development of SWEL 1.
SWEL 2 Development SWEL 2 was developed based on a review of systems associated with the spent fuel pool (SFP) that are Seismic Category I or components whose failure could result in a rapid drain-down of the water level in the SFP to less than ten feet above the fuel.
For Seismic Category I systems associated with the SFP, a sample of components was identified using selection criteria similar to that described for SWEL 1.
Any components whose failure could result in rapid drain-down of the SFP were identified and evaluated for addition to SWEL 2. Identified components that met the criteria for inclusion in the seismic walkdowns were added to SWEL 2. If no component failures were identified that could result in rapid drain-down of the SFP, no components were added to SWEL 2, and the basis for this conclusion was described.
SWEL The SWEL for each unit was developed by combining the items on SWEL 1 and SWEL 2.
The items on the SWEL were reviewed to determine the population of items with anchorage, and at least 50%.of those items were selected for a configuration verification of the installed anchorage during the associated seismic walkdown.
3-2
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report The SWEL serves as the input to the seismic walkdowns conducted in accordance with EPRI 1025286, Section 4, Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys. A walk-by area is defined as the room containing SWEL item(s), or in the case of a large open space, the area within a 35 foot radius around a SWEL item. Walk-by areas are defined to ensure that all items on the SWEL are included within a walk-by area.
3.3 Results The methodology described in Section 3.2 was applied to develop the SWEL and the Area Walk-by list. The results of the implementation of this methodology are provided below.
The SWEL was developed by personnel meeting the qualifications for equipment selection personnel described in Section 2.1. Qualifications of personnel involved in the development of the SWEL are identified in Appendix A.
SWEL 1 The base equipment list used as a starting point for development of the SWEL 1 list for each unit was the composite of the unit-specific SSELs developed to address NRC Generic Letter 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 and NRC Generic Letter 88-20, Supplements 4 and 5, Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. The USI A-46 SSEL was documented in Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to NRC dated November 26, 1997 (Reference 6). The IPEEE SSEL was documented in Virginia Electric and Power Company letter to NRC dated November 26, 1997 (Reference 5).
Thus, Base List 1, as defined by EPRI Report 1025286, is the composite USI A-46 and IPEEE SSELs.
The five sample selection attributes, described in Section 3.2, were applied to the SSEL. The results are summarized for each attribute below:
- 1. A variety of types of systems. Sample items were selected to represent a broad range of frontline and support systems included on the SSEL. The number of selected items associated with each of the represented systems is provided in Appendix B.
- 2. Maior new and replacement equipment. A review of the equipment on the SSEL was performed by experienced system engineers, design engineers, and plant operators to identify major new or replacement equipment installed within the last 15 years. The review was based on plant design change records, maintenance history, and reviewer experience. A sample of these items is included in SWEL 1. Seven of the 100 components on Unit 1 SWEL 1 were judged to fit the definition of major new or replacement equipment. Six of the 100 components on Unit 2 SWEL 1 were judged to fit the definition of major new or replacement equipment.
- 3. A variety of types of equipment. At least one item from each of the classes of equipment listed in EPRI 1025286, Appendix B, Classes of Equipment was included in SWEL 1 to provide a sample selection of a variety of equipment types. The number of items from 3-3
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report each of the equipment classes is identified in Appendix B. There were no items listed on the Unit 1 SSEL for equipment class 13 and no items listed on the Unit 2 SSEL equipment classes 9 and 13, and no items are listed on SWEL 1 for those equipment classes.
- 4. A variety of environments. Sample items were selected from different locations in the plant to include various environments (hot, cold, dry, wet). The installed location is identified for each of the SWEL 1 items, which provides an indication of the operating environment for the item. The number of selected items associated with each of the represented systems is provided in Appendix B.
- 5. Equipment enhanced due to vulnerabilities identified during the IPEEE program. The IPEEE program documentation was reviewed to determine equipment that had been modified or otherwise enhanced to reduce IPEEE vulnerabilities. A sample of these items are included on the Unit 1 SWEL 1 list, and on the Unit 2 SWEL 1 list.
The resulting sample size of the equipment for the SWEL 1 list was 100 items per unit. The unit-specific SWEL 1 lists are provided in Appendix B.
For each item on the SWEL 1 lists, the applicable supported safety function(s), listed below, were identified and indicated:
" Reactor reactivity control
" Reactor coolant pressure control
- Reactor coolant inventory control
- Containment function In addition, risk significant items on SWEL 1 were identified. This information was reviewed by PRA subject matter experts as confirmation that risk insights were adequately considered in the development of SWEL 1. As a result, 50 of the 100 items on Unit 1 SWEL 1 and 45 of the 100 items on Unit 2 SWEL 1 were identified as being risk significant.
SWEL 2 SWEL 2 was developed based on a review of systems associated with the spent fuel pool (SFP) that are Seismic Category I or components whose failure could result in a rapid drain-down of the water in the SFP to less than ten feet above the top of the fuel. The review was supported by a licensed operator and knowledgeable system engineers.
The following Seismic Category I system associated with the SFP was identified:
0 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Purification System This system was then reviewed using the walkdown item sample selection criteria similar to that used for SWEL 1, consistent with the guidance in the EPRI 1025286. Base List 2 and the items identified for inclusion in Unit 1 SWEL 2 are identified in Appendix B.
3-4
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Rapid Drain-down Systems interfacing with the SFP were reviewed to identify any components that could, upon failure, result in rapid drain-down of the SFP water level to below ten feet above the top of the fuel. As stated in UFSAR Sections 9.5.2 and 9.5.3.3, the lowest level of pipe penetration through the fuel pool structure is 20 feet above the top of stored fuel elements.
Therefore, there are no components that could, upon failure, result in rapid drain-down of the SFP water level to below ten feet above the top of the fuel and, as a result, no components have been added to SWEL 2 for this criterion.
SWEL The SWEL for each unit was developed by combining the items on SWEL 1 and SWEL 2, as applicable. The SWELs for Units 1 and 2 are provided in Appendix B. All items on the list are from SWEL 1 except those items indicated by footnote as originating from SWEL 2.
The items on the SWEL were reviewed to identify those that included anchorage (i.e., items that were not line-mounted equipment, such as valves). For Unit 1, 48 of the 70 items that included anchorage (68%) were selected for confirmation that the as-installed equipment anchorage is consistent with plant documentation of the anchorage design. For Unit 2, 40 of the 60 items that included anchorage (67%) were selected for confirmation that the as-installed equipment anchorage is consistent with plant documentation of the anchorage design. The anchorage items selected for confirmation are indicated by a footnote on each of the SWELs.
These lists are the input to the seismic walkdowns to be conducted in accordance with EPRI 1025286, Section 4, Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys.
Walk-by areas were identified to include all of the items on the SWEL and are listed in Appendix B.
3.4 Inaccessible Items In the process of selecting SSCs to be included on the SWEL, items that were accessible and have visible anchorage were selected wherever possible. However, there were 28 items included on the Unit 1 SWEL and 27 items on the Unit 2 SWEL that were not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection. These items are listed in Tables 3-1 and 3-2 below and are indicated by a footnote on the Unit 1 and Unit 2 SWELs (Appendix B). The walkdowns for these items are planned to be completed by the end of the next scheduled refueling outage (Fall 2013 for Unit 1 and Spring 2014 for Unit 2).
3-5
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 3-1: Unit 1 Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection IDNumber Description Location Completion Schedule 1-IA-PCV-101 PORV Backup Air Containment Fall 2013 RFO 1-RC-PCV-1455CPressurizer PQRV Containment Fall 2013 RFO 1455C 1-DA-TV-100A Containment Sump Dsch Trip Containment Fall 2013 RFO Valve 1-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Fall 2013 RFO 151B 1-FW-MOV-151E AFW Header Containment Fall 2013 RFO 151 E 1-SI-MOV- Accumulator Outlet Containment Fall 2013 RFO 1865A 1-VS-AC-1 MCR AC Unit Service Building Fall 2013 RFO 1-VS-AC-7 Relay Room AC Unit Service Building Fall 2013 RFO EE/120V VITAL AC 1-IA BUS ESGR Fall 2013 RFO 1-EP-DB-1-IA (RED)
(RD 1-EP-DB-1SVB1 EE/120V SEMI-VITAL AC BUS Control Room Fall 2013 RFO 1-FW-FT-100A AFW Flow Transmitter Containment Fall 2013 RFO PORV Backup Air Pressure Containment Fall 2013 RFO 1-1A-PS-103B Switch Sic 1-IA-PS-104B PORV Backup Air Bottle Containment Fall 2013 RFO Pressure Switch 1-SI-TK-1C SI Accumulator Containment Fall 2013 RFO 1-CW-PNL-1B* Canal Level Relay Panel ESGR Fall 2013 RFO 1-EP-MCC-1Hi- Cable Vault Fall 2013 RFO 2N* Emergency MCC 1-EP-MCC-1K1* MCC for Chiller 4A ESGR Fall 2013 RFO 1-EP-MCC-1H- MCCforChiller4E MER 5 Fall 2013 RFO 1B*
3-6
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 3-1: Unit I Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule 4160-480V Service ESGR Fall 2013 RFO Transformer 1-EP-XFRM- 480-120V Semi-Vital Control Room Fall 2013 RFO 1SVB1-2* Transformer 1-HT-T-2B3* Heat Tracing Transformer Auxiliary Fall 2013 RFO 1-EPD-DCS-1A- EE/125V VITAL DC SUB PNL ESGR Fall 2013 RFO SUB* 1A 1-MS-BC-1* MSTV App R SOV Battery Control Room Fall 2013 RFO Charger 1-MS-BC-2* MSTV App R SOV Battery ESGR Fall 2013 RFO Charger 1-EE-BC-EG1* EDG 1 Battery Charger EDG 1 Room Fall 2013 RFO 1-SW-CAB-3C* Emergency SW Pump Relay ESPH Fall 2013 RFO Cabinet 1-CW-PNL-1A* Canal Level Relay Panel Cable Vault Fall 2013 RFO 1-EP-CS-100* CONTROL ROOM CHILLER Service Building Fall 2013 RFO TRAN SWITCH vvaIIKUowII inspectAion comrplete Will! Me1 exceptUio Ol access to electrical caoinet internally mouniea items.
3-7
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 3-2: Unit 2 Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule 2-BD-TV-200A S/G IsltoA Blowdown Containment Containment Spring 2014 RFO Isolation 2-IA-PCV-201 PORV Backup Air Containment Spring 2014 RFO 2-RC-PCV- Pressurize PORV Containment Spring 2014 RFO 2455C 2-DA-TV-200A Containment Vav Sump Dsch Trip Containment Spring 2014 RFO Valve 2-VS-AC-6 ESGR Air Handler ESGR Spring 2014 RFO 2-VS-AC-7 ESGR Air Handler ESGR Spring 2014 RFO 2-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Spring 2014 RFO 251B 2-FW-MOV- AFW Header Containment Spring 2014 RFO 251E 2-SI-MOV- Accumulator Outlet Containment Spring 2014 RFO 2865A 2-EP-DB-2-IA EE/120V VITAL AC 2-IA BUS ESGR Spring 2014 RFO (RED) 2-EP-DB-2SVB1 EE/120V SEMI-VITAL AC BUS Control Room Spring 2014 RFO 2-FW-FT-200A AFW Flow Transmitter Containment Spring 2014 RFO 2-lA-PS-203B PORV Backup Air Pressure Containment Spring 2014 RFO Switch PORV Backup Air Bottle Containment Spring 2014 RFO Pressure Switch 2-SI-TK-1C SI Accumulator Containment Spring 2014 RFO 2-EP-MCC-2H1- 2H Emergency MCC EDG 2 Room Spring 2014 RFO 1A*
2-EP-CS-200* CONTROL ROOM CHILLER ESGR Spring 2014 RFO 4B TRANSFER SWITCH 3-8
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 3-2: Unit 2 Deferred Walkdown Items Inspection ID Number Description Location Completion Schedule 2-EP-MCC-2H1- Emergency MCC Cable Vault Spring 2014 RFO 2N*
2-EP-MCC-2K1* MCC for Chiller 4B ESGR Spring 2014 RFO 2-EP-TRAN-2J* 4160-480V Service ESGR Spring 2014 RFO Transformer 2-EP-XFRM- 480-120V Semi-Vital Bus Control Room Spring 2014 RFO 2SVB1-2*
2-EP-UPS-2A-I* EE/UPS 2A1 ESGR Spring 2014 RFO 2-EPD-DCS-2A- EE/125V VITAL DC SUB PNL ESGR Spring 2014 RFO SUB* 2A 2-EP-UPS-2B-2* EE/UPS 2B2 ESGR Spring 2014 RFO 2-MS-BC-2* MSTV App R SOV Battery ESGR Spring 2014 RFO Charger 2-EE-BC-EG2* EDG 2 Battery Charger EDG 2 Room Spring 2014 RFO 2-CW-PNL-1A* Canal Level Relay Panel ESGR Spring 2014 RFO
- Walkdown inspection complete with the exception of access to electrical cabinet internally mounted items.
3-9
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 4.0 Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys The seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys were performed consistent with the guidance provided in EPRI 1025286 (Reference 2).
A site-specific procedure was developed to implement the EPRI 1025286 seismic walkdown guidance for conducting and documenting the seismic walkdowns. A walkdown package was prepared for each component listed on the SWEL and for each area walk-by to be performed.
Each package included a seismic walkdown checklist (SWC) or an area walk-by checklist (AWC) and the drawing(s) showing equipment location, plant documentation showing the anchorage details for each SWEL item requiring anchorage configuration verification, and documents from prior seismic walkdowns (e.g., Seismic Evaluation Work Sheets (SEWS) from USI A-46 walkdowns), as applicable. A hardcopy of the package was available for the SWEs during performance of the equipment walkdown or area walk-by.
The seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys were performed by walkdown teams, which consisted of at least two (2) qualified SWEs.
For the seismic walkdowns, the SWEs focused on the following adverse seismic conditions associated with each item of equipment as described in the EPRI 1025286 guidance:
- adverse anchorage conditions,
" adverse seismic spatial interactions, and
" other adverse seismic conditions.
The purpose of the area walk-bys was to identify potentially adverse seismic conditions associated with other SSCs located in the vicinity of the SWEL items. For the area walk-bys, SWEs focused on the following potentially adverse seismic conditions as described in the EPRI 1025286 guidance:
- anchorage conditions (ifvisible without opening equipment),
- significantly degraded equipment in the area,
- condition of cable/conduit raceways, including condition of supports or fill conditions, and HVAC ducting,
- potential adverse seismic interactions including those that could cause flooding, spray, or a fire in the area, and
- housekeeping items that could cause adverse seismic interactions.
During the walkdown or walk-by, the walkdown teams discussed conditions and/or any findings in the field, reached agreement on the results of the walkdown, and documented results of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys on the checklists. The results of the completed seismic walkdowns are documented on SWCs, which are included as Appendices C and D. The results of the completed area walk-bys are documented on AWCs, which are included as Appendices E and F.
The Unit 1 SWEL includes 104 items to be walked down, and 39 area walk-bys were defined.
The Unit 2 SWEL includes 100 items to be walked down, and 30 area walk-bys were defined. Of the items and areas for Unit 1, 76 walkdowns and 33 area walk-bys have been completed. Of the items and areas for Unit 2, 73 walkdowns and 23 area walk-bys have been completed. The remaining items, 28 walkdowns and 6 area walk-bys for Unit 1 and 27 walkdowns and 7 area walk-bys for Unit 2, have been deferred because the component or area was not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection and walkdown checklists are not included in 4-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report this report for those items. The schedule for performance of these deferred seismic walkdowns for Unit 1 and Unit 2 is described in Section 3.4.
Tables 4-1 and 4-2 list potentially adverse seismic conditions identified during the completed seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys for Units 1 and 2, respectively. The items listed in Tables 4-1 and 4-2 were submitted as Condition Reports (CRs) in the station corrective action program (CAP). Tables 4-1 and 4-2 summarize the potentially adverse seismic conditions, describe how the condition has been addressed, and provide the current status of the resolution. A low threshold was used to identify and document potential adverse conditions. In addition to items listed in Tables 4-1 and 4-2, non-seismic related potentially adverse conditions such as various housekeeping and material condition items, were identified by the walkdown teams and addressed through the CAP.
No significant issues that challenged the Surry seismic licensing or design basis were identified as a result of the walkdowns completed to date. As indicated in Tables 4-1 and 4-2, no planned or newly installed changes to the plant are required to resolve the items identified during the walkdowns.
4-2
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-1: Unit 1 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SP1-WB-009 N/A - CR485502 A large CO 2 fire extinguisher cart located near Fire extinguisher cart secured in accordance CLOSED safety-related equipment not secured in with Seismic Housekeeping procedure.
accordance with the Seismic Housekeeping procedure.
SPl-WB-040 1-VS-FE-101 CR485515 More than minor corrosion identified on the The corrosion is not an immediate seismic Work Order initiated bolting of 1-VS-AC-1 outlet flow element 1-VS- concern as there is no evidence of to replace the FE-101. significant material loss. corroded bolting.
SP1-WB-031 1-SW-MOV-101A CR485518 Two sections of grating over 1-SW-MOV-101A Both of the gratings have at least two other Work Order initiated were found with clips unattached. clips engaged providing adequate support to restore grating for the gratings. clips.
SP1-WB-045 1-CC-E-1C CR485527 Conduit clamps unattached on a vertical run of There are conduit clamps upstream and Work Order initiated conduit above 1-CC-E-1C. downstream of this location providing to install conduit adequate support for the conduit. clamps.
SPl-WB-009 1-VS-1040 CR485530 More than minor corrosion was identified for a The corrosion is not an immediate seismic Work Order initiated small-bore chilled water pipe support. concern since the bolts do not show signs of to replace the excessive loss of material and the seismic corroded bolting.
loads for the restrained small bore piping are minimal.
SP1-WB-045 1-CC-E-1B CR485533 1" Copper pipe support missing U-bolt above 1- The support is providing adequate vertical Work Order initiated CC-E-1 B. support at this location. to install u-bolt.
SPl-WB-045 1-CC-E-1A CR485535 1" Copper pipe rod hanger unattached above 1- The supports upstream and downstream of Work Order'initiated CC-E-1A. this location are actively supporting the pipe to re-attach rod and provide adequate vertical support. hanger.
SP1-WB-030 1-CW-SHD-106B1 CR485552 Spray Shield 1-CW-SHD-106B1, North Panel, This does not challenge the seismic Work Order initiated has a loose bolt along the base flange (spray structure, but should be repaired for to restore bolt shield at the 1 B Water Box Inlet). conformance with standard configuration, configuration.
SP1-WD- 1-EE-TK-3 CR485564 The hold down strap for Emergency Light There are no seismically sensitive targets Work Order initiated SWEL-098 Battery 1-ELT-LF-126 above 1-EE-TK-3 is near this emergency light were it to fail to restore hold down misaligned. In the as-identified configuration during a seismic event, strap configuration.
the hold down strap is not configured to support the light during a seismic event.
SP1-WD- 1-EP-LCC-1H CR485670 The door opening of the bottom level, center The cover is well secured, and is not a Work Order initiated SWEL-014 cube is covered with a blank panel attached to seismic challenge, however, the fasteners to restore fastener the door with bolts and washers. The fasteners will be replaced to restore configuration. configuration.
were missing at 2 of 4 connections for blank cover over 1-EP-LCC-1H cubicle. The Blank is well secured, and is not a seismic challenge, however, the fasteners should be replaced to restore configuration.
4-3
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-1: Unit 1 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SPl-WB-018 HT-TB 2BID CR485682 No grout under heat trace boxes HT-TB 2BID This is not a seismic concern, but the base Work Order initiated and 2AID support baseplates. plates should be shimmed or grouted to to install grout.
provide a bearing surface.
SPI-WD- 1-CW-37 CR485699 Tubing run is poorly supported on both the east This is not a seismic challenge, but will be Work Order initiated SWEL-049 and west side of the condenser waterbox. repaired for conformance with standard to restore supports.
support conditions.
SP1-WD- 1-CW-RTD-100A CR485704 Conduit Support was found unattached for 1- This does not challenge the seismic Work Order initiated SWEL-049 CW-RTD-100A. structure of the valve, but will be repaired for to restore supports.
conformance with standard support conditions.
SP1-WD- 1-EP-MCC-1H1- CR485713 Four out of forty-four anchor bolts were Existing MCC anchorage calculations Corrective action SWEL-010* 2N identified to be missing on 1-EP-MCC-1H1-2N. provide an evaluation which envelops the initiated to missing bolts identified for 1-EP-MCC-1H1- document the as-2N. Therefore, there are no seismic found condition of 1-functionality concerns for 1-EP-MCC-1H1- EP-MCC-1H1-2N 2N in the as-found condition with four anchorage in MCC anchor bolts missing. anchorage calculation.
SP1-WB-030 1-CW-MOV-100A CR485753 2" power supply conduit for 1-CW-MOV-100A The conduit is adequately supported; Work Order initiated not properly secured to the unistrut. however, the loose/missing supports should to restore supports.
be restored to conform with standard maximum unsupported length requirements.
SPl-WB-020 N/A CR485970 Abandoned small-bore copper tubing routed The abandoned tubing is routed such that Work Order initiated through overhead above safety-related existing station components will maintain to remove components. The installation does not meet the location of the tubing. It is lightweight abandoned tubing.
Seismic Il/I supporting standards. and does not contain fluids that could be discharged and affect the operation of station safety related equipment. There is no adverse seismic interaction concern.
SP1-WD- 1-CH-P-1A CR485989 1-CH-P-1A lube oil bearing temperature The connection and rigidity of the conduit Work Order initiated SWEL-020 element conduit supports loose or missing. were inspected and found not to pose an to restore support immediate threat to the functionality of the configuration.
equipment.
SP1-WB-009 1-VS-1035 CR485500 More than minor corrosion identified on flange There are no immediate functionality Work Order initiated CR485530 bolts and chilled water pipe restraint bolts. concerns for this line since the bolts did not to replace the CR486137 show signs of excessive loss of material and corroded bolts.
CR486138 also the seismic loads for the restrained small bore piping are minimal.
4-4
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-1: Unit 1 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SPl-WB-004 1-SW-MOV-102B CR486148 Loose conduit clamp and unistrut anchor bolts The conduit supports upstream and Work Order initiated missing for 1-SW-MOV-102B. downstream were found properly installed to restore support and this condition is not a seismic challenge configuration.
to the conduit.
SPl-WB-040 1-VS-FE-101 CR486151 Pipe support upstream of 1-VS-FE-101 had The corrosion is not an immediate seismic Work Order initiated bolts identified with more than minor corrosion, concern as there is no evidence of to replace corroded significant material loss. bolts.
SP1-WB-040 1-VS-AC-1 CR486154 Valve 1-VS-217 more than minor surface The identified corrosion does not represent Work Order initiated corrosion. This is a small manual valve without an immediate seismic concern since seismic to investigate the a large extended structure. induced loading on the valve body is not extent and repair the significant. corrosion on 1-VS-217.
SPI-WB-004 Support H-5 CR486171 More than minor surface corrosion on a small Based on a review of the support Work Order initiated area of pipe support baseplate and anchor calculation, the predominant support loading to clean and recoat bolts. is in the downward direction (anchor bolt support.
compression). Moderate corrosion will not affect the ability of the support to perform its design function.
SPl-WB-020 3"-CC-73-151 CR486176 3" CC line spring hanger has signs of significant The identified corrosion does not represent Work Order initiated surface corrosion, an immediate seismic concern since the to clean and recoat hanger is loaded in the allowable range and support.
continues to support the piping.
SP1-WD- 1-SW-P-1C CR486253 1-SW-P-IC-ENGINE anchor bolt nut found not Review of the Emergency SW Pump Diesel Work Order initiated SWEL-076 tight to the washers (1/16" gap, washer rotates, Engine anchorage calculation determined to restore but the nut was unable to be turned by hand). that this condition is evaluated and found anchorage acceptable for the 1-SW-P-1 B-ENGINE. configuration.
Therefore, 1-SW-P-lC-ENGINE is anchorage condition is acceptable.
SP1-WB-021 1-SW-P-1C CR486256 Service Water Diesel Pump Fuel Oil Line pipe The pipe support anchorage calculation Work Order initiated support found with 1 of 4 anchor bolts broken. bounds the anchor bolt loading conditions to restore with a broken anchor. Therefore, the anchorage support is adequate for seismic loading, configuration.
SP1-WB-021 1-SW-P-1C CR486287 Emergency lights hanging by the wires in the The lamps are lightweight and not expected Work Order initiated ESWP House. to affect an SSC even if they were to fall to re-support light.
SP1-WD- 1-SW-P-1C CR486318 1-SW-P-iC-ENGINE concrete foundation The spall is superficial in nature and limited Work Order initiated SWEL-076 spalling. to an area away from the concrete that to restore the provides the support load path for the ESW concrete.
Pump diesel and is not in the critical area for the support anchor bolts. The foundation is structurally sound with no operability concerns.
4-5
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-1: Unit 1 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SP1-WD- 1-SW-CAB-3C CR486337 More than mild surface corrosion was noted on The identified corrosion does not represent Work Order initiated SWEL-089* the base angle support and both anchor bolts an immediate seismic concern since seismic to clean and coat for 1-SW-CAB-3C. induced loading on this support is not the lower base significant. angle and both anchor bolts.
SP1-WB-039 N/A CR486390 Seismic housekeeping issue -Unlatched rear Due to the lightweight nature of the cabinet Work Order initiated door on panel. door, there are no immediate seismic to repair broken concerns, latch on cabinet door.
SP1-WB-003 1-VS-P-1B CR486465 1-VS-P-1B pump support minor loose surface The minor loose surface rust is not Work Order initiated rust. considered to be a seismic challenge. to clean and recoat the support.
SP2-WB-038 1-FC-P-1B CR486477 A 3" conduit not attached to the trapeze unistrut The conduit is boxed in at the trapeze Work Order initiated support over 1-FC-P-1B. unistrut support, supported upstream of this to restore support location at a JB attached to the south wall, configuration.
and downstream of this location at the cable tray. Therefore, the conduit is protected from falling on any equipment below.
SP2-WB-038 N/A CR486496 A ventilation cart north of 1-FC-E-1A/1B, in the Cart moved and stored in accordance with CLOSED Fuel Building (el. 6') not properly stored in Seismic Housekeeping procedure.
accordance with Seismic Housekeeping procedure.
SP1-WD- 1-VS-S-1B CR486517 Cracking concrete on the pedestal for 1-VS-S- The strainer is anchored using 5/8" diameter Work Order initiated SWEL-003 1B. The cracking is present on the NW and SW bolts that are doweled into the MER 3 floor to repair concrete corners of the pedestal and a spall (6"x3"xl" slab. The identified spalling and cracking pedestal.
deep) is located on the SE corner, does not affect the anchorage of the strainer. Due to the adequate anchorage configuration, the anchorage for the strainer is considered functional and there are no immediate seismic concerns.
SP2-WB-038 1-FC-4 CR486523 Gaps measuring approximately 1/4" to 3/8" Based on review of support calculation, the Work Order initiated (max.) identified between wall and baseplates loads applied to the wall baseplates of this to install shim plates for the pipe support upstream of Valve 1-FC-4. support are small and therefore there is underneath the plate sufficient margin to accommodate the at the location of the increase in loading due to the gaps anchor bolts.
underneath the plate.
SP2-WB-038 1-FC-E-1B CR486527 Gaps measuring approximately 1/4" to 3/8" Based on review of support calculation, Work Order initiated (max.) were identified underneath the lower there is sufficient margin to accommodate to install shim plates wall-mounted baseplates for pipe support on the increase in loading due to the gaps underneath the plate the CC outlet line from 1-FC-E-1B. underneath the plate. at the location of the anchor bolts.
4-6
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-1: Unit 1 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SP2-WB-038 1-FC-14 CR486528 Gaps measuring approximately 1/4" to 3/8" Based on review of support calculation, Work Order initiated (max.) identified underneath the ceiling- there is sufficient margin to accommodate to install shim plates mounted baseplates for the pipe support the increase in loading due to the gaps underneath the upstream of Valve 1-FC-14. underneath the plate. baseplate at the location of the anchor bolts.
