ML13004A055

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 14, Chapter 2.0 - Site Characteristics, Figure 2.1-1 Through Figure 2.4-30
ML13004A055
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/2012
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
RS-12-221
Download: ML13004A055 (95)
v • d • e


Text

IIOU WIS.

~.~

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-1 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN THE STATE

r

r III III

~

2 0

~

Z W

o

~~

W

..J fi~~

III

..J (J

~

= 0 lit C

a:

u III

+----+--J wz D~

Q C

L---

)0-W

..J

..J C>

C~

~

..J

..J...o w...

o qz]

o

>"'1 Z *

>oo w....

C),

0'

..1 I

r.J I

I

+

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-2 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN OGLE COUNTY

SIrE BOUNDARY

ROCKVALE AND t1ARIOIl TOHtlSHIPS

_..~--..;........

SCALE IN IUlES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAl SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-3 LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHIN ROCI<VALE AND MARION TOWNSHIPS

TRAFFIC LEGEND ANNUAL AVERAGE 24HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME o

STATE HIGHWAYS o

COUNTY HIGHWAYS PRIMARY HIGHWAYS

2000 AND OVER o

2MflES SCALE OTHER HIGHWAYS 1000 TO 1999 400 TO 999 150 TO 399 LESS THAN

'SO BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-4 ROADS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHIN THE SITE VICINITY

BURLINGTON URTURN R.

R.

IlIUUD spua

~1.1 ** ClalCI ****

ClICACO, IIL.AlIEE ST. PAUL l PUIFIC ****

!t:==i::

1 =::::i::

1==1 I'LiI BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-5 RAILROAD NETWORK WITHIN 6 MILES OF THE SITE

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-5a ROUTE OF BYRON STATION RAILROAD SPUR

REFERENCE:

BASE MA" FROM

ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS:

WISCONSIN U.S.G.S.

NK 16,4 DATI'D 1958

____ EXCLUSIOfl AREA

                        • SITE BOUNDARY WlNl101UM EItCLUStON SECTOR BOuNDARY OtSTANeE (FEET)

SECTOR ZOOO "00 NNE 2050 BYRON STATION SSw 3ZOO

~

NE 162!>

UPDATED ANAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

"'00

'.00 39"~

137!l 3000 FIGURE 2.1-6 ESE

'4Z!>

4OZ.

172!l 3300 SITE LAYOUT AND EXCLUSION AREA SSE 2625 28.25

b 1

2 l!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiij SCALE IN MILES EXCLUSION AREA SITE BOUNDARY BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-6a TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE AREA

o 100 100 SOCFeET REVISION 7 DECEMBER i998 BYRON STATION UPDATEO FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT flCURE 2.'-7 LOCATION ANO OiUENTATION OF PRINCIPLE PLANT STRUCTURES 168

w N

E S

~

--L OGlE COUNTY 0

6 10MILES SCALE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-8 SECTOR DESIGNATIONS Wrn-UN 10 MILES OF THE SITE

SCALE FIGURE 2.1-9 LOCATION Of MNOA CITIES WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o*__........iil..O""""""..5....~2a;O"""",,;2SMILE S ELGIN IWALWORTH I COUNTY

-r----'--001"--

.Lft,NESVllU lAOD*

ROCK COUNTY COUNTY

.'IUPOU I

'HARVARD BOONE Me HENRY I C:N" ICO":"

I ULV':J MARENGO

--- -~I DE KALB COUNTY1 KANE SITE r

I SYCAMORE ROCHELLE MALT" I

~

__.~'---.1 DEKALI

\\

flANKUH GlOVE HINKUY WATf~""N

.\\

.AMBOY I

S"NDW'~-~l:~-O-~

LEE COUNTY I

SOMONAUK aT4MPIC0.L

--L

---1._

-f--

  • ULAND T ---

.WA~NUT--*--- I.

IAR~VILLE MENDOT" LA MOILLE I

LA SALLE CHUI'

  • alODHEAD1 4.'",,4.1 MONROEIlt

,,~~~~_o WISCONSI~

WA:EN/

-iUiNOis

_0 WINNEBAGO I

STEPHENSON COUNTY COUNTY

~

.UNA I

WINNEBAGO

._---- --.L.__.-r. OGLECOUNT~-----'

MOU~T I

CAR,ROLl

.LANAU

,fORRESTON MOU"T SAVANNA I

MO~1S CARROLL COUNTY MILlIDGEVILLE..

~.

'OLO' GRAND DETOUR WHITESIDE COUNTY fULTON SWISSYILLf

REVISION 9 DECEMBER 2002 3 MILE S I

2 I

WELD MEMORIAL PARK Q

<ocr

r

()

cr 1

I o

I MOTOSPORT RIVER ROAD CAMPING

&MARINA MOUNT MORRIS BOAT CLUB SCALE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1 - 10 TRANSPORTATION ROUTES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE LOW POPULATION ZONE

N SCALE FIGURE 2.1-11 POPULATION CENTERS WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE 15 20 25MILES 10 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o

E KANE COUNTY s

NORTH

$ECTOR SID PEOPLE/SQUAll MILE 10DD PEOPLE/SQUARE IILE CUMULATIVE PO'ULlTION 1810 CUMULATIVE P'PULATION 2020 10 6

~

/

lOS

/""""

~

~

(/"

z

/

I 0-

/,/

/'

~

1 04

=:I D-O I

D-OW I

~.....

