ML13007A071

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kld TR-495, Rev. 2, Beaver Valley Power Station Development of Evacuation Time Estimates, Appendix J Cover Page Through Page K-30
ML13007A071
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 12/20/2012
From:
KLD Engineering, PC
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-12-441 KLD TR-495, Rev 2
Download: ML13007A071 (47)
v • d • e


Text

APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J-1 provides the volume and queues for the ten highest volume signalized intersections in the study area.Refer to Table K-2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

Table J-2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for ten roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Table J-3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (region R03) for each scenario.

As expected, scenarios 8 and 11, which are snow scenarios, exhibit slower average speeds and longer average travel times.Table J-4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes -Interstate-376 and US-22 -for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (region R03) under scenario 1 conditions.

As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-8, 1-376 is congested for most of the evacuation after the first hour. As such, the average speeds are slower (and travel times longer) after the first hour.Table J-5 provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (region R03) under scenario 1 conditions.

Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Figure J-1 through Figure J-14 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 14 scenarios considered.

The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation.

For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion.

For higher population density sites, the curves are farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion.

As seen in Figure J-1 through Figure J-14, the curves are spatially separated as a result of the traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3.Beaver Valley Power Station J-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 2 Table J-1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections 1547 1,660 74 1582 0 0 1580 1-376 Business & Actuated 1575 895 0 University Blvd 1585 6,633 336 TOTAL 9,188 -1580 897 0 1-376 Business & 1590 6,633 431 1585 Actuated Hanger Rd 1595 0 0*1--TOTAL 7,530 1246 92 0 1242 SR2 & SR 105 Actuated 1252 6,553 17 TOTAL 6,645 -1069 2,521 0 US-22 & On-ramp to 16 ,2 1066 1-27 &nat Actuated 231 4,101 0 1-376 West TOTAL 6,622 -214 4,098 460 US-22 West & On-231 ramp to 1-376 East Actuated 1066 2,524 0 TOTAL 6,622 -210 2,517 0 1071 4,104 0 1074 US-22 & Shopping Actuated 1076 0 0 Center Entrance Atae1060 1077 0 0 TOTAL 6,621 -1074 2,519 0 1069 4,102 0 US-22 & Park Manor 16 ,0 1071 Ur Actuated 1072 0 0 Dr____1073 0 0 TOTAL 6,621 -1074 4,106 0 210 US-22 & Campbells Actuated 1078 2,514 0 Run Rd 1075 0 0 I_ I ITOTAL 6,620 J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 1030 0 0 SR1040 6,420 233 1035 Rd/Shaunton Rd Actuated 1036 0 0 1037 196 2 TOTAL 6,616 -1313 6,603 0 1314 SR 2 & Virginia Ave Actuated 1316 0 0 1 _ TOTAL 6,603 -Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Table J-2. Sample Simulation Model Input Vehicle Enern Destination0 Lin Newr Dietoa De- stiato Capacit 8425 4,500 68 287 NW 8109 1,350 8133 3,800 8425 4,500 99 78 N 8854 4,500 8430 3,800 8423 1,700 353 339 E 8874 4,500 8787 1,700 375 517 SE 8105 4,500 8541 1,575 1548 481 NW 8546 1,700 8145 4,500 115 4 N 8546 1,700 600 89 E 8423 1,700 8715 1,700 1010 25 NE 8630 1,700 8874 4,500 1520 54 N 8109 1,350 8546 1,700 2373 34 NW 8150 1,700 8145 4,500 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)Scenario 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NetworK-wiae Average Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi) 3.3 3.8 3.3 3.3 3.8 3.3 ~3.8 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 37 3733 37 3.3 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.7 Network-Wide Average 18.2 15.7 18.2 15.7 18.3 18.4 16.0 15.5 19.3 16.5 16.3 18.8 18.2 16.4 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles Exiting 91,908 92,092 87,710 87,916 79,755 91,206 91,403 91,776 84,478 84,601 85,017 78,270 88,116 92,141 Network IIIIII J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)US-22 EB 13.0 60.0 13.0 60.0 13.0 56.5 13.8 59.4 13.1 60.0 13.0 US-22 WB 13.1 60.0 13.1 60.0 13.1 59.0 13.3 59.8 13.1 60.0 13.1 1-376 WB 29.7 54.0 33.0 32.2 55.3 42.0 42.4 67.9 26.2 67.9 26.2 1-376 EB 29.9 64.6 27.8 41.5 43.2 30.3 59.3 37.3 48.1 67.9 26.4 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-6 KILD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Table J-S. