ML12356A203

Kld TR-497, Rev. 1, Development of Evacuation Time Estimates, Final Report, Page J-1 Through N-19

ML12356A203
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	10/31/2012
From:	KLD Engineering, PC
To:	Energy Northwest, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GO2-12-178 KLD TR-497, Rev 1
Download: ML12356A203 (113)

Text

APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J-1 provides the volume and queues for the ten highest volume signalized intersections in the study area.Refer to Table K-2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

Table J-2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for several roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Table J-3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) for each scenario.

As expected, midweek scenarios (Scenarios 1, 2, 6 through 8) exhibit the slowest average speeds and longest average travel times due to the peak in employment and the congestion in the Richland area.Table J-4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes -US 395, Washington Way and Stevens Drive/SH 240 -for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-6, Washington Way and Stevens Drive are congested for the first two hours of the evacuation.

As such, the average speeds are significantly slower (and travel times longer) than US-395 during those first two hours.Table J-5 provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Figure J-1 through Figure J-14 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 14 Scenarios considered.

The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation.

For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion.

For higher population density sites, the curves are farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion.

As seen in Figure J-1 through Figure J-14, the curves are spatially separated for midweek scenarios (when employment peaks) as a result of the traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3. Travel time is minimal on weekends and evenings when employees are not commuting into the EPZ.Columbia Generating Station J-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I Table J-1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections 6** 0

• Max.Aproc Toa Turn -Lt~b 4,U1W j54 71 SH 240 and Stevens Dr.Actuated 223 3,263 34 TOTAL 7,464 39 3,669 61 100 SH 240 and Swift Actuated 105 2,773 108 Blvd.TOTAL 6,442 -123 1,859 24 118 Thayer Dr. and Swift Actuated 105 1,843 27 Blvd 120 2,621 41 TOTAL 6,323 -94 5,387 126 97 George Washington Actuated 236 74 1 Way and Aaron Dr.TOA 5,8-TOTAL S,488 George Washington 93 5,323 83 94 Way and Comstock Actuated 239 76 2 St. TOTAL 5,399 -92 5,268 105 93 George Washington Actuated 240 28 1 Way and Falley St. 241 3 0 TOTAL 5,299 -91 2,298 80 92 George Washington Actuated 113 2,969 154 Way and Jadwin Ave TOTAL 5,267 -225 2,199 1 226 SH 240 and Aaron Dr. Actuated 103 2,986 103 TOTAL 5,185 -107 3,650 113 108 Jadwin Ave and Van Actuated 122 851 37 Giesen Ave 87 479 20 TOTAL 4,980 -101 4,676 0 SH 240 and Duportail Actuated 224 67 0 St. 391 43 0 I TOTAL 4,786 -Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-2. Sample Simulation Model Input Vehicles .Entering6

.0 8316 4,500 70 2 S 8010 4,500 8320 4,500 8003 4,500 138 51 S 8010 4,500 8098 4,500 8003 4,500 192 127 S 8010 4,500 8098 4,500 8333 4,500 222 5 NE 8316 4,500 8320 4,500 8316 4,500 259 68 S 8010 4,500 8320 4,500 8098 4,500 300 123 SE 8003 4,500 8010 4,500 8003 4,500 334 26 5 8010 4,500 8320 4,500 8316 4,500 362 3 5 8010 4,500 8320 4,500 8003 4,500 397 27 S 8010 4,500 8098 4,500 8342 1,700 S14 75NE 8320 4,500 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)Scnai 1 2 3 4 A 0 1 1 3 1 Network-Wide Average Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi) 2.3 2.8 1.3 1.4 1.2 2.2 2.6 2.9 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.2 3.9 Network-Wide Average 25.8 21.5 47.7 42.6 50.9 26.9 22.7 20.8 52.4 46.8 41.2 51.5 48.7 15.5 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles Exitin Network 25,622 25,731 19,483 19,561 11,969 24,583 24,644 24,546 18,002 18,041 18,130 11,406 19,726 26,088 Exiting Network Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)US 395 Southbound 14.2 66.7 12.8 47.6 18.0 68.9 12.4 69.1 12.4 69.1 12.4 US 39S Northbound 15.1 49.5 18.3 63.1 14.4 63.6 14.2 68.1 13.3 69.1 13.1 Washington Way Southbound 5.6 6.7 50.3 7.8 43.4 49.0 6.9 50.3 6.7 56.0 6.0 Stevens Drive/SH 240 Southbound 2.1 4.4 29.5 6.5 19.9 23.7 5.4 25.6 5.0 32.8 3.9 US 395 Southbound US 395 Northbound Washington Way Southbound Stevens Drive/SH 240 Southbound 1 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario I Cumulative Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time Cumulative Percent of Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time 1,221 2,544 3,166 3,216 3,228 2 12.7%12.1%12.5%12.6%12.6%16 1,379 3,152 3,756 3,802 3,813 14.3% 14.9% 14.9% 14.9% 14.9%164 1,824 4,107 4,826 4,850 4,854 19.0% 19.5% 19.1% 19.0% 19.0%90 119 119 119 119 238 0.9% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%328 742 834 856 862 285 3.4% 3.5% 3.3% 3.4% 3.4%290 494 535 544 545 318 3.0% 2.3% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%440 1,860 3,928 4,909 4,994 5,013 19.3% 18.6% 19.4% 19.5% 19.6%1,671 3,758 4,567 4,590 4,595 17.4% 17.8% 18.1% 18.0% 17.9%772 1,937 2,198 2,228 2,235 475 8.0% 9.2% 8.7% 8.7% 8.7%188 331 353 357 359 491______ 2.0% 1.6% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4%Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%m 60%0.40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%In a, a, fu.1~0 I-4-0.1~C a, U I-a, a.80%60%40%20%0%Oeo-00,_0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%80%60%I,-' 40%20%0%0.0%, i i , 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%"o 80%60%40%20%I-0%0 30 60 90 120 ISO 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%-2 80%S60% A 40%20%a.0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)-Trip Generation -ETE 4-0.100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)-Trip Generation mETE 100%"o80%#A*J 60%0VY 1-40%C 8 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)-Trip Generation

-ETE a'a'4.0 I-4-0 4.C a'U a'0.100%80%60%40%20%0%Ooeo!ý0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 9)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%60%o40%N 20%0%~ 0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 9)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)-Trip Generation -ETE.2~0-w 100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-10. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%60%4'0 20%Q.-0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 Elapsed Time (min)240 270 300 330 Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 12)-Trip Generation

-ETE In a'a'(U 4-0 I-14-0 4-C a'U I-a'a-100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 12)Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 13)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%"O 80%* 60%040%4..20%~ 0% i , 20%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-13. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 13)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)-Trip Generation

-ETE-W 0 CL 100%80%60%40%20%/'000/0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time (min)210 240 270 300 330 Figure J-14. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate J-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a link-node analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K-1 provides an overview of the link-node analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 34 more detailed figures (Figure K-2 through Figure K-35) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in November 2011. Table K-1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis.

Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided in Table K-1. The roadway type identified in Table K-1 is generally based on the following criteria:* Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds* Freeway ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway* Major arterial:

3 or more lanes in each direction* Minor arterial:

2 or more lanes in each direction* Collector:

single lane in each direction* Local roadways:

single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, "No. of Lanes" in Table K-1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets);

these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.Table K-2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pre-timed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K-2. The location of each node can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided.Columbia Generating Station K-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-1. Columbia Generating Station Link-Node Analysis Network Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 1 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 II Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 2 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 "I f/////e///.Grid 3 CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures N Grid 3 0.5 1 Figure K-4. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 3 K-S KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

...o miles Grid 11"_________

3'S~donr4---

CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures* CGS Shadow Region* Node '" 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile-I," Link Water Section Index Grid Grid 4 S0.5 1 Figure K-S. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 4 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 5 K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate 1K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 6 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-8. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 7 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-9. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 8 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 9 o 0.5 Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 9 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 10 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-12. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 11 K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Grid 12/////I//I Iepr g,,t Of Eowgy R-S Rd 1146 CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 12 0 0.5 Figure K-13. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 12 K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

---

--- --- --- --- --- --231 5 b ie s ,rid 13 I Setdon:-CGS-....