1 03

=:I

Ill!=

u o

5 10 zo 3D 50 DISTANCE FROI

SITE, IllES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 1 OF 16)
It Cit-1 O~

OIC..=

a..

Cit a..

=r.-....

OIC..

103

*

U 1 02 NORTH* NORTHEaST SECTOR 500 PEOPLE/SQUIRE

.,LE lOOO PEO'LE/S,U.E IILE CUIULaTlVE POPUllTlOIL lU.

CUMULaTIVE

'OPULaTlON 2020 10' o

5 10 20 31 40 51 DIStaNCE FROM

SITE, MILES

. BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 2 OF 16)

500 PEOPLE/SQUARE llLE 1100 PEOPLE/S... U IIlE COIUllTIU POPULATIOII 1.. 0 CUMULATIVE POPULATION 2020 z

0-104

=-

A-D Go

=--...

-=...

103

=-*=-

u NORTHEAST SECTOR o

5 10 20 31 40 OISTANCE FIOI

SITE, IIUS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 3 OF 16)

z:

ell t-e-'=

A.

ell A.

t-e-'=

E=

u 1 0' EAST*

NORTHEAST HeTOR SlO PEOPU/SQUAIE IIU 11..

PEOPLEISQURE IILI CalULATIYE

'OPULATIO. lU.

CUIULATIVE POPULATION 2021 o

5 10 30 so D'STUlCE r.oll SIT(.

IllES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 4 OF 16)

z a

=-

1 07 EaST SECTU SOD PEOPLE/SqUaRE IILE 1100 PEOPLE/suau IILE CUIULaTIVE

'O'ULaTION 198' CUIULaTIVE POPUUTION 2020 1 0' o

5 10 20 30..

so DISTANCE FROI

SITE, IllES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALVSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 5 OF 16)

EAST

  • SGUTIEIn SECTOR 1 06

/

  1. i' 105

/

",#i,

~

~"

1/

II:

I I

0-

/,/

to-10*

e....

=-...

0...

I WI I

=--

to-e....

103

=-

Ii

=-u SOD HOPLE/SQUIRE IILE lODO PEOPLE/SOUAIE IUE CUIUUlIH PO'ULAlION Itll CUMUUTlVE POPULATION 2020 0510 20 30 50 DISTANCE FROI SITE.

IILlS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 6 OF 16)

1~

z 0-

~

10 4

~=

Do 0

Do

=--

~-

~

103

*

Col SOUTHEAST SECTOR SOD PEOPLE/SQUAIE llLE 1010 PEOPU/S QUA IE llLE CUIULATIVE POPULATION 1110 CUMULATIVE POPULATION 2020

,10 0

5 10 20 30 40 so DISTANCE FROM

SITE, IllES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 7 OF 16)

SOUTH*

SOUTHEAST SECTOR 500 PE0 PLE IS QU' IE llLE lOOO PEOPLE/SClUAIE llLE CUIULATIVE POPULATIOII 1910 CUMULATIVE POPUUTION 20ZO 1 06

/' ~,--

~

/",~",

105

/

/

/

/

z 0

I I

/,/

10 4

...=

D-O I

D-IAl I

103

=

E=

u o

5 10 20 30 4D 50 DISTANCE fROM

SITE, MILES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 8 OF 16)

SOUTH SECTOR SOO PEOPLE/SQUAIE MILE 100D PEOPLE/SQUIRE llLE CUMULATIVE "POLUIO_ lt1.

CUIULATIVE POPULATION 2020 10 6

/

/'

10$

/"",-"

/

/////

I I

CI-10' //

to-e...

=-

A.

CI I

A.

ow I

=--

to-e...

I:t 10 3

  • =-

u 10 1

o 5

lD 20 31 4D SO DISTANCE FROM SIH, IlLES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 9 OF 16)

10 7

z o...-

oJ=-

CIo o

CIo 0601

=-...-

...=-*=

U 10' SOUTH SOUTHWEST SECTOR SOD PEOPLE/SQUARE llLE 1800 PEOPLE/SQUARE llLE C'IUUlIVl 'OPULATION lUI CUIULATIVE POPULATION 2020 10 '

8 5

10 20 30 40 50 DIS TA NCE FR°I SITE, IllES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 10 OF 16)

SOUTHWEST SECTOR 10 6

,/

/

10 5

/' /'

~~

~~

  • __--e

~~

"-.~

/,/,/

z

,/

~l 0-10*

~

(,/ '/

=t

~

0

~

I r;/

=-

~-

1:1 1 0 ~

0 u

500 PEOPLE/SQUARE IILE lODO PEOPLE/SQUAIE llLE CUMULATIVE POPULATION 1...

CUIULATIVE POPULATION ZOZO 10 1 o

5 10 ZO 30 41 50 OISUNCE FROM SITE, MILES BYRON STATIOh UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 11 OF 16)

500 PlOPLE/SQUARl I.Ll 1000 PUPU/SQUUE I.LE CUMULATIVE POPUUTlON lUO CUIULAT.VE POPULAT.ON 2020

z o-...-...
J 0.

o 0....