- The seismic walkdown for this item is not complete (see Table 3-1) and the final seismic walkdown checklist is not included.in the report.
4-7
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-2: Unit 2 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SP2-WB-015 2-RS-P-2B CR485627 2-RS-P-2B is supported laterally by a The potential concrete wall contact point is Work Order initiated Containment wall mounted support that on a small flange point on 2-RS-TK-2B to restore standard accomplishes load transfer using friction pads tangent to the Containment wall and will not seismic gap space.
on the vibration control ring, and has limited generate significant loads to the tank or seismic shake space between Safeguards pump. As a result, this condition is not Building and Reactor Containment Building considered sufficient to adversely affect the supported items. The concrete wall at this component function.
location should, however, be excavated to create a 3/8" minimum gap between 02-RS-TK-2B at this location. This will ensure unrestrained movement of the Containment wall during the design basis accident pressure/ thermal displacements.
SP2-WD- 2-EP-LCC-2H CR485665 The fasteners were loose or missing at 1 of 4 The covers are well secured, and are not a Work Order initiated SWEL-012 connections for two blank covers over 2-EP- seismic challenge, however, the fasteners to restore fastener LCC-2H 480V Emergency Bus cubicles, will be replaced to restore configuration. configuration.
SP2-WB-006 N/A CR485708 Anchor bolt was identified as missing from a The missing anchor bolt does not Work Order initiated cable tray support in the Unit 2 Cable Vault. significantly increase the seismic load on to install anchor bolt.
the tray support and there are no immediate functionality concerns for this item.
SP2-WD- 2-EP-MCC-2K1 CR485722 Missing conduit strap securing conduit to There are no immediate functionality Work Order initiated SWEL-010* trapeze support. concerns because the conduit is supported to replace the by, but not secured to, the trapeze support. missing conduit clamp.
SP2-WD- 2-EP-LP-2S12 CR485926 2-EP-LP-2S12 MCR Lighting Cabinet anchored The toggle anchors have higher allowable Corrective action SWEL-068 using 4 toggle bolt anchors 3/8" diameter rather load properties than those used in the initiated to than 1/4 inch wedge type anchor assumed for calculation. Therefore, the calculation document the as-the support calculation. bounds the actual bolts and the panel is found anchorage acceptable as found. configuration in the calculation.
SP2-WD- 2-FW-P-3A CR485972 Non-safety related 2-FW-P-3A heat trace The conduit is trapped in the overhead and Work Order initiated SWEL-01 9 conduit support broken anchor bolt. the loss of one anchor at the conduit to replace anchor junction box support stand does not affect bolt.
seismic Il/I function.
SP2-WD- 2-CH-MOV- CR485980 Junction Box support for 2-CH-MOV-2289B Considering the minimal amount of Work Order initiated SWEL-056 2289B power supply is loose at the floor base plate movement of the support, the amount of to restore support to anchor connection. The anchors remain flexibility in the electrical connections to the rigid installation.
engaged, although the baseplate to anchor box, and that the anchors remain engaged -
connection is loose due to gaps. there is no seismic concern with the support condition.
4-8
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Table 4-2: Unit 2 Potentially Adverse Seismic Conditions SWC / AWC
- Equipment ID CAP Description Resolution Status SP2-WD- 2-EE-B-EG2 CR485998 2-EE-B-EG2 battery rack unistrut channei nut The rack at the location of the misaligned Work Order initiated SWEL-071 misaligned and not properly engaged. channel nut is loaded vertically down only. to correct the The batteries, which are tightly restrained by misaligned channel side rails, will not overcome their weight in a nut.
seismic condition and lift off the rack.
Therefore, the identified condition will not compromise the ability of the rack to seismically support the batteries.
SP2-WD- 2-EE-B-EG2 CR486007 Dried battery acid deposits were identified on 2- There are no seismic concerns due to the Work Order initiated SWEL-071 EE-B-EG2 rack baseplate. There was some identified mild corrosion. to remove dried mild corrosion on the baseplate (pitting) and the battery acid from anchors. baseplate and bolts.
SP2-WD- 2-EE-B-EG2 CR486026 Field installation of battery rack anchors not There are no immediate functionality Corrective action SWEL-071 properly reflected in battery rack anchorage concerns for this item as it is a paperwork initiated to update analysis. The existing anchorage configuration issue. The battery rack remains capable of the battery rack is consistent with installation documentation. performing its design function, anchorage analysis calculation to reflect as-built conditions.
SP2-WD- 2-CH-P-1A CR486152 2-CH-P-1A bearing lube oil temperature There is no threat to functionality of any Work Order initiated SWEL-043 indicator conduit loose clamps and conduit in equipment due to this issue. to restore support contact with nearby flexible conduit in the configuration.
overhead.
- The seismic walkdown for this item is not complete (see Table 3-2) and the final seismic walkdown checklist is not included in the report.
4-9
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 5.0 Licensing Basis Evaluation The station CAP was used to document the evaluation of potentially adverse seismic conditions identified in Section 4.0.
5.1 Summary of Evaluations There were no conditions identified during the seismic walkdowns completed to date that challenge the validity of the current plant seismic licensing or design basis.
5.2 Plant Modifications There are no planned or newly installed changes to the plant as a result of implementation of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys completed to date.
As identified in Table 4-1, actions plarhned as a result of seismic walkdown findings include documentation updates, maintenance items, and engineering evaluations to document as-found conditions.
5-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 6.0 IPEEE Vulnerabilities On June 28, 1991, the NRC issued Generic Letter (GL) 88-20, Supplement 4 (with NUREG-1407, Procedural and Submittal Guidance) requesting each licensee to perform an individual plant examination of external events (IPEEE) to identify plant-specific severe accident vulnerabilities and to report the results to the Commission together with any licensee-determined improvements and corrective actions.
The results of the IPEEE Program for SPS were submitted in its Surry Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2 Summary Report for IPEEE - Seismic dated November 26, 1997 (Reference 5) and indicated that there were no severe accident vulnerabilities associated with seismic events, and, therefore, no major plant modifications were necessary as a result of the IPEEE Program.
Table 4-1 of the Surry IPEEE Summary Report provides the resolution of issues and outliers resulting in modifications. Table 6.1-1 of the Surry IPEEE Summary Report provides the outstanding mechanical and electrical issues that were identified during walkdown evaluations for the seismic IPEEE review. On April 27, 2000, the Completion of Outstanding Issues Related to IPEEE - Seismic Report (Reference 7) for SPS was submitted, which stated that resolution of the unresolved issues in Table 6.1-1 of the Summary Report specified above was complete.
The SPS configuration management program has maintained the equipment modifications and programmatic changes implemented to eliminate or reduce the seismic vulnerabilities identified during the IPEEE program.
6-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 7.0 Peer Review Summary The Peer Review Team function and required activities are delineated in the EPRI 1025286, Section 6, PeerReview. The Peer Review Team provided an overview of the following seismic walkdown activities, as defined in EPRI 1025286:
- 2. Checklists prepared for the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys
- 3. Licensing basis evaluations
- 4. Decisions for entering the potentially adverse seismic conditions into the CAP process
- 5. Submittal report Peer review activities were performed during the preparation and performance of the seismic walkdowns. The Peer Review Team members were:
- Marc Hotchkiss, Dominion, Peer Review Team Lead
" Leo Nadeau, Bechtel A summary of the results of the Peer Review is provided below:
- 1. Selection of SSCs The Peer Review Team performed a comprehensive review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL). The SWEL was compared to the requirements of EPRI 1025286, Section 3, Selection of SSC, utilizing Appendix F, Peer Review Checklist and was found to appropriately apply the EPRI 1025286 guidance including:
" Selection of Unit 1 and 2 SWEL 1 SSCs
- Use of sample selection attributes
" Adequate representation of the five safety functions
" Consideration of risk insights
" Selection of spent fuel pool related items All comments were minor and were adequately resolved.
The Peer Review Team reviewed a sample of walkdown results and concluded that the Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWC) and Area Walk-By Checklists (AWC) were completed in accordance with the EPRI 1025286 guidance.
- a. Packages - The Peer Review Team reviewed the seismic walkdown packages for 22 SWCs prepared before walkdowns were performed. These walkdown packages were reviewed to ensure the seismic walkdown checklist and related documentation (e.g.,
Screening Evaluation Work Sheet - SEWS, anchorage details) were included. The packages were determined to be adequate to support the walkdowns.
- b. Unit 1 SWC/AWC - There are 104 SWCs and 39 AWCs for a total of 143 checklists. Of the 143, forty-one (41) SWCs and fourteen (14) AWCs were peer reviewed representing 7-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 38% of the total. Overall, the SWC and AWC were determined to be appropriately detailed and complete.
- c. Unit 2 SWC/AWC - There are 100 SWCs and 30 AWCs for a total of 130 checklists. Of the 130, twenty-five (25) SWCs and nine (9) AWCs were peer reviewed representing 26% of the total. Overall, the SWC and AWC were determined to be appropriately detailed and complete.
- d. SWEs were interviewed by the Peer Review Team to verify that they understood and followed the guidance in the EPRI 1025286, Section 4, Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-Bys. Results of the interviews indicated that each team understood and followed the EPRI 1025286 guidance.
All comments were minor and were adequately resolved.
- 3. Review of Licensing Basis Evaluations All potentially adverse seismic conditions identified during the walkdowns were entered into the CAP consistent with plant procedure. There were no Licensing Basis Evaluations, as defined in the EPRI 1025286, performed that were in addition to the corrective action process reviews.
- 4. Review of Conditions Entered into CAP The threshold level at which field-identified conditions were entered in CAP was considered to be appropriate to ensure that potential licensing basis issues were documented and reviewed by Engineering and the Operations Shift Manager for operability concerns.
Appropriate functional organizations (e.g., Operations, Maintenance, and Site Engineering) were routinely consulted and engaged in the evaluation of potentially adverse seismic conditions.
- 5. Review of Submittal Report A review of the submittal report was performed by members of the Peer Review Team, and it was determined that the objectives and requirements of the 50.54(f) Letter were met.
7-2
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report 8.0 References
- 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(0 Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of the Insights from the Fukushima DaiichiAccident, dated March 12, 2012 (ML12056A046).
- 2. EPRI Report 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, June 2012.
- 3. NRC letter, Endorsement of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Draft Report 1025286, "Seismic Walkdown Guidance," dated May 31, 2012 (ML12145A529).
- 4. Surry UFSAR, Revision 44, Updated 9/27/2012
- 5. Virginia Electric and Power Company Letter S/N 97-665, J. P. O'Hanlon to NRC Document Control Desk, Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2, Summary Report for Individual PlantExamination of External Events (IPEEE)- Seismic, November 26, 1997
- 6. Virginia Electric and Power Company Letter S/N 97-664, J. P. O'Hanlon to NRC Document Control Desk, Surry Power Station Units I and 2, Summary Report for Resolution of Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46, November 26, 1997
- 7. Virginia Electric and Power Company Letter S/N 00-143, L. N. Hartz to NRC Document Control Desk, Surry Power Station Units 1 and 2 Completion of Outstanding Issues Related to Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE)- Seismic, Generic Letter (GL) 88-20, Supplements 4 and 5, April 27, 2000.
8-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix A Personnel Qualifications A-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Ellery Baker Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed SQUG walkdown training course (2010)
" BS Civil Engineering
" Approximately four years nuclear plant civil/structural/seismic engineering.
Larry Cullivan, Jr.
Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed SQUG walkdown training course (2012)
- BET, Mechanical/Structural Engineering
" Masters, Engineering Management
" Forty-four years of civil engineering experience in the nuclear industry, including preparation and implementation civil and mechanical design modifications.
William Gallagher, Sr.
Summary of Background and Experience:
- Completed SQUG walkdown training course (1992)
- BS Civil Engineering
- Thirty-eight years in the nuclear industry and thirty-three with nuclear power plant design activities, including: IE Bulletin 79-14 Walkdown and Seismic Design Evaluation, Seismic Analyses For As-Built Safety-Related Piping Systems, Unresolved Safety Issue A-46 Walk Down and Seismic Design Evaluation, verification of seismic adequacy of equipment in operating plants, supplementary walkdowns for design basis document preparation, seismic design of nuclear power plant building structure, seismic evaluation of cable tray structure, seismic evaluation of piping system supports.
David Germano Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed SQUG walkdown training course (2010)
" BS Civil Engineering
" Four years of nuclear seismic engineering experience, including: preparation and implementation of civil and structural plant design modifications, civil and structural calculations,.
A-2
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Kevin McGuire Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed EPRI SWE training course (2012)
- BS Civil Engineering
" Thirty-one years of nuclear seismic engineering experience, including preparation and implementation of civil and structural plant modifications and civil and structural calculations.
Marc Hotchkiss Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed EPRI SWE training course (2012)
" BS Mechanical Engineering
" Twenty-nine years of commercial nuclear power plant experience including: plant and system engineering; plant modifications; project management; nuclear control room shift operations (SRO); shift technical advisor; and new plant licensing; three years of nuclear plant seismic engineering-related experience.
Leo Nadeau Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed EPRI SWE training course (2012)
- BS Mechanical Engineering/ MS Mechanical Engineering
" Over twenty-five years of experience in project management and engineering activities related to nuclear power plant projects including engineering and construction experience with refueling outages in operating facilities; performing new construction and the refurbishment of nuclear power plants; fifteen years of seismic engineering experience.
Kurt Rowland Summary of Background and Experience:
" Twenty-four years of experience in nuclear as a mechanical engineer and as a Project Manager, of which nineteen were at Surry Power Station A-3
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Daniel J. Vasquez Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed 5-day SQUG training (2007)
- BS, Aerospace Engineering
- Twelve years of nuclear seismic engineering experience in the Dominion Corporate Engineering group. SQUG Seismic Capacity Engineer qualification and EPRI-SQURTS (Seismic Qualification Reporting and Testing Standardization) chairman.
Tim Wattleworth Summary of Background and Experience:
" Completed 5-day SQUG training (2010)
- BS Civil Engineering/ MS Civil Engineering
" Five years of experience at the Kewaunee Power Station in Rapid Response Design Engineering supporting numerous station project seismic reviews, scaffolds, temporary shielding, and design basis reviews. Performed SQUG walkdown reviews for seismic verification of new and existing equipment adequacy.
Matthew Winter Summary of Background and Experience:
- Completed 5-day SQUG training (2007)
" BS Civil Engineering
" Twelve years of nuclear seismic engineering experience including preparation and implementation of civil and structural plant modifications, civil and structural calculations, and equipment qualification using SQUG methodology.
A-4
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix B Seismic Walkdown Equipment Lists (SWEL) and Area Walk-By Lists
- 1. Unit 1 SWEL 1
- 2. Unit 2 SWEL 1
- 3. Base List 2 and SWEL 2
- 4. Unit 1 SWEL
- 5. Unit 1 Summary Tables
- 6. Unit 2 SWEL
- 7. Unit 2 Summary Tables
- 8. Unit 1 Area Walk-by List
- 9. Unit 2 Area Walk-by List B-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 1. Unit 1 SWEL I Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) I Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes Canal Level Circulating Cable Vault 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-008 1,2,3 1 20 1-CW-PNL-1B Panel Relay Water Charging Pump 2 0 1-VS-MOD-101C Cubicle Exhaust Ventilation Auxiliary 2' N 1,2, 3 SP1-WB-002 Damper 3 0 1-VS-S-1B Strainer Ventilation MER 3 9' Y 1, 2, 3,4,5 SP1-WB-003 2 4 0 1-SW-REJ-101A MOV-101A Outlet Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-031 5 0 1-SW-REJ-102A CC Hx Inlet Header Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-004 6 10 1-VS-AC-219 MER5 AIR HANDLER Ventilation MER 5 9' N 1,2, 3,4,5 SPl-WB-010 2 7 0 1-FW-T-2 Terry Turbine Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y 4 SP1-WB-006 2,3 Feedwater 8 10 1-VS-AC-222 MER5 AIR HANDLER Ventilation MER 5 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-010 2 9 0 1-MS-GOV-005 Terry Turbine Main Steam MSVH 27' Y 4 SPl-WB-006 Governor Valve 10 1 1-EP-MCC-1H1-2N Emergency MCC Electrical Cable Vault 15' Y 1,2, 3,4, 5 Y SPl-WB-008 1,2 Power 11 1 1-EP-MCC-1K1 MCC for Chiller 4A Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Power 12 1 1-EP-MCC-1H-1B MCC for Chiller E Electrical MER 5 9' Y 1, 2,3,4, 5 SPl-WB-010 1,2 Power 13 2 1-RP-BKR-52-BYB Rx Trip Breaker Reactor Cable Spreading Room 45' Y 1 SPl-WB-011 2 Bypass Protection 14 2 1-EP-LCC-1H 480V Emergency Bus Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 2,3 Power 15 2 1-EP-LCC-1H1 480V Emergency Bus Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 2,3 Power 16 3 1-EP-BKR-15J9 Stub Bus Tie Breaker Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 2 11 -1 5J9 StbuTPower B-2
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) I Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 17 4 1-EP-TRAN-1J 4160-480V Service Electrical ESGR 9' Y 2,4,5 Y SPI-WB-009 1,2,3 Transformer Power 18 4 1-EP-XFRM-1SVB1- 480-120V Semi-Vital Electrical Control Room 27 N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-012 1,2,3 2 Transformer Power 19 4 1-HT-T-2B3 Heat Tracing Heat Tracing Auxiliary 27' N 1 SP1-WB-013 1,2,3 Transformer 20 5 1-CH-P-1A Charging Pump CVCS Auxiliary 2' Y 1,2, 3 SP1-WB-014 2,3 21 5 1-EE-P-1C EDG 3 FOTransfer EDG FOPH 16' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-015 2,3 Pump 22 5 1-CS-P-lA CONTAINMENT Containment CSPH 27' Y 5 SPl-WB-048 2,3 SPRAY PUMP Spray 23 5 1FW-P-2 Steam Driven Aux Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y Y 4 SPl-WB-006 2,3 Feed Pump Feedwater 24 5 1-FW-P-4A Emergency Cond Auxiliary CSPH 11i N 4 SP1-WB-017 2,3 Makeup Pump Feedwater 25 5 1-CC-P-lA CC Pump Component Auxiliary 2' Y 4 SP1-WB-018 2,3 Cooling 26 5 1-FP-P-2 Diesel Fire Pump Fire Protection Fire Pump 27' N 4 SP1-WB-019 2,3 House 27 6 1-CC-P-2A Charging Pump CC Component Auxiliary 2' Y 1,2, 3 SPl-WB-020 2,3 Pump Cooling 28 6 1-SW-P-10A Charging Pump SW Service Water MER 4 9' Y Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-014 2,3 Pump 29 6 1-SW-P-1C Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' Y 4 SP1-WB-021 2,3 Recirculation 30 6 1-RS-P-2A Outside RS Pump Spray Safeguards 12' Y 4,5 SP1-WB-022 2 31 6 1-SI-P-lA Safety Injection Pump Safety nSP-WB-022 2 32___ 6 1-VS-P-1D____Service__ Water____Pump___
VInjection SEr 12' N 4,5 32 6 1-VS-P-ID Service Water Pump Ventilation MER 5 9' N 4 SPl-WB-010 2 B-3
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 33 7 1-FW-HCV-155A A FW BYP Feedwater MER 1 47' N 4 SP1-WB-026 FLOW 34 7 1-MS-PCV-102A Terry Turbine PCV Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SPl-WB-006 35 7 1-DA-TV-103A OUTSIDE CTMT RET Dearated Auxiliary 2- N 5 SPl-WB-020 HDR TV Drains LM/LMC TAP 3 & 6 36 7 1-LM-TV-100A BAROMETER SUP g5 SP -WB-042 TRIP VALVE Monitoring Auxiliary 13 N 37 7 1-MS-TV-101A MS Trip Valve Main Steam MSVH 40' N 4 SP1-WB-024 38 7 1-MS-TV-120 Terry Turbine Steam Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SPl-WB-006 Isolation LM/LMC TAP 1 & 8 39 7 1-LM-TV-100C BAROMETER SUP Leakag Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP1-WB-042 TRIP VALVE Monitoring 40 7 1-CV-TV-150A Cont Vacuum Pump Containment Auxiliary 2' N 5 SPl-WB-020 1B Suction Vacuum 41 7 1-CC-TV-109B RHR Valve Outlet Trip Component2' Cooling Auxiliary 2' YY_4 SP1-W_-020 42 7 1-FW-FCV-1488 Main Feed Reg Valve Feedwater MER 1 47' N Y 4 SPl-WB-026 43 7 1-IA-PCV-101 PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP1-WB-027 1 44 7 1-RC-PCV-1455C Pressurizer PORV Reactor Containment 47' Y 2, 3 SP1-WB-027 1 Coolant 45 7 1-DA-TV-100A Containment Sump Dearated Containment -3' N Y 5 SP1-WB-028 1 Dsch Trip Valve Drains 46 8 I-CS-MOV-101A CS Pump Dsch Containment CSPH 11' Y 3 SP1-WB-017 46___ 8 C O 0 C u DSpray 47 8 1-CS-MOV-102A Chemical Addition Containment CSPH 11' N Y 3 SP1-WB-017 Tank Isolation Spray 48 8 1-CW-MOV-100A Condenser Outlet Circulating Turbine 9. N 4 SP1-WB-030 Water B-4
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 49 8 1-CW-MOV-106A Condenser Inlet Circulating Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-030 Water 50 8 1-CW-MOV-106C Condenser Inlet Circulating Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-030 Water 51 8 1-SW-MOV-101A BC Hx Isolation Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-031 52 8 1-CHMOV-267A CH/CHARGING 52 8 P-CH-MOV-1267A P PINLET SOL CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP1-WB-014 PUMPCINLE INGL 53 8 1-CH-MOV-1275A CH/CHARGING CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP1-WB-014 PUMP RECIRC 54 8 1-FW-MOV-151B AFW Header Auxiliary Containment 47' Y 4 SPl-WB-033 1 Feedwater 55 8 1-FW-MOV-151E AFW Header Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 47' Y 4 SP1-WB-033 1 56 8 1-SI-MOV-1865A Accumulator Outlet Safety Containment -27' N 2 SP1-WB-032 1 Injection 57 9 1-VS-F-58A Filter 3A Exhaust Fan Ventilation Auxiliary 47' Y 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-034 2,3 58 9 1-VS-F-58B Filter 3B Exhaust Fan Ventilation Auxiliary 47' Y 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-034 2,3 59 10 1-VS-AC-1 MCR AC Unit Ventilation Service 27' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-040 1,2,3 60 10 1-VS-AC-7 Relay Room AC Unit Ventilation Service 9' Y 1, 2, 3,4,5 Y SP1-WB-039 1,2 61 11 1-CS-MR-1B RWST Refrigeration Containment Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP1-WB-035 2 Unit Spray 62 11 1-VS-E-4B Chiller Ventilation MER 3 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPI-WB-003 2,3 63 11 1-VS-E-4E MCR/ESGR Chiller Ventilation MER 5 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-010 2,3 64 12 1-EG-C-2 EDG Air Compressor EDG EDG 1 Room 27' N 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-001 2,3 65 12 1-1A-C-1 Instrument Air Instrument Air Turbine 9' N 4 SP2-WB-030 2,3 Compressor 66 14 1-EP-DB-1-IA EE/120V VITAL AC 1- Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 IA BUS (RED) Power B-5
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) I Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 67 12 1-EP-DB-1SVB1 EE/120V SEMI-VITAL Electrical Control Room 27' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-012 1,2,3 AC BUS Power 68 14 1-EPD-DCS-1A-SUB EE/125V VITAL DC Electrical ESGR 9, Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 SUB PNL 1A Power 14 1-EPD-LP-1ECl Emergency Lighting Electrical MCR 69 Panel Power Computer 27' N 1,2, 3,4, 5 SP1-WB-038 2 Room 70 15 1-SW-B-iC Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' Y 4 Y SP1-WB-021 2 Battery 71 15 1-EE-B-EG1 EDG Battery EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1, 2, 3, 4 SPl-WB-001 2,3 72 15 72 1-PD--1A 1
-EPD-B-1A 25VBatery 125V Battery Power Electrical Battery Room 9' Y 1,2,3,4, 5 SP1-WB-047 2,3 MCR 73 16 1-MS-BC-1 MSBttApp R SOy Main Steam Computer 27' N 4 SP1-WB-038 1,2,3 Battery Charger Room 74 16 1-MS-BC-2 MSTV App R SOV Main Steam ESGR 9' N 4 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Battery Charger 75 17 1-EE-EG-1 Emergency Diesel EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1, 2,3,4 SPl-WB-001 2,3 171-E-EG-1Generator 76 17 1-SW-PENG-iC Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' Y 4 SP1-WB-021 2,3 Diesel 77 18 1-CC-PS-103 CH PumpSwitch CC Component Auxiliary 2' Y 1,2, 3 SPl-WB-020 2,3 Pressure Cooling 78 18 1-CN-LT-100 ECST Level Auxiliary Yard 27' N 4 SP1-WB-041 Transmitter Feedwater 79 18 RWST Level C-CS-LT-100B Spray Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP1-WB-035 80 18 1-RC-LT-1321 RVLIS B N-Range Reactor Auxiliary 13' N 3 SP1-WB-042 2,3 Level Coolant 81 18 1-FW-FT-100A AFW Flow Auxiliary Containment 18' N 4 SP1-WB-043 1,2 Transmitter Feedwater _
82 18 1-IA-PS-103B PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 53' N 2,3 SP1-WB-044 1,2 Pressure Switch B-6
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) I Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes PORV Backup Air 83 18 1-IA-PS-104B Bottle Pressure Instrument Air Containment 53' N 2,3 SP1-WB-044 1,2 Switch 84 19 1-CC-RTD-109B RHR Hx Outlet Temp Component Auxiliary 2' N 4 SP1-WB-020 Cooling 85 19 1-CH-TIC-1107 BAST A Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N I SPl-WB-042 2,3 86 19 1-CH-TIC-1164 BAST B Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP1-WB-042 2,3 87 19 1-CS-RTD-100A RWST Temp Containment Yard 27' N 3,5 SP1-WB-035
____ __________Spray 88 16 1-EE-BC-EG1 EDG 1 Battery EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-001 1,2,3 Charger 89 20 1-SW-CAB-3C Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' N 4 SP1-WB-021 1,2,3 Relay Cabinet 90 20 1-CW-PNL-1A Canal Level Relay Circulating Cable Vault 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-008 1,2,3 Panel Water CONTROL ROOM 91 14 1-EP-CS-100 CHILLER MAN TRAN Electrical ESGR N 4 P-WB-009 1,2,3 SWITCH 92 20 1-EP-PNL-ASP AUX SHUTDOWN Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2, 3,4 SPl-WB-009 2 PANEL Power 93 21 1-CC-E-1A CC Hx Component Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-045 2,3 Cooling 94 21 1-CN-TK-1 ECST Auxiliary Yard 27' Y 4 SP1-WB-041 2 Feedwater 95 21 1-CS-TK-2 Caustic Storage Tank Containment Yard 27' N 5 SP1-WB-035 2,3 Spray 96 21 1-SW-E-8 Emergency SW Pump Service Water Brg Oil Cooler ESPH 18' N 4 SP1-WB-021 2 97 21 1-FW-E-9 FW-P-2 Oil Cooler Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y 4 SP1-WB-006 2 Feedwater 98 21 1-EE-TK-3 Fuel Oil Day Tank EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4 SPI-WB-001 2,3 B-7
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 99 21 1-EG-TK-2 EDG Air Comp Air EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-001 2 Receiver 100 21 1-SI-TK-lC SI Accumulator Safety Containment -27 N 3,4 SP1-WB-032 1,2,3 Injection Notes
- 1. Not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection. To be inspected when accessible.