Figure K-14. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 13 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 14 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

-KOnath Rd ~el I q 5/C, Jipý,s~ Rd 1rid' 15 I Rd t0 0'I-0 CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 15 0.5 1 Miles Figure K-16. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 15 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-17. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 16 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-18. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 17 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 18 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-20. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 19 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 20 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 132............. N CoulJeeRdg--------------

I, 6, 131 It~It I Gri'd 27 0~U, I I Fir Rd Bellevce Dr Elm Ln S, I I I I Rd/'0 4.U5//----------Figure K-22. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 21 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-23. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 22 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

-Secfion:-3A-0 0/m i Grid 23 W OrCutt \d Figure K-24. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 23 Columbia Generating Station K-25 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-25. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 24 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-26. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 25 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-27. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 26 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-28. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 27 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-29. Unk-Node Analysis Network -Grid 28 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Yr ----------

W Orcutt Rd 1=.5~.0 N U N S S N ,GnckR S&S ,%W Kelly Rd IN S S S WA'9'rd Rd ,?WM'9'gar' RdN 099 99 W H,ghland E'9t'9a S IN N%w Corral Creek Ca&n I S S E 2Nd St si 3Rd St.........90. .CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 29 0 35 IMIIes Figure K-30. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 29 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-31 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-31. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 30 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-32 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-32. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 31 K-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Legend* CGS* Node-j1, Link Section Shadow Region" 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Ring: Water LI] Index Grid Keyma iL CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures I.11 Grid 32 SO.S 1 Miles Figure K-33. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 32 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-34 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