=-...-

J*
J U

10 '

1 O~

10' WEST SOUTHWEST SECTOR 10 '

0510 20 30 40 SO DISTANCE FROM

SITE, IlLES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 12 OF 16)

zo...

c...

1:1

~

o

~

'AI=-...

c...

1:1 E

1:1 tot 18' 10" DISTANCE WEST SECTOR SOO PEOPLEISQuaRE IIlE 1000 PE OPLE/SQUIE IIlE CUIUUTIVE POPUUTI'. Itli CUI~L~TI~E POPULaTION 2020 40 50 SITE III IlLES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 13 OF 16)

WEST NORTHWEST SECTOR 500 PEOPLE/SQUARE IILE 1110 'IOPLE/stUn IILE C'IIUOn ""Utll. " **

CUIUlaTIVE 'O'UlaTION 2020 10 6

/

/'

10 5

/'..;;"

,,~

/~

a

!/

0-I I 10* //

=-

a.

0a.

I I

110-.........

=-

10 3

  • =-..

1\\)1 o

5 10 40 50 DISTANCE FlOM SITE. IlLES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 14 OF 16)

o l-e...=..

o..

l-e...=

E

=

u 10' 10' NORTHWEST SECTOR

~,

~/"

/

/

/,,/"

,/

~

1/

r' I

I, 500 PEOPLE/SQUARE MILE 10DD PEOPLE/SOUARE MILE CUMUlATI¥[

POPUlATION 1110 CUMULaTIVE POPULATION 2020 10 1 o DISTANCE FROM SITE.

MILES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 15 OF 16)

NORTH NORTHWlST SECTOR 500 PEO PLE IS QVA R£ III E 10 00 P£ 0 PLE IS GII IE II L£ CUMULATIVE POPULATION 1.10 CUMULATIVE POPULATION 2020 10 6

,~

/

1 05

/

,~.,

~,.

/~~~

~

II:

I,"~

0-I

//

c 10'

""'"=

L 0

L I

I

=-...

c...=

10 3

  • =

c..

10 1

o DISTANCE FROM

SITE, IIUS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.1-12 1980 AND 2020 POPULATION DENSITY WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE SITE (SHEET 16 OF 16)
  • d STILLMAN VALLEY ApLANT WSITE LEAF RIVER
  • 0

MORRIS

~.

INDUSTRIAL AREAS QUARRIES o

5 SCI LE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-1 LOCATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE

2MILES I

I I

8:'12'",

I I

I I

~=**

o SITEo

~O'EGON STATION 6"

6" LEGEND

____... 3"

AMOCO

eADGER PIPELINE CO.

--- NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.

SCALE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-2 LOCATION OF PIPELINES WlllilN 5 MILES OF THE SITE

o 5

10MILES LEGEND

.. CITY o

TOWN

-t AIRPORT

~

SEAPLANE BASE

~\\\\...\\\\\\\\ AIRWAY

.,,\\\\.*...

SCALE BYRON STATlON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSrS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-3 AIRPORTS AND AIRWAYS WITHIN 10 MILES OF THE SITE

IlIWX

_s 3

2 I

9 w**

13 I

~.....

JO DAYIESS Sf(,,"ENsor. -NtMao!

McHENRY lAKE

-3 3

5 i

4 3

I Scale of Miles 20 40 eo 110 100 I

NO. OF TORNADOES

  • ~

OGLE II' 0[

KANE COOl(

PER COUNTY (1916-1969)

IW.8 54YEAR PERIOD WHlTtSIOE LE£ 3

6 6

  • ~

HOIRY BUttfAll LASALLE

~ISlNID 7

S 9

1BC03

..3 1oo-"....-cIc.

o BYRON STAnON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-1 NUMBER OF TORNADOES ORIGINATING IN EACH COUNTY IN THE STATE OF. ILLINOIS.

1916*1969

NNW N

J S

NNE ENE E

ESE SSE

>1.50 8

0.26-3.01-1.5 7.0 CALM

"'~__*

1.51-3.0 MPS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-2 JANUARY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW NW WNW w -

wsw SW SSW S

N I

NNE SSE NE SE ENE

- E ESE FIGURE 2.3-3 FEBRUARY WIND ROSE 30*FOOT lEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

>7 MPS 8

0.26-3.01-

_ 1 5 7.0 CALM

\\,,'U__

1. 5 1-3.0

NNW N

I NNE WNW w -

wsw ENE E

ESE SSW I

S 0.26-3.01-8 15 7.0 CALM

~,~__*

1.51-

>7 3.0 MPS SSE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-4 MARCH WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW N

I NNE WNW W -

wsw ssw SSE ENE

- E 0.26-3.01-8 1 5 7.0 CALM C

1.51-

>7 3.0 MPS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-5 APRIL WIND ROSE 30*FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW N