- 2. Has anchorage
- 3. Detailed anchorage inspection to be performed 5 Safety Functions
- 1. Reactor reactivity control
- 2. Reactor coolant pressure control
- 3. Reactor coolant inventory control
- 5. Containment function B-8
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 2. Unit 2 SWEL 1 Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes Charging Pump 1 0 2-VS-MOD-201C Cubicle Exhaust Ventilation Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2,3 SP2-WB-001 Damper 2 0 2-SW-REJ-201A BC Hx Inlet Header Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-002 CH/BORIC ACID 3 21 1-CH-TK-1C STORAGE TANK C CVCS Auxiliary 13' Y 1 SP2-WB-011 2,3 (BAST) 4 3 2-EP-BKR-25H9 4kV Emergency Stub Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 2,3 Bus Tie Breaker Power 5 1 2-EP-MCC-2HI-IA 2HEmergencyMCC Electrical EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP2-WB-029 1,2,3 Power 6 0 2-FW-T-2 Terry Turbine Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2,3 Feedwater CONTROL ROOM Electrical 9N 7 2 2-EP-CS-200 CHILLER 4B Eler ESGR N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 TRANSFER SWITCH Power 8 0 2-MS-GOV-005 Terry Turbine Main Steam MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 Governor Valve 9 Electrical Cable Vault 15' Y 1,2,3,4,5 Y SP2-WB-006 1,2,3 9 1 2-EP-MCC-2H1-2N Emergency MCC Power 10 1 2-EP-MCC-2K1 MCC for Chiller4B Electrical ESGR 91 Y 1,2,3,4, 5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Power 11 2 2-RP-BKR-52-BYB Raco CableBraer Rx Trip Breaker Reactor 1CablBe08 Bypass Protection Spreading 45' Y 1 SP2-WB-008 2 Room 12 2 2-EP-LCC-2H 480V Emergency Bus Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 2,3 1 2Power 13 2 2-EP-lCC-2H1 480V Emergency Bus Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 2,3 Power 14 4 2-EP-TRAN-2J 4160-480V Service Electrical ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 Y SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Transformer Power B-9
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 15 4 2-EP-XFRM-2SVB1- 480-120V Semi-Vital Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 2 Bus Power 16 5 2-CH-P-1A Charging Pump CVCS Auxiliary 2- Y 1,2, 3 SP2-WB-010 2,3 Boric Acid Transfer CC uiir 3 17 5 1-CH-P-2C Pump CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP2-WB-011 2 18 5 2-FW-P-2 Steam Driven Aux Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2,3 Feed Pump Feedwater 19 5 2-FW-P-3A Aux Feed Pump Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2,3 Feedwater 20 5 2-CS-P-lA CS Pump 1A Containment CSPH 27' Y 5 SP2-WB-041 2,3 Spray _____
Emergency Auxiliary 21 5 2-FW-P-4A Condensate Makeup Feedwater CSPH ill Y 4 SP2-WB-013 2,3 Pump 22 5 1-CC-P-lC CC Pump Component Auxiliary 2' Y 4 SP1-WB-018 2,3 Cooling 23 6 2-CC-P-2B Charging Pump CC Component Auxiliary 2- Y 1,2, 3 SP2-WB-019 2 Pump Cooling 24 6 2-SW-P-10A Charging Pump SW Service Water MER 4 9' Y Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-014 2,3 Pump 25 6 2-RS-P-2A Outside RS Pump Recirculation Safeguards 12' Y 4,5 SP2-WB-015 2 Spray______
26 6 2-SI-P-lA Safety Injection Pump Safety Injection Safeguards 12' Y 3,4,5 SP2-WB-015 2 27 20 2-EP-PNL-ASP AUX SHUTDOWN Electrical ESGR 9' N 1, 2, 3,4 SPl-WB-009 2 PANEL Power S/G A Blowdown Steam 28 7 2-BD-TV-200A Containment Isolation Generator Bodw Containment -3' N 5 SP2-WB-023 1 Blowdown FW/SG A FW 29 7 2-FW-HCV-255A BYPA FW Feedwater MER 2 47' N 4 SP2-WB-021 II ~ BYPASS FLOWII DA/HRSS WASTE Dearated 30 7 2-DA-TV-203A TK PUMP DISCH Drains Auxiliary 2' N 5 SP2-WB-019 CIV B-10
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) I Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 31 7 2-MS-PCV-202A Terry Turbine PCV Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-004 LM/CTMT LEAKAGE 32 7 2-LM-TV-200A MONITORING HDR Leakage Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP2-WB-042 TRIP VALVE Monitoring FWISG C FW 33 7 2-FW-HCV-255C BYPSS FW BYPASS FLOW" Feedwater MER 2 47' N 4 SP2-WB-021 34 7 2-MS-TV-220 Terry Turbine Steam Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-004 Isolation LM/CTMT LEAKAGE 35 7 2-LM-TV-200C MONITORING HDR Leakage Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP2-WB-042 TRIP VALVE Monitoring Containment Vacuum Containment 36 7 2-CV-TV-250A Pump 1B Suction Vacuum Auxiliary 2' N 5 SP2-WB-019 37 7 2-MS-TV-201A MS Trip Valve Main Steam MSVH 40' N 4 SP2-WB-020 38 7 2-CC-TV-209B RHR Outlet Trip Component Auxiliary 2' N Y 4,5 SP2-WB-019 Valve Cooling 39 7 2-FW-FCV-2478 Main Feed Reg Valve Feedwater MER 2 47' N Y 4 SP2-WB-021 40 7 2-IA-PCV-201 PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP2-WB-022 1 41 7 2-RC-PCV-2455C Pressurize PORV Reactor Containment 47' Y 2, 3 SP2-WB-022 1 Coolant 42 7 2-DA-TV-200A Containment Sump Dearated Containment -3' N Y 5 SP2-WB-023 1 Dsch Trip Valve Drains 43 8 2-CH-MOV-2267A CH Pump Inlet CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP2-WB-010 Isolation 44 ~~~~~~Containment CPH1'N3PWB3 44 8 2-CS-MOV-201A CS Pump Dsch Spray t CSPH il N SP2-WB-013 45 8 2-CS-MOV-202A Chemical Addition Containment CSPH ill N Y 3 SP2-WB-013 8 Tank Isolation Spray 46 8 2-CW-MOV-200A Condenser Outlet Circulating Turbine 9' N 4 SP2-WB-024 Water I B-11
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 47 8 2-CW-MOV-206A Condenser Inlet Circulating Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-024 Water 48 8 2-CW-MOV-206C Condenser Inlet Circulating Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-024 Water 49 16 2-EP-UPS-2A-1 EE/UPS 2A1 Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2 Power 50 8 2-SW-MOV-201A BC Hx Isolation Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-002 51 10 2-VS-AC-6 ESGR Air Handler Ventilation ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2 52 10 2-VS-AC-7 ESGR Air Handler Ventilation ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2 53 8 2-CH-MOV-2275A CH/CHARGING CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP2-WB-010 PUMP RECIRC CH/CHARGING 54 8 2-CH-MOV-2286A PUMP OUTLET TO CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP2-WB-010 CHARGING LINE 55 8 2-CH-MOV-2289A CH/CHARGING CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2,3 SP2-WB-019 STOP VALVE 56 8 2-CH-MOV-2289B CHTCHARGING CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2,3 SP2-WB-019 STOP VALVE 57 8 2-FW-MOV-251B AFW Header Auxiliary Containment 47' Y 4 SP2-WB-025 1 Feedwater 58 8 2-FW-MOV-251 E AFW Header Auxiliary Containment 47' Y 4 SP2-WB-025 1 Feedwater 59 8 2-SI-MOV-2865A Accumulator Outlet Safety Injection Containment -27' N 2 SP2-WB-026 1 60 8 1-FW-MOV-160A AFW Cross-Connect Auxiliary MSVH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-004 Feedwater 61 8 2-SW-MOV-205A RS Hx Isolation Service Water CSPH 11' N 4 SP2-WB-013 62 11 2-CS-MR-1iB RWST Refrigeration Containment Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP2-WB-028 2 Unit Spray 63 12 2-EG-C-2 EDG Air Compressor EDG EDG 2 Room 27' N 1, 2, 3, 4 SP2-WB-029 2,3 B-12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 64 12 2-IA-C-1 Instrument Air Instrument Air Turbine 9' N 4 SP2-WB-030 2,3 Compressor 65 14 2-EP-DB-2-IA EE/120V VITAL AC Electrical ESGR 9 Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 2-IA BUS (RED) Power 66 14 2-EP-DB-2SVBI EE/120V SEMI- Electrical Control Room 27' N 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 SP2-WB-003 1,2,3 VITAL AC BUS Power 67 14 2-EPD-DCS-2A- EE/1 25V VITAL DC Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 SUB SUB PNL 2A Power 68 14 2-EP-LP-2S12 MCR Lighting Electrical ESGR 9' N 1,2, 3,4, 5 SP1-WB-009 2 Cabinet Power 69 15 2-EPD-B-2A 125V Battery Electrical Battery Room 9' Y 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 SP2-WB-007 2,3 Power 70 15 2-EPD-B-2B 125V Battery Electrical Battery Room 9' Y 1,2, 3,4, 5 SP2-WB-040 2,3 Power 71 15 2-EE-B-EG2 EDG Battery EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1, 2, 3, 4 SP2-WB-029 2,3 72 16 2-EP-UPS-2B-2 EE/UPS 2B2 Electrical Power ES___Y_,,345 Y 1,2,3,4,5 _ SP-WB-009 P1W-09 1,2,3 1,_
73 16 2-MS-BC-2 MSTV App R SOV Main Steam ESGR 9' N 4 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 Battery Charger 74 17 2-EE-EG-1 Emergency Diesel EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1, 2, 3,4 SP2-WB-029 2,3 Generator 75 18 2-CC-PS-203 CH Pump CC Component Auxiliary 2' Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-019 Pressure Switch Cooling 76 18 2-CN-LT-200 ECST Level Transmitter Auxiliary Yard 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-031 Feedwater 77 18 2-CC-FT-210A CC/RHR HX Component Auxiliary 2' N 1,2,3 SP2-WB-019 2,3 OUTLET FLOW Cooling 78 18 2-CS-LT-200B RWST Level Containment Yard 27' N 3 SP2-WB-028 Spray 79 18 2-MS-PT-2484 MSaPressure Main Steam CSPH 11' N 2,4,5 SP2-WB-013 2,3 182M-P-44 TransmitterI B-1 3
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) I Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 80 18 2-MS-FT-200 MS Flow Transmitter Main Steam CSPH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-041 2 81 18 2-MS-PT-201A MS Pressure Transmitter Main Steam CSPH 11' N 4 SP2-WB-013 2 82 18 2-RC-LT-2321 RVLIS B N-Range Reactor Auxiliary 13' N 3 SP2-WB-01 1 2,3 Level Coolant 83 18 2-SW-PS-7 CH Pump SW Service Water MER 4 9' Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-014 Pressure Switch 84 18 2-FW-FT-200A AFW Flow Auxiliary Containment 18' N 4 SP2-WB-036 1,2 Transmitter Feedwater 85 18 2-IA-PS-203B PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2,3 SP2-WB-037 1,2 Pressure Switch PORV Backup Air 86 18 2-IA-PS-204B Bottle Pressure Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP2-WB-037 1,2 Switch 87 19 2-CC-RTD-209B RHR Hx Outlet Temp Component 4 SP2-WB-019 Cooling Auxiliary 2' N 88 19 1-CH-TIC-1103 BAST A Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP2-WB-011 2,3 89 19 1-CH-TIC-1166 BAST B Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP2-WB-011 2,3 9Q ~~~~~~~Containment Yr 7 ,552W-2 90 19 2-CS-RTD-200A RWST Temp Spray Yard 27' N 3,5 SP2-WB-028 91 16 2-EE-BC-EG2 EDG 2 Battery EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1,2, 3,4 SP2-WB-029 1,2,3 Charger____________
92 20 2-CW-PNL-1A Canal Level Relay Circulating ESGR 9' Y 4 SPI-WB-009 1,2,3 Panel Water 93 18 2-MS-PT-2475 MS Pressure Main Steam CSPH 11' N- 2,4,5 SP2-WB-013 2,3 Transmitter REACTOR Reactor 94 20 2-RP-CAB-CHIB PROTECTION Protection ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPI-WB-009 2 TRAIN B 95 21 9 1-CC-E-1D CC Heat Exchanger Component Cooling Tubn9.Y4SIW05 9' Turbine Y 4 SP1-WB-045 2, 2,3 96 21 2-CN-TK-1 ECST Auxiliary Yard 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-031 2 Feedwater B-14
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) 1 Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 97 21 2-CS-TK-2 Caustic Storage Tank Coray Yard 27' Y 5 SP2-WB-028 2,3 98 21 2-FW-E-9 FW-P-2 Oil Cooler Auxiliary MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2 Feedwater 99 21 2-EE-TK-3 EDG 2 FO Day Tank EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1, 2, 3, 4 SP2-WB-029 2 100 21 2-SI-TK-1C SI Accumulator Safety Injection Containment -27' N 3,4 SP2-WB-026 1,2,3 Notes
- 1. Not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection. To be inspected when accessible.
- 2. Has anchorage
- 3. Detailed anchorage inspection performed 5 Safety Functions
- 1. Reactor reactivity control
- 2. Reactor coolant pressure control
- 3. Reactor coolant inventory control
- 5. Containment function B-15
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 3. Base List 2 and SWEL 2 ID Description System SWEL2?
01-FC--11 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1A DISCH CHK VA Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--12 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1A DISCH Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--13 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1B DISCH Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--14 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMPS 1A/B DISCH XCO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--34 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1A SUCT HDR ISO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--35 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1B SUCT HDR ISO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Y 01-FC--36 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMPS SUCT HDR XTIE Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 001-FC--38 FUEL PIT CLR 1A INLET ISOL Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--4 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1B SUCT Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--40 FUEL PIT CLR 1B INLET ISOL Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Y 01-FC--41 FUEL PIT CLR 1B OUTLET Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--42 FUEL PIT CLR 1A OUTLET Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC--9 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1B DISCH CHK VA Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-E-1A SPENT FUEL PIT CLR 1A Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-E-1B SPENT FUEL PIT CLR 1B Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Y 01-FC-P-1A SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1A Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-P-1B SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1B Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Y 01-FC-PNL-FC1A 1-FC-P-1A STARTER PANEL Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-PNL-IA-PDB FC PUMP 1A NORMAL POWER DISTRIBUTIO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-PNL-1A1B-PDB FC PUMPS 1A AND 1B ALTERNATE POWER Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-S-1A SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1A SUCT STRAINE Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-S-1B SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP 1B SUCT STRAINE Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-TRAN-FC1A CONTROL TRANSFORMER FOR 1-FC-P-1A Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-TW-IOOA SPENT FUEL PIT CLR 1A INLET THERMOW Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-TW-100B SPENT FUEL PIT CLR 1B INLET THERMOW Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-TW-101A SPENT FUEL PIT CLR 1A OUTLET THERMO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 01-FC-TW-101B SPENT FUEL PIT CLR 1B OUTLET THERMO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 02-FC-PNL-FClB 1-FC-P-1B STARTER PANEL Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 02-FC-PNL-1B-PDB FC PUMP 1B NORMAL POWER DISTRIBUTIO Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N 02-FC-TRAN-FClB CONTROL TRANSFORMER FOR 1-FC-P-1B Spent Fuel Pool Cooling N B-16
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 1 20 1-CW-PNL-1B Canal Level Relay Circulating Water Cable Vault 91 N 1,2,3,4,5 SPI-WB-008 1,2,3 Panel Charging Pump 2 0 1-VS-MOD-101C Cubicle Exhaust Ventilation Auxiliary 2' N 1,2,3 SPI-WB-002 Damper 3 0 1-VS-S-1B Strainer Ventilation MER 3 9' Y 1, 2, 3,4, 5 SPl-WB-003 2 4 0 1-SW-REJ-101A MOV-101A Outlet Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-031 5 0 1-SW-REJ-102A CC Hx Inlet Header Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SPl-WB-004 6 10 1-VS-AC-219 MER5 AIR HANDLER Ventilation MER 5 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-010 2 7 0 1-FW-T-2 Terry Turbine Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y 4 SPl-WB-006 2,3 8 10 1-VS-AC-222 MER5 AIR HANDLER Ventilation MER 5 9' N 1, 2, 3,4, 5 SPl-WB-010 2 9 0 1-MS-GOV-005 Terry Turbine Main Steam MSVH 27' Y 4 SP1-WB-006 Governor Valve 10 1 1-EP-MCC-1H1-2N Emergency MCC Electrical Power Cable Vault 15' Y 1,2,3,4,5 Y SP1-WB-008 1,2 11 1 1-EP-MCC-1K1 MCC for Chiller 4A Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 12 1 1-EP-MCC-1H-1B MCC for Chiller E Electrical Power MER 5 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-010 1,2 Cable 13 2 1-RP-BKR-52-BYB Rx Trip Breaker Reactor Protection Spreading 45' Y 1 SPl-WB-011 2 Bypass Room 14 2 1-EP-LCC-1H 480V Emergency Bus Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 2,3 15 2 1-EP-LCC-1H1 480V Emergency Bus Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2, 3,4, 5 SPI-WB-009 2,3 16 3 1-EP-BKR-15J9 Stub Bus Tie Breaker Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2, 3,4, 5 SPI-WB-009 2 B-1 7
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 17 4 1-EP-TRAN-1J 4160-480V Service Electrical Power ESGR 9. Y 2,4, 5 Y SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 Transformer 18 4 1-EP-XFRM-1SVB1-2 480-120V Semi-Vital Electrical Power Control Room 27' N 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 SP1-WB-012 1,2,3 Transformer 1 4 1HT-T-2B3 Heat Tracing Heat Tracing Auxiliary 27' N 1 SP1-WB-013 1,2,3 Transformer 20 5 1-CH-P-lA Charging Pump CVCS Auxiliary 2' Y 1, 2, 3 SP1-WB-014 2,3 21 5 1-EE-P-lC EDG 3 FO Transfer EDG FOPH 16' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-015 2,3 Pump CS/CONTAINMENT 22 5 1-CS-P-lA SPRAY PUMP Containment Spray CSPH 27' Y 5 SPl-WB-048 2,3 23 5 1-FW-P-2 Steam Driven Aux Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y Y 4 SPl-WB-006 2,3 Feed Pump1 24 5 1-FW-P-4A Emergency Cond Auxiliary Feedwater CSPH ill N 4 SPl-WB-017 2,3 Makeup Pump 25 5 1-CC-P-lA CC Pump Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y 4 SP1-WB-018 2,3 26 5 1-FP-P-2 Diesel Fire Pump Fire Protection Fire Pump 27s N 4 SP-WB-019 2,3 House 2 6 1 C--APump Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y 1, 2, 3 SPl-WB-020 2,3 28 6 1-SW-P-bA Charging Pump SW Service Water MER 4 9, Y Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-014 2,3 Pump 29 6 1-SW-P-lC Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' Y 4 SPl-WB-021 2,3 30 6 1-RS-P-2A Outside RS Pump Recirculation Spray Safeguards 12' Y 4,5 SPl-WB-022 2 31 6 1-SI-P-lA Safety Injection Pump Safety Injection Safeguards 12' Y 3,4,5 SP1-WB-022 2 32 6 1-VS-P-1D Service Water Pump Ventilation MER 5 9' N 4 SP1-WB-0l0 2 B-18
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 33 7 1-FW-HCV-155A A FW BYP Feedwater MER 1 47' N 4 SP1-WB-026 FLOW 34 7 1-MS-PCV-102A Terry Turbine PCV Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SPl-WB-006 35 7 1-DA-TV-103A OUTSIDE CTMT RET Dearated Drains Auxiliary 2' N 5 SPl-WB-020 HDR TV LM/LMC TAP 3 & 6 36 7 1-LM-TV-100A BAROMETER SUP Leakage Monitoring Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP1-WB-042 TRIP VALVE 37 7 1-MS-TV-101A MS Trip Valve Main Steam MSVH 40' N 4 SP1-WB-024 38 7 1-MS-TV-120 Terry Turbine Steam Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SP1-WB-006 Isolation LM/LMC TAP 1 & 8 39 7 1-LM-TV-100C BAROMETER SUP Leakage Monitoring Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP1-WB-042 TRIP VALVE 40 7 1-CV-TV-150A Cont Vacuum Pump Containment Vacuum Auxiliary 2' N 5 SPl-WB-020 1B Suction 41 7 1-CC-TV-109B RHR Outlet Trip Valve Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y Y 4 SP1-WB-020 42 7 1-FW-FCV-1488 Main Feed Reg Valve Feedwater MER 1 47' N Y 4 SP1-WB-026 43 7 1-IA-PCV-101 PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP1-WB-027 1 44 7 1-RC-PCV-1455C Pressurizer PORV Reactor Coolant Containment 47' Y 2, 3 SP1-WB-027 1 45 7 1-DA-TV-100A Containment Sump Dearated Drains Containment -3' N Y 5 SPl-WB-028 I Dsch Trip Valve 46 8 1-CS-MOV-101A CS Pump Dsch Containment Spray CSPH 11' Y 3 SP1-WB-017 47 8 1-CS-MOV-102A Chemical Addition Containment Spray CSPH 11' N Y 3 SPI-WB-017 Tank Isolation 48 8 1-CW-MOV-100A Condenser Outlet Circulating Water Turbine 9' N 4 SPl-WB-030 B-1 9
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 49 8 1-CW-MOV-106A Condenser Inlet Circulating Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SPl-WB-030 50 8 1-CW-MOV-106C Condenser Inlet Circulating Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-030 51 8 1-SW-MOV-101A BC Hx Isolation Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-031 CH/CHARGING PUMP 52 8 1-CH-MOV-1267A INLET ISOL CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2, 3 SP1-WB-014 CH/CHARGING PUMP 53 8 1-CH-MOV-1275A RECIRC CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2, 3 SP1-WB-014 54 8 1-FW-MOV-151B AFW Header Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 47' Y 4 SP1-WB-033 1 55 8 1-FW-MOV-151E AFW Header Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 47' Y 4 SP1-WB-033 1 56 8 1-SI-MOV-1865A Accumulator Outlet Safety Injection Containment -27' N 2 SP1-WB-032 1 57 9 1-VS-F-58A Filter 3A Exhaust Fan Ventilation Auxiliary 47' Y 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-034 2,3 58 9 1-VS-F-58B Filter 3B Exhaust Fan Ventilation Auxiliary 47' Y 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-034 2,3 59 10 1-VS-AC-1 MCR AC Unit Ventilation Service 27' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-040 1,2,3 60 10 1-VS-AC-7 Relay Room AC Unit Ventilation Service 9' Y 1, 2, 3,4, 5 Y SP1-WB-039 1,2 61 11 1-CS-MR-1B RWST Refrigeration Containment Spray Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP1-WB-035 2 Unit 62 11 1-VS-E-4B Chiller Ventilation MER 3 9' Y 1, 2, 3, 4,5 SPl-WB-003 2,3 63 11 1-VS-E-4E MCR/ESGR Chiller Ventilation MER 5 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-010 2,3 64 12 1-EG-C-2 EDG Air Compressor EDG EDG 1 Room 27' N 1,2,3,4 SPl-WB-001 2,3 65 12 1-IA-C-1 Instrument Air Instrument Air Turbine 9' N 4 SP2-WB-030 2,3 Compressor 66 14 1-EP-DB-1-IA EE/120V VITAL AC 1- Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPI-WB-009 1,2,3 IA BUS (RED)
B-20
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 67 12 1-EP-DB-1SVB1 EE/120V SEMI-VITAL Electrical Power Control Room 27' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-012 1,2,3 AC BUS 68 14 1-EPD-DCS-1A-SUB EE/125V VITAL DC Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 SUB PNL 1A MCR 69 141-EPm-LP-nEC Lighting SP-W-08 69 14 1-EPD-LP-1EC Emergencyl Electrical Power Computer 27' N 1,2, 3,4,5 SP-WB-038 2 Panel Room 70 15 1-SW-B-1C Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' Y 4 Y SP1-WB-021 2 Battery 71 15 1-EE-B-EG1 EDG Battery EDG EDG I Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4 SPl-WB-001 2,3 72 15 1-EPD-B-1A 125V Battery Electrical Power Battery Room 9' Y 1,2,3,4, 5 SP1-WB-047 2,3 73MSTV App R OV MCR 73 16 1-MS-BC-1 Battery Charger Main Steam Computer 27' N 4 SP1-WB-038 1,2,3 Room 74 hMSVAppRSOVMain Steam ESGR 9' N 4 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 16 5 1-E-BC-1 EBattery Charger 75 17 1-EE-EG-1 Emergency Diesel EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1, 2, 3, 4 SPl-WB-001 2,3 Generator 76 17 1-SW-PENG-iC Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' Y 4 SPl-WB-021 2,3 Diesel 77 CH Pump CC Pressure Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y 1, 2, 3 SP1-WB-020 2,3 18 1CC-P-103Switch 78 18 1-CN-LT-100 ECST Level Auxiliary Feedwater Yard 27' N 4 SP1-WB-041 Transmitter 79 18 1-CS-LT-100B RWST Level Containment Spray Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP1-WB-035 80 18 1-RC-LT-1321 RVLIS B N-Range Reactor Coolant Auxiliary 13' N 3 SP1-WB-042 2,3 Level 81 18 1-FW-FT-100A AFW Flow Transmitter Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 18' N 4 SPI-WB-043 1,2 82 18 1-lA-PS-103B PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 53 N 2,3 SPl-WB-044 1,2 Pressure Switch B-21
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 83 18 1-IA-PS-104B PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 53' N 2,3 SPl-WB-044 1,2 Bottle Pressure Switch 84 19 1-CC-RTD-109B RHR Hx Outlet Temp Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' N 4 SP1-WB-020 85 19 1-CH-TIC-1107 BAST A Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP1-WB-042 2,3 86 19 1-CH-TIC-1164 BAST B Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP1-WB-042 2,3 87 19 1-CS-RTD-100A RWST Temp Containment Spray Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP1-WB-035 88 16 1-EE-BC-EG1 EDG 1 Battery Charger EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-001 1,2,3 89 20 1-SW-CAB-3C Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' N 4 SP1-WB-021 1,2,3 Relay Cabinet I11 90 20 1-CW-PNL-1A Canal Panel Level Relay Circulating Water Cable Vault 9' Y 4 SP1-WB-008 1,2,3 CONTROL ROOM 91 14 1-EP-CS-100 CHILLER MAN TRAN Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 4 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 SWITCH 92 20 1-EP-PNL-ASP AUX SHUTDOWN Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-009 2 PANEL1 93 21 1-CC-E-1A CC Hx Component Cooling Turbine 9' Y 4. SP1-WB-045 2,3 F94 21 1-CN-TK-1 ECST Auxiliary Feedwater Yard 27' Y 4 SP1-WB-041 2 95 21 1-CS-TK-2 Caustic Storage Tank Containment Spray Yard 27' N 5 SP1-WB-035 2,3 96 21 1-SW-E-8 Emergency SW Pump Service Water ESPH 18' N 4 SP1-WB-021 2 Brg Oil Cooler 97 21 1-FW-E-9 FW-P-2 Oil Cooler Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y 4 SPl-WB-006 2 98 21 1-EE-TK-3 Fuel Oil Day Tank EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1,2, 3,4 SPl-WB-001 2,3 99 21 1-EG-TK-2 EDG Air Comp Air EDG EDG 1 Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4 SP1-WB-001 2 Receiver 100 21 1-SI-TK-1C SI Accumulator Safety Injection Containment -27 N 3,4 SP1-WB-032 1,2,3 B-22
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elev. (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 101 21 1-FC-E-1B SFP Cooler Spent Fuel Cooling Fuel 6' Y N/A SP2-WB-038 2,3,4 102 5 1-FC-P-18 SFP Cooling Pump Spent Fuel Cooling Fuel 6' Y N/A SP2-WB-038 2,3,4 103 1-F-40 SEP Cooler B Inlet 103 0 1-FC-40 Isolation Spent Fuel Cooling Fuel 6' N N/A SP2-WB-038 4 Cooling Pump 18 SEctionP Cooling Spent Fuel Cooling Fuel 20' N N/A SP2-WB-038 1001-C3 Suction IsolationI III Notes
- 1. Not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection. To be inspected when accessible.