/A , Rd Janet Rd Iv uRd-I O uadf Rd 7 RobertaRd' le.,s, 128 Overton Rd~Grid Valenci DrO 3-3 6 ~aSrrocC0Or 0, 1411to,; oerop 27 Mae WArgmfl PII WCOortStZA2 7 St 71 CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures Grid 33 0.5 l Figure K-34. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 33 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 1 Locu~st Grove Rd IV Feed Lot Rd a: b (V Voss Rd a: a: E Foster Wells Rd Foster Wells Rd a: a: Grid 34-Water Rd M1e"329 Rd CGS Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figures* CGS Shadow Region* Node ' 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile-Im. Link Water 0 Section L-] Index Grid Grid 34 0 05 Mo.Figure K-35. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 34 K-36 KID Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-36 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table K-i. Evacuation Roadway Network Characteristics Up Don No Lan Shule Flow Flo Strea Strea Le.gt of Wit Width RateS Spe Gri 1 3 4 1-82 FREEWAY 528 2 12 4 2250 70 30 2 3 298 1-82 FREEWAY 5518 2 12 4 2250 70 29 3 4 3 1-82 FREEWAY 528 2 12 4 2250 70 30 4 4 5 1-82 FREEWAY 14914 2 12 4 2250 70 30 5 5 4 1-82 FREEWAY 14914 2 12 4 2250 70 30 6 5 6 1-82 FREEWAY 9992 2 12 4 2250 70 30 7 6 5 1-82 FREEWAY 9998 2 12 4 2250 70 30 8 6 7 1-82 FREEWAY 693 2 12 4 2250 70 31 9 7 6 1-82 FREEWAY 693 2 12 4 2250 70 31 10 7 8 1-82 FREEWAY 729 2 12 4 2250 70 31 1-82 ON RAMP 11 7 28 FROM 1-182 FREEWAY RAMP 2996 1 12 4 1700 45 31 12 8 7 1-82 FREEWAY 729 2 12 4 2250 70 31 13 8 9 1-82 FREEWAY 728 2 12 4 2250 70 31 14 9 8 1-82 FREEWAY 728 2 12 4 2250 70 31 1-82 ON RAMP 15 9 10 FROM 1-182 FREEWAY RAMP 1547 1 12 4 1700 45 31 16 9 299 1-82 FREEWAY 649 2 12 4 2250 70 31 1-182 ON RAMP 17 10 8 FROM 1-82 FREEWAY RAMP 2169 1 12 4 1700 45 31 18 10 11 1-182 FREEWAY 2342 2 12 4 2250 70 31 19 10 28 1-182 RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 723 1 12 4 1700 70 31 20 11 10 1-182 FREEWAY 2342 2 12 4 2250 70 31 21 11 12 1-182 FREEWAY 1692 2 12 4 2250 70 31 22 12 11 1-182 FREEWAY 1692 2 12 4 2250 70 31 Columbia Generating Station K-37 Evacuation Time Estimate KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Up Don No Lan Shule Flo Flo T12e 13 Stream FREEWAY o29 2f2 4 225th 70dt 31eSpe Gi 1-182 OFF RAMP TO QUEENSGATE DR 45 24 12 294 FREEWAY RAMP 299 1 12 4 1750 31 25 13 12 1-182 FREEWAY 259 2 12 4 2250 70 31 26 13 14 1-182 FREEWAY 293 2 12 4 2250 70 31 1-182 OFF RAMP TO QUEENSGATE 27 13 192 DR FREEWAY RAMP 344 1 12 4 1350 30 31 28 14 13 1-182 FREEWAY 293 2 12 4 2250 70 31 29 14 15 1-182 FREEWAY 904 2 12 4 2250 70 31 30 15 14 1-182 FREEWAY 904 2 12 4 2250 70 31 31 15 16 1-182 FREEWAY 340 2 12 4 2250 70 31 32 16 15 1-182 FREEWAY 340 2 12 4 2250 70 31 33 16 17 1-182 FREEWAY 574 2 12 4 2250 70 32 34 17 16 1-182 FREEWAY 573 2 12 4 2250 30 32 35 17 18 1-182 FREEWAY 722 3 12 4 2250 70 32 36 18 17 1-182 FREEWAY 722 2 12 4 2250 70 32 37 18 19 1-182 FREEWAY 312 3 12 4 2250 70 32 38 19 18 1-182 FREEWAY 312 2 12 4 2250 70 32 39 19 20 1-182 FREEWAY 347 2 12 4 2250 70 32 1-182 OFF RAMP TO GEORGE WASHINGTON 40 19 96 WAY FREEWAY RAMP 1137 1 12 4 1350 30 32 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Up- Do n No Lan Shole Flo Flow Stea Stea Legt of Wit Witae Sed Gi Link #5 Node Nod Roda Nam Roawa Typ (ft. Lae (f. (f. Sl (mhSNme 1-182 OFF RAMP TO GEORGE WASHINGTON WAY 41 19 98 FREEWAY RAMP 1029 1 12 4 1700 45 32 42 20 19 1-182 FREEWAY 347 2 12 4 2250 70 32 43 20 21 1-182 FREEWAY 485 2 12 4 2250 70 32 44 21 20 1-182 FREEWAY 485 2 12 4 2250 70 32 45 21 22 1-182 FREEWAY 1871 3 12 4 2250 70 32 46 22 21 1-182 FREEWAY 1871 3 12 4 2250 70 32 47 22 23 1-182 FREEWAY 2059 3 12 9 2250 70 32 48 23 22 1-182 FREEWAY 2059 3 12 9 2250 70 32 49 23 24 1-182 FREEWAY 1723 3 12 9 2250 70 32 50 24 23 1-182 FREEWAY 1723 3 12 9 2250 70 32 51 24 25 1-182 FREEWAY 1428 2 12 4 2250 70 32 52 25 24 1-182 FREEWAY 1428 2 12 4 2250 70 32 53 25 26 1-182 FREEWAY 2401 2 12 12 2250 65 32 54 26 25 1-182 FREEWAY 2401 2 12 12 2250 65 32 1-82 OFF RAMP TO 55 26 203 N RD 68 FREEWAY RAMP 1625 1 12 4 1750 30 33 56 26 304 1-182 FREEWAY 713 2 12 12 2250 65 33 57 27 301 1-182 FREEWAY 1894 2 12 12 2250 65 33 58 27 304 1-182 FREEWAY 998 2 12 12 2250 65 33 1-182 ON RAMP 59 28 8 FROM 1-82 FREEWAY RAMP 1174 1 12 4 1350 30 31 60 28 10 1-182 FREEWAY RAMP 723 1 12 4 1700 70 31 61 29 30 SH 224 COLLECTOR 302 1 12 6 1575 35 30 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-39 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 62 30 31 SH 224 COLLECTOR 171 1 261575 35 30 1-82 ON RAMP 63 31 3 FROM SH 225 FREEWAY RAMP 294 1 12 4 1700 45 30 64 31 32 SH 224 COLLECTOR 254 1 12 4 1575 35 30 1-82 ON RAMP 65 32 4 FROM SH 225 FREEWAY RAMP 251 1 12 4 1700 45 30 66 33 34 SH 224 COLLECTOR 3666 1 12 4 1700 55 30 67 33 180 KEENE RD COLLECTOR 3658 1 12 4 1700 50 30 68 34 35 SH 224 COLLECTOR 3081 1 12 4 1700 55 30 69 35 36 SH 224 COLLECTOR 1828 1 12 4 1700 55 30 70 36 37 SH 224 COLLECTOR 1853 1 12 4 1700 55 30 71 37 38 SH 224 COLLECTOR 703 1 12 4 1700 45 30 72 38 29 SH 224 COLLECTOR 4180 1 12 4 1700 45 30 74 39 100 SH 240 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1570 3 12 4 1750 65 31 BOMBING RANGE 78 42 170 RD COLLECTOR 1778 1 12 4 1700 45 31 79 43 381 SH 224 COLLECTOR 4656 1 11 2 1700 40 31 80 44 33 SH 224 COLLECTOR 4646 1 11 2 1700 45 30 81 45 46 US 395 FREEWAY 1208 2 12 4 2250 70 22 82 45 51 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 2601 2 12 10 1900 70 22 83 46 45 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 1208 2 12 4 1750 70 22 84 46 47 US 395 FREEWAY 2637 2 12 4 2250 70 22 85 47 46 US 395 FREEWAY 2637 2 12 4 2250 70 22 86 47 48 US 395 FREEWAY 1675 2 12 4 2250 70 16 87 48 47 US 395 FREEWAY 1675 2 12 4 2250 70 16 88 48 49 US 395 FREEWAY 1247 2 12 4 2250 70 16 Columbia Generating Station K-40 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 89 49 48 US 395 FREEWAY 1247 2 24 2250 70 16 90 49 50 US 395 FREEWAY 5183 2 12 4 2250 70 16 91 50 49 US 395 FREEWAY 1514 2 12 4 2250 70 16 92 50 331 US 395 FREEWAY 7780 2 12 4 2250 70 16 93 51 45 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 2601 2 12 10 1900 70 22 94 51 52 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 1470 2 12 10 1900 70 22 95 52 51 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 1470 2 12 10 1900 70 22 96 52 53 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 4127 2 12 10 1900 70 22 97 53 52 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 4127 2 12 10 1900 70 22 98 53 54 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 2695 2 12 10 1900 70 28 99 54 53 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 2695 2 12 10 1900 70 28 100 54 55 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 7864 2 12 10 1900 70 27 101 55 54 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 7864 2 12 10 1900 70 27 102 55 56 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 21121 2 12 10 1900 70 27 103 56 55 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 21121 2 12 10 1900 70 27 104 56 322 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 2017 2 12 10 1900 70 33 N POWER PLANT 105 57 58 LOOP LOCAL ROADWAY 1770 1 12 4 1700 45 19 106 58 61 STEVENS DR MINOR ARTERIAL 2857 2 12 4 1900 50 19 107 58 146 GLADE NORTH RD MINOR ARTERIAL 3562 2 12 4 1900 50 19 PLANT ACCESS 108 59 60 ROAD LOCAL ROADWAY 1403 1 12 4 1700 45 19 PLANT ACCESS 109 60 61 ROAD LOCAL ROADWAY 2526 1 12 4 1700 45 19 110 61 58 STEVENS DR MINOR ARTERIAL 2857 2 12 4 1900 50 19 111 61 62 STEVENS DR MINOR ARTERIAL 5270 2 12 4 1900 65 19 Columbia Generating Station K-41 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. I 112 62 63 STEVENS DR MINOR A-RTERIAL 293410655 113 63 64 STEVENS DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1959 4 1900 50 25 114 64 65 STEVENS DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1008 12 4 1750 50 25 WASHINGTON WAY 115 64 252 COLLECTOR 928 1 13 0 1700 40 26 116 65 66 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 744 3 12 4 1750 55 25 117 66 67 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1216 3 12 4 1750 55 26 118 66 81 BATTELLE BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 827 1 12 4 1750 40 26 119 67 68 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1332 3 12 4 1750 45 26 120 67 80 1ST ST LOCAL ROADWAY 813 1 12 4 1750 40 26 121 68 69 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 324 3 12 4 1750 45 26 122 69 70 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 386 3 12 4 1900 45 26 123 69 78 SPENGLER ST COLLECTOR 826 1 12 4 1750 40 26 124 70 77 SNYDERST LOCAL ROADWAY 803 1 12 4 1700 40 32 125 70 286 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 401 3 12 4 1750 45 32 126 71 72 SH 240 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1269 3 12 4 1750 65 31 127 71 106 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 390 2 11 0 1900 40 31 128 72 39 SH 240 MAJOR ARTERIAL 944 3 12 4 1750 65 31 129 73 72 TERMINAL DR COLLECTOR 1063 1 12 4 1750 40 31 130 74 75 SH 240 COLLECTOR 2963 1 12 8 1700 65 24 131 74 155 SR 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 1266 1 12 8 1700 55 24 132 74 160 SH 225 COLLECTOR 1500 1 11 2 1700 55 24 133 75 276 SH 240 COLLECTOR 4487 1 12 8 1700 65 25 134 76 223 SH 240 COLLECTOR 206 1 12 8 1700 55 31 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-42 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Saturation Free Up- Down- No. Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Stream Stream Length of Width Width Rate Speed Grid Link # Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number WASHINGTON WAY 135 77 248 MINOR ARTERIAL 396 2 13 0 1750 40 32 136 78 69 SPENGLER ST LOCAL ROADWAY 826 1 12 4 1750 40 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 137 78 77 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 374 2 13 0 1900 40 26 138 79 68 GARLICK BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 275 1 12 4 1750 40 26 139 80 67 1ST ST LOCAL ROADWAY 813 1 12 4 1750 40 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 140 80 250 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 910 2 13 0 1750 40 26 141 81 66 BATTELLE BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 827 1 12 4 1750 40 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 142 81 80 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 1238 2 13 0 1750 40 26 143 82 65 HORN RAPIDS RD COLLECTOR 813 1 12 4 1750 40 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 144 82 83 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 1008 2 13 0 1900 40 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 145 83 81 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 455 2 13 0 1750 40 26 146 84 83 10TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 272 1 12 4 1700 40 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 147 86 246 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 574 2 13 0 1750 40 32 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-43 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Saturation Free Up-~~~. Do n No ae Shudr FlwFo WASHINGTON WAY 148 87 88 MINOR ARTERIAL 507 2 13 0 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 149 88 89 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 459 2 12 4 1750 40 32 150 88 109 SYMONS ST LOCAL ROADWAY 212 1 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 151 89 90 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 567 2 12 4 1750 40 32 152 89 110 WILLIAMS BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 296 1 12 4 1750 40 32 153 90 111 SWIFT BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 124 2 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 154 90 242 WAY COLLECTOR 287 2 12 4 1750 30 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 155 91 92 WAY COLLECTOR 189 2 12 4 1750 40 32 156 91 112 LEE BLVD COLLECTOR 147 1 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 157 92 93 WAY COLLECTOR 204 3 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 158 93 94 WAY COLLECTOR 494 3 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 159 94 97 WAY COLLECTOR 474 3 12 4 1750 40 32 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-44 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Up- Down No Lan Shule Flo Flow Strea Stea Legt of. Wit Witatped Gi (jURUI:E WASHINGTON WAY 160 96 98 COLLECTOR 426 2 12 4 1900 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 161 97 238 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 111 2 12 4 1900 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 162 98 300 WAY FREEWAY 2063 2 12 4 2250 40 32 1-182 WB ON RAMP FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON 163 99 18 WAY FREEWAY RAMP 1163 1 12 4 1700 40 32 1-182 EB ON RAMP 164 99 21 FROM SH 240 FREEWAY RAMP 3303 2 12 4 1900 40 32 165 100 101 SH 240 MAJOR ARTERIAL 743 3 12 4 1900 65 31 166 101 102 SH 240 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1562 3 12 4 1750 65 31 167 102 103 SH 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 4815 2 12 4 1900 65 31 168 103 226 SH 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 102 2 12 4 1750 55 31 1-182 WB ON RAMP FROM SH 169 103 227 240 FREEWAY RAMP 393 1 12 4 1700 45 31 1-182 WB ON RAMP FROM SH 170 104 17 240 FREEWAY RAMP 1481 2 12 4 1900 40 32 171 105 100 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 854 1 12 4 1750 45 31 172 105 118 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 455 2 12 4 1750 45 31 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-45 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 173 106 290 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 333 2 11 0 1900 40 32 174 106 291 STEVENS RD COLLECTOR 562 1 14 2 900 20 31 175 107 108 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 2063 2 11 0 1750 40 32 176 108 109 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 572 2 12 4 1750 40 32 177 109 88 SYMONS ST LOCAL ROADWAY 212 1 12 4 1750 40 32 178 109 110 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 438 2 12 4 1750 40 32 179 110 89 WILLIAMS BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 296 1 12 4 1750 40 32 180 110 111 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 615 2 12 4 1750 40 32 181 111 90 SWIFT BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 124 1 12 4 1750 40 32 182 111 243 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 278 2 12 4 1750 40 32 183 112 91 LEE BLVD COLLECTOR 148 1 12 4 1750 40 32 184 112 113 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 172 2 12 4 1900 40 32 185 113 92 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 137 2 12 4 1750 40 32 186 114 115 THAYER DR COLLECTOR 1009 1 12 4 1700 45 31 187 114 119 LEE BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 639 2 12 4 1750 40 31 188 115 116 THAYER DR COLLECTOR 562 1 12 4 1700 45 31 189 116 225 THAYER DR COLLECTOR 564 1 12 4 1700 45 31 190 118 105 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 455 2 12 4 1900 45 31 191 118 114 THAYER DR COLLECTOR 659 2 12 4 1750 45 31 192 118 120 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 530 2 12 4 1750 45 31 193 119 112 LEE BLVD COLLECTOR 513 1 12 4 1750 40 32 194 120 111 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 635 2 12 4 1750 45 32 195 120 119 STEVENS RD COLLECTOR 2046 2 12 4 1750 35 32 196 121 120 STEVENS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 564 2 12 4 1750 35 32 197 122 108 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 425 1 12 4 1750 40 32 K-46 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-46 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 198 122 121 STEVENS RD COLLECTOR 827 1 12 4 1575 35 31 199 122 123 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 375 1 12 4 1700 40 31 200 123 118 THAYER DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1348 1 12 4 1750 40 31 201 123 122 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 375 1 12 4 1750 40 31 202 123 287 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 631 1 12 4 1750 40 31 203 124 130 ELTOPIA WEST COLLECTOR 6984 1 12 4 1700 60 22 204 124 131 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 975 1 12 2 1575 35 21 205 124 199 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 1556 1 12 2 1575 35 21 206 125 126 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 906 1 12 2 1700 60 27 207 126 127 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 1265 1 12 2 1700 60 27 208 127 128 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 4315 1 12 2 1700 55 33 209 128 129 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 764 1 12 2 1700 45 33 210 129 328 