I NNE WNW W

WSW ENE E

ESE SSW 0.26-3.01-B ALM 1.5 <<

~~~__*

1.51-

>7 3.0 MPS S

SSE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-6 MAY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW N

I NNE WNW w -

wsw ENE E

ESE

>7 ssw 0.26-3.01-8 1 5 7*0 CAL M

.'~N__*

1.51-3.0 MPS I

S SSE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-7 JUNE WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW WNW W -

wsw 0.26-3.01-G AUA 1.5

..,~~~__*

1.51-

>7 3.0 MPS N

I NNE ENE

- E ESE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-8 JULY WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW w -

wsw N

I 11.20 S

NNE SSE ENE

- E ESE 0.26-3.01-8 AlM 1.5 "J;J

1. 5 1-3.0 MPS

>7 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-9 AUGUST WIND ROSE 30*FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW N

I NNE WNW W -

WSW ENE E

ESE SSW 12.82 S

SSE 0.26-3.01-8 ALM 1.5 <<

.~.O 1.51-3.0 MPS

>7 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-10 SEPTEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW WNW W -

WSW N

I NNE ENE E

ESE 0.26-3.01-B ALM 1.5

~~.,~***

1.51-

> 7 3.0 MPS 14.83 S

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-11 OCTOBER WIND ROSE 30*FOOT LEVEl (BYRON 1974-1976)

NNW WNW W -

wsw S

N I

NNE ENE

- E ESE 0.26-3.01-8 ALM 1.5

.~~_~

1.51-

>7 3.0 MPS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-12 NOVEMBER WIND ROSE 30*FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW W -

WSW SSW N

I 11.41

~

NNE SSE ENE E

ESE

>7 0.26-81.5 3.01-7.0

[

~I:.'-

1.51-3.0 MPS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-13 DECEMBER WIND ROSE 30-FOOT lEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW w -

WSW SSW N

I s

NNE SSE ENE

- E ESE 0.26-3.01-o 1.5 r r';~~_.

V 1.51-

>7 3.0 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-14 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 30-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-1976)

WNW W -

WSW NNW N

I I

S NNE ENE E

ESE SSE 0.26-3.01-8 1.5 1.0 CALM

~..:z.._.

1.51-

-.>1 3.0 MPS BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-15 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 250-FOOT LEVEL (BYRON 1974-197~)

w I e

41-12

>'2 0- 3 '---<=:=::::l mph N

0/0 IS 0/0 s

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-16 WINTER WIND ROSE 19*FOOT LEVEL (ARGONNE 1950-1964)

£

w N

8 4 - 12

> 12 O* ~ --c::===,

",ph BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-17 SPRING WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL (ARGONNE 1950-1964)

£

N s

e.*"

mph BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-18 SUMMER WIND ROSE 19-FOOT LEVEL (ARGONNE 1950-1964)

w N

s G...:,._-...:12:....c:==>=12~

V mph BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-19 FALL WIND ROSE 19*FOOT LEVEL (ARGONNE 1950-1964)

E

NNW N

NNE WNW WSW ENE o Of.

E ESE SSW s

SSE

@.25-1.80 1.8rG.30 ALM

(

I t1 5

> 6 030 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-20 ANNUAL WIND ROSE 20-FOOT LEVEL (ROCKFORD 1966-1975)

PASQUILL STABILITY CLASSES A

~ I~D+-E-+- F-+-- G

~

28 BJ Lc 26 24 22 20 BYRON 1974 -1976 (250-30 FT) 18

°

  • *** CARROLL COUNTY 1975-1976

( 330 -33 FT.)

U 16 Z

w 14 0

w 12 0::

lL.

10 8

6 4

2 0

-6.0

-4.5

-3.0

-t5 0

1.5 3.0 4.5 60 7.5 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT (oC/10e M)

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE GRADIENT HISTOGRAMS FOR BYRON (1974-1976) AND CARROLL COUNTY (1975-1976)

o I

I I

SCALE -

MILES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21a PREDICTED SPRING SEASON VISIBLE PLUME FREOUENCY, TWO NATURAL DRAFT TOWERS.

55% CAPACITY FACTOR

o I

I I

SCAlE -MILES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21b PREDICTED SUMMER SEASON VISIBLE PLUME FREQUENCY. TWO NATURAL DRAFT TOWERS.

75% CAPACITY FACTOR

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21c PREDICTED FAll SEASON VISIBLE PLUME FREQUENCY,lWO NATURAL. DRAFT TOWERS, 55% CAPACITY FACTOR

SCALE - MILES BYRON STAnON UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-21d PREDICTED WINTER SEASON VISIBLE PLUME FREQUENCY, TWO NATURAl DRAFT TOWERS, 75% CAPACITY FACTOR

BYRON SCALE -

MILES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3*21.

PREDICTED ANNUAL AVERAGE DEPOSITION RATE OF ORin SOLIDS, TWO NATURAL. DRAn TOWERS, 65% CAPACITY FACTOR

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-22 TOPOGRAPHICAl MAP OF SITE VICINITY WITHIN A la-MILE RADIUS o

I 2

3 Scale in Miles 4

5

900 N 800 ~~aI-~-~------";::------------:::~

700 900 NNE 800+~~~-~....L.~",-==:=:--"","-T""':=-::-::::'::---"""::::=

700 900 NE 800 -l-"'::::==:::::::=---~=====----~-----

700 900 ENE 8001-------=----======---------

700 900 E 800 +--~======---""11111::"'--~-=:::=.-_=='--

700 900.-__--_

ESE 800 +------l..~_:;JII"'.:==--====::::::...~-':;::::::::====:::::lI"..-tt:.:..-

100 900 1--

SE 8 004----------.,;:::::=.===:::a..~...yte.::::::lIoo.,..e~-----

700 o

2

.., LE S 3

4 5

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTION OF SITE VICINITY WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS (SHEET 1 OF 3)

5 4

3 2

900 S 800 700 900 SSW 800 700 900 SW 800 700 900 WSW 800 700 900 W 800 700 900 WN.800 700 900 NW 800 700 900 NNW 800 700 0

MILES BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-23 TOPOGRAPHICAL CROSS SECTION OF SITE VICINITY WITHIN A 10-MILE RADIUS (SHEET 2 OF 3)

c:

0 "ll 0

"tl

$8 nl

~~

0..,

=H z>>IJI