- 2. Has anchorage
- 3. Detailed anchorage inspection performed
- 4. SWEL 2 item 5 Safety Functions
- 1. Reactor reactivity control
- 2. Reactor coolant pressure control
- 3. Reactor coolant inventory control
- 5. Containment function B-23
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 5. Unit 1 Summary Tables Unit 1 SWEL Equipment Class Summary GIP Class Class Title Items 0 Miscellaneous 8 1 Motor Control Centers 3 2 Low Voltage Switchgear 3 3 Medium Voltage Switchgear 1 4 Transformers 3 5 Horizontal Pumps 8 6 Vertical Pumps 6 7 Fluid Operated Valves 13 8 Motor Operated Valves, Solenoid Operated Valves 11 9 Fans 2 10 Air Handlers 4 11 Chillers 3 12 Air Compressors 3 13 Motor Generators 0 14 Distribution Panels 4 15 Batteries on Racks 3 16 Battery Chargers and Inverters 3 17 Engine Generators 2 18 Instruments on Racks 7 19 Temperature Sensors 4 20 Instrumentation and Control Panels and Racks 4 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers (GIP Section 7) 9 Total 104 B-24
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report UNIT 1 SWEL Location Summary Building Elevation Items Auxiliary 2 11 Auxiliary 13 5 Auxiliary 27 1 Auxiliary 47 2 Battery Room 9 1 Cable Spreading Room 45 1 Cable Vault 9 2 Cable Vault 15 1 Containment -27 2 Containment -3 1 Containment 18 1 Containment 47 4 Containment 53 2 Control Room 27 2 CSPH 11 3 CSPH 27 1 EDG Room 27 6 ESGR 9 10 ESPH 18 5 Fire Pump House 27 1 Fuel Oil Pump House 16 1 Fuel Building 6 3 Fuel Building 20 1 MCR Computer Room 27 2 MER 1 47 2 MER3 9 2 MER4 9 1 MER5 9 5 MSVH 27 6 MSVH 40 1 Safeguards 12 2 Turbine 9 8 Service 9 1 Service 27 1 Yard 27 6 TOTAL 104 B-25
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I SWEL System Summary System Items Auxiliary Feedwater 9 Circulating Water 5 Component Cooling 6 Containment Spray 7 Containment Vacuum 1 CVCS 5 Dearated Drains 2 EDG 7 Electrical Power 15 Feedwater 2 Fire Protection 1 Heat Tracing 1 Instrument Air 4 Leakage Monitoring 2 Main Steam 6 Reactor Coolant 2 Reactor Protection 1 Recirculation Spray 1 Safety Injection 3 Service Water 9 Spent Fuel Cooling 4 Ventilation 11 TOTAL 104 B-26
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes Charging Pump 1 0 2-VS-MOD-201C Cubicle Exhaust Ventilation Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP2-WB-001 Damper 2 0 2-SW-REJ-201A BC Hx Inlet Header Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-002 CH/BORIC ACID 3 21 1-CH-TK-IC STORAGE TANK C CVCS Auxiliary 13' Y 1 SP2-WB-011 2,3 (BAST) 4 3 2-EP-BKR-25H9 Bus Emerger Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 2,3 3 2-E-BKR25H9 Bus Tie Breaker 5 1 2-EP-MCC-2H1-1A 2H Emergency MCC Electrical Power EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP2-WB-029 1,2,3 6 0 2-FW-T-2 Terry Turbine Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2,3 CONTROL ROOM 7 2 2-EP-CS-200 CHILLER 4B Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 TRANSFER SWITCH 8 0 2-MS-GOV-005 Terry Turbine Main Steam MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 Governor Valve 9 1 2-EP-MCC-2H1-2N Emergency MCC Electrical Power Cable Vault 15' Y 1,2,3,4,5 Y SP2-WB-006 1,2,3 10 1 2-EP-MCC-2K1 MCC for Chiller 4B Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2, 3, 4, 5 SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 Cable 11 2 2-RP-BKR-52-BYB R Trip Breaker Reactor Protection Spreading 45' Y 1 SP2-WB-008 2 Bypass Room 12 2 2-EP-LCC-2H 480V Emergency Bus Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 2,3 13 2 2-EP-LCC-2H1 480V Emergency Bus Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2, 3, 4, 5 SPl-WB-009 2,3 B-27
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 14 4 2-EP-TRAN-2J 4160-480V Service Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 Y SP1-WB-009 1,2,3 Transformer 15 4 2-EP-XFRM-2SVB1-2 480-120V Semi-Vital Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4, 5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Bus 16 5 2-CH-P-1A Charging Pump CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2,3 SP2-WB-010 2,3 17 5 1-CH-P-2C Boric Acid Transfer CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP2-WB-011 2 Pump 18 5 2-FW-P-2 Steam Driven Aux Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2,3 Feed Pump 19 5 2-FW-P-3A Aux Feed Pump Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2,3 20 5 2-CS-P-1A CS Pump 1A Containment Spray CSPH 27' Y 5 SP2-WB-041 2,3 Emergency 21 5 2-FW-P-4A Condensate Makeup Auxiliary Feedwater CSPH 11' Y 4 SP2-WB-013 2,3 Pump 22 5 1-CC-P-lC CC Pump Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y 4 SP1-WB-018 2,3 23 6 2-CC-P-2B Charging Pump CC 52W-1 Pump Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y 1, 2,3 SP2-WB-019 2 24 62-SWP-10 ChagingPump S 24 6 2-SW-P-bA Charging Pump SW Service Water MER 4 9' Y Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-014 2,3 Pump 25 6 2-RS-P-2A Outside RS Pump Recirculation Spray Safeguards 12' Y 4,5 SP2-WB-015 2 26 6 2-SI-P-lA Safety Injection Pump Safety Injection Safeguards 12' Y 3,4,5 SP2-WB-015 2 27 20 2-EP-PNL-ASP AUX SHUTDOWN Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1, 2, 3,4 SP1-WB-009 2 PANEL 28SG A Blowdown Steam Generator Containment -3' N 5 SP2-WB-023 Containment Isolation Blowdown 1 FW/SG A FW 29 7 2-FW-HCV-255A BYPAS BYPASS FLOW FW Feedwater MER 2 47' N 4 SP2-WB-021 I
B-28
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (YIN) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 30 7 2-DA-TV-203A PUMP WASTE TK Dearated Drains Auxiliary 2' N 5 SP2-WB-019 72-A-TV203A PUMP DISCH CIV 31 7 2-MS-PCV-202A Terry Turbine PCV Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-004 LM/CTMT LEAKAGE 32 7 2-LM-TV-200A MONITORING HDR Leakage Monitoring Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP2-WB-042 TRIP VALVE FW/SG C FW 33 7 2-FW-HCV-255C BYPSS FLOW BYPASS FW Feedwater MER 2 47' N 4 SP2-WB-021 34 7 2-MS-TV-220 Terry Turbine Steam Main Steam MSVH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-004 Isolation LM/CTMT LEAKAGE 35 7 2-LM-TV-200C MONITORING HDR Leakage Monitoring Auxiliary 13' N 5 SP2-WB-042 TRIP VALVE 36 7 2-CV-TV-250A Containment Vacuum Containment Vacuum Auxiliary 2' N 5 SP2-WB-019 Pump 18BSuction 37 7 2-MS-TV-201A MS Trip Valve Main Steam MSVH 40' N 4 SP2-WB-020 38 7 2-CC-TV-209B RHR Outlet Trip Valve Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' N Y 4,5 SP2-WB-019 39 7 2-FW-FCV-2478 Main Feed Reg Valve Feedwater MER 2 47' N Y 4 SP2-WB-021 40 7 2-IA-PCV-201 PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP2-WB-022 1 41 7 2-RC-PCV-2455C Pressurize PORV Reactor Coolant Containment 47' Y 2, 3 SP2-WB-022 1 42 7 2-DA-TV-200A Containment Sump Dearated Drains Containment -3' N Y 5 SP2-WB-023 1 Dsch Trip Valve 43 CH Pump Inlet CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1, 2, 3 SP2-WB-010 8
4 2-CH-MOV-201A CIsolation 44 8 2-CS-MOV-201A CS Pump Dsch Containment Spray CSPH ill N 3 SP2-WB-013 B-29
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 45 Chemical Addition Containment Spray CSPH 11' N Y 3 SP2-WB-013 58 2-CS-MOV-202A Tank Isolation 46 8 2-CW-MOV-200A Condenser Outlet Circulating Water Turbine 9' N 4 SP2-WB-024 47 8 2-CW-MOV-206A Condenser Inlet Circulating Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-024 48 8 2-CW-MOV-206C Condenser Inlet Circulating Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-024 49 16 2-EP-UPS-2A-1 EE/UPS 2A1 Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SP1-WB-009 1,2 50 8 2-SW-MOV-201A BC Hx Isolation Service Water Turbine 9' Y 4 SP2-WB-002 51 10 2-VS-AC-6 ESGR Air Handler Ventilation ESGR 9. Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2 52 10 2-VS-AC-7 ESGR Air Handler Ventilation ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2 53 8 2-CH-MOV-2275A CH/CHARGING PUMP RECIRC CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2, 3 SP2-WB-010 CH/CHARGING 54 8 2-CH-MOV-2286A PUMP OUTLET TO CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2,3 SP2-WB-010 CHARGING LINE 55 8 2-CH-MOV-2289A CH/CHARGING STOP CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2,3 SP2-WB-019 VALVE 56 8 2-CH-MOV-2289B CH/CHARGING STOP CVCS Auxiliary 2' N 1,2, 3 SP2-WB-019 VALVE 57 8 2-FW-MOV-251B AFW Header Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 47' Y 4 SP2-WB-025 1 58 8 2-FW-MOV-251E AFW Header Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 47' Y 4 SP2-WB-025 1 59 8 2-SI-MOV-2865A Accumulator Outlet Safety Injection Containment -27' N 2 SP2-WB-026 1 60 8 1-FW-MOV-160A AFW Cross-Connect Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-004 61 8 2-SW-MOV-205A RS Hx Isolation Service Water CSPH 11' N 4 SP2-WB-013 B-30
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 62 11 2-CS-MR-1B RWST Refrigeration Containment Spray Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP2-WB-028 2 Unit 63 12 2-EG-C-2 EDG Air Compressor EDG EDG 2 Room 27' N 1,2, 3,4 SP2-WB-029 2,3 64 12 2-IA-C-1 Instrument Air Instrument Air Turbine 9' N 4 SP2-WB-030 2,3 Compressor 65 14 2-EP-DB-2-IA EEI120V VITAL AC 2- Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 IA BUS (RED) 66 14 2-EP-DB-2SVB1 EE/120V SEMI-VITAL Electrical Power 27' N 1,2, 3,4,5 SP2-WB-003 1,2,3 AC BUS Room 67 14 2-EPD-DCS-2A-SUB EE/125V VITAL DC Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 SUB PNL 2A 68 14 2-EP-LP-2S12 MCR Lighting Cabinet Electrical Power ESGR 9' N 1,2, 3,4, 5 SPl-WB-009 2 69 15 2-EPD-B-2A 125V Battery Electrical Power Battery 9' Y 1,2, 3,4,5 SP2-WB-007 2,3 Room 70 15 2-EPD-B-2B 125V Battery Electrical Power Battery 9, Y 1,2, 3,4,5 P2-WB-040 2,3 Room 71 15 2-EE-B-EG2 EDG Battery EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1,2, 3,4 SP2-WB-029 2,3 72 16 2-EP-UPS-2B-2 EE/UPS 2B2 Electrical Power ESGR 9' Y 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 73 16 2-MS-BC-2 MSTV App R SOV Main Steam ESGR 9' N 4 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Battery Charger 74 17 2-EE-EG-1 Emergency Diesel EDG EDG 2 Room 27 Y 1,2,3,4 SP2-WB-029 2,3 Generator 1 75 1 2-C-PS203 Pressure PressCH PumpSwitch CC Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' Y 1, 2, 3 SP2-WB-019 76 18 2-CN-LT-200 ECST Level Auxiliary Feedwater Yard 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-031 Transmitter 77 18 2-CC-FT-210A CC/RHR HX OUTLET FLOW Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' N 1,2, 3 SP2-WB-019 2,3 B-31
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 78 18 2-CS-LT-200B RWST Level Containment Spray Yard 27' N 3 SP2-WB-028 79 18 2-MS-PT-2484 MS Pressure Main Steam CSPH 11' N 2,4,5 SP2-WB-013 2,3 Transmitter 80 18 2-MS-FT-200 MS Flow Transmitter Main Steam CSPH 27' N 4 SP2-WB-041 2 81 18 2-MS-PT-201A MS Pressure Main Steam CSPH 11' N 4 SP2-WB-013 2 Transmitter 82 18 2-RC-LT-2321 RVLIS B N-Range Reactor Coolant Auxiliary 13' N 3 SP2-WB-011 2,3 Level 83 18 2-SW-PS-7 CH Pump SW Service Water MER 4 9' Y 1,2,3 SP2-WB-014 Pressure Switch 84 18 2-FW-FT-200A AFW Flow Transmitter Auxiliary Feedwater Containment 18' N 4 SP2-WB-036 1,2 85 18 2-IA-PS-203B PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP2-WB-037 1,2 Pressure Switch 86 18 2-IA-PS-204B PORV Backup Air Instrument Air Containment 47' N 2, 3 SP2-WB-037 1,2 Bottle Pressure Switch 87 19 2-CC-RTD-209B RHR Hx Outlet Temp Component Cooling Auxiliary 2' N 4 SP2-WB-019 88 19 1-CH-TIC-1103 BAST A Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP2-WB-011 2,3 89 19 1-CH-TIC-1166 BAST B Temp CVCS Auxiliary 13' N 1 SP2-WB-011 2,3 90 19 2-CS-RTD-200A RWST Temp Containment Spray Yard 27' N 3, 5 SP2-WB-028 91 16 2-EE-BC-EG2 EDG 2 Battery EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1,2,3,4 SP2-WB-029 1,2,3 Charger 92 20 2-CW-PNL-1A Canal Level Relay Circulating Water ESGR 9' Y 4 SPl-WB-009 1,2,3 Panel 93 MS Pressure Main Steam CSPH 11' N 2,4,5 SP2-WB-013 2,3 3 18 2-MS-PT-2475 Transmitter REACTOR 94 20 2-RP-CAB-CHIB PROTECTION TRAIN Reactor Protection ESGR 9' N 1,2,3,4,5 SPl-WB-009 2 B _________ ___ _________
B-32
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL)
Risk Significant New or Safety IPEEE Area Item # Class ID Description System Location Elevation (Y/N) Replaced Functions Enhanced Walkby Notes 95 21 1-CC-E-1D CC Heat Exchanger Component Cooling Turbine 9' Y 4 SPl-WB-045 2,3 96 21 2-CN-TK-1 ECST Auxiliary Feedwater Yard 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-031 2 97 21 2-CS-TK-2 Cuastic Storage Tank Containment Spray Yard 27' Y 5 SP2-WB-028 2,3 98 21 2-FW-E-9 FW-P-2 Oil Cooler Auxiliary Feedwater MSVH 27' Y 4 SP2-WB-004 2 99 21 2-EE-TK-3 EDG 2 FO Day Tank EDG EDG 2 Room 27' Y 1, 2, 3, 4 SP2-WB-029 2 100 21 2-SI-TK-1C SI Accumulator Safety Injection Containment -27' N 3,4 SP2-WB-026 1,2,3 Notes
- 1. Not sufficiently accessible to complete the walkdown inspection. To be inspected when accessible.
- 2. Has anchorage
- 3. Detailed anchorage inspection to be performed 5 Safety Functions
- 1. Reactor reactivity control
- 2. Reactor coolant pressure control
- 3. Reactor coolant inventory control
- 5. Containment function B-33
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 7. Unit 2 Summary Tables UNIT 2 SWEL Eauipment Class Summarv GIP Class Title Items ClassI 0 Miscellaneous 4 1 Motor Control Centers 3 2 Low Voltage Switchgear 4 3 Medium Voltage Switchgear 1 4 Transformers 2 5 Horizontal Pumps 7 6 Vertical Pumps 4 7 Fluid Operated Valves 15 8 Motor Operated Valves, Solenoid Operated Valves 16 9 Fans 0 10 Air Handlers 2 11 Chillers 1 12 Air Compressors 2 13 Motor Generators 0 14 Distribution Panels 4 15 Batteries on Racks 3 16 Battery Chargers and Inverters 4 17 Engine Generators 1 18 Instruments on Racks 13 19 Temperature Sensors 4 20 Instrumentation and Control Panels and Racks 3 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers (GIP Section 7) 7 Total 100 B-34
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report UNIT 2 SWEL Location Summary Building Elevation Items Auxiliary 2 15 Auxiliary 13 7 Battery Room 9 2 Cable Spreading Room 45 1 Cable Vault 15 1 Containment -27 2 Containment -3 2 Containment 18 1 Containment 47 6 Control Room 27 1 CSPH 11 7 CSPH 27 2 EDG Room 27 6 ESGR 9 18 MER 2 47 3 MER4 9 2 MSVH 27 8 MSVH 40 1 Safeguards 12 2 Turbine 9 7 Yard 27 6 TOTAL 100 B-35
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 SWEL System Summary System Auxiliary Feedwater Circulating Water Component Cooling Containment Spray Containment Vacuum CVCS Dearated Drains EDG Electrical Power Feedwater Instrument Air Leakage Monitoring Main Steam Reactor Coolant Reactor Protection Recirculation Spray Safety Injection Service Water Steam Generator Blowdown Ventilation TOTAL B-36
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 8. Unit I Area Walk-by List Unit I Area Walk-by List Area Nmer Area Description Notes Number 1 EDG 1 Room 2 U1 CH Pump Cubicle C 3 MER 3 4 U1 TB 9'- CC SW Valve Pit 5 Not Used 6 U1 AFW Pump Area 7 Not Used 8 U1 Cable Vault 9 U1/U2 ESGR (inc Relay Rooms) 10 MER5 11 U1 Cable Spreading Room - RTB Cubicle 12 U1 MCR 13 U1 AB 27' 14 U1 CH Pump Cubicle A 15 U1 FOPH 16 Not Used 17 U1 CSPH 11' 18 AB 2' (CC Pump Area) 19 Fire Pump House 20 U1 AB 2' 21 ESPH 22 U1 RS/SI Pump Area 23 Not Used 24 UI MSVH 40' 25 Not Used 26 MER I 27 U1 Cont 47' (PRZ Cubicle) 1 28 U1 Cont -3' 1 29 Not Used 30 U1 TB 9' - Condenser Area 31 U1 TB 9' - BC SW Valve Pit 32 U1 Cont -27' 1 33 U1 Cont 47' (at Personnel Hatch Area) 1 34 U1 AB 47' 35 U1 RWST Area B-37
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit I Area Walk-by List Area Nmer Area Description Notes Number 36 Not Used 37 Not Used 38 U1 MCR Computer Room 39 U1 ESGR - near 1-VS-AC-7 40 U1 MCRAC Room 41 U1 ECST Area 42 U1 AB 13' 43 U1 Cont 18' 44 U1 Cont 47' (PORV Area) 45 CC HX Area 46 Not Used 47 U1 Battery Room A 48 U1 CSPH 27' Note
- 1. Walk-by not completed - associated SWEL items inaccessible during normal plant operations.
B-38
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report
- 9. Unit 2 Area Walk-by List Unit 2 Area Walk-by List Area Nmer Area Description Notes Number 1 U2 CH Pump Cubicle C 2 U2 TB 9'- BC SW Valve Pit 3 U2 MCR 4 U2 AFW Pump Area 5 Not Used 6 U2 Cable Vault 7 U2 Battery Room A 8 U2 Cable Spreading Room - RTB Cubicle 9 Not Used 10 U2 CH Pump Cubicle A 11 U2 AB 13'- BAST Area 12 Not Used 13 U2 CSPH 11' 14 MER4 15 U2 RS/Sl Pump Area 16 Not Used 17 Not Used 18 Not Used 19 U2 AB 2' 20 U2 MSVH 40' 21 MER 2 22 U2 Cont 47' (PRZ Cubicle) 1 23 U2 Cont -3' 1 24 U2 TB 9' - Condenser Area 25 U2 Cont 47' (at Personnel Hatch Area) 1 26 U2 Cont -27' 1 27 Not Used 28 U2 RWST Area 29 EDG 2 Room 30 U2 TB 9' - IA Compressor Area 31 U2 ECST Area 32 Not Used 33 Not Used 34 Not Used 35 Not Used B-39
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Unit 2 Area Walk-by List Area Nmer Area Description Notes Number 36 U2 Cont 18' 1 37 U2 Cont 47' (PORV Area) 1 38 SFP Cooler Area 39 Not Used 40 U2 Battery Room B 41 U2 CSPH 27' 42 U2 AB 13' Note
- 1. Walk-by not completed - associated SWEL items inaccessible during normal plant operations.
B-40
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Checklists C-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-2 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-002 AWC # SP1-WB-002 Status YZ NE] U'-
Equipment ID No. l-VS-MOD-101C Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description CHA4RGING PUMP CUBICLE EXHA USTDAMPER Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area CP CUB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NEI U[I N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YM Nnl UZ N/AZl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UZ N/AD
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE] N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[]NZf]UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-3 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-002 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN Nil U-] N/Ar]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Ni] U[] N/A:]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UI- N/AL]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[D Nil U[]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
None Evaluated by: William Gallagher. Sr.
LL~S~Žzzz Date: 8/23/2012 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/23/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-4 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-003 AWC # SP1-WB-003 Status YO NE UD]
Equipment ID No. 1-VS-S-lB Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description SELF CLEANING STRAINER Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER 3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) KINNEY SP, ENGINEERS INC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NE UE1 N/AEI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NC UE' N/AEl oxidation?
Minor corrosion on anchorbolts andpedestal -- not a seismic concern
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NE UE N/ADl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI N] UD] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UEJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
NW anchor bolt less thanfull engagement (-1 threadshort) --* not a seismic concern
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-5 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-003 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U[L N/AL
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[] N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overheadfluorescent lights -- previously evaluated by USI-A-46/IPEEE,therefore, no seismic concerns.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE-) U[" N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Spalling on three corners (NW, SW, SE) --+ straineris anchoredby (4) 5/8" 0 bolts that are doweled into the floor slab, therefore, no seismic concerns but should be fixed. CR 486517 submitted.
Evaluated by: David Germano Lb.. ~;~P A4teAAL4~ Date: 8/29/2012 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan <:7g06ý Date: 8/29/2012 A ýý
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-6 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-004 AWC # SP1-WB-031 Status YO No] Ur Equipment ID No. 1-SW-REJ-101A Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description MOV-IOIA OUTLET Location: Bldg. TURBINE Floor El. 9' Room, Area TURBINE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NI] U-- N/AI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NI] UI] N/AI oxidation?
Note: mild surface corrosiongenerally noted on all tension connection all threadand nuts.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YDJ NEI U'I N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NI] UI] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-7 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-004 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI Ut] N/At]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO Ntl Ut] N/At]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yt] NEI Ut] N/AZ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI Ut]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] UtI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Reference Drawing 11448-FC-2C Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-8 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-005 AWC # SP1-WB-004 Status YO N[I UEI Equipment ID No. 1-SW-REJ-102A Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description CCHXINLETHEADER Location: Bldg. TURBINE Floor El. 9' Room, Area TURBINE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE N/A[
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE UE" N/A0 oxidation?
Note: all threadstud tension members do have minor corrosion.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UEl N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[ NEI UE N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI NEI UEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-9 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-005 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NI U'I N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[-] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N- ULI N/Al
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Drawing11448-FC-2R Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth PEkb ý" ?Q.- +euuý" Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-10 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-006 AWC # SP1-WB-010 Status YE NE] UM Equipment ID No. 1-VS-AC-219 Equip. Class 10 Equipment Description MER5 AIR HANDLER Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE N/A[]
Anchored by tube steel, welded to embedded plates
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UE[ N/AE1 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE- N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEi NEI UE N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[E potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-ll Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-006 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE UE"] N/AEq
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y(E NEI UE1 N/A[:
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UEI N/AE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire I Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-12 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-007 AWC # SPl-WB-006 Status YIE NI] UiM Equipment ID No. 1-FW-T-2 Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NI] UiO N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI ND UD N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YID NEI UD N/AD
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YS NO UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith VTMDrawing V-46HMTA86X4-A.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS ND Ui potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-13 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-007 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NI] U[I N/Al]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N[:] U[-] N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI Ul1 N/Al
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-14 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-008 AWC # SP1-WB-010 Status YZ N7 UFI Equipment ID No. 1-VS-AC-222 Equip. Class 10 Equipment Description MER 5 AIR HANDLER Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE U- N/As Anchored by tube steel, welded to embeddedplates
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U- N/A-oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO U- N/A[I
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE UE[ N/An (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTrF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-15 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-008 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UI] N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[] UI] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NI] UDI N/AI]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NIEUI-]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
OtherAdverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UI]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan 4AL Q:2. Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /Sr- r
"'I /4" Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-16 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-009 AWC # SP1-WB-006 Status YN N[-] U']
Equipment ID No. l-MS-GOV-005 Equip.
Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE GOVERNOR VALVE Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLJ NEI ULI N/AI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YLI NnI UD N/A[9 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YU NEI UE" N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YrU NII UlI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page 0-17 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-009 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U[].N/AEU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE] N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NI UUD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO* N[] UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Elle' Baker Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-18 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-013 AWC # SP1-WB-011 Status YZ NE] UE]
Equipment ID No. 1-RP-BKR-52-BYB Equip.
Equipment Description RX TRIP BREAKER BYPASS Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 45' Room, Area CABLE SPREADING ROOM (RTB CUBICLE Onlv)
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) WESTINGHOUSE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the'results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE U[] N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U!] N/A!]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U!] N/A!]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U[:] N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-19 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-013 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/AL
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NEI- U[I N/A['
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Fluorescentlighting above cabinet to the east and west. Fluorescent lighting was addressedduring USIA-U6/IPEEEand determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-- N/AUl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE U[i of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J Vasquez 4ý Date: 8/22/2012 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/22/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-20 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-014 AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status YED NEI UE-Equipment ID No. 1-EP-LCC-1H Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description 480VEMERGENCYBUS Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage-free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NDI UE N/All
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE UO N/ADl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE" N/AC'
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U" N/ACl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UC'q potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-21 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-014 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI UD' N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NDI UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND U-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
CR 485666.: 1-EP-LCC-1H--- 1-EP-BRR-15H7, I penetration notfully sealed CR 485670."cabinet block out blank coverfor 1-EP-CUB-14H-6missing 2 bolts Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter AU10 L Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-22 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-015 AWC # SPI-WB-009 Status YZ No UI]
Equipment ID No. 1-EP-LCC-1H1 Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description 480VEMERGENCY BUS Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ITE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO ND UL1 N/Af1
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI U- N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ ND UD N/Afl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UD- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-23 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-015 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UWI N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEl UE] N/AFI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEl UEi N/A[]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[-- U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NfE Uf]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinets are bolted together.
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-24 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-016 AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status YE NEl Ui]
Equipment ID No. 1-EP-BKR-15J9 Equip. Class 3 Equipment Description STUB BUS TIE BREAKER Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE1 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE1 N/AE
-Plugwelds used. Fourplug welds for 15J9 cabinet. Fourplug welds for 15JlO and 15JlJ cabinet were also inspected.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE UE1 N/AE1 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE[ N/AM
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-25 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-016 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UE N/AE1
- 1) 3" clear of 1JJ load center to the west, acceptable.
- 2) Junction box on east side ofpanel close to wall mounted cable tray on east wall (1/2"clearance),judged acceptablesince cable tray will have minimal displacement and will not interact.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UE- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 1) Fluorescentlights on north and south side. Fluorescentlights were evaluated during USIA-46/IPEEE and concluded not to be a seismic concern.
- 2) Threaded rod overhead on South side appearsbent to clear interferences. Conduits supported adequately despite this condition.
- 3) Cable duct between 1JJ stub bus tie breaker andnormalfeed JJ is supported with threaded rods and approximatelymid span. Welded angle lug on west side of duct not used.
- 4) Adjacent stub bus cabinets were bolted together.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE UE N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI U[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/28/12 A4 J-Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/28/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-26 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-020 AWC # SP1-WB-014 Status YZ Ni] UL Equipment ID No. 1-CH-P-1A Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area J/9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) WESTINGHOUSE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions niay be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YNI-]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE U-I N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI] U-] N/AL]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NI] UL] N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NI] U-] N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-27 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-020 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDI U- N/ADl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NDI UD-' N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UD N/ADl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Conduit at temperatureinstrument 01-CH-TE-1 08A at bearingEast side. Flex out of conduit adapter and 3/4" conduit not attachedto supports. CR 485989 submitted.