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario 1 CumultiveEhilapes Discared by(heoIdiatdsim Cumlaiv Percen ofVeicle Dicare byteIdctdTm 5 37 50 54 55 9 I I 0.0%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.1%20 20 189 274 293 298 0.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3%333 1,239 1,534 1,584 1,594 2.0% 2.5% 2.1% 1.8% 1.7%157 767 2,356 3,479 3,649 3,670 4.6% 4.8% 4.7% 4.3% 4.0%268 1,258 2,873 3,987 4,092 4,107 7.6% 5.9% 5.4% 4.8% 4.5%276 2,840 7,309 11,641 15,697 19,516 17.2% 14.9% 15.9% 18.3% 21.3%84 666 913 966 982 0.5% 1.4% 1.2% 1.1% 1.1%538 75 822 1,263 1,339 1,354 0.5% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.5%541 3,006 7,488 11,924 14,359 14,412 18.2% 15.3% 16.2% 16.8% 15.7%550 116 601 864 897 903 0.7% 1.2% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0%819 168 1,128 1,709 1,819 1,844 1.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.1% 2.0%824 8 57 77 81 83 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%826 50 389 532 562 571 0.3% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6%923 89 751 1,180 1,260 1,276 0.5% 1.5% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4%941 2,239 3,475 4,698 4,811 1018 5.7% 4.6% 4.7% 5.5% 5.2%16 270 481 496 497 1123 0.1% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5%78 585 1,047 1,105 1,122 1161 0.5% 1.2% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2%Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-7 KID Engineering, P.C.J-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Cumulative Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time Cumulative Percent of Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time 429 2,431 4,027 4,581 4,855 1276 4,581 4,855 4 + +/- -I-2.6%5.0%5.5%5.3%5.3%1364 778 2,011 3,217 4,298 4,926 4.7% 4.1% 4.4% 5.0% 5.4%1520 136 853 1,224 1,256 1,261 0.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.5% 1.4%1697 1,516 3,606 4,801 4,890 4,900 9.2% 7.4% 6.5% 5.7% 5.3%1785 815 2,405 3,965 5,485 6,373 4.9% 4.9% 5.4% 6.4% 7.0%2138 231 610 955 996 1,000 1.4% 1.2% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1%2358 2,393 6,556 8,846 9,195 9,241 14.5% 13.4% 12.1% 10.7% 10.1%2359 265 1,135 1,363 1,398 1,402 1.6% 2.3% 1.9% 1.6% 1.5%70 196 235 243 245 2464 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%25 238 342 363 370 2576_____ 0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4%Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)-Trip Generation lETE 100%U 80%~60%0 U7 I-e S40%CP 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)-Trip Generation m ETE 100%f,"0 80%U60%o 40%.20%S a.0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)-Trip Generation -ETE 4-0O I-*6 100%80%60%40%20%0%ZZ Lo/ý001 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)-Trip Generation mETE 100%" 80%40 20%20%a.0% I , I i 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)i-b KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)-Trip Generation -mETE 100%1 80%01 2 60%0%S20%0% p 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)-Trip Generation iETE In 01 S U 4-0 I-.4-0 4-C S U I-S a.100%80%60%40%20%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)0%Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)-Trip Generation mETE 100%-80%M 60%I,-S40%P 20%0.0 0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)-Trip Generation -ETE us M 4-0 100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Elapsed Time (min)270 300 330 360 390 Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 9)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%"O 80%~60%49 0-W i 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 9)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)-Trip Generation