~~~

i5 r--<

en:D

>>0 m_C'>

C

..,z

'!jZ:D

D

~~

",~lil m

N

°tC/)

~

>>!j C/)

~F~

z-m::j

~g

~~

en in

~~

D C/)

m

=i "ll 0

m

D....

27D s

CHICAGO (O'HARE) PERSISTENCES NE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-24 CHICAGO (O'HARE) WIND ROSE

w-8 AL M ~-::--ci::;::;;:;:JnIlUIII_~~

0.26 1.61 3.01

> 7.0 1.5 3.0 7.0 MPS N

- E I

S BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-25 ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 33*FOOT LEVEL AT CARROLL COUNTY STATION SITE (8-1-76 TO 7*31-n)

WNW wsw NNW SSW N

NNE ENE E

ESE SSE S

2.0 -6.00

>6.00 11 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.3-26 ANNUAL WIND ROSE FOR 20-FOOT LEVEL AT MOLINE, ILLINOIS (1967-1976)

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-1 2

MILES IN SCALI::

o PLANT SITE AREA TOPOGRAPHY

                    • SHE BOUNDARY 3000 0

seA L E IN FEET 3000 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-2 RIVER SCREEN HOUSE AND MAKEUP LINES

1000 0

1000' SCALE IN FEET

_ ******** SITE BOUNDARY BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFm ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 24-3 OUTLINE OF MAJOR PLANT STRUCTURES

LOCATION MAP

)

I Mi'",-

IOWA ii:rnio lS LEGEND.

-+4------+----r------~---42° (JD 10 5

0 10 20 SCALE IN MILES RECORDING STATION I::;

NON-RECORDING STATION CITY OR TOWN BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-4 HYDROLOGIC NETWORK OF ROCK RIVER

l)RlRRESTON V

FREEPORT

~

\\)

POLO STAR CEMEN DIXON DAM

~

OAMBOY a

ASHTON USER ROCHELLE CJ c:

"'1:1

~

0

~

~

m 0

0

!I (II z

i!~

~~

enn m>

/5 cn:D

~o

-vO

>>>0 00

~~

c:

~;

"m

'"~

~~

iii" c:

>>>0

~

... Z en en

~

a1..

Z

D

~

m

"'CI 0:D...

105

~.----.--~--..-..-..-... --'-r-,---

V'l lL.

U Z

w C) 0::

oct J:u V'l o

104 620 2.

10 L_..

605 610 615

-l 625 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-6 RATING CURVE FOR ROCK RIVER AT COMO

en LL U

Z UJ

(!)

0:

<l

I:

U en 0

103 I

i I

1 I

I I,

I I

~

I i

if/

I i

7 I

/:

/

I I

I I

I I

t

--1

-T I

..... --_._---+

._.~

i I

I I

l 725 II 102 I'---

---'L...------L.-------'

705 710 715 720 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-7 RATING CURVE FOR ROCK RIVER AT ROCKTON

REvISION 8 DECEMBER 2000 zoo 0

2.00 400 SCAL! IN FEET

..AHHOLf AND UNDERGROUND PIPE DRAINS DIRECTION OF GRADING SLOPt CULVERt BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAlYSIS REPORT AGURE2.4-B SITE DRAINAGE. ROAD AND TRACK ELEVATIONS

REVISION 8

DECEMBER 2000 CUL.VERT FIGURE 2.4-9 SUBDMSION OF PLANT AREA FOR LOCAL INTENSf PRECIPITAnON ANALYSIS BYRON STAnON UPOATEO FINAL SAfETY ANALYSIS REPORT

IIQIIOLE AIlD UImUtSIIllUIrO ptll£ DRAIlIIS OIltECTION 01' GlIADDI:l II.OP ill

\\c:.

_~

,)0

r----,---r-----,---,-------r--.----.,---.-----.:

t----+---+----+--+---+---t-----"i------!1Il....