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker 74A~-~ /"3 Date: 8/23/12
- A* I I Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/23/12 V
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-28 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-021 AWC # SP1-WB-015 Status YZ NE U[]
Equipment lID No. 1-EE-P-lC Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description EDG 3 FO TRANSFER PUMP Location: Bldg. FOPH Floor El. 16' Room, Area FOPH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) SIER - BATHPUMPS/DRESSER PUMP Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[3 N!] U!] N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO N!] U!] N/A!]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO N!I U!] N/A!]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NE] U!] N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 11448-FC-29J
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-29 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-021 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI UE N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] UE N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UEI N/AZ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Evauatd y: arrCllianDat: Date: 8/22/12
/221" Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /" / -4 Date: 8122112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-30 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-022 AWC # SP1-WB-048 Status YN NE] UIM Equipment ID No. 1-CS-P-lA Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 27' Room, Area CSPH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[9 NEI UE] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NE UE] N/As
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11448-FC-19C Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-31 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-022 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI UE N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UE- N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE] ULJ N/AEJ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[O NIJ UU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larrv Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire , . Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-32 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-023 AWC # SP1-WB-006 Status YE NEI UD Equipment ID No. 1-FW-P-2 Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description STEAM DRIVENA UXFEED PUMP Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 2 7'-6" Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) INGERSOLL - RAND, 4HMTA-6 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[D NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI0 NE UO N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEl Uf- N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI Ur- N/AD!
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YS NEI UOI N/A]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Reference:
VTM Drawing V-46HMTA86X4-A
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NITTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-33 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-023 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U'- N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[] U[] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UD- N/AD1
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDi U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker "Oý/ ký= - Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-34 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-024 AWC # SPI-WB-017 Status YID N[] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-FW-P-4A Equip. Class Equipment Description EMERGENCY COND MAKEUP PUMP Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GOULDS PUMPSINC. 3196XLT. 6XB-13 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEL of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NI] Ui] N/AIl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y* NI] UI] N/AI]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NIl U- N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NI] UI] N/AI-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEUI'-!
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-35 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-024 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI ULi N/A]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UfL N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE" N/AE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI Un of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /Y/11 ~J~- Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-36 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-025 AWC # SP1-WB-018 Status YZ NE] UI1 Equipment ID No. 1-CC-P-lA Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CC PUMP Location: Bldg. AUX - Floor El. 2' Room, Area G/9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) DE LA VAL TURBINE INC.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y1N NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UL7 N/All
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UL1 N/ALl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N[ UL[ N/AL1
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UL- N/AL (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[9 NEl UEL potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-37 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-025 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[Z NEI UE N/AE-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[* NO U' N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI Ul N/Al:
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE:
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
East end ofpump: Bearing temperatureindicatorconduit is missing Unistrut clamp. Not a seismic concern, but should be corrected.Submitted CR 485686.
Evaluated by: Eller' Baker I.Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher. SAr e: 8/22/12 6,
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-38 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-026 AWC # SP1-WB-019 Status YN NEI UD Equipment ID No. 1-FP-P-2 Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description DIESEL FIRE* PUMP Location: Bldg. FPH Floor El. 27' Room, Area FIREPUMPHOUSE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) CUMMINGS ENGINE CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UU N/AU
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NfE UR N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEE NEI U- N/A[
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEl UD N/A[
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11448-FC-36A
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UU potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-39 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-026 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] U[J] N/AD]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UE] N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE] UE] N/ADl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan IV Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire K* / Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-40 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-027 AWC # SPl-WB-020 Status, YlZ NEI U']
Equipment ID No. 1-CC-P-2A Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP CC PUMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area J/8.1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GOULDS PUMPINC. 3446ST Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI Ni]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NI- UI] N/AI]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN Ni] Ui- N/Ai]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ Ni] UI] N/Ai
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YtE Ni] Ui N/Ai]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NiE U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-41 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-027 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO U1I N/AQ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE] N/AN
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eller Baker Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher Sr Date: 8/22/12
%, W/
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-42 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-028 AWC # SP2-WB-014 Status YO NiO UO Equipment ID No. 1-SW-P-10A Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMPSWPUMP Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GOULD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments, Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NO I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE1 N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UO] N/A[:
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UI- N/A[1
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YNi] U-I N/A[U (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS and 11448-PSSK-1021A36.131
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NI] U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-43 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-028 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] U[- N/AL]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U-] N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NI UI] N/A[-
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI Ut]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UL]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Pump base has mild corrosion -* not a seismic concern.
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan *o . Date: 8/29/12 Evaluated by: David Gernano obaA~e/ JWM44.'O Date: 8/29/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-44 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-029 AWC # SP1-WB-021 Status YN NE] UE]
Equipment ID No. 1-SW-P-IC Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description EMERGENCY SW PUMP Location: Bldg. ESPH Floor El. 18' Room, Area ESWPUMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) SULZER BINGHAM, VLTM, 45 FTHO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UI] N/AIl Noted lack ofthread engagement at westernmost two offour anchors.
Lacking I - 1 % threads.Found to be acceptable.Note these are 1 1/4" anchorsvs 1" anchors at lA/B pumps.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NI[] UI N/AI]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI Ur] N/AI]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NI] UI]- N/AI]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USI A-46 SEWS Drawing 11448-FC-9H/9M
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-45 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-029 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEP UE N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UI- N/AUl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[l UF1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerg Baker 151-I'/-V 45v-ý Date: 8/2 7/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-46 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-030 AWC # SP1-WB-022 Status YN NEI UD Equipment ID No. I-RS-P-2A Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description OUTSIDERS PUMP Location: Bldg. SFGD Floor El. 12' Room, Area RS/SI Pump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) SULZER BINGHAM 10 x 18B J- VCRI AH Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NIO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YDI NEI Ut] N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI Ut] N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI Ut NWAS
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI Ut] N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO Ut]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Pump supports are bedded (notfriction sliding) to Reactor Containmentwall support.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-47 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-030 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NI] UI- N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N] Ui N/AI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NI] U-] N/AI]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NIE UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NI] UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: E11e Baker Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William GallagherS 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-48 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-031 AWC # SPl-WB-022 Status YE Ni-] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-SI-P-IA Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description SAFETY INJECTIONPUMP Location: Bldg. SFGD Floor El. 12' Room, Area RS/SIPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) BYRON JACKSONPUMP, TURBINE PUMP Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UDl N/AU
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U[] N/AEI oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U0 N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YDJ NEI U0 N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-49 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-031 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U[- N/A[J
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UE] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UfI N/As
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker I _Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, __Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-50 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-032 AWC # SP1-WB-010 Status YO N[:] U-1 Equipment ID No. 1-VS-P-1D Equip. Class" 6 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 10' Room, Area MER 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GOULD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE1 N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE] UE] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE] UE1 N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE- N/A9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-51 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-032 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[] UE N/AEl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UE1 N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE UE N/AE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NM UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N['] Ur-E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated. by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /.i1 1 Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-52 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-033 AWC # SP1-WB-026 Status YZ NEI UI1 Equipment ID No. 1-FW-HCV-155A Equip. Class 07 Equipment Description FW/SG A FWBYP FLOW Location: Bldg. SERV Floor El. 42' Room, Area MER-1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NI] U-] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI- N] UIE] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI- NEI UI] N/As
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[- NEI U-1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NE'UI"U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-53 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-033 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U[] N/AE
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE UE N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE NIAE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEIUE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire 14<A4 >1- Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-54 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-034 AWC # SP1-WB-006 Status YO N[ UC-Equipment ID No. I-MS-PCV-102A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE PCV Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWVEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEl NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YC NEI UC- N/AI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI- NEI UC N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YC NE U- N/AI
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YC NC UC N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-55 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEI,-034 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NE UEI N/A[-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UL- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NE UEJ N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0D N[O UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Elley Baker / Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Galla er Sr. Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-56 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-035 AWC # SP1-WB-020 Status Y[D N[i Ur-1 Equipment ID No. I1-DA-TV- 103A _ Equip. Class '07 Equipment Description OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT RET J-DR TV Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmrents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YrI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE[ NFO UEI N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ- NEI UE1 N/A9 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- NEI UE- N/A
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NIh UEr N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Ur-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-57 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-035 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[:] UE N/A((
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEJ N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YID NEI U[I N/AE3
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0Z NEI U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallazher, Sr. Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Aý /-I- U Date: 8/27/12
/
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-58 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-036 AWC # SP1-WB-042 Status YO NOI UD Equipment ID No. 1-LM-TV-lOOA Equip. Class 07 Equipment Description LM/LMC TAP 3 & 6 BAROMETER SUP TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorase
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI N[D of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YU NEI UD N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEJ NEI UD N/AS oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI- NEI UO N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE! N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI uE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-59 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-036 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NED ULI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UfI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NEI UE1 N/AUE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE U[3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallagher, D Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8124112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-60 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-037 AWC # SP1-WB-024 Status YE NE] UE1 Equipment ID No. 1-MS-TV-101A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description MS TRIP VALVE.
Location: Bldg. MSVH ' Floor El. 40' Room, Area GA/5.6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) SHUTTE & KOERTING CO.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UEr N/A0
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEr NE UE1 N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- NE UE N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[3 UEr potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-61 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-037 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NCI UO N/ACI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UL- N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UC N/AlC
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NC UC7 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan . Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /- Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-62 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-038 AWC # SP1-WB-006 Status YN NE] U]
Equipment ID No. 1-MS-TV-120 Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE STEAM ISOLATION Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GIMPEL GROUP, P3435 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[1 NN]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEJ NEI UL1 N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YLI NE U[] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YLI NEI U-1 N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YHI NEI U[H N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UH-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-63 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-038 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI UI] N/Al]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NI] U-1 N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UI] N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NI] Ul]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated 8/21/12 Evaluated 8121112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-64 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-039 AWC # SP1-WB-042 Status YZ NE] U--
Equipment ID No. 1-LM-TV-100C Equip. Class 07 Equipment Description LM/LMC TAP 1 & 8 BAROMETER SUP TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 13' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- NI] UI] N/AýZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NI] U[] NWAN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NI] UI1 N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI] NEI UI1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZNIEUI[-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-65 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-039 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NLI ULI N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[O NE] UZ N/A[
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI ULI N/AZ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NZFI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr.
61/1- Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker A Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-66 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-040 AWC # SP1-WB-020 Status YZ NO U[j Equipment ID No. 1-CV-TV-150A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description CONT VACUUMPUMP 1B SUCTION Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area PENETRATIONAREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE N/AIZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI U- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-67 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-040 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI ULI N/A[]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U'- N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[:] N/AL
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker ~Li~1JtzZ Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/22/12 I.'IV
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-68 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-041 AWC # SP1-WB-020 Status YZ NR] UF]
Equipment ID No. I-CC-TV-109B Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description RHR OUTLET TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area K/7.4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE[- NE] U"] N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE] U[- N/As oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE1 N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-69 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-041 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UF] N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UE] N/A[U and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO Ni] UIl N/AUI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Ni] UM]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker /Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,S /" ate: 8/22/12 U
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-70 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-042 AWC # SP1-WB-026 Status YE NEI UE]
Equipment ID No. 1-FW-FCV-1488 Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description MAIN FEED REG VALVE Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 42' Room, Area MER 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NI] UI] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YDI NEI UI] N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI] NE] UI] N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI] NI] UI] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YONIEI UI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-71 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # iSP1-W-SWEL-042 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0R NEI UE" N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[] UE N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE1 N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NF UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /K / 1- Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-72 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-046 AWC # SP1-WB-017 Status YZ NE] UE]
Equipment ID No. I-CS-MOV-101A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CS PUMPDSCH Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE- N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE1 N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE] UE] N/As
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] U0 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEE NE*] U[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-73 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-046 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE1 N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE1 N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE N/AO
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UEC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire * /11 ,J-- Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-74 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-047 AWC # SP1-WB-017 Status YE NE] UL]
Equipment ID No. 1-CS-MOV-102A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CHEMICAL ADDITION TANK ISOLATION Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE1 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[I NEI Ut] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI Ut] N/As oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] U-] N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YED N[I UE] N/AjZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-75 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-047 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U['- N/AZ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NM ULI N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YJE NEI UI N/AZ3
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UZl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YER NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larr, Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-76 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-048 AWC # SP1-WB-030 Status YO NE] UD]
Equipment ID No. 1-CW-MOV-100A Equip. Class Equipment Description CONDENSER OUTLET Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area Condenser Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PRATT. HENRY CO. XR-70 961N Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI" NEI U] N/AS
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YDI NI] UI] N/A[9 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YDI NI] UI] N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YDI NI] UI] N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NIE UI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-77 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-048 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE ND UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN N[:] U[ N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SEWS Drawing11448-FC-2J Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-78 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-049 AWC # SPI-WB-030 Status YN N[] U-]
Equipment ID No. 1-CW-MOV-106A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CONDENSER INLET Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area CondenserArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PRATT, HENRY, CO. XR-70 96IN Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLI NEI U-- N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE1 N/AZ oxidation?
Note. mild surface corrosion on tension connection all threadbolts
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE UE N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE' N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
CR 485421 - valve actuatorto valve bonnet loose, retorque, no seismic challenge
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-79 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-049 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UFI N/AEl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[K NE-I U-1 N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Note: condenser inlet IA CWInlet RTD-J OOA is missing a clip CR 485699 01-CW-37 condenser inlet IA tube runpoorly supported CR 485704 - conduit support clipfor 38-01-CW-RTD-1OOA is missing
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI ULI N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ Nil U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
CR 485562- stuffing box glandfollower loose drip water at bottom of ]A, note also at 1C Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS Drawing 11448-FC-2F Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth "."X6ý6 Date: 8/21/12 r-IZh- t-A Y
l, w tlý-wffA, IVI*L*R&*
WiUjmntor FV Yr LJLL*F f QJD~ Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-80 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-050 AWC-# SP1-W]B-030 Status YN NO U]
Equipment ID No. 1-CW-MOV-106C Equip.
Equipment Description CONDENSER INLET Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area CondenserArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PRATT. LENRY. CO. XR-70 961N Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NE UE- N/A0
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE[ NEl UE N/AZ oxidation?
Note: some mild surface corrosionon approximately 30% of tension connection all-threadsteel studs and nuts.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- NE UE] N/A
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE N/A[
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UE[
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-81 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-050 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI N/AL
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-CR 485543for conduitfor 1-CW-RTD-IOOD needs to be supported at west end 1D waterbox access platform.
-CR 485711 - condenserinlet ID tube run to 38-01-CW-24 is missing support.
-CR 485746- CW-RTD-I OOC conduitsupport clip is missing.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] U[- N/ALl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEL UrL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
CR 485536 to note SW-MOV-106C (and 106A) stem packing collar bolts, 2 each at approximately 4" lock washer loose Consistent with USI A-46 SEWS Drawing11448-FC-2F Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Y(
-ML)>ý' Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-82 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-051 AWC # SP1-WB-031 Status Yo NO] ULi Equipment ID No. 1-SW-MOV-101A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description BCHXISOLATION Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area Valve Pit Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) PRATT, HENRY, CO. XR-70 36IN Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NI UL N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NI] U1I N/AN oxidation?
Note: Mild surface corrosion generally noted on all tension connection all-threadand nuts.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO1 NI] UL1 N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[O NO- UOI N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEDNIE] U1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-83 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-051 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI ULI N/AE
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED N[1 UI"E N/AE:]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ* NDF UE1 N/A[-]
YN NEI UO' A
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] UI-'
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Reference:
Drawing11448-FC-2C SEWS Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-84 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-052 AWC # SP1-WB-014 Status YZ NEI Ur-Equipment ID No. 1-CH-MOV-1267A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CH/CHARGING PUMPINLET ISOL Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area "A" CHARGING PUMP CUBICLE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE] U[-] N/A[D oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE] N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE]- NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-85 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-052 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U[] N/AZ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Ni] U!] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] U! N/A!
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NEI Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker 74 / 4d Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William GallagherS Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-86 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-053 AWC # SP1-WB-014 Status YZ N[] Ur']
Equipment ID No. 1-CH-MOV-1275A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CHICHARGING PUMPRECIRC Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area "A" CHARGING PUMP CUBICLE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[O NE] U-] N/Ag
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE] U!] N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y!] NEI U!] N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI U!] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[-] UE" potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-87 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-053 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO U[E N/AE1
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nil UE N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U[l N/AE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE U-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eller Baker tDate: 8/23/112 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, S / & -- ate: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-88 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-057 AWC # SP1-WB-034 Status YZ N[] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-VS-F-58A Equip. Class 9 Equipment Description FILTER 3A EXHA UST FAN Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 47' Room, Area J11_0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist.shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE1 N/A[1
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE] N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YED NEI U[] N/AE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11448-FC-24GG
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendii C Page C-89 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-057 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI JD N/AQI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOl U[E N/AO1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UE] N!AQJ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEIUU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked.for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by- Larry Cullivan C [ Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire e**L J' ý4 =~ Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-90 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-058 AWC # SP1-WB-034 Status YO N[] UMI Equipment ID No. 1-VS-F-58B Equip. Class 9 Equipment Description FILTER 3B EXHA UST FAN Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 47' Room, Area J/1O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[O NEI UI- N/AEU
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE U"] N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UL-1 N/A[
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N[- ULI N/AUl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11448-FC-24GG
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NI UU1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-91 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEe-058 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NI UO N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0@ NO 11 N/AEJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
--- -~9.-Do7-attachedi-ines-have-adequate-flexibility-to-avoid-damage?---------YZ--NE3-U~-N-/AD-- --
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UI3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIB Nf' U["]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
PvahiAtf~.d hv: Cullivan Tan,, Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated bv ..... Cu........
Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8124112 jr
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-92 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-061 AWC # SP1-WB-035 Status YZ NO UL-Equipment ID No. 1-CS-MR-lB Equip. Class 11 Equipment Description RWSTREFRIGERATOR UNIT Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) DRAKE INDUSTRIES INC., 20AOCSJ 0 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOl N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UO N/Afl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UM N/AM oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y19 NO- UOI N/AFl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOl NEI UO N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the itemis one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-93 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-061 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE UE1 N/AE
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NEI U[- N/AN and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE' N/AE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluatedby: KevinMcGuire Date: 8/21/12.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-94 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-062 AWC # SP1-WB-003 Status YZ NE] U[:]
Equipment ID No. l-VS-E-4B Equip. Class 11 Equipment Description CHILLER Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6", Room, Area MER 3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) WESTINGHO USE PANEL, MCOUAY CONDENSER, EAST COAST COMPRESSOR Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE] N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] U[-] N/AM oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN N[] U[E] N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USI A-46 SEWS and calc. no. 01039.4610-NPB-022-XE
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-95 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-062 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N]I UrI N/Al]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI ULI N/AU]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Fluorescentlights overhead not a seismic concernper USIA-46.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NEl UE1 N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[] UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
C;I Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan - Date: 8/29/2012 Evaluated by: David Germano f .. Date: 8/29/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-96 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-063 AWC # SP1-WB-010 Status YZ NE] ULI Equipment ID No. l-VS-E-4E Equip. Class 11 Equipment Description MCR/ESGR CHILLER Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area MIER5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIE NE UE N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE UEI N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UEI N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11548-FC-6F
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-97 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-063 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UE" N/A[I
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UE N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI NE UE" N/Afl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan 5ýý:46;t4n Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-98 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-064 AWC # SP1-WB-O01 Status YZ NE] UL1 Equipment IDeNo. 1-EG-C-2 Equip. Class 12 Equipment ]Description ED G AIR COMPRESSOR No. 2 Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 1 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE N/AEl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI UE N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE N/AE1
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with Drawing: 11448-1.30-104A
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-99 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-064 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/AEl
- 1) After cooler 1-EG-E-7 well supported. InstalledDCP 04-013
- 2) Overheadsteam line to space heater is rod hung -- adequate to restrainline duringseismic event
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE] NE] U-1 N/AFl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-Large overhead light secured Unistrut that is rod hung. Acceptable.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE1 N/A[1
- 10. Base~d on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez £ Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Evlute b:O~3Aoid avd eran mato-ew Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-100 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-065 AWC # SP2-WB-030 Status YER NO UED Equipment ID No. 1-IA-C-1 Equip. Class 12 Equipment Description INSTR UMENT AIR COMPRESSOR Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area TURBINE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UL N/A[l
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U- N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN ND UOI N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI U[I N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
PerDrawing 11548-FC-6A. (Note.: 1-IA-C-1 is on Unit 2 side)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-101 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-065 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UD- N/AD1
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM ND UD N/AD[
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
CR 486192 - tubing runfrom compressor outlet vertically and west is not securely supported,has loose and missing nuts on supports. This was determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD N/AD1
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO U[1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth P t , &
1 %"-Lt.3 p**, ,-Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter ft-wlý 0ý Date: 8124112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-102 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-069 AWC # SPI-WB-038 Status YZ No U-1 Equipment ID No. 1-EPD-LP-1EC1 Equip. Class 14 Equipment Description EMERGENCY LIGHTING PANEL Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 277' Room, Area MCR COMPUTER ROOM #1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) sOQUARED - CATNO. NA JB-9-7596-1C Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[-1 UL N/AE-
-Fouranchors to Unistrut viewed from inside cabinet
-Could not view inside Unistrut since ends are capped
-Tug-tested satisfactorily
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UF1 N/AL oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN N[- ULJ N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/A9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-103 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-069 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULI N/AE1 Approximately V2" clear ofblock wall support column to South side of panel. Acceptable based on judgment ofboth SWEs.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NEI UE N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-Block wall panel mounted to is reinforced.
-Drop ceilingpanels in overhead. This equipment is classified as NSQ and non-seismic (see note below); therefore, it is not a sensitive target.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NEI U-I N/AEI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U[E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Small crack (<0.04 ") in groutedconduit penetrationthrough the floor.
Not a seismic concern.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Note: this component is classified in EDS as NSQ but non-seismic; however, it was included within the scope of USIA-46 and a SEWS package was preparedthat indicates that the panel is adequately mountedfor seismic.
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez /1 Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-104 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-070 AWC # SP1-WB-021 Status YZ NE] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-SW-B-iC Equip. Class 15 Equipment Description EMERGENCY SWPUMP BATTERY Location: Bldg. ESW Floor El. 18' Room, Area ESPH PUMP Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) EXIDE LEAD CALCIUM PLATE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE U[- N/ACI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI Ufl N/AE1 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NEI UE N/A[-
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U-1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11448-FC-9H2/9H3 Note: SEWS is no longer applicablefor this battery rack.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-105 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-070 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y10 NEI UEI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UI] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U-I N/AUl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[N NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Ni] U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-106 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-071 AWC # SP1-WB-001 Status YN NEI UI-Equipment ID No. l-EE-B-EG1 Equip. Class 15 Equipment Description EDG BATTERY Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG #1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U!] N/Al]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U[] N/An oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE] N/AE3
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NE] U[] N/A[]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Calculation CE-1806 (and 14257.46-DSC-2.1, which has been superseded by CE-1806) considers %-"diameter anchor bolts. Actual configuration is different, but bounded by the analysis-of-record.See sketch for actualbolt configuration.
3/4" dia. 5/8" dia. 5/8" dia. 5/8" dia. 1/2" dia. 1/2" dia.
- Same outline
+ r-[+ dimensions, different 155 bolt sizes as shown.
+*+ Typ* Typ* Typ* Typ* Typ*
14.75"+/- + U + fI I Field measurements- "
1-North
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C PaP*g7 2 of 2 SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-071
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NE] UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UL] N/ANi
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U] N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE] UTiE N/ArU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free, YM NO- UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] UE1 adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-108 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-072 AWC # SP1-WB-047 Status Y[ NM UM Equipment ID No. 1-EPD-B-lA Equip. Class 15 Equipment Description 125 VBAITERY Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area BATTERYROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) EXIDE G Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YS NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NE UE N/AE-oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UO N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UE] N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS Calculations52182-C-006, 52182-C-007
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-109 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-072 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NI U[t] N/At
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI ULI N/At]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U[I N/At]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NtI Ut]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nt] U[t adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth 4*I I Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter (*7*k'L)Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-110 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-075 AWC # SP1-WB-O01 Status YN Ni] ULJ Equipment ID No. l-EE-EG-1 Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 1 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) GENERAL MOTOR CORP. MODEL #20-645-E4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YS NI] UO N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI] UO] N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI Ui N/A]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI Ui] N/Ai]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith drawing 11448-FC-2VC
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-111 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-075 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UI- N/A[:
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI ULI N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- Conduitrun on the east side of the engine in the overhead, supportedusing clips -- this was identified in the USIA-46 SEWS
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UF' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: David Germano ebaod hmowrta, Date: 8122112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-i112 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-076 AWC # SP1-WB-021 Status YN NE UM Equipment ID No. 1-SW-PENG-1C Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description EMERGENCY SW PUMPDIESEL Location: Bldg. ESPH. Floor El. 20' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) DETROITDIESEL ALLISON Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NZ ULI N/AE1 CR 486253 - one offour southeast anchor nuts is loose (washerspins) on south foot.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE UE N/A[3 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE UE1 N/AE1 CR 486318- base of concrete pedestalfor 1-SW-PENG-1C has a crack/spall in the southeast corner. 6" long x 2" wide x 4" deep.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UL N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS Drawing 11448-FC-9H/9M
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 13 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-076 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NI] UI] N/AZl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NEI UE] N/AEZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NI] UI] N/AEZ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIE NI] UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIQ NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker 2ý114 Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 14 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-077 AWC # SP1-WB-020 Status YO NE UE1 Equipment ID No. 1-CC-PS-103 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description CHPUMP CC PRESSURE SWITCH Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area J/8.1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) BARKSDALE CONTROLS DIV., D2TM15OSS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[l UE] N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE UE N/AE[
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE UE[ N/A[
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NEI UiE N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE U[E potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 15 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-077 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NE] UE] N/A[
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U!] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NM U[] N/AUq
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-'
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eller Baker ate: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher ,R ate: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 16 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-078 AWC # SP1-WB-041 Status YZ Nn] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-CN-LT-100 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description ECST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ROSSMOUNTINC., 1152DP5N22PB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE" NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y9 NE] UE3 N/AE!
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UI] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UI] N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NI] U-1 N/A[O (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NI UM]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-117 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-078 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-1 N/AUl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NEI UE1 N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE- N/Afl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE1 ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: LaM Clivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-118 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-079 AWC # SPl-WB-035 Status YO N[] ULJ Equipment ID No. 1-CS-LT-100B Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description RWSTLEVEL Location: Bldg. YARD. Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ROSEMOUNT INC., 1152DP5A22PB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y["] NEI UE N/A09
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE-] UE N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE UE N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UEI N/A[
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 19 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-079 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YU N" U-- N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO- NOI- U- N/A[
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YU NE UE- N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U[-]U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larra Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated bv: Kevin McGuire
{& Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-120 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-080 AWC # SP1-WB-042 Status YZ Ni] UI]
Equipment ID No. 1-RC-LT-1321 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description R VLISB N-RANGE LEVEL Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 13' Room, Area AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the'item one YZ NI]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NI] UI] N/AI]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NI] UI] N/AIl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NEI UI1 N/A-1
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NI] U"I N/AI]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NO- U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-121 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-080 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI ULI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEIl U-1 N/AU]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEl Ui[] N/A
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[]U[:
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallazher.Sr. Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/24/12 yr
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-122 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-084 AWC # SP1-WB-020 Status YZ NEi U[-
Equipment ID No. 1-CC-RTD-109B Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description RHR !fX OUTLET TEMP Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area K/7. 3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLI NE UE1 N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YLI NEI UO N/AH oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YOI NEI U(( N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NEI U-- N/AJE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page 0-123 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC 9 SPl-WD-SWEL-084 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO] UL N/A[
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] UE- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U[I N/A[
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:. 8/22/12 Evaluated by:. 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-124 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-085 AWC # SP1-WB-042 Status YO Nil U[I Equipment ID No. I-CH-TIC-1107 Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description BASTA TEMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area G/9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FOXBORO TEMP. INDICATOR Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage'configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE3 N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE N/AEN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE] UE1 N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE UE] N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-125 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-085 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UL] N/AIU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE' N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE UE- N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND UI' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI U'-
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher. Sr. Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-126 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-086 AWC # SP1-WB-042 Status YE N[] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-CH-TIC-1164 Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description BASTB TEMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area G/9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FOXBORO TEMP. INDICATOR Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U[-- N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI ULJ N/A[Z oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE UE N/A[Z
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE UL- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS Bolt spacing at 4 2" is within 1/4"of SEWS, which listed 4 31 ". This is acceptable verification.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-127 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-086 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U[I N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U[- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NI] UI1 N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[I U[L]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: ElleimBaker Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-128 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-087 AWC # SPI-WB-035 Status YE NEI UD]
Equipment ID No. 1-CS-RTD-I00A Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description RWST TEMP Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE'I N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI UE N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE] UE] N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-129 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-087 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI UEI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YUI NEI UE- N/A and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NEI UL N/AN
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NO UF-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: LarM Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-130 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-092 AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status YE Ni] UII Equipment ID No. 1-EP-PNL-ASP Equip. Class 20 Equipment Description AUXSHUTDOWNPANEL Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yri NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE] Ui] N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO Ni] Ur] N/A[]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI Ui] N/A[]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- Ni Ui-] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NiE Ui]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-131 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-092 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/AZ
- 1) An unsecured laptop was stored on an angle of a hinged drawer inside the panel to the west side. Discussed with Operations,who agreed to relocate the laptop off the angle and onto theflat surface of the drawer.