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 2719 1 12 2 1700 45 33 211 130 198 ELTOPIA WEST RD COLLECTOR 3523 1 12 4 1700 40 22 212 131 132 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 2287 1 12 2 1700 65 21 213 132 144 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 554 1 12 2 1750 60 15 214 133 134 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 3178 1 12 2 1700 60 7 215 134 139 RD 170 COLLECTOR 5827 1 12 2 1700 65 7 216 134 219 RD 170 COLLECTOR 9528 1 12 2 1700 35 7 217 135 220 SAGHILL RD COLLECTOR 1996 1 12 8 1700 60 7 218 139 197 RD 170 COLLECTOR 393 1 12 2 1700 60 8 219 140 142 W SAGEMOOR RD COLLECTOR 3210 1 12 4 1700 50 27 220 140 356 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 10287 1 14 2 1700 65 27 221 141 212 W SAGEMOOR RD COLLECTOR 2473 1 12 4 1700 60 26 222 142 53 W SAGEMOOR RD COLLECTOR 441 1 12 4 1700 50 28 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-47 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 223 143 145 RINGOLD RD COLLECTOR 4923 1 11 4 1700 55 15 224 144 369 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 21595 1 12 2 1750 60 15 225 145 144 RINGOLD RD COLLECTOR 2424 1 11 4 1750 50 15 226 146 147 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 2296 1 12 4 1700 50 18 227 146 254 HANFORD RD COLLECTOR 309 1 12 4 1700 50 18 228 147 148 GLADE NORTH RD MINOR ARTERIAL 30124 2 12 4 1900 50 12 229 148 149 GLADE NORTH RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1451 2 12 4 1900 50 4 230 149 150 GLADE NORTH RD MINOR ARTERIAL 12647 2 12 4 1900 50 4 231 150 151 GLADE NORTH RD MINOR ARTERIAL 4733 2 12 4 1900 50 2 232 152 74 HANFORD RD COLLECTOR 849 1 12 6 1700 65 24 233 153 154 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 3410 1 12 4 1700 45 11 234 154 150 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 3865 1 12 4 1700 50 11 235 155 156 SR 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 2372 1 12 8 1700 55 24 236 156 157 SR 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 5529 1 12 8 1700 70 18 237 157 158 SR 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 11551 1 12 8 1700 70 17 238 158 159 SR 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 2831 1 12 8 1700 70 10 239 160 161 SH 225 COLLECTOR 3005 1 11 2 1700 55 24 240 161 162 SH 225 COLLECTOR 13298 1 11 2 1700 55 24 241 162 163 SH 225 COLLECTOR 5994 1 10 0 1700 45 29 242 163 164 SH 225 COLLECTOR 926 1 10 0 1700 40 29 243 164 350 SH 225 COLLECTOR 1134 1 11 2 1700 40 29 244 165 166 SH 225 COLLECTOR 618 1 11 2 1700 40 30 245 166 30 SH 225 COLLECTOR 377 1 12 6 1575 35 30 246 167 297 ELTOPIA WEST COLLECTOR 1608 1 14 0 1700 60 20 247 168 214 RD 170 COLLECTOR 2866 1 11 1 1700 50 14 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-48 KLD Engineering, P.C.K-48 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 248 169 86 CATSKILL ST LOCAL ROADWAY 237 1 12 4 1750 45 32 BOMBING RANGE 249 170 171 RD COLLECTOR 3294 1 12 4 1700 45 31 BOMBING RANGE 250 171 172 RD COLLECTOR 1851 1 12 4 1700 45 31 BOMBING RANGE 251 172 173 RD COLLECTOR 298 1 12 4 1700 45 31 BOMBING RANGE 252 173 174 RD COLLECTOR 883 1 12 4 1700 45 31 BOMBING RANGE 253 174 175 RD COLLECTOR 1659 1 12 4 1700 45 31 BOMBING RANGE 254 175 176 RD COLLECTOR 423 1 12 4 1700 45 31 BOMBING RANGE 255 176 177 RD COLLECTOR 221 1 12 4 900 20 31 BOMBING RANGE 256 177 178 RD COLLECTOR 265 1 12 4 900 20 31 BOMBING RANGE 257 178 179 RD COLLECTOR 241 1 12 4 900 20 31 BOMBING RANGE 258 178 181 RD COLLECTOR 391 1 12 4 1700 50 31 259 179 187 KEENE RD COLLECTOR 1107 1 12 4 1700 50 31 260 180 177 KEENE RD COLLECTOR 3323 1 12 4 1700 50 31 261 181 182 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 2352 1 12 4 1700 50 31 262 181 186 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 440 1 12 4 1700 50 31 263 182 183 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 933 1 12 4 1700 50 31 264 183 184 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 1518 1 12 4 1700 50 30 K-49 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-49 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Up Don No Lane- Shoude Flw Fo Stra Strea Le.gt of Wit Wit Rat Spe Grid 265 184 185 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 4663 1 12 4 1700 50 30 266 185 29 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 857 1 12 4 1700 50 30 267 186 187 KENNEDY RD COLLECTOR 1898 1 12 4 1700 50 31 268 187 189 KEENE RD COLLECTOR 838 1 12 4 1750 50 31 269 189 190 DUPORTAIL ST COLLECTOR 1078 1 12 4 1750 45 31 270 189 194 KEENE RD COLLECTOR 1427 1 12 4 1750 50 31 271 190 191 QUEENSGATE DR COLLECTOR 313 1 12 4 1700 50 31 12 I 182 SB ON RAMP FROM QUEENSGATE DR 1700 272 191 FREEWAY RAMP 1171 1 12 4 45 31 273 191 192 QUEENSGATE DR COLLECTOR 93 1 12 4 1700 50 31 274 192 294 QUEENSGATE DR MINOR ARTERIAL 191 2 12 4 1750 50 31 275 193 194 QUEENSGATE DR COLLECTOR 325 1 12 4 1750 50 31 COLUMBIA PARK 276 193 295 TRAIL COLLECTOR 1094 1 12 4 1700 45 31 277 194 302 KEENE ST COLLECTOR 1090 1 12 4 1700 50 31 278 195 171 PARADISE WAY LOCAL ROADWAY 486 1 12 2 1700 45 31 279 196 195 PARADISE WAY LOCAL ROADWAY 1307 1 12 2 1700 45 31 280 197 330 RD 170 COLLECTOR 2770 1 12 2 1700 65 8 281 198 45 ELTOPIA WEST RD COLLECTOR 719 1 12 4 1750 40 22 282 199 355 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 10700 1 12 2 1750 65 21 283 200 354 N RD 68 COLLECTOR 10382 1 11 2 1750 60 26 284 201 207 N RD 68 COLLECTOR 2513 1 12 4 1750 60 32 1-82 ON RAMP 285 202 26 FROM N RD 68 FREEWAY RAMP 1074 1 12 4 1700 50 33 286 202 203 N RD 68 MINOR ARTERIAL 495 1 12 4 1750 50 33 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-50 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 287 203 202 N RD 68 MINOR ARTERIAL 495 2 24 1750 50 33 1-82 ON RAMP 288 203 305 FROM N RD 68 FREEWAY RAMP 743 1 12 4 1700 35 33 1-82 ON RAMP 289 203 306 FROM N RD 68 FREEWAY RAMP 584 1 12 4 1700 45 33 290 206 207 SANDIFUR PKWY COLLECTOR 785 1 12 4 1750 40 32 291 206 232 SANDIFUR PKWY COLLECTOR 1934 1 12 4 1750 40 32 292 207 210 N RD 68 MINOR ARTERIAL 434 2 12 4 1750 50 32 293 208 202 N RD 68 MINOR ARTERIAL 290 1 12 4 1750 50 33 294 209 208 BURDEN BLVD COLLECTOR 408 1 12 4 1750 50 33 295 210 208 N RD 68 MINOR ARTERIAL 424 2 12 4 1750 50 33 296 211 210 WRIGLEY RD MINOR ARTERIAL 338 2 12 4 1750 50 33 297 212 140 W SAGEMOOR RD COLLECTOR 6291 1 12 4 1750 60 27 298 212 353 TAYLOR FLATS RD COLLECTOR 10353 1 12 4 1700 50 26 299 213 168 RD 170 COLLECTOR 3187 1 11 1 1700 50 14 300 214 215 W KLAMATH RD COLLECTOR 1493 1 12 4 1700 60 14 301 215 133 W KLAMATH RD COLLECTOR 4746 1 12 4 1750 60 15 302 215 216 RD 170 COLLECTOR 2173 1 12 4 1700 65 6 303 216 217 RD 170 COLLECTOR 4641 1 12 4 1700 65 6 304 217 218 RD 170 COLLECTOR 1071 1 12 4 1700 65 7 305 218 135 RD 170 COLLECTOR 1947 1 12 4 1750 65 7 306 219 134 RD 170 COLLECTOR 2904 1 12 2 1700 35 7 307 219 135 RD 170 COLLECTOR 357 1 12 2 1750 35 7 308 220 357 SAGHILL RD COLLECTOR 2379 1 12 8 1700 55 7 309 221 222 SAGHILL RD COLLECTOR 4541 1 12 8 1700 60 6 Columbia Generating Station K-51 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Saturation Free Up- Down- No. Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Stream Stream Length of Width Width Rate Speed Grid Link # Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 310 223 71 SH 240 MAJOR ARTERIAL 403 3 12 8 1750 55 31 311 224 102 DUPORTAIL ST COLLECTOR 1188 1 12 4 1750 45 31 312 225 226 AARON DR MINOR ARTERIAL 117 2 12 4 1750 40 31 1-182 EB ON RAMP 313 226 104 FROM SH 240 FREEWAY RAMP 1182 2 12 4 1900 40 31 1-182 WB ON RAMP FROM SH 314 226 227 240 FREEWAY RAMP 111 1 12 4 1700 45 31 1-182 WB ON RAMP FROM SH 315 227 15 240 FREEWAY RAMP 70 1 12 4 1700 45 31 316 228 213 RINGOLD RD COLLECTOR 4586 1 12 0 1700 55 14 317 229 228 RINGOLD RIVER RD COLLECTOR 1993 1 10 0 1575 35 14 318 230 228 RINGOLD RIVER COLLECTOR 2086 1 12 0 1575 35 14 319 231 229 RINGOLD RIVER RD COLLECTOR 5297 1 10 0 1575 35 13 BROADMOOR 320 232 234 BLVD COLLECTOR 150 2 12 4 1900 45 32 BROADMOOR 321 233 232 BLVD COLLECTOR 858 1 12 4 1750 45 32 1-182 ON RAMP FROM BRAODMOOR 322 234 23 BLVD FREEWAY RAMP 1782 1 12 4 1700 45 32 BROADMOOR 323 234 235 BLVD COLLECTOR 415 1 12 4 1700 45 32 K-52 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-52 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Sauaio Fre Up Down No Lan Shule Flo Flow Stream___