N

(/)

~--_-

I III

~

i ~

0 I

Z N

I'"

z I

0

~

<l 0::

)o

_-+---+-_10 lID

--+---+---+----4 ~

o

._+ >

~+---+----+--------~ ~

'2

~

I

-+--+---+---=~-+----l~~~--ID t--1t-+--+---+--+----4--+---+--__~-__+_-----l~

~i I

\\~--i

+----_=\\-~

d

---.---,~

-.__44__+___

L---

-\\_

----- T\\\\'--***----------+-\\-H-il-L

I I

!-'l. r i"

S3H:>NI NI S311W '05 oooe*~o.:l NOIl.\\flldl:>3~d3g\\f~3A\\f BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-10 COMPARISON OF DEPTH-DURATION*

RELATIONSHIPS FOR MAJOR STORMS

BYRON STATION BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-11 ROCK RIVER 72-HOUR SPS ISOHYETAl AND SUB-BASIN MAP

..J 42 33

...1--

_1._.*...

32 34

...1

-J._.

24 28

"loo,----.-...-.

20 16

...._.._- ----+----

j 12 6 ~.. - ---+--4 5 -

(/)

l&.

to>

0 Z<<

(/)

0

r:r-z w

C) cr<<

r:

to>

(/)

0 TIME.

IN DAY S BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-12 ROCK RIVER SUB-BASIN I 12-HOUR UNIT HYDROORAPH

14,-----.....----..,---

168 144

. - --_....__.._----1 120

+- --- -

I I

72 96 TIME IN HOURS SUB-BASIN Y (4 HOUR) 48 SUB-BASIN m (8 HOUR)

J 24 t\\-SUB-BASIN l1r (2

HOUR)

\\,

ol-.

..l..-

.L.

..L.._~_...L__=~_

_L_=~_....r::~l!lIL.._.....J o

12 I--~-

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-13 ROCK RIVER SU~ASINS II, III, IV, AND V UNIT HYDROGRAPHS

IN al II.-o N

o

- -- \\D

\\D

--'-~N

,0

---._-_' '--__--#-_ CD, 1~

1'-

L\\D I

j-!

./ -~

I tf) 0 0=

I

--~ 5 I

CD

I:

I

-0

- z I

--~

---l-~ -* ~

z~

I

-tr I

~:l ~- -#.

--- CD CD~

I I \\D I

CD_

~~

7 I

~//-

/.

/

I.\\

-~

I '~

~

~~

~+-~N I,

i I

-T ----,-- - - --

i

-i al CD

\\D S.:f:l ON'fSnOH.l. NI 3!H:l\\fH::>SIO BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-14 ROCK RIVER SUB-BASINS VI AND VII UNIT HYDROGRAPHS

II) 0.,

CD It)

N It) en II)

)0-N

<t 0

Z N

UJ 0

~-

N I-

~

o o

o N

£

~

.i

£

~

s.:l~ ON'VSnoH.l NI 3~~:n1H~SIO o.,

1 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I i

I I

I i

I i

I I

I i

I I

I i

i I

I j

~

I i

~-

I i

LJ I

iI

.. ~

.~

... _._-+--_.--+

I I

I

~... _-

~

-, -.--t' I

i i

I I

I I

.---J j

I i

r I

(/)

I u.u i

g I

I

,-0 _...--

t I

.-~

I I

I

!!?

I I

II I

i

lC I

I I

,...,4 I

t-.- *..

W el-I i

c:::

I i

I j

I BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-15 ROCK RIVER STANDARD PROJECT FLOOD HYDROGRAPH

0

E 0(,)

,It) 0 I

Q CD (7)

~

0

~

\\oJ

~

C)

Vl z

a C

UJ I~

UJ

,U Q><w u.

0

>-I-

J II)

<t II) 0 00:

-Q.

-oJ<t

>zz<t N

I Q

ID,

--r------, 0 1 *T I,,

I,,,,

\\

-.--..----\\-.------1\\1-+--------

\\,

\\

i-*'*----

\\

\\,

..._._._..-\\--~\\-

\\

\\

z

\\

, 0,~,,

I 0'----8-'-----::~--~0-~-g'----~---gL-L------'0 Q

~",

2 S.:l:>

ON\\1SnOH~

NI 3~~\\1H::>SIO BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-16 FLOOD DISCHARGES AT INTAKE

I-ww...

720,..

i:

700 -

690 -

680 -

620 Lo 10 15 20 25 30 35 DISTANCE UPSTREAM FROM GOVERMENT DAM AT STERLING IN MILES 40 45 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-17 ROCK RIVER WATER SURFACE PROFILES

4000 3000 2000

\\

I J

-~

/

,r

~

I l

~ 0.".'LES DOWNSTR",

1M TI£ SCREENHOUS~

UJ 660 1000 670 700 680 690 lL.

700 r------~...,------_r_-----.....,

3000 6000 1000 2000 DISTANCE IN FEET 4000 I

)

I

,.-V

)

MB.'LES DOWNST......