- 2) Similar to the Unit 2 Auxiliary Shutdown Panel,there was unsecured equipment stored inside the panel to the right (west).
See SWC# SP2-WD-SWEL-02 7forjustificationof stored equipment on the similar Unit 2 Auxiliary Shutdown Panel.
- 3) >2" clearfrom Unistrutframefor communications equipment to the east of the panel, acceptable.
- 4) >2" clearfrom J-CM-PNL-DAS-1, acceptable
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEr N/AZ1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 1) Fluorescentlight overhead to North, secured to rod-hung fixture. In general,fluorescent lightingwas addressedduring USI A-46/ IPEEEand concluded not to be a seismic concern.
- 2) Block on the east side ofpanel is reinforced.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE] U-1 N/AZ
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez z Date: 8/28/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Atortý)
T w hh4ymz,ý
, Date: 8/28/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 32 Page l of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-093 AWC # SP1-WB-045 Status YZ N[] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-CC-E-1A Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description CC RiX Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area CCHx Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UE] N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE] N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UE3 N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS Drawing11448-FS-2F/2S
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-133 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-093 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[-] UD N/Al]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO ND Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NM u[-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8121112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 34 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-094 AWC # SPI-WB-041 Status Y[ NEI UE[
Equipment ID No. 1-CN-TK-1 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description ECST Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZi NEI UL1 N/A[R
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UO N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE:- NEI UE N/A[D
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE1 NEI UE1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage is encased in concrete.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-135 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-094 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE- U[' N/ALI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NE] U-] N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[] UEi N/A[-]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NE] UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire #-*'- I"-' <T- Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-136 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-095 AWC # SP1-WB-035 Status YO* No U' Equipment ID No. 1-CS-TK-2 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description CA USTIC STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area YARD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) _
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage .free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UL N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y9 NEI UE- N/AEl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE1 N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
EQE Calculation250226-C-130
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NO UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-137 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-095 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI U-1 N/A["]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-- N/A['
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND U-- N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-'
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan n
tvýz'ý - Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /&:i- 3 Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 38 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-096 AWC # SP1-WB-021 Status YIE NO] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-SW-E-8 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description EMERGENCY SW PUMPBRG OIL COOLER Location: Bldg. ESPH Floor El. 18' Room, Area EPSH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[O NEI- UO1 N/AM
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UD N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO1 NO UI N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N[ UE N/A[D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-139 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-096 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULI N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] UI- N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI UEi N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U[]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIZ NEI Ul1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-140 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-097 AWC # SP1-WB-006 Status YE NE] U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-FW-E-9 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description FW-P-2 OIL COOLER Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27'-6" Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N9 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE1 N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI UE] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE] N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE' potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-141 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-097 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UI[] N/ADI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO. NEI U-] N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NIl UI- N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO Ni] UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NI] UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker D-te: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher Sr.. 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-142 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPl-WD-SWEL-098 AWC # SPI-WB-001 Status YZ N[: Uf1 Equipment ID No. I1-EE-TK-3 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description FUEL OIL DAY TANK Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 1 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIO NEI UI- N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UD N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NEI U-1 N/Afl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UE- N/A[]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith US1 A-46 SEWS for 1-EE-TK-4 and 1-EE-TK-3 except inset 'A" thick square plate is 6" versus 5" as shown. This difference is minor and inconsequential.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UEZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-143 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-098 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YCK NEI U[-1 N/All 1-ELT-LF-126 hold down strapmisaligned -* should be relocated to better hold down the light. CR 485564 submitted.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE UEI N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE N/AE
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE:] Ul-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: David Germano nba4),Ld&WV4*W Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-144 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-099 AWC # SP1-WB-001 Status YE NE U[-
Equipment ID No. 1-EG-TK-2 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description EDG AIR COMPAIR RECIEVER Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 1 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO N[i UEI1 N/AEl Upper support.flange of channelsection slightly bent. No structural/seismicconcern.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI Ui- N/AFl oxidation?
Very minor corrosion of anchorbolts at baseplate
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UZ1 N/AE3
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI' NE] Ul N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-145 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-099 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE ULI N/ADl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NO UE N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-Large overheadlight supportedoff Unistrutthat is rod hungfrom ceiling - no seismic concerns.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE1 N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N[E] U-1 adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: David Germano J)W'ý hohm.2.ý Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-146 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SPI-WD-SWEL-101 AWC # SP2-WB-038 Status YZ N[] Ull Equipment ID No. 1-FC-E-1B Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description SFP COOLER Location: Bldg. FUEL Floor El. 6' Room, Area SFP COOLER AREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UU N/A[
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NOl UL- N/AEl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEl UI" N/AEl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[K NEI U[-E N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with calc. 11448-CG-21. Drawingupdated needed to reflect properconfiguration ofupper restrain.Det. 11 on 11448-FC-27F.
MSDUR#12-601184 submitted.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEl U--
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-147 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-101 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED Nl] U[] N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE] UII N/AEL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM N[E UI] N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NI UUE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NM] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/29/2012 Evaluated by: DanielJ.Vasquez Date: 812912012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-148 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-102 AWC # SP2-WB-038 Status YZ Ni] Ut]
Equipment ID No. 1-FC-P-1B Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description SFP COOLING PUMP Location: Bldg. FUEL Floor El. 6' Room, Area SFP COOLER AREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NIZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yi NE] Ut] N/At]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ Nt] Ut] N/At]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NEI Ut] N/At]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] Ut] N/At]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USI-A-U6 SEWS, but not drawing 11448-FC-27E. Nut elevation is incorrecton drawing. (drawingwill be updated to reflect as-built configuration)MSDUR# 12-601183 submitted.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-149 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-102 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE] N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZJ NEI U[3 N/AL]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NEI U'] N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[ UU-U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UM]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/29/2012 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter M *t -_--1 Date: 8/29/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-1 50 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-103 AWC # SP2-.WB-038 Status YO NEI U[E]
Equipment ID No. 1-FC-40 Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description SFP COOLER INLET ISOLATION Location: Bldg. FUEL Floor El. 6 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE" NEI UE N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE] N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[-] UEr potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-151 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-103 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEi Ur] N/At]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI- N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Bent threadedrod supportingcable tray on west side of room - no seismic concern since bent <50 tolerance
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI Ut] N/AM
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y21 NI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[2 NEI Ut]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter 1 YM [,,.J Date: 8/29/2012 Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez xVi Date: 8/29/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-152 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-104 AWC # SP2-WB-038 Status YE N[] U-"
Equipment lID No. 1-FC-35 Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description SFP COOLER INLETISOLATIONPUMP 1B SUCTIONISOLATION Location: Bldg. FUEL Floor El. 20' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] UE] N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO] UI- N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YIO NEI UE] N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UI] N/An (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO U[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix C Page C-153 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP1-WD-SWEL-104 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN N[- U-1 N/Al]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UE N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U" N/AD]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[i UEl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[K NEI Ull adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter (Yl~V&~, J~ Date: 8/29/12 Evaluated by: Daniel]. Vasquez I'-* A Date: 8/29/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklists D-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-2 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-001 AWC # SP2-WB-001 Status YO NL] Ufl Equipment ID No. 2-VS-MOD-201C Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP CUBICLE EXHA UST DAMPER Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area CP CUB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorag-e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI ULI N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YJ- NEI U[] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[1I NEI UEj N/A9
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI N[:] UEi N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UR potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-3 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-001 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN* NEI U-1 N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEl ULI N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U[I N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NE-I UIZI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellera Baker Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: WilliamGgher, Sr ate:8/23/112 U
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-4 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-002 AWC # SP2-WB-002 Status Y1N Ni] UI-Equipment ID No. 2-SW-REJ-201A Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description BCHXINLETHEADER Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area TURBINE Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE1 NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI- NI] UI1 N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UEF N/AI oxidation?
Minor corrosion noted on all-threadtension connections and bolts.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE] N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI UE- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix b Page D-5 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-002 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UL] N/AL
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE] ULI N/AL]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9 NEI UL] N/AL]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 Nr] U[-]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE0 NEI UL]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Reference:
Drawing 11448-FC-2C Expansionjoint is encapsulatedwith spray shield (boltsfor both are visible).
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter m~D Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-6 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-003 AWC # SP2-WB-011 Status YN N] UM]
Equipment ID No. l-CH-TK-1C Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description C BAST Location: Bldg. Aux Floor El. 13' Room, Area BASTArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NIO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[9 NEI U[- N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI Ul] N/A[]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concree near the anchors? YZ NE] Uf] N/An
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE-] UT N/Al]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-7 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-003 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD- N/A[l
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U[ N/A[D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UD- N/A-D
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI U1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/27/12
.- If
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-8 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-004 AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status Y[ N[-] UL]
Equipment ID No. 2-EP-BKR-25H9 Equip. Class 3 Equipment Description 4kV EMERGENCY STUB BUS Location: Bldg. ESGR Floor El. 9' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Ancborafge
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[3 UO- N/AEI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AEl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YrI Nil UI] N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI U[] N/A-]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with Calculation CE-1254, Rev. 0
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-9 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-004 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NI] UE- N/Afl
- 1) Adjacent cabinets bolted together. Connected to 2H1 Load Centerper DC 93-033.
- 2) Approximately 1 1 ""clear ofcabinet to east, acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UE- N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-Fluorescentlights overhead to north and south side. Fluorescentlights were evaluatedduring USIA-46/IPEEE andconcluded not to be a seismic concern.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE UEI N/AEI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez 7 1) Date: 8/28/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/28/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-10 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-006 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status Yg NEI U-]
Equipment ID No. 2-FW-T-2 Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Also with pump 2-FW-P-2 Skid
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NE] UE1 N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO] UL] N/Afl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE] NMAEJ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE] UE] N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Reference:
VTM 38-1096-00005 Drawing V-4 6HMTA86X4-A
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N] UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 1 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-006 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO Ut- N/All
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UI- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UO 1N/At]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UF of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker .*.14 //Date:
AI) 8/21/1 2
-AII
- "* ,J- 8121112 Evaluated by: William Gallagher.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-12 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-008 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status YZ NEI UF]
Equipment ID No. 2-MS-GOV-005 Equip. Class 0 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE GOVERNOR VALVE Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPUMPAREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) IngersollRand Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:] NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NEI UE] N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE] N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO] NEI UOi-N/AM
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UIE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO U" potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-13 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEI,008 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE UO N/AOl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[3 UI-] N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE N/AE3
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEIUCu of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker
- Date: 8/20/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, r.te: 8/20/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-14 Page l of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-011 AWC # SP2-WB-008 Status YO NEI U]-1 Equipment 1D No. 2-RP-BKR-52-BYB Equip. (
Equipment Description RX TRIP BREAKER BYPASS Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 45' Room, Area CABLE SPREADING ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorag~e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ1 NI] U0I NIAE]
One ineffective anchor bolt 6"from West side and one good anchor bolt approximately 12 "from West side -- by design, each bay is supposed to have two anchor bolts; therefore, the as-found configuration isjudged to be acceptable.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE] U[] N/A[1 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UO N/A--
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD- NE] UD] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-15 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-011
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEDNEIUE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
On the North side of the cabinet, the upperpanel doors at the top were opened, and it was identified that allfour bolts to the reinforcementframing were short by I to 2 threads.Based on the robust design of the upper reinforcement (S-89151-2-C-003) being short I to 2 threads at most isjudged to be acceptable and the existing thread engagement is seismically acceptable to support the cabinet.
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIM NE UI-- N/A[E
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI U] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-Fluorescentlighting was evaluated during USIA-46/IPEEE and determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UEI- N/A]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI"U[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEL UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez 7 ' Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-16 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-012 AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status YO NEI UM Equipment ID No. 2-EP-LCC-2H Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description 48OVEMERGENCY BUS Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9 '-6" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NEl U[-] N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y! NF[ UEi N/Al]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U[- N/AL]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NI] Ui] N/A[]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[-
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-17 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-012 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE U-- N/AE
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NI-] U[] N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO U' N/AE3
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO N-I UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 Cabinets are bolted togetherperSEWS
- 2 cover plate blanks, 1 of 4fastenersnoted, CR 485665
- CR 485684 - loose paint on hangerfor PB-ESR-9 over bus Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter
~A~LD Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-18 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-013 AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status YO NI] U-1 Equipment ID No. 2-EP-LCC-2H1 Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description 480V EMERGENCY BUS Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YS NEI U-1 N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AI]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI] Uri N/AI]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UE- N/AI]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-19 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-013 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UU N/A[l
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UiD N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO N17 U1 N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UED of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND-1 UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Cabinets are bolted together.
Evaluatedby: Tim Wattleworth -- "6, Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8122112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-20 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-016 AWC # SP2-WB-010O Status YM NE] UE-Equipment ID No. 2-CH-P-1A Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area J1/9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NI]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI0 NI] UI- N/AU
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U"] N/Afl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NI--1 U N/A[]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NI] U[I N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NIO U-l potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-21 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-016 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NEI UEl N/AUl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YER NEI U['] N/A"]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE U[:- N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellety Baker 7 Date: 8/23/112 Evaluated by-. William Gallagher.Sr. V--ýDate: 8/23/112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-22 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-017 AWC # SP2-WB-011 Status YM No UII]
Equipment ID No. 1-CH-P-2C Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO1 UO- N/A[I
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UD N/AUI oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U] N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO N[3 UO N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-23 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-017 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ ND Ut] N/At]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI Ut] N/A[t and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NtI U[I N/AtI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO Nt Ut]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Minor concrete surface degradationon the pump pedestal was evident, but is not a structuralor seismic concern.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Elle Baker -Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. ( 6 t" Date: 8/24/12
.Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-24 Page I of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-018 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status YMI NEL U-]
Equipment ID No. 2-FW-P-2 Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description STEAMDRIVENA UXFEED PUMP Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27'-6' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y9 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM NEl ULi N/A'
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEl U" N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEIl U[- N/AU No cracking,east of middle ofpump pedestal is missing concrete -
not a defect
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NFl UOI N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Reference:
VTM 38-1096-00005 Drawing V-4 6HMTA86X4-A
.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-25 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-018 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NDI UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y(9 NEI UM N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UO N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U[D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI U17 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
, // DaDate: 8121112 Evaluated by: Eller Baker y Date: 8/21/1 2 Evaluated by: WlimG~ahr E b Wl..h.SDate: a 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-26 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-4119 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status Y0E N[] U1 Equipment ID No. 2-FW-P-3A Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description A UXFEEDPUMP Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27'-6" Room, Area AFW PumpArea Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NDI Ur] N/AED
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y10 NDI U-1 N/AED oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YM NEI UD- N/AD-
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NDI UD1 N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Reference VTM, dwg V-38117MTA86X4
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-27 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-019 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI ULI N/All
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIO NEI U[" N/AE1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UEI N/AEI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE N[D UE' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIO NEI Ull adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Noted open WO 38103082383 tagfor the heat trace at the 3A pump. There is a broken anchor at the stanchion baseplatefor the heat tracejunction box. The Y2" heat trace conduit at 3A and3B is overspanned,but it essentially respondsas-ifrod hung due to the support of the final vertical run ofconduit. No seismic concerns with any of these issues.
Evaluated by: Elle Baker 6 t Date: 8/21/2012 Evaluated by: William Galla her, Sr. Date: 8/21/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-28 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-020 AWC # SP2-WB-041 Status YIZ NEI U-I Equipment ID No. 2-CS-P-lA Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 27' Room, Area CSPH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NIE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] UE] N/Afl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NI-TUE N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEE NEI UI] N/Afl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] UE] N/AE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing11548-FC-19C
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y Ni UI" potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-29 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-020 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE- U[3 N/ADI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] U[] N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U-1 N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEE ND UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[ U"]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 WC.
Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire h? Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-30 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-021 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YIN NEI U[-
Equipment ID No. 2-FW-P-4A Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description EMERGENCY CONDENSATE MAKEUP PUMP Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NE1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEl UL- N/Afl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N-]EUM N/ANl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE1 N/Al]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UF' N/AE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
CalculationNo. 250226-C-005 Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UJ-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-31 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-021 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NO UE N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NOl UEi] N/Af" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI Ur-] N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire &M24~*z J
Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-32 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-022 AWC # SPl-WB-018 Status YiZ N[] UI[
Equipment IID No. 1-CC-P-IC Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description CC PUMP Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area CC PUMPAREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEE NO UOI N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO- UE] N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NO U-1 N/Afl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UO N/Afl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-33 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-022 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UDI N/AED
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI U[I N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI U-1 N/AD3
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJZ ND UD"I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date:
= 8/22/12 Evaluated by. William Gallagher, S e: /22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-34 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-023 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ NEl U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-CC-P-2B Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP CC PUMP Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area G/9.5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YOJ NEl U-1 N/A[l
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI Ui- N/Afl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UfI N/AI
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NEI Ui- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UQI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-35 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-023 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YU NE] U-I N/A-]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[] U-] N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[I N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[K NEI U-]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE] U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
(IJuD*- JO Evaluated by: William Gallagher, I/
V V/ Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: Ellera Baker ,3ý Aoýý Date: 8/27/12 I1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-36 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-024 AWC # SP2-WB-014 Status YZ NEI UE3 Equipment ID No. 2-SW-P-1OA Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP SW PUMP Location: Bldg. Service Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER 4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UE1 N/AEl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UL- N/AE-oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE UE] N/AJJ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UE1 N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS and 11448-PSSK-1021A36.133
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-37 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-024 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI UI-! N/AL]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U-] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U-] N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NUE U[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND-I Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Pump base has mild corrosion - not a seismic concern.
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/29/12 Evaluated by: David Germano 11ýf
'/ 16.0J. Date: 8/29/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-38 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-025 AWC 9 SIP2-WB-015 Status Y9 NE] U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-RS-P-2A Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description OUTSIDERS PUMP Location: Bldg. SFGD Floor El. 12' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE] N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NE] UE] N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N[E UE] N/A1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NE] UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-39 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-025 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI Ut] N/A]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] Ut] N/At]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI U[] N/At]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YJZ NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Ut]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
None Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr.V Date: 8/21/2012 Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/21/2012 Y
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-40 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-026 AWC # SP2-WB-015 Status Y[ NE] UL]
Equipment ID No. 2-SI-P-1A Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description SAFETY7INJECTIONPUMP Location: Bldg. SFGD Floor El. 12.8' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UI- N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 NI] U[] N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI] U-1 N/AD
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U'] N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI*N!]U!]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-41 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-026 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ* NEIq U"I N/AEI YZ NEI UE- N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
YZ NEI ULI N/AUl
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
See Comments section below.
YO NEI UENA
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] UI]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
See Comments section below.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The SI piping to the seal tank through 2-S1-201 is attachedto the Reactor Containmentwall at one point and the SafeguardsBuilding at all other building attachment supports. The piping transitionsto
'A" diametertubing between the 314 "piping and the pump. As a result there is adequateflexibility between the RC and the pump which is attached to the Safeguards Building. The piping on the RC and Safeguards Building is adequate to allowfor the M2" displacement between the two buildings at this point. . n Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/21/2012 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/21/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-42 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-027 AWC # SPI-WB-009 Status YO N[] UI]
Equipment ID No. 2-EP-PNL-ASP Equip. Class 20 Equipment Description AUXSHUTDOWNPANEL Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UL- N/AE1
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEIl U[- N/A[
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ ND UE1 N/AE1
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UrJ1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NUEU potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-43 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-027 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YX ND UD1 N/ADl Unsecuredequipment stored inside the attachedpanel to the South (wire, light bulbs, mouse). Discussedwith Operations,who indicated that none of the equipment inside the panel was seismically sensitive.
Since the stored equipment is lightweight and enclosed inside the panel, it is not likely to be a seismic interactionconcern with the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel equipment in the adjacentpanel to the North.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UI] N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 1) Cable tray A13 overhead, sufficiently clear
- 2) HVAC duct to North also sufficiently clear. Threadedrod hanger on duct support (south side) nearNorthwest corner on panel shortedabout I to 2 threads (painted)-) acceptable since all adjacent duct supports are adequate.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UDI N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NF UED of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/28/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Atý-hvvwý Date: 8/28/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-44 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
.SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-029 AWC # SP2-WB-021 Status YZ NE] UE]
Equipment ID No. 2-FW-HCV-255A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description FW/SG A FWBYPASS FLOW Location: Bldg. SERV Floor El. 47' Room, Area MER 2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] U-I N/AM
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI UiE] N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI] NE] liE] N/AX
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UIE] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI] UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-45 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-022 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UE1 N/AEl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U]E N/Ar' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NI] U[l N/AO
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NI] UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire LA-I< M /2 Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-46 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-030 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YN NEl UEi Equipment ID No. 2-DA-TV-203A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description DA/HRSS WASTE TK PUMPDISCH CIV Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoragie
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- NEI UO N/A0
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NOl UE1 N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NO UE3 N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NEI Ufi N/A[K (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-47 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-030 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEl UI- N/A[L
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEl U-i N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI Uf- N/AL
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEl UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Elle Baker &/ Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Sr. Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-48 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-031 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status Y9 N] Ui]
Equipment ID No. 2-MS-PCV-202A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE PCV Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yfl NEI UE N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEL NEI UE] N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE] N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEr NEI UO- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-49 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # $yP2-SWEL-031 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NI] UI] N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NI] U[:1 N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UE] N/A[U
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NI] ur-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher-Sr. Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-50 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-032 AWC # SP2-WB-042 Status Y9 NID U-]
Equipment ID No. 2-LM-TV-200A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description LM/CTMT LEAKAGE MONITORING HDR TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13 ' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UI] N/AEI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U-I N/AlI oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NIl Ui] N/AL]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] Ni] UOl N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NE] UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-51 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWVEL-032 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[K NEI U1 N/A[I S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE1 N/AIZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO U[E N/AEI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YU NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NE: UE-U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-52 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-033 AWC # SP2-WB-021 Status YZ NE UE[
Equipment ID No. 2-FW-HCV-255C Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description FW/SG C FWBYPASS FLOW Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 47' Room, Area MER 2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora*e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEIUE N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE N/AM
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-53 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-033 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NI3 UEI N/Al]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NI] Ul" N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] U-I N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YONIE UO]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] Ui]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan V '07
/
. Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-54 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-034 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status YN N[] Ufl Equipment ID No. 2-MS-TV-220 Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description TERRY TURBINE STEAMISOLATION Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YL1 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO-1 NO UI7 N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YnI NO UI] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UI1 N/AS
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO] NEI U13 N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YONIEUI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions? /
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-55 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP-WD-SWEL-34 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UEI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UOI N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y* NEI UE- N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE_
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NR] UI]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-56 Page I of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-035 AWC # SP2-WB-042 Status Y19 N[] U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-LM-TV-200C Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description LM / CTMT LEAKAGE MONITORING HDR TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13 ' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI ULJ N/AEl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UF1 N/AOl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NLI UE1 N/ALl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE1 NEI UEj N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-57 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-035 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NE] U[E] N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YMI NEI U[3 N/AD]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED N[] UE] N/AU[
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UL-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI1 NEI UEi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker - -A n -Date: 8/24/112 Evaluated by: William Gallagher.Sr. Date: 8/24/112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-58 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-036 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ N[] U-]
Equipment ID No. 2-CV-TV-250A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description CONTAINMENT VACUUMPUMP 1B SUCTION Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YF- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NEI Ut] N/A9
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOI NIO UO N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE] N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO' NEI UE- N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-59 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-036 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NI-- U-I N/AOl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NOl U-] N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO- UL- N/AU]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEl U'I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker 2A , hlow A tDate: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-60 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-037 AWC # SP2-WB-020 Status YN NQ3 UMI Equipment ID No. 2-MS-TV-201A Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description MS TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 40' Room, Area GA/5.6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YL1 NIE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YD NEI U[1- N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[1 NO U- N/AR oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UD- N/A0
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD NEl UD' N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-61 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-037 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0Z NEII lID N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UD N/AU]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND LID of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCD NEIUI]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire A-7y.4-
- Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report . Appendix D Page D-62 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-038 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ Ni Uf-Equipment ID No. 2-CC-TV-209B Equip. Class 7 Equipment Description RHR OUTLET TRIP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area J/1 0.7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismnic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorag~e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UE- NWA oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE U- NWAS
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UE N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-63 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-038 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y1 NO UQI N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NCI U[1 N/AUI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[:] N/AU-
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UUI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YlN NU UUI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) e 4 4 Z2 4i Evaluated by: William Galla-zher, Sr. Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Ell*e Baker '/ Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-64 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-039 AWC # SP2-WB-021 Status YO NEI UE1 Equipment ID No. 2-FW-FCV-2478 Equip.
Equipment Description MAIN FEEDREG VALVE Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 42' Room, Area MER 2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE' NEI UO N/AS
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UE* N/A[]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE" NO UE N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE"] NE U[-' N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-65 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-039 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEl U' N/AOl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE9 N[-1 UFI N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NfE Uf" N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO- UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: LarrM Cullivan *v u
- Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire P
- 1 Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-66 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SIP2-WD-SWE"-43 AWC # SP2-WB-010 Status YZ NE] UI[
Equipment ID No. 2-CH-MOV-2267A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CHPUMPINLETISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area CHPUMPCUBICLE A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yl NIO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UIZ N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE- NEI U[ N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE- N/A21
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO Nil UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Conduitfor TI atpump west bearing housing in contact with MOV power cables, TI conduit clamps loose. CR 486152 submitted.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-67 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-043 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U!-I N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U[I N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NIl UI-1 N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO Nfl Ur]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker I"' Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher.Sr. Sate: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-68 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-044 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YN NE] Ut-Equipment ID No. 2-CS-MOV-201A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CS PUMP DSCH Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI UE] N/A[K
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI] NO] UI- N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] Ut] N/A[
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEi UD] N/As (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI Ut]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-69 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-044 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U] N/AOl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI UL N/AOl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEK NO U0 N/AO
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NElI U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
-42 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan 7 Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /:ý-- /it Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-70 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-045 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YZ N[E] U-1 Equipment ID No. 2-CS-MOV-202A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CHEMICAL ADDITION TANK ISOLATION Location: Bldg, CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE UE- N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UO N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UOI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-71 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC #, SP2-WD-SWEL-045 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[R NEI UD- N/A[]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NDl U'- N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UD N/AD3
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI NCi U["D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan 0' Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-72 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-046 AWC # SP2-WB-024 Status YM Nil] U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-CW-MOV-200A Equip. Clas, Equipment Description CONDENSER OUTLET Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area CONDENSER AREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NI UEl N/A[E
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOj NEI Uf N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI Ur] N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE UEl N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NIE UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-73 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-046 interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD1 N/A[D
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NDI UD1 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI U[-D N/AUl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Drawing 11448-FC-2K CR 486177 - groundwaterfor CW leak from concrete wall approximately 3' above top pipe drains onto anchoredsteel pipe. Corrosionprod rust colored, saltprecipitateon wall. Beginning to deteriorateheads ofpipe collar wall anchors.
Evaluated by:w Tim Wattleworth ( L*hI
) *I I.IIZŽ, -" L Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8124112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-74 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-047 AWC # SP2-WB-024 Status YZ N[ UE Equipment ID No. , 2-CW-MOV-206A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CONDENSER INLET Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area CONDENSER AREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE1 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE N/A0
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE UEI N/AZ oxidation?