Stea Lengt of* Wit Width- Rat Spee Grid Link #0 Nod No.0 Roda Name Roda Typ Lae (f. (f. 0p l (mh Nme 1-182 EB ON RAMP FROM BROADMOOR BLVD 324 235 25 FREEWAY RAMP 1867 1 12 4 1700 45 32 325 236 97 AARON DR COLLECTOR 265 1 12 4 1750 20 32 COLUMBIA POINT 326 237 97 DR MINOR ARTERIAL 200 2 12 4 1750 45 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 327 238 96 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 308 1 12 4 1700 40 32 1-182 ON RAMP FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON 328 238 99 WAY FREEWAY RAMP 110 2 12 4 1900 40 32 329 239 94 COMSTOCK ST COLLECTOR 785 1 12 4 1750 45 32 330 240 93 FALLEY ST COLLECTOR 348 1 12 4 1750 45 32 331 241 93 BRADLEY BLVD COLLECTOR 642 1 12 4 1750 45 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 332 242 91 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 335 2 12 4 1750 30 32 333 242 243 KNIGHT ST COLLECTOR 149 1 12 4 1750 40 32 334 243 112 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 328 2 12 4 1750 40 32 335 243 242 KNIGHT ST COLLECTOR 149 1 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 336 244 87 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 310 2 13 0 1750 40 32 337 245 244 VAN GIESEN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 429 1 12 4 1750 45 32 K-53 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-53 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Saturation Free Up- Down- No. Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Stream Stream Length of Width Width Rate Speed Grid Link # Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type Lanes (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number.1 Mlý(EORGE WASHINGTON WAY 339 246 244 MINOR ARTERIAL 295 2 13 0 1750 40 32 340 247 246 MCMURRAY ST LOCAL ROADWAY 456 1 12 4 1750 40 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 341 248 86 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 716 2 13 0 1750 40 32 342 248 286 SAINTST LOCAL ROADWAY 834 1 12 4 1750 45 32 343 249 248 SAINTST LOCAL ROADWAY 913 1 12 4 1750 45 32 GEORGE WASHINGTON 344 250 78 WAY MINOR ARTERIAL 720 2 13 0 1750 40 26 345 251 250 HANFORD ST LOCAL ROADWAY 459 1 12 4 1750 45 26 GEORGE WASHINGTON 346 252 82 WAY COLLECTOR 359 2 13 0 1900 40 26 347 253 63 CYPRESS ST COLLECTOR 655 2 12 4 1900 45 26 348 254 152 HANFORD RD COLLECTOR 10316 1 12 6 1700 65 18 349 255 160 PARK ACCESS RD COLLECTOR 605 1 12 4 1700 45 24 350 256 43 GROSSCUP BLVD COLLECTOR 593 1 14 0 1700 40 31 351 257 258 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 815 1 14 4 1700 40 24 352 258 259 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 232 1 14 4 1700 40 25 353 259 260 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 399 1 14 4 1750 40 25 354 260 261 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 3073 1 14 0 1700 40 25 355 261 389 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 790 1 14 0 1700 40 31 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-54 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Up Down No Lan Shule Flo Flow StemSremLnt of Wit Wit Rat Spe Gri 356 262 266 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 901 1 14 4 900 20 24 357 263 264 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 2848 1 14 4 1700 40 24 358 264 257 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 2432 1 14 4 1700 40 24 359 265 262 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 2273 1 14 4 1700 40 24 360 266 263 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 7166 1 14 4 1700 40 24 361 267 268 N SHIVELY RD COLLECTOR 5751 1 12 4 1700 45 24 362 268 269 N SHIVELY RD COLLECTOR 1491 1 12 4 1700 45 25 363 269 270 N SHIVELY RD COLLECTOR 983 1 12 4 1700 45 25 364 270 271 N SHIVELY RD COLLECTOR 428 1 12 4 1700 45 25 365 271 272 N SHIVELY RD COLLECTOR 2476 1 12 4 1700 45 25 366 272 260 TWIN BRIDGES RD COLLECTOR 650 1 12 4 1750 45 25 367 272 273 TWIN BRIDGES RD COLLECTOR 1539 1 12 2 1700 45 25 368 273 274 TWIN BRIDGES RD COLLECTOR 762 1 12 2 1700 45 25 369 274 275 TWIN BRIDGES RD COLLECTOR 267 1 12 2 1700 45 25 370 275 276 TWIN BRIDGES RD COLLECTOR 682 1 12 2 1700 45 25 371 276 278 SH 240 COLLECTOR 3003 1 12 8 1750 65 25 372 277 276 TWIN BRIDGES RD COLLECTOR 3516 1 12 4 1700 45 25 373 278 76 SH 240 COLLECTOR 2394 1 12 8 1700 65 25 374 279 278 KINGSGATE WAY COLLECTOR 1979 1 12 1 1750 45 25 375 280 278 CLUBHOUSE LN COLLECTOR 1489 1 12 4 1750 45 25 376 281 279 KINGSGATE WAY COLLECTOR 2678 1 12 1 1700 45 25 377 282 281 KINGSGATE WAY COLLECTOR 1509 1 12 1 1700 45 25 378 282 284 HORN RAPIDS RD COLLECTOR 452 1 12 1 1700 55 25 379 283 282 HORN RAPIDS RD COLLECTOR 701 1 12 1 1700 55 25 3801 2841 65 HORN RAPIDS RD ICOLLECTOR 1 16991 1 [ 121 1[ 1750] 551 25 Columbia Generating Station K-55 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 381 285 284 AREVA ACCESS RD LOCAL ROADWAY 209 1 24 1700 45 25'382 286 71 STEVENS DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1261 3 12 4 1750 45 31 383 287 39 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 529 2 12 4 1750 40 31 384 288 287 MCMURRAY ST LOCAL ROADWAY 1042 1 12 4 1750 40 31 385 288 289 MCMURRAY ST LOCAL ROADWAY 317 1 12 4 1750 40 31 386 289 107 MCMURRAY ST COLLECTOR 278 1 12 4 1750 40 32 387 289 122 STEVENS RD COLLECTOR 772 1 14 2 1750 35 31 388 290 107 JADWIN AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 287 2 11 0 1750 40 32 389 291 289 STEVENS RD COLLECTOR 397 1 14 2 1750 35 31 390 292 189 KENSINGTON WAY COLLECTOR 270 1 12 4 1750 45 31 391 293 190 W DUPORTAILST COLLECTOR 357 1 12 4 1750 45 31 I 182 NB ON RAMP FROM QUEENSGATE DR 392 294 14 FREEWAY RAMP 936 1 12 4 1700 45 31 393 294 193 QUEENSGATE DR COLLECTOR 376 1 12 4 1700 50 31 394 296 201 TAYLOR FLATS RD COLLECTOR 13864 1 12 4 1750 50 26 395 297 124 ELTOPIA WEST COLLECTOR 6454 1 14 0 1700 60 21 396 297 352 TAYLOR FLATS RD COLLECTOR 12438 1 12 4 1700 50 20 397 298 3 1-82 FREEWAY 5515 2 12 4 2250 70 29 398 299 9 1-82 FREEWAY 648 2 12 4 2250 70 31 399 301 27 1-182 FREEWAY 1894 2 12 12 2250 65 33 400 301 307 1-182 FREEWAY 772 2 12 12 2250 65 33 401 303 203 N RD 68 MINOR ARTERIAL 455 2 12 4 1750 50 33 402 304 26 1-182 FREEWAY 713 2 12 12 2250 65 33 403 304 27 1-182 FREEWAY 998 2 12 12 2250 65 33 K-56 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-56 KLD EngineeringR, P.C.Rev. 1 404 305 306 FROM NRD 68 FREEWAY RAMP 1013 1 241700 45 33 1-82 ON RAMP 405 306 304 FROM N RD 68 FREEWAY RAMP 137 1 12 4 1700 45 33 406 307 301 1-182 FREEWAY 772 2 12 12 2250 65 33 407 307 308 US 12 FREEWAY 352 2 12 12 2250 65 33 408 308 307 US 12 FREEWAY 352 2 12 12 2250 65 33 409 308 309 US 12 FREEWAY 237 2 12 12 2250 65 33 US 12 OFF RAMP 410 308 320 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 1807 1 12 10 1700 45 33 411 309 308 US 12 FREEWAY 237 2 12 12 2250 65 33 412 309 310 US 12 FREEWAY 428 2 12 12 2250 65 33 US 12 OFF RAMP 413 309 319 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 578 1 12 10 1700 35 33 414 310 309 US 12 FREEWAY 428 2 12 12 2250 65 33 415 310 311 US 12 FREEWAY 1579 2 12 12 2250 65 33 416 311 310 US 12 FREEWAY 1579 2 12 12 2250 65 33 417 311 312 US 12 FREEWAY 364 2 12 12 2250 65 33 US 12 OFF RAMP TO GLADE NORTH 418 311 318 RD FREEWAY RAMP 528 1 12 10 1750 45 33 419 312 311 US 12 FREEWAY 364 2 12 12 2250 65 33 420 312 313 US 12 FREEWAY 807 2 12 12 2250 65 33 US 12 OFF RAMP TO GLADE NORTH 421 312 317 RD FREEWAY RAMP 875 1 12 10 1750 35 33 422 313 312 US 12 FREEWAY 807 2 12 12 2250 65 33 Columbia Generating Station K-57 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 423 313 314 US512 FREEWAY 1161 2 12 12 2250 65 34 424 314 313 US 12 FREEWAY 1161 2 12 12 2250 65 34 425 314 315 US 12 FREEWAY 253 2 12 12 2250 65 34 US 12 ON RAMP 426 314 388 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 395 1 12 4 1575 35 34 427 315 314 US 12 FREEWAY 253 2 12 12 2250 65 34 428 315 316 US 12 FREEWAY 1117 2 12 12 2250 65 34 429 316 315 US 12 FREEWAY 1117 2 12 12 2250 65 34 430 316 329 US 12 FREEWAY 1834 2 12 12 2250 65 34 US 12 ON RAMP FROM GLADE 431 1 317 311 NORTH RD FREEWAY RAMP 1959 1 1 12 10 1700 45 33 432 317 318 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 368 1 12 2 1750 45 33 US 12 ON RAMP FROM GLADE 433 318 312 NORTH RD FREEWAY RAMP 761 1 12 10 1700 35 33 434 318 317 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 368 1 12 2 1750 45 33 US 12 ON RAMP 435 319 307 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 1598 1 1 12 10 1700 45 33 US 12 OFF RAMP 436 319 321 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 603 1 12 10 1700 35 33 US 12 ON RAMP 437 320 310 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 1826 1 12 10 1700 45 33 438 320 321 US 395 FREEWAY 1709 2 12 10 2250 70 33 439 320 327 US 395 FREEWAY 591 2 12 10 2250 70 33 US 12 ON RAMP 440 321 319 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 603 1 12 10 1700 45 33 K-SB kLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-58 Rev. 1 441 321 320 US 395 FREEWAY 1709 1 12 10 2250 70 33 442 322 56 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 2017 2 12 10 1900 70 33 443 322 323 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 1484 2 12 10 1900 70 34 US 12 ON RAMP 444 323 313 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 1517 1 12 10 1700 45 34 445 323 322 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 1484 2 12 10 1900 70 34 446 323 324 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 217 2 12 10 1900 70 34 US 12 ON RAMP 447 324 315 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 544 1 12 10 1350 30 34 448 324 323 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 217 2 12 10 1900 70 34 449 324 325 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 292 1 12 10 1700 70 34 US 395 ON RAMP 450 325 314 FROM US 12 FREEWAY RAMP 334 1 12 4 1575 35 34 451 325 324 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 292 2 12 10 1900 70 34 US 12 ON RAMP 452 326 316 FROM US 395 FREEWAY RAMP 1418 1 12 10 1700 45 34 453 326 388 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 746 2 12 10 1900 70 34 454 327 320 US 395 FREEWAY 591 2 12 10 2250 70 33.455 328 317 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 204 1 12 2 1750 45 33 456 329 316 US 12 FREEWAY 1834 2 12 12 2250 65 34 457 330 339 RD 170 COLLECTOR 387 1 12 5 1700 50 8 458 331 50 US 395 FREEWAY 7802 2 12 4 2250 70 16 459 331 332 US 395 FREEWAY 8764 2 12 4 2250 70 16 460 332 331 US 395 FREEWAY 8764 2 12 4 2250 70 16 461 332 333 US 395 FREEWAY 531 2 12 4 2250 70 8 462 332 334 US 395 OFF RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 365 1 12 5 1700 50 8 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-59 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 463 333 332 US 395 FREEWAY 531 2 12 4 2250 70 8 464 333 335 US 395 OFF RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 392 1 12 5 1700 50 8 465 333 343 US 395 FREEWAY 3986 2 12 4 2250 70 8 466 334 333 US 395 ON RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 290 1 12 5 1700 50 8 467 334 335 SH 17 COLLECTOR 459 1 12 5 1700 50 8 468 335 332 US 395 ON RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 359 1 12 5 1700 50 8 469 335 334 SH 17 COLLECTOR 459 1 12 5 1700 50 8 470 335 336 SH 17 COLLECTOR 4063 1 12 5 1700 50 8 471 336 335 SH 17 COLLECTOR 4112 1 12 5 1700 50 8 472 336 337 SH 17 COLLECTOR 615 1 12 5 1700 50 8 473 337 336 SH 17 COLLECTOR 615 1 12 5 1700 50 8 474 337 338 SH 17 COLLECTOR 3090 1 12 5 1700 50 8 475 338 337 SH 17 COLLECTOR 2974 1 12 5 1700 50 8 476 338 342 SH 17 COLLECTOR 3162 1 12 5 1700 50 8 477 339 340 RD 170 COLLECTOR 373 1 12 5 1700 50 8 478 340 341 RD 170 COLLECTOR 363 1 12 5 1700 50 8 479 341 342 RD 170 COLLECTOR 182 1 12 5 1700 50 8 480 342 338 SH 17 COLLECTOR 3172 1 12 5 1700 50 8 481 342 344 SH 17 COLLECTOR 1704 1 12 5 1700 50 8 482 343 333 US 395 FREEWAY 3986 2 12 4 2250 70 8 N POWER PLANT 483 345 57 LOOP LOCAL ROADWAY 699 1 12 4 1700 45 19 PLANT ACCESS 484 345 59 