-ETE U'El El'p 4'0 I-p.-0 4'El U a-a'0.100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-10. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)1-13 KID Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)-Trip Generation -ETE U, 0 0 4.0 4..100%80%60%40%20%ZZ-.0/,00000", 0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 Elapsed Time (min)270 300 330 360 390 Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 12)1Trip Generation -ETE In"0 U=0'I*4 100%80%60%40%20%AOL_00eO00004 JU 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 12)J-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-14 KI.D Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 13)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%'A 0 1 80%4 0 % 1 S. 20%0%I-' 40%, ,,,,,,, 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-13. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 13)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)-Trip Generation , ETE 100%"80%60%I,-S40%C N 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-14. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)J-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a link-node analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K-1 provides an overview of the link-node analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 64 more detailed figures (Figure K-2 through Figure K-65) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in December 2010. Table K-1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis.

Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided in Table K-1. The roadway type identified in Table K-1 is generally based on the following criteria:* Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds* Freeway ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway* Major arterial:

3 or more lanes in each direction* Minor arterial:

2 or more lanes in each direction" Collector:

single lane in each direction* Local roadways:

single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, "No. of Lanes" in Table K-1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets);

these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.Table K-2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pre-timed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K-2. The location of each node can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided.Beaver Valley Power Station K-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 2 Figure K-1. Beaver Valley Link-Node Analysis Network K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 I .- -S I , all T7 ka S gO. efpe l ITSI einýSt~~f/1 h~ r -T'0.Y.~-1 5N-1,s PA 1131 RdN I I Legend BVPS* Node 11- Unk In1] dex Grid Sub-Aa..Shadow Region" 2,5, 10, 15 Mile RingsWater Key..p WRL -Beaver Valley Power Station Link-Node Analysis Network Figures I Grid 1 I I I ----,.-...--.-.

--- J Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 1 K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 2 K-4 KID Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Vi ce2MR if 8864 1134 13.$2 A I-oO~~Rd dS Rdt0 4-------i -t W RpMFd U'Hi I [&n tAe AA,,elA'"79 Gr-dO~tR Moo,, Rd'2-1JI 4 6" At I Legend SobAre Beaver Valley Power Station Unk-Node Analysis Network Figures* BVPS bAe* Node Shadow RegionLink e' 2,5,10,15 Mile Rings G rid 3[- Index Grid L5 Water 0.Figure K-4. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 3 K-S KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-S KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-5. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 4 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-6 KILD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 5 K-7 KID Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 1007 j 101706 126y t, 4r i 1313 Cwia ~207~$X 11/ 20 117 ~1 ~140 61 Ok~24 ,- 121 162_____ -9 1______________

/112o'Iý I&Leged BeverVally Pwer taton Uk-Nde Aalyis Ntwok Fiure*~3 VVP S143r o~~~~4 Noe SaowRg 1 38r 1 15 2.5.44 10Rddelg[~~~]~ 117 Gi atrL Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 6 Beaver Valley Power Station K-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 2

~oI -A 10415 100 11 U2 1006 11120)~'k. Rd Y6 A~L 0'Rd 'ý.Rde TI R~dl / ~ 5ThS \2 7t j N2142:7--

Wor~R 134o 63 7-1._____ _____ G___ _ 7r _ _ _L20en Beve VlePoeSttoLikNdAnlssNetokFiue 143e,~JS~bA.

  • Nod Si~dow egbo 46 Link rp,,10 511R Oa]a Rd. G939T Dr5 600e Figur K-.LikNdeAayssNtwr Gi Beaver Valley ower Station KI4nineigPC EvacutionTimeEstiate ev.7 Figure K-9. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 8 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 9 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 10 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-12. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 11 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-13. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 12 K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 64 22Nd St I20 4 4U '02 unRd~ r
  • 14S I Wmý 47 L'ndy St ar1 74683I 41 Main~ Avei A Q 74~ t N.~ 4 A dý/'Y Sub-rea P-7 5uoa2er 736 Be Ch~~~pj Rd1K %W I324 3~~~~~~~ -~- ---~ ----------(- -973 --- -664 0~iap 74d1 S65o8~ga 7]5 md. k6nd S1 ae Figure73 K-4 LikNd\nlss ewr rd1 Beaver Vale Po e St t o7-K D En i e r n , P C Evauaio Timeori EsimteRe.2 Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 14 K-16 KLD Engineering.