FROM THE SCREEN HOUSE

~

I 650o 660 S80 ~-----~r----,,----+---~--_j 680 670 Z

690f-------\\+-------+-----~_j

~

670 ~-----~---\\=~~=+=~----~

0.85 MILES DOWNSTREAM FROM THE SCREEN HOUSE J-660 '--

~'_'_

~

<l 3000 UJ 690

...J NOTE:

CROSS SECTIONS ARE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-18 ROCK RIVER CROSS SECTIONS NEAR THE SITE

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Fir 800 o

i

/

/

FIGURE 2.4-19 1912-1913 CROSS SECTION BASE LINE OF C OF E SCALE IN FEET ROCK RIVER 1913 SURVEY 800 I

I I.'..,..,.

I

.:~

X 680.9 ILLINOIS R 0 UTE 2

X681.2 681.8 X

=- _._

---""::-:.. _::::X::;67=6.:::8::::~_.

"'~...

WATER ELEVATiON: 671.6' DATE OF SURVEY:

JULY 13,1973 HISTORIC HIGH wATER ELEVATION :

68~.6*

LOW WATER ELEVATION 670.4 ROCK R I V E R OIl FLOW 100.

o IN fEET SCALE 100 FIGURE 2.4-20 ROCK RNER 1973 SURVEY J,

~t BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 679.8 X

681.7

_81 +50W SCREEN I

HOUSE 679.6

\\X,--

I I L---l-....J--:::::::::::,-./

II

~

,I 0

I I 1'---,

679.4 X

X 679.0 678.8 X n 680.9 \\j X 678,8 o..+,..

677.7 X

X 678.4

IT I

\\L.I.

\\ '-

~

II I

-_~~

I I

I I

I I

I I

I n.

t \\ )

i I

'J

~)

I I

_-J, I

i I

I I

I v

I t i

j I

I I

~..

.,.--.+._-----, ~

i J ~

i I

II II I

iI 1----- - -,.*

.. f..._-_..

j I

A

_2 I

,-V I--

og o

01

<0 1.33.:1 NI NOI1.'11\\313 o

CD CD 08 N

0

~

'~

If' 0

2!

~

If' I

~

en

~ -.

g...

~

w>

)

a::

~LU

)

~

Ul w

I&i

~

a::

0 0

) u

~~

Ul 0

z z

~

w Clw (f)

..J go CD 0

2:

cot

~

UJ z ex:

01-

..... (,/')

I-z:

U3 i

UJO

(,/')0

(,/') (,/')

(,/')~

00

~I c:: 0 U....J 0

0N o

,0 It)

CD BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-21 ROCK RIVER CROSS SECTIONS NEAR INTAKE

10 6 ~===l====+=~=-t:===:J

~---_.- --------

..--------- ------------1------1 1

1

.1

-!._-- ------j

'1 -----

I

/

I I

==- 7/

-- ---------- ----'----+-----1

/

I

.- ***7 f-----

105 r-------+-~v-___t_-~

/:

If) l.L U

~

LLI

(.!)a:

<t J:

U If) 0 104 I

II j

j-----+---_. -

710 680 690 700 WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IN FEET

---..1+----+----+------1

~+-------

I i

103 l.L..-

...I.--

...l.-

.....L-

.....J 670 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-22 RATING CURVE FOR ROCK RIVER AT INTAKE

RIVER SCREEN HOUSE

  • ...._.~-.;.;...:..~.:~...:-.:...,...._..*_~

1/2 o

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-23 SCALE IN MILES ROCK RIVER WIND ACTION FETCH DIAGRAM

SYSTEM SERJES GROUP OR HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION HYDROGEOLOGI C CHARACTERISTI CS FORMAT! ON UNIT Peoria i~~~~ j~~:~r-Ground water Occurs predominantly in thin sllnd and gravel pockets within the glacial Wedron arilt.

Yields are quite variable and formation typically low. suitable only for domestic (Esmond Ti 11 and fann purposes.

Wells or cisterns that Memher)

Silt. locally clayey.

intersect the more permeable lone!> may i

Morton Glacilll gravelly and sandy.

e)(h1bit high, short...tentl ylelds.

P1e i 50 tocene Loess Drift wi th 1nterbedded Winnebago Aquitard 1enses of sand and Formation gravel

~

(Argyle Till Member)

Glasford formatton (Ogle Till Member)

Gal ena Dolaml te and limestone.

Group Galena-Loca l1y cherty. sandy Platteville et base. shale partings Platteville dolomi tes Group Ground water occurs under leaky artesian Champ1ainian conditions in the sandstones and in joints in the dolomites.

In the Galena*Platteville dolomites ground ",,/liter also occurs under u

Ancei I water table cand' lions whe"e the over-8 Glenwood-Sandstone, shale at lying Maquoketa Gro\\lp is absent.

Yields g

Group St. Peter lop, little aolomile, are variable and depend upon which units sandstone

~

locally cherty at base are open to the well.

Prairie c

In terms of

~he total yield of a well Canadian au Chien

~

penetrating the entire thickness of the Group u

Prairie

  • s Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer, the Glenwood*
51. Peter sandstone supplies about 15 per*

du Chien,

"'E Sandy dolomite.

cent, the Prairie du Chien, Eminence.

Eminence, 9

dolomitic sandstone.