Noted mild corrosionon all-threadtension bolts (approximately50%).
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE- NE UE N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEi NEI U- N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-75 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-047 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[3 UEZ N/A[-]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NI] U!] N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NI] UI] N/All
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ul]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Drawing11548-FC-2F Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 krInf-
,- - JVI*LLI&*
Y AX Ur ,,th- Wx; 11,-
VV Wq LfLL*I Put 0ýý Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-76 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-048 AWC # SP2-WB-024 Status YN NEI U[1 Equipment ID No. 2-CW-MOV-206C Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CONDENSER INLET Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area CONDENSER AREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YDI NE] Ui] N/AX
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOI NI] U1] N/AN oxidation?
Note: minor surface corrosion on tension bolted connection.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UO N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NO] UM N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UDI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-77 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-048 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UL] N/AE-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UEJ N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE U[- N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YID NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Drawing11548-FC-2F Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Oub Uý Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-78 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-050 AWC # SP2-WB-002 Status YE NEI U[-
Equipment ID No. 2-SW-MOV-201A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description BC HXISOLATION Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area Valve Pit Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI U-] N/AID
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI] N] UI-[] N/A[
oxidation?
Note. mild surface corrosion on all-threadtension connection nuts.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UE'] N/A9
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
1
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U[:]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-79 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-05O Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U[ N/A((]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NE U- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE UE N/AO'
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO U[
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE[
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Reference:
Drawing11448-FC-2C SEWS Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter M
- D L- ý Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-80 Page I of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-053 AWC # SP2-WB-010 Status Y[ NEl UF1 Equipment ID No. 2-CH-MOV-2275A Equip.
Equipment Description CHI/CHARGING PUMPRECIRC Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2 ' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorape
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE1 N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yf- NE UE" N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YrE NEI U0 N/A
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI UE1 N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-81 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-053 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NIl U-] N/A[-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] U[] N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YlZ NI] U[I] N/A[D
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] Ul_
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-82 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-054 AWC # SP2-WB-010 Status YS NE U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-CH-MOV-2286A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CH/ CHARGING PUMPOUTLET Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2 ' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UO N/A19
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE U- N/AN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/AM (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YV NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-83 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-054 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEl UI- N/AUl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM Nol U[I N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U-1 N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UE" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI U[--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-84 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-055 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ NEI UM]
Equipment ID No. 2-CH-MOV-2289A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CHI CHARGING STOP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2 ' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE' NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NE UQ N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI U0 N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI- N[] U[ N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI U[ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-85 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC #ti2-WD-SWE055 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UE! N/Afl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ No! ULI N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE! UEI N/AfI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIZ NE U[-]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE) UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Sr Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-86 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-056 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ NE U1-1 Equipment ID No. 2-CH-MOV-2289B Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description CH /CHARGING STOP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2 ' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE1 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI UI- N/AZ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE NWAN
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE1 N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ N[] U[1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-87 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-EeD-SWEL-056 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NEIl U[] N/AlI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NIl U[E N/A[]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U'] N/Al]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NF- UI--
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
JB supportfor MOVpower loose atfloor, submitted CR 485980.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Galla her, Sr. Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Elle!y Baker Ellery Evaluated by: Baker Date: 8/23/i 81231122
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-88 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-060 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status YZ N[3 Uf[
EquipmentIDNo. 1-FW-MOV-160A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description AFW CROSS-CONNECT Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YL1 NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE[ NEl UEJ N/AM
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YD- N[I UE- N/A9 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEL NEI Uf N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?, YLI NEI U- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-89 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-060 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UEW N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI0 NEI UI- N/A0 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI Uf2 N/AUl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y19 NEI UI]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. L #E Date: 8/27/12
- *--'* 'Date: R/27/12 Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8127112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-90 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-061 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YE ND- U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-SW-MOV-205A Equip. Class 8 Equipment Description RS HXISOLATION Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area SAFEGUARDS Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- NOI- UL N/AN
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[-! NE'I UI NIAN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U-1 N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO-- NE'I UE1 WN/I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YN NEI U NI
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-91 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # c-WD-SWEL-061 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U"] N/AE]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE] U-1 N/Ah]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE] Ut] N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NIE U"]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire ,hK / Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-92 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-062 AWC # SP2-WB-028 Status YZ NEI UE]
Equipment ID No. 2-CS-MR-1B Equip. Class 11 Equipment Description RWST REFRIGERATION UNIT Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 2 7' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEJ UE] N/AUl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[] NZ Urn N/AU1 Auxiliary Building at Southeast -pier has spalled concrete CalculationNo. 250226 verifies no uplift on Auxiliary Building, minimum shearload.Anchor bolts acceptable. CR 485907 submitted to document concrete condition.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE3 N/AN]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-93 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-062 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIZ NE U[ N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UD N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN ND UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND UD adversely affect the safety fumctions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry CuIlivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire l Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-94 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-063 AWC # SP2-WB-029 Status YZ NE] U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-EG-C-2 Equip. Class 12 Equipment Description EDG AIR COMPRESSORNo. 2 Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 2 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NO U-- N/AE
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 NEI ULI N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEl UEi N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEIUfE N/Afl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith 11448-1.30-104A
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NOl U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-95 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-063 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE UI N/AL 2-EG-E-7 over equipment - supportedfor seismic, no issue.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE U[] N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Large overhead lighting supported off Unistrutframe that is rod hung.
No seismic concerns.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND UL N/AL
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE UL of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEJ N[L UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Al Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-96 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-064 AWC # SP2-WB-030 Status YZ N[:] UI Equipment ID No. 2-IA-C-1 Equip. Class 12 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR COMPRESSOR Location: Bldg. TURBINE Floor El. 9' Room, Area IA COMPRESSOR AREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NiO UEI N/AU
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U'I N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UEl N/A-I
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UI] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 11548-FC-6A
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE1 UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-97 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-064 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YCK N[-I UEI N/AD3
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[ U[] N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE UE N/AlU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI-U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI U[2 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth fy-kbb ý` 1..0ý Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-98 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-068 AWC # SPl-WB-009 Status YX NEI U-Equipment ID No. 2-EP-LP-2S12 Equip. Class 14 Equipment Description MCR LIGHTING CABINET Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE] N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE3 N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE] N/A[]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UE] N/AE1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Calculation250226-C-114 excerpt shows (4) '14"sleeve anchors.As-built is (4) 3/8" toggle bolt anchors. This bounds the calculation and is acceptable. CR 485926 to update calculation.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[N NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-99 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-068 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI U[ N/AEl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO- ULI N/AOl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE UL1 N/A[l
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM Nl UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter 1j Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-100 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-069 AWC # SP2-WB-007 Status YM Nn U-Equipment ID No. 2-EPD-B-2A Equip. Class 15 Equipment Description 125 VBATTERY Location: Bldg. SERVICE FloorEl. 9"-6" Room, Area Battery Room 2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO N[-] UE N/A[
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI UIE N/AEl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE] U[ N/A[
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI NEI UE-] N/AE]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS Calculations52182-C-006, 52182-C-006
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YER NI UUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-101 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-069 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NI] UO N/AZ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NI] UE' N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UI] N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UI' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter ftbý L) 'ý--> Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-102 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-070 AWC # SP2-WB-040 Status YZ NEI UEO Equipment ID No. 2-EPD-B-2B Equip. Class 15 Equipment Description 125VBATTERY Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area Battery Room 2B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UL] N/AEI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI NOI UO' N/AEl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[& NEI U-- N/A[]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UL-I N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USI A-46 SEWS Note: "0" bolts not "J".This was noted in SEWS.
Calculations52182-C-006, 52182-C-007
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEIUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-103 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-070 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM NI] UI] N/AEU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NI- UE] N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UEI N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEE NE UI]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth 1 Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter I J-....
Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-104 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-071 AWC # SP2-WB-029 Status YE Nil] U]
Equipment ID No. 2-EE-B-EG2 Equip. Class 15 Equipment Description EDG BATTERY Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 2 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YED NEI UE] N/At]
- 1) All bolts are VA " diameter anchor bolts, where installed.
- 2) Anchor bolts on North side only of southernmost baseplate.All other5 baseplates were as-designed.
+ 0 4- no anchor bolts
+ -0
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ Nt] Ut] N/At]
oxidation?
Dried battery acid on second baseplate in from the North side, some minor corrosion -- informed battery system engineer and submitted CR 486007.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE] Ut] N/At]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] Ut] N/At]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
The anchorageconfiguration is consistent with 14257.46-DSC-2.1 and DCP 83-11. This configuration is not accountedfor in CE-1806 (which is the analysis-of-record). CR 486026 submitted to update calculation.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-105 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-071
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[] U[] N/AE 1-HS-UH-7B overhead to North side - supported by threadedrods and piping- no seismic concern.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NE-I UI N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 1) Large overhead lights secured to Unistrutframe that is rod-hungfrom ceiling. No seismic concern.
- 2) See note about SA line in SP2-WB-029.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YER NO] UE N/A[1
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YCK NEl Url of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
-Misalignedchannel nut on bottom tier at south side of battery rack. CR 485998 submitted.
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-106 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-074 AWC # SP2-WB-029 Status YO N[-] U!1 Equipment ID No, 2-EE-EG-1 Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 2 ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N!]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U!] N/A!
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO N!] U!] N/A!]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI] U!] N/A[]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN N!] U!1 N/A!]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with Drawing11 448-FC-2 VC
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NITTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-107 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-074 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[] U[1 N/A[
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE1 N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI ULJ N/A[
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE U[-
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE UU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Several bolts appeared to be missingfrom the generatorend of the diesel -* discussed with electrical systems engineer who identified that the "missing bolts" are not missing, but are used asjacking bolts. Not an issue.
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by-, David GermanoEvaluated by: oe~A~d Germano David ,~1Vv~OA4O Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 08 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-075 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YO NEI U[]
Equipment ED No. 2-CC-PS-203 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description CHPUMPCC PRESSURE SWITCH Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area G/9.5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI[] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM NI] UO N/AIO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED NI UE] N/Al oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO UE] N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO] NEI UlE N/AR (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN] IUE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-109 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-075 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE- N/ADI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] UE- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NDI U!I N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NI2 U[1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Condition
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDI U[
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Fl
- Baker / --
....... ate bv Ell -
Baker
/¢ Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-110 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-076 AWC # SP2-WB-031 Status YZ NEI UE Equipment ID No. 2-CN-LT-200 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description ECST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI Ul] N/AEI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UEI N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UE N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE UE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 11 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-076 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEE NEI UEi N/AEl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] U[! N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yt NE] UE] N/AEU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ N[ UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] Ul-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire I~Af~~4z~ Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 12 Page l of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-077 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YX NEI UE]
Equipment ID No. 2-CC-FT-210A Equip. Class 1,2,3 Equipment Description CC/RH] HX OUTLETFLOW Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area NEAR GATE 2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YR Nfl U[:] N/A12
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y19 NEI UEI N/All oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI U[] N/AlU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YM NEI UDi N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED NEI Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report AppendixD Page D-113 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-077 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEE NEI U[-] N/AW
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEIUL N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE U- N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NWO UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-114 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-078 AWC # SP2-WB-028 Status YZ NE] UEI Equipment ID No. 2-CS-LT-200B Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description RWSTLEVEL Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YDl NEI Ul-1 NWAS
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y-' NEI UEI N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI- NEI UDi N/AI
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y1 NEl UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO Nil U[3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 15 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-078 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE U"] N/A[l
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI N[ UI" N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE3 NEI U" NAN
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI N[-] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Lar Clivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 16 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-079 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YJZ N] U[-]
Equipment ID No. 2-MS-PT-2484 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description MS PressureTransmitter Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NO] UlI N/A]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI U-3 N/Al]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YED NEI U1 N/A[]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YU NE] U-] N/Al]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-117 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-079 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UI] N/AEl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI UE1 N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI U[ N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE] UE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIO NE] UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-1 18 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-080 AWC # SP2-WB-044 Status YZ NE] UL]
Equipment ID No. 2-MS-FT-200 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description MS FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 27' Room, Area GA/5.6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE- N/A--
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UEI- N/Afl oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N[I UE- N/All
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yrl NUi UII N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UUL potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-119 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEEe080 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YER NEI U- N/AI]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI U- N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UEI N/AUI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9 NI UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eller, Baker Date: 8/20/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Sr Date: 8/20/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-120 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-081 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YIM NE] U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-MS-PT-201A Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description MS PRESSURE TRANSM1ITER Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI U-1 N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEl- NEl Ufi N/AI oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NI] UIE N/AZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI ULI N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI Ul_
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-121 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-081 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NO UF' N/A5
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UfI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UDI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-122 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-082 AWC # SP2-WB-011 Status Y0 NO U-Equipment ID No. 2-RC-LT-2321 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description RVLIS B N-RANGE LEVEL Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area L/1O.5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorane
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE1 N/AE3
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE] N/AE[
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE N/AFE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YM NE UE' N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YM NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-123 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-082 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI ULE3 N/AL]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ No U[J N/Al]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YM NEI UF- N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[-
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
... A.4n Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Sr -% -Ji9 Ž U Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/24/12
/
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-124 Page l of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-083 AWC # SP2-WB-014 Status Y0 NEI UU-Equipment ID No. 2-SW-PS-7 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description CHPUMPSWPRESSURE SWITCH Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER 4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI Ufl N/AUI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE- N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE] N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI] NE UEI N/AH (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-125 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # E-WD-SWEL-083 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UEL N/AL]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NI] UD] N/ALl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U[] N/AE]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U!]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larg Cullivan Date: 8/29/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Ib44--;tj bmwý Date: 8/29/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-126 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-087 AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ NI] UE]
Equipment ID No. 2-CC-RTD-209B Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description RHR HX OUTLET TEMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area J/JO.7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE] UE] N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YER NEI UI] N/A"I oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UI] N/AI]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] UI] N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NI] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NITTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-127 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-087 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YCD NEI UF- N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIE NE] UI-- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NI] UOI N/Af
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
I I I' Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. W Date: 8123/12 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-128 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-088 AWC # SP2-WB-011 Status YO N[-] UM-Equipment ID No. 1-CH-TIC-1103 Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description BASTA TEMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N[]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIO NEI U!] N/A!]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N!3 UI] N/A[]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NJ-] U!] N/A!]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN N[! U!] N/A!]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ N[-] UE" potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-129 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-088 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N-I U[] N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UJE N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UI" N/AlI
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NI ULI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI U"]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, S Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-130 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-089 AWC # SP2-WB-011 Status YM No U[]
Equipment ID No. 1-CH-TIC-1166 Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description BAST B TEMP Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area FOPH Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI Ufl N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U-1 N/Al]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U-1 N/AE1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Spacing is essentially the same as in SEWS +/- 14 " normally
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-131 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-089 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI U[I N/AE1
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI U[I N/AOl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE UE N/A[l
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9 NEIlur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE- U[]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/24/12 ki
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-132 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-090 AWC # SP2-WB-028 Status YZ ND U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-CS-RTD-200A Equip. Class 19 Equipment Description RWST TEMP Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- N! U!] N/A0
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y["] N!] U!] N/AZ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO N!] U"] N/AI
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- N!] U!] N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-133 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-090 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZI NEI U- N/AZ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UQ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI NEI UED N/A[D
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NEl U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-134 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-093 AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YN NEI U[]
Equipment ID No. 2-MS-PT-2475 Equip. Class 18 Equipment Description MS Pressure Transmitter Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y1* NEI U!] N/A[]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U!] N/Al]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO] NEI U"] N/Al]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U!] N/Al]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistent with USIA-46 SEWS
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NF1 U[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-135 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-093 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE N[ UrE N/Al[I
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO* NEI UL' N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YtO NEI UEJ N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NI] UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan ~A6~k/~9 Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-136 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-094 AWC # SB1-WB-009 Status YN NE] ULI Equipment ID No. 2-RP-CAB-CH-IB Equip. Class 20 Equipment Description REACTOR PROTECTION CAINETS Location: Bldg. SVCS Floor El. 9'6'" Room, Area ESGR Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
Opened cabinets 2-RP-CAB-IB, LIB, IIB, IVB, and 5B - observed eight totalanchor bolts. This anchorage configurationwasfound to be adequate during IPEEE.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 NEI UiE] N/AE]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yl] NEI UE] N/AE]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE1 N/A[K (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN Nn UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-137 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-094 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NE UE N/AE[
- 1) Bolted to adjacent cabinet to the west (Miscellaneous Rack No. 2)
- 2) Two large storagecabinets to the east of J-RP-CH-IB and one largestorage cabinet to the east of2-RP-CAB-CH-5A. All three storage cabinets were unlocked by I&C, and it was determined that all three storage cabinets are secured to the wall using four boltsfor each cabinet.No seismic interactionconcerns.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1I NEI UE- N/AE!
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overheadfluorescent lighting to North and South of cabinet. This type of lighting was addressedduring USIA-46/IPEEE and concluded not to be a seismic concern.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE ULI N/AL!
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UUE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez . Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: David Germano 0&21X Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-138 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-095 AWC # S?1-WB-045 Status Y1 N[] UE Equipment ID No. 1-CC-E-ID Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description CC HX Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 10' Room, Area CC HXAREA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N'I Ufl N/A[
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE1 N/AE oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UiE N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UE N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Consistentwith USIA-46 SEWS Drawings 11448-FM-6C, 11448-FC-2S/6A Calculation52182-C-016
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-139 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-Vfc-SWEL-095 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE UE N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NEI U[3 N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE U- N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YM NEIUE]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter I'tW L\D Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-140 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-096 AWC # SP2-WB-031 Status YE NEI U[3 Equipment ID No. 2-CN-TK-1 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description ECST Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEJ NEI UL] N/AS
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI U[- N/AN oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI U[J N/AjZ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UO N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage is encased in concrete.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-141 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-096 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI U-] N/AU
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UE- N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE ULI N/AU
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-'
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan * .= *..,, r nJ Date: 8/21/12 1-11 V V Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire r Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-142 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-097 AWC # SP2-WB-028 Status Yn Ni] U--
Equipment ID No. 2-CS-TK-2 Equip. Class 21.
Equipment Description CA USTIC STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area YARD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NI] UE1 N/AE]
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI Ur- N/Al]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NI] U-1 N/Al]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI U-] N/Al]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
EQE Calculation250226-C-130
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNINEI U1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-143 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-097 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UI- N/AI]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NE] UE] N/AE]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE UEr N/A-
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NL- U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UF' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire A--7yA--- Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-144 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-098 AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status YE NEI UF-Equipment ID No. 2-FW-E-9 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description FW-P-2-OIL COOLER Location: Bldg. MSVH 'FloorEl. 27'-6" Room, Area AFWPump Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI UEJ NIA[D
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE- N/A0 oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[] NEI UE] N/AM
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U[-]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-145 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-098 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE N/AEI
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl NEI UEi N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEl UEI N/AEl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UrZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEl ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-146 Page 1 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEL-099 AWC # SP2-WB-029 Status YO NE UE]
Equipment ID No. 2-EE-TK-3 Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description EDG 2 FO DAY TANK Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 2 Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YUI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE1 N/AL
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UFJ N/AL oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NOI ULI N/ALl
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NO UEJ N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yi N[i UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix D Page D-147 Page 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
SWC # SP2-WD-SWEEt99s Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE] U-] N/AL
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YID NI] Ut] N/ALE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
-Largeoverhead lights -+ no seismic concerns (rod-hungfixture)
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N-] Ut] N/AL
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YIR NEI U"]
of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NOt Ut]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: David Germano d )Qd*&4 ) Date: 8/27/12 Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez 7 De 8127112 Date: /
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Unit I Area Walk-by Checklists E-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-2 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPl-WB-O01 Status YNl N[-] UI-Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG #1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U["] N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NE] UE] N/Afl degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YjM NEI Uf-] N/AF1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 1) SA line above 1-EE-B-EG1 vertically supportedfor deadweight by angle-bracedcantilever supports and clampedfor lateral support approximatelyevery 10' --*judged by both SWEs to be seismically adequate to support the SA line.
- 2) Frictionclips on conduit attached to the blue air intake; noted on USIA-46 SEWS - not a seismic concern
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Large overhead lights attached to Unistrut via rod hangers -* no seismic concern
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-3 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-O01
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE1 N/Ar-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-- N/ALl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NE1 UL" N/A-I interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[g NE] UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-O01, 064, 071, 075, 088, 099 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez >7I Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-4 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-002 Status YM NE] ULI Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area U1 CHPUMPCUBICLE C Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NI] UE] N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NE] U[] N/Al]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE] UE] N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NE] U[-] N/A[]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI U-- N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-5 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-002
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NIJ U-1 N/ALl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEL U-1 N/All interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1- WD-SWEL-002 Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: William Galaer, Sr/I Sr.
+~; U Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-6 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-003 Status YZ NE- UI-Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER 3 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NE] UE- N/AO potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y 9 NEI U]I N/AD degraded conditions?
1-VS-P-1B has minor loose surface corrosion on supportfor pump base: Ref 11448-PSSK-1021A4.140 (SH.1-9), not a seismic concern.
CR486465 was submitted.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YM NE] U-] N/A!
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Overheadfluorescent lighting evaluated by US] A-46
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE] N! U-] N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI UE] N/AU]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-7 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-003
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UI- N/AUl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UUl N/A[U interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEIUE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-O03, 028, 062 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/29/2012 Ur Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/29/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-8 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-004 Status YM NEI U--
Location: Bldg. TURBINE Floor El. 9' Room, Area U1 SWPIT (EAST)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NI] UEJ N/AI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
CR 486147 - SWpit level indicator1-DA-LS-116A is not anchoredto concrete slab. It is not a seismic concern - no targets.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YER NI] UI] N/AI]
degraded conditions?
CR 486171 - The pipe support near 1-SW-495 has more than minor degradationof bolt cross section (atprojections) and an areaof section loss on the base plate. Not criticalto support ofpipe. Suggest repairing.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[I N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
CR 486148 - conduit anchorage on west wall ofpit is loose (e.g.,
Unistrutbar) and a 1 " conduit clamp is loose.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NI] UI] N/AD]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NI] UI] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-9 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-004
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[I N/As interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U-I N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI- WD-SWEL-005
Reference:
Drawing 11448-FC-2R CR 486150 and 486159 - leakage was noted on pipe unions upstream of 1-SW-887 and 1-SW-938, brominationpiping, <1 dpm, mark onfloor, greenish blue stainingpresent on brass or bronze fittings downstream (verdigris).
CR 486163 - lights out in pit.
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth ffArc) LD rz_-) IýOr TO). 1 " ~ Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Evaluated by: Matthew Winter 8/24/12 Date: 8124112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-10 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-006 Status Y! NEI ULI Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27' Room, Area U] AFWPUMP AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YM NE! UE" N/A-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NE! U'! N/AZ degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NE! UE- N/Al raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YU NEI UZ N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UZ N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-I 1 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPI-WB-006
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIE NEI UE N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UDi N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIUO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AssociatedSeismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-007, 009, 023, 034, 038, 097 Heat tracejunction box supportframe south of MDAFWPs is missing, grout under East baseplate.
Not a seismic concern.
Evaluated by: Eller Baker T7*1 1 Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Galla her Sr. te: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-12 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-008 Status YO Ni] UM" Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 15' Room, Area U1 CABLE VAULTAND TUANEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NI] UEI N/A[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
1-PEN-PI-50is missing one bolt (out offour) connectingit to vertical cable tray Run 11 at containment wall. It does not appear as if the bolt was ever installedbecause of alignment issues. Both SWEs agree that three bolts are adequate to seismically support the pressure indicator.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UI] N/AE]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y* NI] Ui] N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Duct support at South-Eastcorner of room (Unit I cable vault):
threadedrod on West side of duct, but not on East side. The East side has angle drilledfor threaded rod, but none present because of cable tray above. Judged to be acceptablebased on adjacentsupports being adequate.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NI] UI] N/AEl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
-Overheadfluorescent lights were addressedduring USI A-46/1IPEEE and determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NIN] U-I N/A-1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-13 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-008
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-1 N/A[l interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOl UE N/A[l interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UDJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-010, 090 Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez ,i t) Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Azatwhljt'*ýý Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-14 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-009 Status YN NE] UE]
Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area U1/U2 ESGR (includingRelay Rooms)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UE- N/AZ1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NE] UI- N/AZl degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE] N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UE] N/AE3 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- Fluorescentlighting in the overhead- addressedduring US]
A-46/IPEEE -3, not a seismic concern
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause a firein the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-15 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-009
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-1 N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Mobile fire extinguishingunit adjacent to 2J1 Load Center and 2JLoad Center- unstable and not supported adequately to prevent interaction with load centers. CR 485502 submitted.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
- 1) 2-VS-AC-7 corroded bolting on outlet headerflange (top). 3 out of 4 bolts corroded. 1flange bolt corrodedon inletflange.
Source of water may be leaking threadedconnection at 2- VS-TI-217.
- 2) Corrodedpipe support bolting 1-VS-1040 and 1-VS-1035 CR 485500 and CR 486138 submittedfor Item 1.
CR 485530 and CR 486137 submittedfor Item 2.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-011, 014, 015, 016, 017, 074 SP2-WD-SWEL-012, 013, 014, 068, 073 Evaluated by: DanielJ.Vasquez A Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8121112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-16 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-OIO Status YZ N[3 U[3 Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area MER 5 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE" N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UE] N/AUl degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI Ufl N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE U[] N/A[
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE N/AU1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-17 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-OO
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE1 N/Al interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEi N/A[l interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEIUE3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPJ-WD-SWEL-O]2, 032, 063 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-18 Page I of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-011 Status YN ND UL1 Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 45' Room, Area U1 CABLE SPREADING ROOM (RTB CUBICLE Only)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U-- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ Nil U[] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI UD- N/AD]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YER NEI Uil N/AD]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U1 N/AD]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-19 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-O11
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED Nil UD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI UE1 N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NDI UD[
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI- WD-SWEL-013 Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez e!! 0 Date: 8/22/12 2 1 AbM*VaV4 Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: David Germano
Surry Power Station . NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-20 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-012 Status YZ N[ UM Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area CONTROL ROOM (UNIT 1 SIDE)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YIE NE UD N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO N[] U[] N/AD degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NEI U-' N/A[D raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ N[ U[] N/A[
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Light diffusers in Main Control Room clippedper USIA-46/IPEEE recommendations to protect operators.
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YC9 NE UE N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-21 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-012
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 N[] U[I N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEl U-1 N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEl U[-
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
A clock mounted to conduit above the Heat Trace Monitoring CTS Panelwas discussed between the two Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs). Both SWEs agreed that the clock mounting was adequate.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-018, 067 Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/23/12 91R..
- 1. - J L. tL~
V(1LUL.AS I' tt,$ '~JU)
C-~ ~ S'(A~A ~.JM~ttdt Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-22 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPI-WB-013 Status YN No7 ULI Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 27' Room, Area U1 AB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YCD NEI UL N/AL potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE U[] N/AD degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NE UL1 N/A]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE UL N/ALl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U- N/AL-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-23 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPI-WJ3-013
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NOl U] N/A[D interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE N/AQ interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NDE U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-019 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan -6mn'ýQ- Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire e/f*A -Da/ Date: 8124112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-24 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-014 Status YO NE] U-]
Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area U] CHPUMPCUBICLE A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE" N/AE potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YI NEI UE- N/AE degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI UE] N/AO raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE1 N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE- N/AE interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-25 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-014
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE1 N/AEI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE1 N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-020 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Dae: 8/22/12 Evalatedby:Ellev Bker ate 8/2/1I Evaluated by: Elley Baker Date: 8122112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-26 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-015 Status YZ NEI UF]
Location: Bldg. FOPH Floor El. 16' Room, Area FO PUMPHOUSE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NM UD N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ Nn UE] N/All degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE- N/AU1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NU] U[ N/A!]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UD N/A!]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTrF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-27 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-015
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI UD N/AE2 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[l UE N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AssociatedSeismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-021 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 14-Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire &;Lý Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-28 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-017 Status YZ NE] U[]
Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11 Room, Area Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI ULI N/A[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] UE] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NO Uf1 N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UED N/A[1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YI NE UL] N/A[-]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station N-TTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-29 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPl-WB-017
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] UE N/AE]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NO UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-024, 047 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan 0-1 01 Date: 8/22/12 4
Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /-'- M Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-30 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-018 Status YZ N[-] UD Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area U1 AB (CC PUMPAREA)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[] N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N] Ur] N/AIO degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NEI UE3 N/AL raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fil conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UI] N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO UD N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-31 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-018
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI ULI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NE UE N/AE-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Heat trace boxes H7-7B 2BID and 2A/D supportframe baseplates are not grouted and do not have shims under (no surface to bearon).