ROAD LOCAL ROADWAY 576 1 12 4 1700 45 19 485 346 345 PLANT ACCESS RD LOCAL ROADWAY 344 1 12 4 1700 45 19 K-60 KW Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-60 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 486 347 114 LEE BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 470 2 12 4 1750 40 31 487 348 236 AARON DR COLLECTOR 196 1 12 5 1700 40 32 488 349 225 AARON DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1314 2 12 5 1900 40 32 489 349 348 AARON DR COLLECTOR 740 1 12 5 1700 40 32 490 350 165 SH 225 COLLECTOR 931 1 12 6 1125 25 29 491 351 42 N 46TH AVE COLLECTOR 2267 1 12 5 1750 45 31 492 352 212 TAYLOR FLATS RD COLLECTOR 13816 1 12 4 1700 50 20 493 353 296 TAYLOR FLATS RD COLLECTOR 8193 1 12 4 1700 50 26 494 354 201 N RD 68 COLLECTOR 13679 1 11 2 1750 60 32 495 355 140 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 10641 1 12 2 1750 65 21 496 356 125 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 8246 1 14 2 1700 65 27 497 357 221 SAGH ILL RD COLLECTOR 7109 1 12 8 1700 55 6 498 358 220 BASIN HILL RD LOCAL ROADWAY 3170 1 12 2 1700 50o 499 359 358 BASIN HILL RD LOCAL ROADWAY 2788 1 12 2 1700 50 6 500 360 359 BASIN HILL RD LOCAL ROADWAY 5762 1 12 2 1700 50 6 501 360 361 WAHLUKE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 5080 1 12 2 1700 506 502 361 360 WAHLUKE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 5080 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HOLLINGSWORTH 503 361 367 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 826 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HO LLI NGSWORTH 504 362 363 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 15946 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HOLLINGS WORTH 505 363 368 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 4556 1 12 2 1700 50 6 506 364 363 BUFFALO RD LOCAL ROADWAY 24137 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HOLLINGSWORTH 507 365 221 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 9368 1 12 2 1700 50 6 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-61 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Sauain Fe HOLLINGSWORTH RD 508 366 365 LOCAL ROADWAY 1553 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HOLLINGSWORTH 509 367 366 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 3742 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HOLLINGSWORTH 510 368 361 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 838 1 12 2 1700 50 6 HOLLINGSWORTH 511 368 367 RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1249 1 12 4 1700 50 6 512 369 133 GLADE NORTH RD COLLECTOR 5424 1 12 2 1750 60 15 513 369 370 RUSSELL RD COLLECTOR 17301 1 12 2 1700 50 15 514 370 371 RUSSELL RD COLLECTOR 13154 1 12 2 1700 50 16 515 371 372 RUSSELL RD COLLECTOR 2515 1 12 2 1700 50 16 516 372 374 RUSSELL RD COLLECTOR 578 1 12 2 1575 35 16 517 373 331 RUSSELL RD COLLECTOR 390 1 12 2 1700 50 16 518 374 373 RUSSELL RD COLLECTOR 1026 1 12 2 1700 50 16 519 375 355 DOGWOOD RD COLLECTOR 10908 1 12 2 1700 50 21 520 376 198 FIR RD COLLECTOR 1931 1 12 2 1700 50 22 521 377 53 W SAGEMOOR RD COLLECTOR 2587 1 12 2 1700 50 28 522 378 377 E SAGEMOOR RD COLLECTOR 6810 1 12 2 1700 50 28 523 379 55 PHEND RD COLLECTOR 5086 1 12 2 1700 50 28 BROADMOOR 524 380 235 BLVD COLLECTOR 1189 1 12 2 1700 45 32 525 381 44 SH 224 COLLECTOR 1374 1 11 2 1700 40 31 526 382 381 E RUPPERT RD COLLECTOR 8676 1 12 2 1700 45 30 527 383 382 E RUPPERT RD COLLECTOR 5457 1 12 2 1700 45 30 528 384 387 E RUPPERT RD COLLECTOR 2992 1 12 2 1700 45 30 K-62 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-62 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 529 385 384 E RUPPERT RD COLLECTOR 7048 1 1 12 2 1700 45 30 E RED MOUNTAIN 530 386 34 RD COLLECTOR 6672 1 12 2 1700 45 30 531 387 383 E RUPPERT RD COLLECTOR 1649 1 12 2 1700 45 30 532 388 325 US 395 MINOR ARTERIAL 135 2 12 10 1900 70 34 533 389 256 HARRINGTON RD COLLECTOR 2000 1 14 0 1700 40 31 534 390 389 GROSSCUP BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 886 1 12 4 1700 40 31 535 391 102 DUPORTAILST LOCAL ROADWAY 714 1 12 4 1750 30 31 536 8003 298 1-82 FREEWAY 543 2 12 4 2250 70 29 537 8010 299 1-82 FREEWAY 275 2 12 4 2250 70 31 538 8316 329 US 12 FREEWAY 774 2 12 12 2250 65 34 539 8320 327 US 395 FREEWAY 577 2 12 10 2250 70 33 540 8333 343 US 395 FREEWAY 7365 2 12 4 2250 70 9 553 43 42 SH 224 COLLECTOR 4032 2 11 2 1750 40 31 553 39 287 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 1738 1 12 4 1750 40 31 554 42 41 SH 224 MINOR ARTERIAL 2744 2 12 4 1900 50 31 554 287 123 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 2070 1 12 4 1700 40 31 555 41 40 SH 224 MINOR ARTERIAL 5288 2 12 4 1900 50 31 555 108 87 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 1401 1 12 4 1750 40 32 556 40 39 SH 224 MINOR ARTERIAL 4045 1 12 4 1750 50 31 556 87 108 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 1401 1 12 4 1750 40 32 557 108 122 VAN GIESEN COLLECTOR 1396 1 12 4 1750 40 32 558 100 105 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2801 2 12 4 1900 45 31 559 120 118 SWIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1739. 2 12 4 1750 45 31 Exit Link 159 8159 SR 240 MINOR ARTERIAL 2476 1 12 8 1700 70 10 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-63 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Exit Link 299 8010 1-82 FREEWAY 275 2 12 4 2250 70 31 COLUMBIA PARK Exit Link 295 8295 TRAIL COLLECTOR 7452 1 12 4 1700 45 32 WASHINGTON WAY Exit Link 300 8098 FREEWAY 330 2 12 4 2250 40 32 Exit Link 151 8151 GLADE NORTH RD MINOR ARTERIAL 3500 2 12 4 1900 50 2 Exit Link 302 8194 KEENE ST COLLECTOR 221 1 12 4 1700 50 31 Exit Link 222 8222 SAGHILL RD COLLECTOR 1584 1 12 8 1700 60 1 Exit Link 344 8342 SH 17 COLLECTOR 1427 1 12 5 1700 50 8 Exit Link 329 8316 US 12 FREEWAY 772 2 12 12 2250 65 34 Exit Link 327 8320 US 395 FREEWAY 577 2 12 10 2250 70 33 Exit Link 343 8333 US 395 FREEWAY 7365 2 12 4 2250 70 9 K-64 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-64 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table K-2. Nodes in the Link-Node Analysis Network which are Controlled I I 29 o1900102 337660at S otop l 30d a 30 1 1899111 337637 Stop 30 39 1942509 352538 Actuated 31 42 1931830 354796 Actuated 31 43 1928303 356344 Stop 31 45 2013922 410543 TCP 22 53 2001790 387321 Stop 28 55 1996016 371749 Stop 27 58 1928054 411878 Stop 19 61 1934770 405336 Stop 19 63 1947545 383434 Stop 25 65 1947480 373703 Actuated 25 66 1947667 371268 Actuated 26 67 1947791 367279 Actuated 26 68 1947667 362912 Actuated 26 69 1947673 361846 TCP 26 71 1947211 358070 TCP 31 72 1944481 354927 Actuated 31 74 1912352 384956 Stop 24 77 1950308 360583 Stop 32 78 1950383 361807 TCP 26 80 1950455 367154 Actuated 26 81 1950377 371216 Actuated 26 83 1950403 372709 Stop 26 86 1950304 356938 Actuated 32 87 1950242 353070 Actuated 32 88 1950193 351406 Actuated 32 89 1950308 349904 Actuated 32 90 1950541 348060 Actuated 32 91 1950616 346023 Actuated 32 92 1950580 345403 Actuated 32 93 1950921 344832 Actuated 32 94 1951538 343329 Actuated 32 97 1952181 341915 Actuated 32 100 1942211 347397 Actuated 31 102 1943005 343606 Actuated 31 107 1948490 355091 Actuated 32 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-65 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 108 1948841 353060 Actuated 32 109 1949504 351305 Actuated 32 110 1949337 349881 Actuated 32 111 1950134 348027 Actuated 32 112 1950134 346039 Actuated 32 114 1946354 345983 Actuated 31 118 1946315 348145 Actuated 31 119 1948451 346023 Actuated 32 120 1948050 348027 Actuated 32 121 1947634 349832 Stop 31 122 1947545 352542 Actuated 31 124 1990287 414044 Stop 21 133 1984185 451366 TCP 15 134 1983723 461782 Stop 7 135 1973024 461684 TCP 7 140 1989907 387604 TCP 27 144 1984851 424365 TCP 15 150 1877671 455290 Stop 3 160 1907510 384067 Stop 24 161 1904580 374654 TCP 29 163 1894754 345809 TCP 29 171 1931503 350058 Stop 31 176 1933231 341584 Yield 31 177 1933047 341462 Yield 31 181 1933205 339953 Stop 31 187 1936502 339517 Stop 31 189 1938815 338031 Actuated 31 190 1941869 339809 Actuated 31 194 1943136 336230 Actuated 31 198 2013472 411068 Stop 22 201 1970478 355547 TCP 32 202 1973444 343910 Actuated 33 203 1973736 342312 Actuated 33 207 1972581 347575 Actuated 32 208 1973227 344838 Actuated 33 210 1972935 346197 Actuated 33 212 1969271 387230 Stop 26 213 1957811 433410 Stop 14 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-66 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 220 1973326 463657 Stop 7_____221 1973001 472156 Stop 7_____226 1946984 340340 1 Actuated 31 227 1946663 340170 Yield 31 232 1963664 347368 Actuated 32 242 1950606 347122 Actuated 32 243 1950117 347115 Actuated 32 244 1950213 354087 Actuated 32 246 1950196 355055 Actuated 32 248 1950350 359284 Actuated 32 250 1950442 364169 Actuated 26 254 1919235 419818 Stop 18 260 1924786 362935 TCP 25 272 1925741 364841 Stop 25 276 1931774 370120 Stop 25 278 1939658 364208 TCP 25 284 1941909 373716 Stop 25 286 1947614 359264 Actuated 31 287 1944245 352611 Actuated 31 289 1947578 355074 Actuated 31 294 1943077 338333 Actuated 31 297 1969123 413483 Stop 20 317 1995878 338106 Actuated 33 318 1995894 336896 Actuated 33 331 2015556 444895 Stop 16 334 2020208 453462 Stop 8 335 2018804 454004 Stop 8 342 2015884 464886 Stop 8 355 1989858 398245 Stop 21 361 1962780 466629 Stop 6 363 1957387 466565 Stop 6 367 1962791 467455 Yield 6 381 1923839 355020 Stop 31 389 1926701 359627 Stop 31 392 1894889 360646 TCP 29' Coordinates are in the North American Datum of 1983 Washington South State Plane Zone Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate K-67 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX L Section Boundaries L. SECTION BOUNDARIES CGS County: Benton Includes the following areas: The Columbia Generating Station site. (Includes a two mile radius around the plant.)Section 1 County: Franklin Includes the following areas: (1) north of Eltopia West Rd., west of Glade North Rd., south of West Klamath Rd. and east of the Columbia River; (2) north of West Klamath Rd., west of Far Way Rd., south of Basin Hill Rd. and west of the Columbia River; (3) north of Basin Hill Rd., west of Wahluke Rd., south of Hollingsworth Rd. and east of the Columbia River. A portion of section 1 extends west of the Columbia River to Columbia Generating Station but there are no permanent residents in this area.Section 2 County: Franklin Includes the following areas: (1) north of West Sagemoor Rd., west of Glad North Rd., south of Eltopia West Rd. and east of the Columbia River; (2) north of Alder Rd., west of Dayton Rd., south of West Sagemoor Rd. and east of the Columbia River; (3) north of Selph Landing Rd., west of Taylor Flats Rd., south of Alder Rd. and wast of the Columbia River. A portion of section 2 extends west of the Columbia River to Columbia Generating Station but there are not permanent residents in this area.Section 3A County: Benton Includes the following areas: This area is entirely on the Hanford Site and is southwest of the Columbia Generating Station.Section 3B County: Benton Includes the following areas: south of SR 240, west of Kingsgate Way and north of West Richland and east of SH 225. It includes the Innovation Center Apartments and those homes and businesses that are accessed from Harrington Rd., Yakima River Dr., Snively Rd., Twin Bridges Rd. and Weidle Rd.It also includes the Rattlesnake Mountain Shooting Facility and the Horn Rapids Park.Columbia Generating Station L-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Section 3C County: Benton Includes the following areas: south of the Hanford Site and north of Battelle Blvd. between Stevens Dr. and the Columbia River. It also includes the area west of Stevens Dr. between SR 240 and the Hanford Site. It includes the Horn Rapids Off-road Vehicle Park and the Richland Landfill.