Potosi. and Franconia dolomites collectively Eminence Potos f. and ;

cherty at top, inter*

s:Jpp1y about 3, percent. and the 1ronton-Formation Franconia

~

bedded sl'\\ale to lower bblesvilJe sandstone supplies about 50 per-dolo",' tes

~

put cent.

POtOSl Oolomi te Fra~conid FOnl"'4tlon

ror.t.~f S..r..¢\\'t.D('1!t sandstone. upper part

!t

! ro.ntoo-t'"Oj,... ~

~ll!i'J1Tle dolomite

~~t'S'I~Ht

$.IM"S!.tl1'-.f!'

sar:.;1'S.t~ne

[au Chire Insignificant amounts of ground water may fau Clai"e Ao:.u'terd Shales. do'orn'tes. and occur in joints.

These beds act as a con-I Fo~tion

(~pper dnd shaly dolomitic sand*

fining hyer between the Cambr1an..Ordovician r:iddle beds) stone Aquifer and ttte Mt. Simon Aquifer.

Ground water occurs under le~"y arteslan conditions.

Adequate supplies for municipal Mt.

Simon Sandstone and industrial use are more easl1y obtained Mt. S,rrof\\

Aqu; fer from shallower aqutfers..

Sandstone c:

Cl

D

~

m Q

Cl

~

Z

~III

~

r-~

en:ll 15

~~

Jl C

8 Jl

~~

m

~

'"t

~!i

~..

Zi5

~z

~

0 en p

iii f

II m"

Z

~

JI

-i NOTES:

1) 2)

3)

MODIFIED FROM:

REFERENCE 19.

STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE FROM BULLETINS 94 AND 95. ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. REFERENCES 29 AND 26.

THE SPACING OF THE HYOROGEOLOGIC UNITS IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT THEIR RELATIVE THICKNESSES.

EXCLUSION AREA SITE BOUNDARY LEGEND

~ell desl9ootlon 8223 Pfdzometer INel Btron Slohon water wetl Temoorary conmuctlcn

.ell Former domestic well

~

I ~ bas.cI on water...... dDto mectlUr'Od on Jut, I, 19"N 2 Mop mocMlOd from DQIft** a Moon, f""lfOlmlantlll Report-In.. of e.....ed To_/C "1II'.nol'l, Unpl,lllh.II,C1 Fr.r*

9 3 Ow- **,.,. ou forma, I, P'lvot,.ot'f **0' Sc~. '" F**,

CortII:Iw InT'al

  • 10 f.....

BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2 4*25 SITE AREA PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE MAP GALENA-PLATTEVILLE AQUIFER

NOTES I.

Data for public ground water supplies within 10 miles ore presented in Table 2.4-21 2.

Bose map modified from USGS, I: 250,000 series (fopographlc),Aurora, Illinois (NK 16-F),1958. Rockford, Illinois (NK 16-4), 1958.

Q Scale in Miles 5

I BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-26 PUBLIC GROUNDWATER SUPPLIERS WITHIN 10 MILES

~

-N-

~ \\

\\

\\.\\;\\

'\\,

I I

NOTES I.

Modified from Reference 22.

2.

Piezometric contour interval is 50 feet.

10 0

15 11IIII Scale in Miles BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-27 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE CAMBRIAN*ORDOVICIAN AQUIFER, OCTOBER 1971

c==:J Site boundary Designators Refer to Table 2.4-26 Base map modified from USGS.

1:62.500 series (topographic).

Oregon. Illinois. 1948 0EH3:::EH;c]R=1'C2::1bd;;;C]:;HD1, mil e SCALE BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-28 LOCAnON OF V*..:LLS WITHIN 2.25 MILES OFTl-IE PlANT

~

o Well location and number NOTES I. The records of ground wattr levels Ore presented on Table 2.4-28.

2. The wat.r quolit)' dota from Ihese **ltI i, prelented In Table 2.4-27.
3. Well No 4 WOI not Included in fhe monitOring progrOft'l.

400 0

400-Seal. in F**t

~bl.....al.IOF..t BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.4-29 WEll LOCATION MAP-WATER QUALf1Y MONITORING SYSTEM

GROUND SURFACE 24 inch diameter casing

~--- 23 inch diameter grouted hole

~~---20 inch diameter casing tt-----19 inch diameter grouted hole

~~----16 inch diameter casing 1--------12 or 15 inch diameter open hole DEPTH, FEET 0

GALENA-100 PLATTE-200

\\)

NON-300 PUMPING WATER LEVEL 400

GLENWOOD, PUMP ST.

PETER SANDSTONE 500 600 POTOSI DOLOMITE) 700 FRANCONIA FORMATION 800 IRONTON-GALESVILLE 900 SANDSTONES 1000 1100 EAU CLAIRE FORMATION 1200 1300 1400 MT. SIMON SANDSTONE 1500 BYRON STATION UPDATED FINAL SAFETY At~AL YSIS REPORT NOTES I. NOT TO SCALE.

2. WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SUMMARIZED IN TABLE 2.4-29.
3. PITLESS ADAPTER NOT SHOWN.

FIGURE 2.4*30 SKETCH OF DEEP WELL CONSTRUCTION

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13004A055&oldid=5244530"