Should be grouted or shims installed.Not a seismic concern. Submitted CR 485682.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists.-
SPI-WD-SWEL-025 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallapher.Sr. S-ate: 8/22/12 LI
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-32 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-019 Status YO NDI UM Location: Bldg. FPH Floor El. 15' Room, Area FIRE PUMPHOUSE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K NDI UE] N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NDI UDE N/AD1 degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ ND UE- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UD N/ADl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEE NDI UD N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-33 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPl-WB-019
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UD N/A[U interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEI N/AUl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi U"]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI- WD-SWEL-026 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-34 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-020 Status YE NE] UE Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area U1 AB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE" N/AE potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NO U!] N/AE degraded conditions?
CR 486176 was submittedfor a spring hanger on line 3 "-CC- 73-151.
This support has significantcorrosion but is consideredfunctional.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI UE N/A[]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO Nn UE1 N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/A!]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-35 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-020
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO U'- N/AL]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE- UE- N/AL-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-027, 040, 041, 077, 084 CR 485970 was submitted to document abandonedin place Copper Tubing labeled "Argon ". The line is I" diameterat the AB Basement elevation on the Unit 1 side of the AB. The piping increases in diameter to 2" between Unit 1 and Unit 2 AB Basement. The piping is sometimes attached to existing supports or routed throughpipe supports so that the position will be maintainedduring and after a seismic event.
00 vf Evaluated by: William Gallaher.Sr. Date: 8/27/12
~aIzi#---
Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker Date: 8/27/12 1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-36 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-021 Status YE N[l UMi Location: Bldg. ESPH Floor El. 18' Room, Area ESPH Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEl UI- N/A[l potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI U'] N/AEl degraded conditions?
CR 486256 - 1 of 4 anchor bolts (Southwest corner)broken offfor pipe support to 1-SW-288 and -289. Supports upstream and downstream are solid (satisfactory).
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NJ- Ui- N/A' raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YND NEI Ufl N/Afl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI Ufl N/AF' interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-37 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-021
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UEI N/AE]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE UE- N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE U[E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
1-SW-P-1A and -lB engine concretepedestals have been previously reportedfor cracked/spalledconcrete. Reference CR 018353, CR 369643, and CR 436313.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-029, 070, 076, 089, 096 CR 486287: 1-ELT-LF-141A, both lights hanging by wires CR 486291: five of eight lights are out CR 486293: epoxy flooringis delaminatingin two locations CR 48629 7: water standing near south door (1-BS-DR-1S20-2)
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter r(tb LJ2I: Date: 8/27/12
/
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Evaluated by: Ellerv Baker 4Am~ Date: 8/27/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-38 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-022 Status Y[D NE] UE]
Location: Bldg. SFGD Floor El. 12' Room, Area UJ RS/SI PUMPAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE UE] N/AZ potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N] U[] N/AUl degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NEI UE N/AEZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NE UE1 N/All interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE UE3 N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-39 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-022
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/A[-]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NCI U[] N/A[]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-030, 031 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Sr. Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-40 Page I of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-024 Status YZ N[] UE]
Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 40' Room, Area GA/5.6 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NE] UE] N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YI NE] UE] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ N[] U[] N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-41 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-024
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UI- N/A-]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-1 N/AE]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-03 7 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-42 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-026 Status YZ N[] UF-Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 42' Room, Area MER 1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[E U[ N/A[
potentially, adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NE] UE N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U[ N/A[]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI UE N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that-the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE UE N/AE3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-43 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-026
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI U"I N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NI] UL1 N/AM interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-042, 052, 053 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Kr-[iA--. Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-44 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-030 Status YN N] Uf Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area U1 CONDENSER AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[K NEI UE] N/AI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NI] UI] N/A[I degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NIl UI] N/AE3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Note:
CR 485536- too far between supportsfor conduit on south wall condenser inlet pit, 14'for 1" to 1 1/4" conduit at waterbox 1B (1-CW-LS-1 06B3, etc) access platform. Add support as appropriate.
CR 485554 - also conduit on condenser under 1C inletfor 1-CW-LS-107B1 is loose, tighten and support CR 485567- hanger clamp loosefor 1 1/4" conduit, 8' west of valve SW-I OOA. Tighten as appropriate.
CR 485753 - hanger clamp loosefor 2 Y2 " conduit, north of valve SW-1OA. Tighten as appropriate.
All above are determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] U-1 N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NIE UI N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
CR 485569 - bottom bolts for access ladderfrom Elevation 10' to the Amertappit has loose bolts CR 485552 - loose floor bolt on 1-CW-SHLD-106B1 north panel, no significant challenge to function, tighten or replaceas appropriate.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-45 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-030
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE] Ur- N/AUI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/Al]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-048, 049, 050 Drawings11 448-FC-2Cand I1548-FC-2F CR 485559: 1-CW-25 through wall leak at bottom of valve on condenserside (upstream)
CR 485560:. -CW-116 crack in pipe on upstream side of valve CR 485566: Potentialgroundwaterleakage at I-CW-JA dischargepipe to concrete wall in pit, Amertap pit in wall 2 o'clock (facing north)
CR 485556: unterminated wires east wall of condenser inlet pit Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter (YUCZ) 0 Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-46 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-031 Status Y19 N[I Ur' Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area UI SWPit (West)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NE UE- N/All potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NEI U!] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI U!] N/A!]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] U!1 N/A!]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Note: Gratingpanel east of entrance, 1 of 3 clips loose; north of entrance, 1 of 4 clips loose. Not seismically challenged. CR 485518
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE] U!] N/A!]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-47 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPl-WB-031
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NI- UZ1 N/AEI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NI] UI" N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-051 SP1- WD-SWEL-004 Reference Drawing 11448-FC-2C Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 IY*Dý-
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter v ..
Date: 8121112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-48 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-034 Status YO N[] ULI Location: Bldg. AUX FloorEl. 47' Room, Area U1 AB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U-] N/AO potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ N[] U[] N/Al]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit ' YO NEI UL] N/All raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE] N/AL]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UL] N/AL]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-49 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-034
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI UE1 N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
7- Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y19 NE] UI] N/AD]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YONE U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AssociatedSeismic Wallkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-057, 058 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /4-%I-t4 Date: 8124/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-50 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-035 Status YZ NO] UM]
Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area U1 RWSTAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document.the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UE] N/AE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N[-] UE] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE] NEI UV] N/AZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UM N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-51 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-035
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UfI N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U[] N/AE]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YER NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-061, 079, 087 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan - Date: 8/21/12 1140ýrý(ýý
, -"A Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire ýýI /I--- Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-52 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-038 Status YN N[-] U[1 Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area MCR COMPUTER ROOM #1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEi UE] N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE] UE] N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NE] UE] N/A[]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
-Drop ceiling in the overhead in the Computer Room. This is acceptable since there are no seismically sensitive targets.
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-53 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-038
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE1 N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] ULI N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[:]UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
- 1) Mobile cart with printerand monitor to east of 1-Ri-CAB-i-1.
Potentialseismic housekeeping issue -- subsequent research shows that the Hathaway cabinets are non-safety, non-seismic.
Since the Hathawaycabinet (i-Ri-CAB-i-1) is non-safety, non-seismic, there are no seismic housekeeping concerns.
- 2) Computer desk with printersand monitor in computer room on west side is sufficiently clear ofpotentially seismically sensitive targets.
- 3) Equipment rack in North-Eastcorner of computer room has unsecured laptop and routerthat couldfall - no seismic sensitive items as targets, therefore, acceptable.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPJI-WD-SWEL-069, 073 Evaluated by: DanielJ.Vasquez ' 1) Date: 8/23/12 r
JVa I + A 1, UaI U..I
, ,. Y& ~,U T)
I~vI~a~u
- 14 /__
Vt Lt ,. Irt "WVA Al.IJ91A~~
rJnn"UAr Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTrF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-54 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-039 Status Y[ N[1 UM Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area U1 SERVICE Near I-VS-AC-7 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI UE-- N/Arl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NEI UE3 N/AE3 degraded conditions?
- 1) Baseplatefor 1-EPL-BCR-150 and -151 shimmed below SE anchor bolt andNE bolt. Acceptable.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UE' N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN N[1 UI'- N/A[Z]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 1) Cable tray along west side of 1-VS-AC-6 close to unit noted in US] A-46 SEWS.
- 2) Fluorescentlighting throughout room. Fluorescent lighting was addressedduring USIA-46/IPEEE and concluded not to be a seismic concern.
- 3) Unit I EHC Cabinet to east of l-EP-CS-100- door not secured
- potentialseismic interactions with 1-EP-CS-I00 and overhead FP line.
Discussed issue with Operationsand I&C, submitted CR 486390.
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE UW] N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
-Halon lines well supported.
11
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-55 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-039
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NI] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NI] U-I N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 1) Monitor/keyboardfor ESOMS kiosk 14 restingatop telecom cabinet -+ no sensitive targets. Acceptable
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AssociatedSeismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-060, 091
-Hairline cracking in dividingwall between 1-VS-AC-6 and 1Jswitchgear.Superficialonly.
Acceptable.
Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Date: 8/20/12 Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8120112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-56 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-040 Status YO NEI U[]
Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area U1 SERVICE (Unit 1 AC Room)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NE] UE] N/AE potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NE] U[] N/AO degraded conditions?
Baseplateforpipe support on north wall behind 1-VS-AC-2 has gap between plate and wall -- < 1" therefore acceptableper GIP
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE] N/A[]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Duct support above 1-VS-AC-2 has threadedrod that is out-of-plumb.
Both Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs) agree that support remains adequate to support duct work.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM NEI UE] N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overheadfluorescent lighting was addressedduring USIA-46/IPEEE not a seismic concern
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-57 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-040
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UL] N/AL]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/A[l interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NLEI I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
- 1) 1-VS-FE-IO1 -- corrodedbolting onflow element. Also, corroded bolting on pipe supportupstream of FE.
- 2) Corrosionon 1-VS-217 ConditionReports: CR 485515 submitted to address the corroded bolting on the flow element; CR 486151 submitted to address the corrodedbolting on the pipe support, and CR 486154 submitted to address the corrosion on 1-VS-21 7.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-059, 092 Evaluated by: DanielJ.Vasquez Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: David Germano u0"1a* iL)IO'W Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-58 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-041 Status YZ ND U-]
Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area U1 ECSTAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YER NE UE] N/AC3 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N- U!] N/AU degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NO U!] N/AC1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM NEI UO N/AC interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UC N/AC interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-59 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-041
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] U[" N/AZl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y10 NEI UE1 N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1- WD-SWEL-0 78, 094 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan A~A~9) Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin MeGuire Date: 8/21/12 r '4
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-60 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-042 Status YN NI UM Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area U1 AB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UE N/AI]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] UE N/AE degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NI UE1 N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] UI] N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NI] U-I N/A[]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-61 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-042
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 NE U-1 N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE ULI N/AL interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NiE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPJ- WD-SWEL-080, 085, 086 Evaluated by: Ellery Baker / Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr?/. Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-62 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-045 Status YZ NO- UI-Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' _ Room, Area CC HXAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UI-I N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment inthe area appear to be free of significant YN N[o UE] N/AE]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UE3 N/All raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
-Noted a 1 "pipe rod hangerunattachedabove 1-CC-E-1A. The supports upstream and downstream ofthis location are adequately supportingthe pipe. CR485535 submitted to re-attach hanger.
-Noted a 1 "pipe support missing U-bolt above 1-CC-E-JB. The support is providing adequate verticalsupport at this location and is not a seismic concern. CR485533 submitted to re-install U-bolt to hanger.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y* NE] UE] N/AEl interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-63 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SPI-WB-045
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YID NE] U-] N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UI- N/AL!
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP1-WD-SWEL-093 CR 485544 Loose bolt on Platform (West end) to access 1-CC-E-1A at NE leg CR 485540 FME concern open vents CR 485527 Conduit Clamps unattachedon verticalrun of conduit above 1-CC-E-1C Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-64 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-047 Status YO NEI UF' Location: Bldg. SERVICE FloorEl. 9'-6" Room, Area UI BATTERYROOMA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U[] N/At]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI Ut] N/At]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UE] N/At]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y[ Nt]1 Ut] N/At]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI Ut] N/AtI interactions that could'cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-65 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-047
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/ASl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE U[- N/AS interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI US3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-072 Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth ý117 44"ý Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter InA QzŽ*___ý: Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-66 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-048 Status YZ NE] UF1 Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 27' Room, Area U1 CSPH Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UE- N/AU potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE] NI] U"] N/A[U degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE UU- N/AU3 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM NE UI] N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ur N/AU1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix E Page E-67 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP1-WB-048
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UI' N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U'- N/AUl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEIUU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-022 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire /41 -. Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Unit 2 Area Walk-by Checklists F-1
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-2 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-001 Status YN N[] UE]
Location: Bldg. A UX Floor El. 2' Room, Area U2 CHPUMPCUBICLE C Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NE] UE1 N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NEI U[] N/AE]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE] UE] N/An raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] UE1 N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-3 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-001
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NOi U[i N/An interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2- WD-SWEL-O01 Evaluated by: William Gallagher Sr. ate: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Elleg Baker
'(I Date: 8123112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-4 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-002 Status YZ N] U-]
Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area U2 SWPIT (WEST SIDE)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YIZ NH Uli N/AU potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NHI UD] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NE UH N/AlU raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y[ NHI U[ N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NHI UH' N/AU interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-5 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-002
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE[ N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NE U[3 N/AU[
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-002, 050 CR 485960. Replace sealant at ground wire penetrationin east wall, south side, mid height (2-SW-MOV-201B) and west wall south side, mid height.Not significantflood concern.
Evaluated by: Matthew Winter fY~KI~
fYlký' Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth nk, Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-6 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-004 Status Y0 N] UM Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 27'-6" Room, Area U2 AFWPUMP AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NC UEI N/AC potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NC UC] N/AC degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NCI UC" N/AC raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NCI UC] N/AC interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y* NCI UC- N/AC interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-7 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-004
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEI N/AE]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YJZ NEI U-- N/A[U interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI Uf]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-006, 008, 018, 019, 031, 034, 098.
Noted W" Tag hung at 2-MS-PCV-202B (refCR 463 734)
WO 38103082383 1 bolt on "A" deficient Evaluated by: Eller Baker Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher, Sr. -Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-8 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-006 Status YZ Nil Ul2 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 15' Room, Area U2 CABLE VAULT, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI U[ N/A[l potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
-Anchor bolt missingfrom cable tray support in the North-East corner of the U2 cable vault (Penetration1E). CR 485708 submitted.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NEI UO N/AE[
degraded conditions?
-Cable tray CR] has missing washer at one support. This is minor and is not a seismic concern.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE1 N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ N[] UE- N/A[U interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
-Fluorescentlighting was evaluatedduring US] A-46/IPEEE and determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U[-] N/A[
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
-Fireprotection line to North-East of 2-EP-MCC-2H1-2Nhas long unsupportedspan. Refer to SP2-WD-SWEL-009 for disposition.
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-9 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-006
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEil Ur N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UI- N/At]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ut]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2- WD-SWEL-009, 092 Evaluated by: David Germano ob"~ J&4me1ý Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: DanielJ.Vasquez 4 Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-10 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-007 Status YZ No UF]
Location: Bldg. SERVICE FloorEl. 9"-6" Room, Area U2 BATTERYROOMA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YI NO UE- N/AE potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NE UE N/A" degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UE N/AO raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE UE N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE N/AO interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-11 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-007
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NI] UEI N/AEI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NI] ULI N/A[]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO No UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists.-
SP2-WD-SWEL-069 Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth ~;;'* Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter yDt' _1ýý Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-12 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-008 Status YN NEi U-]
Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 45' Room, Area U2 CABLE SPREADING ROOM (RTB CUBICLE Only)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YlZ NE] Ur] N/A-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ Ni] UIZ N/Al]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI U-- N/AI]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NEI U"] N/Al]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] Ul] N/Al]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-13 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-008
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEI N/AZ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NEI UEZ N/AUI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[ UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2- WD-SWEL-011
/zkQ Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez Date: 8/22/2012 Evaluated by: David Germano akLy-Atd xUVt*M -4ter Date: 8/22/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-14 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-010 Status YN NE] Ur]
Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area U2 CHPUMPCUBICLEA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED NE] UE3 N/A[3 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U[] N/A[]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE] UE- N/A[]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UE- N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NE] UE] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-15 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-010
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI ULI N/AL interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI ULI N/All interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-016, 043 Evaluated by: Elle Baker Date: 8/23112 Evaluated by: William Gallagher Sr. e: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-16 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-011 Status YE NE] UL1 Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 13' Room, Area BASTAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI ULI N/A[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N[] U[] N/AL]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI UE1 N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI ULI N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[l U[] N/AE1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-17 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-011
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE N/AEI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND Url N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-01 7, 082, 088, 089 Evaluated Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-18 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-013 Status YO N[] Ut]
Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 11' Room, Area U2 SFGD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YED N[3 Ut] N/At]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] Ut] N/AE]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NE] Ut] N/At]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of.cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM NE] Ut] N/Al]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NE] Ut] N/At]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-19 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-013
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YJZ NI] ULI N/AUI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE N/AE' interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AssociatedSeismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-021, 045, 061 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/22/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/22/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-20 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-014 Status Y0 NU ULI Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 9' Room, Area MER 4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YU N["] UE- N/AZ" potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UD N/All degraded conditions?
All anchors werepreviously tested perET-S-0070020.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U-- N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YI NEI UZ N/AU3 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y1Z N[I UE- N/A[l interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-21 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-014
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-1 N/A[]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] U-1 N/A[]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] Ui]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-024, 042, 083 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan _GMVAY14 V W ý X I Q- ' Date: 8/29/2012 Evaluated by: David Germano ojkAud Aj*t"s'.Vi Date: 8/29/2012
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-22 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-015 Status YlI N[] UM]
Location: Bldg. SFGD Floor El. 12' Room, Area U2 RS/SIPUMP AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI U'] N/Al]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YlZ Ni] U[] N/Al]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UED N/AE1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ Ni] U[] N/Al]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
See Comments section below
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UI] N/Al]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-23 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-015
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[] ULI N/AUl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE- N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ Nr] U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
See Comments section below.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
The SIpiping to the seal head tank through 2-SI-201 at 02-SI-P-1A.and 2-S1-205 at 2-SI-P-lB is attachedto the Reactor Containment wall at one point and the Safeguards Building at all other building attachmentsupports. The piping transitionsto Y2" diameter tubing between the 34 "piping and the pump. As a result there is adequateflexibility between the ContainmentBuilding and the SI Pump and associatedinlet and outlet piping supported on the SafeguardsBuilding. The Containment Building and SafeguardsBuilding supportedpiping adequatelyprovidesfor the relative displacement between the two buildings which is not expected to exceed Y2" at this point.
The 02-RS-P-2B pump is supported laterally through a vibration control ring to a Containment Building wall mounted support throughfriction pads (i.e., non linearsupport). While the pads are fully engaged, there is no relative movement between the ContainmentBuilding and pump through the seal head tank. The concrete contactpointon 02-RS-TK-2B is on a small tankflange point that is tangent to the ContainmentBuilding wall. As a result, the adverse consequences of this condition is limited and not consideredsufficient to result in seal head tankfailure. This condition is reported in and will be fully addressed in the corrective actionsfor CR 485627.
Heat tracingflexibleconduit at 02-RS-P-2B is not well connected to the rigid conduit. There is no added stress on the enclosed cable. This condition does not affect the function of the heat tracing.
, A//
1 CR486224 was submitted to document this condition.
7' C Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8121112 F.valated hv:
- j ......
Ellervt Baker Date: 8/21/12
>01-
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-24 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-019 Status YZ N[] U-]
Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 2' Room, Area PENETRATIONAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NE] U-] N/A[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NO UI' N/AE1 degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UE- N/AE raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEI UE- N/AE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI U-l N/AEF interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area? ,
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-25 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-019
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE- N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U- N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2- WD-SWEL-036, 038, 075, 087 Abandoned argonpipe system maintainsposition based on continuity through overhead rigidsupports
--+ not a seismic concern. CR 485970 was written to document argonpiping in overheadsupported on non standardsupportsfor both units.
Evaluated by: Ellery Baker Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: William Gallagher,Sr. Date: 8/24/12 k)
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-26 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-020 Status YN NM] UI]
Location: Bldg. MSVH Floor El. 40' Room, Area UD Status YI* Nil Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NI] UEI N/A[]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZJ N[I UL N/AE]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NEI Ul] N/Al]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NEl Ul] N/Al]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nl] U-] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-27 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-020
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE1 N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE UEI N/AE interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-037 Evaluated by: Lary Clivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire / .I Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-28 I Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-021 Status YZ NE] UF]
Location: Bldg. SERVICE Floor El. 42' Room, Area MER 2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y0 NEI U!] N/Al]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN NEI U'- N/AUl degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI U!] N/AI]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] U[] N/AL]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI UE] N/AE3 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-29 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-021
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI Ufl N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEl UDI N/AED interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-039, 051, 052 C
Evaluated by: Larrylullivan Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire 6L m/n,- Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-30 Page 1 of 3 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-024 Status YZ NE] U[]
Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area U2 CONDENSER AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NI] UI] N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NI] UI- N/AI]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NI] UI] N/AE]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NI] UI N/AI]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] UI] N/AE]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-31 Page 2 of 3 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-024
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NO U[- N/ALl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UEL N/A[D interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-046, 047, 048
Reference:
drawings 11548-FC-2F,11448-FC-2K See next pagefor CRs.
4 Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 L
M#0 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-32 Page I of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-028 Status YZ NE UI-Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area U2 RWSTAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UD N/AU potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO* NHI UH- N/AU degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YU NEI UU N/AS raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NEI UEZ N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UU N/AU interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-33 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-028
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE N/AEl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear. that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE" N/A[l interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UI" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AssociatedSeismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-062, 078, 090, 093 Evaluated by: Lary Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-34 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-029 Status YZ NE] UI]
Location: Bldg. SER VICE Floor El. 27' Room, Area EDG 2 ROOM Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YX NLJ U[-1 N/AU potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
-Refer to 2-EE-B-EG2for resolution to anchor bolt issue on the southernmost baseplate (SP2-WD-SWEL-071).
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U-] N/AOl degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YED NEI U"I N/AEl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
SA line above 2-EE-B-EG2 supported by angle braced cantilever supports and clamped with vertical lateralsupports approximately 16' apart --+judgedby both SWEs to be seismically adequate to support the SA line.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y[ NZ Ur N/AU interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
-Large overhead lights secured to Unistrutthat is rod-hung.Not a seismic concern.
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI U-1 N/AUl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-35 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-029
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NOi U'] N/Afl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YS NEI U[- N/AE]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
-Unanchored catch containerfrom 2-EG-2, on the floor no sensitive interactiontargets nearby - no seismic concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-074, 091, 099
-Large spall in missile shield; this was identified during maintenance rule inspections and entered into the corrective action system.
Evaluated by: David Germano Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: DanielJ. Vasquez Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-36 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-030 Status YO NEI UE1 Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9' Room, Area IA COMPRESSOR AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[] U-1 N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YN N[] U[] N/Al]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UI] N/A[']
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
-CR 486209 - clamp loose on 1 "conduit in overhead, conduit extends to junction box with 1-IA-TV-125/126 A Dryer, J-IA-CP-125, 1-IA-XFMR-1 00, 1-IA-PS-125, 1-IA-SOV-125 and 126, 3feet north of T50.
-CR 486208 -junction box cover for 2-IA-TS-HATS and -HWTS is loose (3 of 4 bolts missing) (high air/high water)
CR 486199 - conduit to I-SA-FI-] flow indicatorhas loose clamp not a seismic concern CR 486196 - no groutpad instrument air tank 1-IA-TK-1, previously identified by CR 477338 --+ not a seismic concern These issues were determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YM NEI UFI N/AE]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-37 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-030
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y0 Nl UEI1 N/Al]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM N[I Ul] N/AD]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SPI-WD-SWEL-065 SP2- WD-SWEL-064 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Pub Date: 8/24/12
)
Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth, Evaluated b : T m t?.. h ate: 8124112
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-38 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-031 Status Y[O. NE] UEI Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 27' Room, Area U2 ECSTAREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YM. N[D U-1 N/AD]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO* NEI UI] N/AI]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YI] NI] UI- N/AE raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO NI] UI1 N/AI interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NI] UI] N/AI]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-39 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-031
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI ULJ N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UE N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-076, 096 Evaluated by: Larg Cullivan Date: 8/21/12 Evaluated by: Kevin McGuire A -/' ' 4-...* Date: 8/21/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-40 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-038 Status YO N[] U[_]
Location: Bldg. FUEL Floor El. 6' to 14' Room, Area SFP COOLER AREA Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN N[J UI-I N/A'-
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
-Pipe supportupstream ofl-FC-14 not tight to ceiling. Submitted CR 486528.
-Pipesupport upstream of l-FC-4 not tight to wall (approximately 1/4" to 3/8"). Second support (vert/lat) upstream of l-FC-4. Submitted CR 486523.
-Firstpipe support on EC outlet, east baseplate not tight againstwall at top and bottom but is tight at middle (-3/8" gap). Submitted CR 486527.
The above CRs are determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NIh U-1 N/A--
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NOI UE N/AU raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
-CR 486477 - 3" conduit support not attached to Unistrut, approximately 12' span, supportedupstream and downstream of that location.
-CR 486482 -four loose ground wire clamps. Runs to 1-FC-P-3A.
The above CRs are determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YO Nil U-] N/A-1 interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[: UI- N/AU1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-41 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-038
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[9 N[l U-- N/AEI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEl UM-] N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
CR 486496 - HV-500-11 ventilation cart near north wall behind FC-1A8-1B is not secured to prevent tipping over during a seismic event.
Potentialinteractionwith 1-CC-418 and 1-CC-411 Storage offrames againstnorth wall The above-CR is determined not to be a seismic concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO* NEI' U[-i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Daniel J. Vasquez 4 () Date: 8/29/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter ()1~ QIŽŽ Date: 8/29/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-42 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-040 Status Y[ NEI UI-J Location: Bldg. TURB Floor El. 9'-6" Room, Area U2 BATTERY ROOM B Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YIN NEI UL1 N/AE]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UE] N/AE) degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI Ull N/AEZ raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE) UE) N/AE) interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UE] N/AE) interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-43 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-040
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE1 UE1 N/A[l interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NO ULI N/All interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2-WD-SWEL-070 Evaluated by: Tim Wattleworth Date: 8/23/12 Evaluated by: Matthew Winter Ivw
- -- Date: 8/23/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-44 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-041 Status YZ N[] U-]
Location: Bldg. CSPH Floor El. 27' Room, Area U2 CSPH Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NO] ULI N/An potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YE NE] UE] N/AL]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UD] N/AD]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YE NE] U[-] N/AL]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NE] UL- N/AL]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-45 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-041
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y9 NEI UEI N/AE interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UEI N/AEl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists.
SP2-WD-SWEL-020 Evaluated by: Larry Cullivan Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Kevin MeGuire ( ' f 4(. Date: 8/24/12
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report. Appendix F Page F-46 Page 1 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-042 Status YZ N[] UI-Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 13' Room, Area U2 AB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist shall be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI U-] N/Al]
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y[ NI] U[l N/Al]
degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEl Ul] N/Al-]
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ Nl] Ul-1 N/Al]
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE Nl] U'- N/Al]
interactions that, could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Surry Power Station NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Summary Report Appendix F Page F-47 Page 2 of 2 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC # SP2-WB-042
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UU1 N/AU interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NI U-I N/AU interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Associated Seismic Walkdown Checklists:
SP2- WD-SWEL-032 SP2-WD-SWEL-035 Evaluated by: Date: 8/24/12 Evaluated by: Date: 8/24/12