P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2

' $741 720, 42, ~~~ 740' .~~'$y 7ji~'73 N~~&U ~. L 39Th St!,-,~, ~ ShannonQ,r A L\ It.46Th St 972 5Sf LYýS Sub2rea P-t GraodonS ~le 2.780.8.-s 734 MCI Dfl,d'-% ~ <'Lvo-COPc '326 767 j~Wh~7CF ~ ~ \ ~~517 3a "N'_____ ___ 0 ,-~, ,3 -p IF L_I Legend K Beaver Valley Power Station Link-Node Analysis Network Figures* 1BVPS efJ ub-Area* Node Sttadow Region-i nk C 2,5,10.15 Mile Rings Grid 15--Index Grid Water .Figure K-16. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 15 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-17. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 16 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure 1(-8. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 17 K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 18 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2

/- ... N p'A.j,,.

  • ci /, '0. 70 4 72 S PCk *h Rd" / /0 vl.

..... lid',

66101 616 _ ___ Rd[3. .Sub-Area:

0-3 ,1, 6213 sn"d,62126~k~o~yR Fg.K 6230 1ae Val1 05 t0 1 Evauaio TieEsiat4ev y~665 1132st f 3Rd- i 62 134m3 1112B~%-.. II, , .-7 j0 igg6 ;HIýd.d 6 AndV-'1343 067%,o p 44z8d~~p 1342; FodAd' p Avedo Od d________M

!!z___ _ 'i JSub-Arei:

0-21 -Legend Beaver Valley Power Station Link-Node Analysis Network Figures* BVPS Sub-Area* Node Shadow Region~ r ~ 2. 5, 10.1 SMile G id 1] Index Grid Water.,%Figure K-20. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 19 Beaver Valley Power Station K-21 KID Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 2

--I -A li 7 T6_ _ _ _ 1 >_ _ _ z :_ _ _It ! , 87.6W Sub-Area:

0-3 .0 4345i 638 II.... .8 -!'6335;F r Rd 17" -33 3 p/ nn~ ew ,/.. 3 j1t7ne p.e--ny -, j,/6326 as 4 1374 134 fin/n Vden J, 1143 17 1367 11 1 .'2. 1371 G72 '347 '-k I I, 32 .A 1367--< 0 Sin"*- I,- ..SeSuill-Area:P-7 i<2.6-A,~ f P. 111327 1-.113 11359 117.i' 1atr 3 1 137 F ..igurAe 0-2 13 318 / 1.3-rI 3 __Legend 1 Beaver Valley Power Station Link-Node Analysis Network Figures*uBVPS anTesSmb-A,..te

  • Node Shadow Region Li- nk 2,5, 10, 15 Mile RingsGrd2 L7I-] lj e i ndu Grd Water J Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 20 Beaver Valley Power Station K-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 2 Figure K-22. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 21 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-23. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 22 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-24. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 23 K-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-25. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 24 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-26. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 25 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2

------------

-- ,,,,.,o,.

........-+ ..... +,, " 764 e, 8: -as 76 0 6 / < -..I R onne/,0002 Ridg.epIto- \ -I 8 16 Al-'- 5-- ."12 ' % 1011 ,"% Lo y.... .' O ,4i 5~ r 1 s ' + // ' , " 1140 W --/ -- -I+,i.-# ['o, ..... .403 +. >.A + ,t --t ]<_* ,, -t 1, .... o.i1 ., 22 S.s 1 7 '5\13"7 L R P '7Rd+,+++ ~ ~ ~ A 3W, 401 --...01412[Legend Beai Valley Power Station Link-Node Analysis Network Figures b 11, 40, 101 %5Mc8)-} Ln 2 105 lenIi Grid 26 292 /271~ 13 ;so b Figure K-27, Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 26 Beaver Valley Power Station l-lB KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 2 Figure K-28. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 27 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure K-29. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 28 Beaver Valley Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13007A071&oldid=907064"