It does not include businesses or parks accessed from Logston Blvd., Sullivan Blvd., and Robertson Dr. or businesses on the west side of Stevens Dr. south of Curie St.County: Benton Includes the following areas: This section is the Hanford Site and under jurisdiction of the Department of Energy. There are no permanent residents in this area. Hanford workers would be notified if any protective actions are necessary.

Section 4 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate L-2 KILD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX M Evacuation Sensitivity Studies M. EVACUATION SENSITIVITY STUDIES This appendix presents the results of a series of sensitivity analyses.

These analyses are designed to identify the sensitivity of the ETE to changes in some base evacuation conditions.

M.1 Effect of Changes in Trip Generation Times A sensitivity study was performed to determine whether changes in the estimated trip generation time have an effect on the ETE for the entire EPZ. Specifically, if the tail of the mobilization distribution were truncated (i.e., if those who responded most slowly to the Advisory to Evacuate, could be persuaded to respond much more rapidly), how would the ETE be affected?

The case considered was Scenario 1, Region 3; a summer, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation of the entire EPZ. Table M-1 presents the results of this study.Table M-1. Evacuation Time Estimates for Trip Generation Sensitivity Study 3 Hours 2:00 3:10 4 Hours 2:00 4:10 5 Hours (Base) 2:00 5:10 The results confirm the importance of accurately estimating the trip generation (mobilization) times. The ETE for the 1 0 0 th percentile closely mirror the values for the time the last evacuation trip is generated.

As discussed in Section 7.3, traffic congestion within the EPZ clears at about 2:30 after the ATE, well before the base trip generation time of 5:00. As such, the ETE for the 100th percentile is affected by the trip generation time, if the public finishes mobilizing after congestion clears. The results indicate that programs to educate the public and encourage them toward faster response for a radiological emergency, translates into shorter ETE at the 1 0 0 th percentile.

The results also justify the guidance to employ the stable 9 0 th percentile ETE for protective action recommendation (PAR) and decision-making.

Columbia Generating Station M-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 M.2 Effect of Changes in the Number of People in the Shadow Region Who Relocate A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the percentage of people who decide to relocate from the Shadow Region. The case considered was Scenario 1, Region 3; a summer, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation for the entire EPZ. The movement of people in the Shadow Region has the potential to impede vehicles evacuating from an Evacuation Region within the EPZ. Refer to Sections 3.2 and 7.1 for additional information on population within the shadow region.Table M-2 presents the ETE for each of the cases considered.

The results show that the ETE is not materially impacted by shadow evacuation from 0% to 20%. Tripling the shadow percentage increases the ETE by 40 minutes at the 9 0 th percentile, a significant change. As discussed in Section 7.3, almost all congestion in the study area is located in Richland, which is located in the Shadow Region, just south of the EPZ. Increasing the number of evacuees in the Shadow Region compounds this congestion and prolongs ETE. Tripling the shadow percentage, however, has no effect on the 1 0 0 th percentile ETE which is dictated by trip generation rather than traffic congestion.

Note, the telephone survey results presented in Appendix F indicate that 20% of households would elect to evacuate if advised to shelter. Thus, the base assumption of 20% non-compliance suggested in NUREG/CR-7002 is valid.Table M-2. Evacuation Time Estimates for Shadow Sensitivity Study 0 0 1:55 5:10 15 3,521 2:00 5:10 20 (Base) 4,695 2:00 5:10 60 14,085 2:40 5:10 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 M.3 Effect of Changes in EPZ Resident Population A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the resident population within the study area (EPZ plus Shadow Region). As population in the EPZ changes over time, the time required to evacuate the public may increase, decrease, or remain the same. Since the ETE is related to the demand to capacity ratio present within the EPZ, changes in population will cause the demand side of the equation to change. The sensitivity study was conducted using the following planning assumptions:

1. The population was increased by as much as 160%. Changes in population were applied to permanent residents only (as per federal guidance), in both the EPZ and the Shadow Region.2. The transportation infrastructure remained fixed; the presence of new roads or highway capacity improvements were not considered.

3. The study was performed for the 2-Mile Region (R01), the 5-Mile Region (R02) and the entire EPZ (R03).4. The good weather scenario which yielded the highest ETE values was selected as the case to be considered in this sensitivity study (Scenario 1).Table M-3 presents the results of the sensitivity study.Section IV of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and NUREG/CR-7002, Section 5.4, requires licensees to provide an updated ETE analysis to the NRC when a population increase within the EPZ causes ETE values (for the 2-Mile Region, 5-Mile Region or entire EPZ) to increase by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less.The base ETE is 1:05 (65 minutes) for the 2-Mile region. Twenty five percent of 65 minutes is about 15 minutes. Twenty five percent of the 5-Mile region, with an ETE of 1:25, is about 20 minutes. Twenty five percent of the full EPZ, with an ETE of 2:00, is 30 minutes. Any changes in ETE of 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes or greater for the 2-Mile region, 5-Mile region, and full EPZ, respectively, will trigger an updated ETE analysis.Those percent population changes which result in ETE changes greater than the thresholds for the are highlighted in red in Table M-3 -a 155% increase or more in the EPZ and Shadow Region population.

Energy Northwest will have to estimate the EPZ population on an annual basis. If the EPZ population increases by 155% or more, an updated ETE analysis will be needed.Energy Northwest will have to estimate the EPZ population on an annual basis to comply with Section IV of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. However, as the results of this sensitivity study indicate, an updated ETE based on population change will most likely not be needed until the next Census.Columbia Generating Station M-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Table M-3. ETE Variation with Population Change Resident & Population Change Shadow Base 150% 155% 160%Population 15,828 39,570 40,361 47,484 ETE for 901h Percentile Population Change Region Base 150% 1 155% 1 160%2-MILE 1:05 1:05 1:05 1:05 5-MILE 1:25 1:40 1:40 1:40 FULL EPZ 2:00 2:25 2:40 2:40 Population Change Region Base 150% 155% 160%2-MILE 1:55 1:55 1:55 1:55 5-MILE 5:05 5:05 5:05 5:05 FULL EPZ 5:10 5:10 5:10 5:10 Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 M.4 Innovation Center Apartments Sensitivity Analysis A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of the Innovation Center Apartments.

The facility consists of an extended stay facility containing 320 units and two upscale hotels with 150 units each. A total of 620 units, or households, will be in the facility.Assuming 100% occupancy during peak times, a total of 1,941 people (3.13 people per household

-see Figure F-i) and 819 vehicles (1.32 evacuating vehicles per household

-see Figure F-8) will be evacuating from the facility.The facility is going to be located on University Drive/1s t St between Stevens Drive and George Washington Way. The proposed location for the facility is shown in Figure M-1.Figure M-1. Proposed Locations of Innovation Center Apartments M-S KID Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table M-4 summarizes the ETE for the 2-Mile, 5-Mile and Full EPZ Regions for the base (current conditions) case and the case with the Innovation Center Apartments in existence.

Scenario 1 conditions (summer, midweek, midday with good weather) were considered for this study. The additional vehicles evacuating from this facility have no impact on the ETE for any of the regions considered at the 100th percentile, which is to be expected as ETE at the 100th percentile reflect trip generation time. The 9 0 th percentile ETE is unaffected for the 2 and 5-Mile Regions, while the full EPZ increases by 5 minutes -not a significant change. The Innovation Center Apartments (based on the current plans) will not have a significant impact on ETE.Table M-4. Innovation Center Apartments Sensitivity Analysis 2-Mile Region 1:05 1:05 5-Mile Region 1:25 1:25 Full EPZ 2:00 2:05 101 Pren-e T 2-Mile Region 1:55 1:55 5-Mile Region 5:05 5:05 Full EPZ 5:10 5:10 M.5 Migratory Worker Sensitivity Analysis A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of the seasonal migratory worker population.

These workers are only present during the harvest seasons. The harvest seasons are in the spring and fall. For this reason, a winter, midweek midday scenario was chosen for this sensitivity study (Scenario 6). School is in session during the spring and fall, and winter is defined as school in session in this study. The migratory workers primarily work in Franklin County, in Sections 1 and 2. Since the majority of these Sections are beyond 5 miles, the full EPZ (Region R03) was used for this sensitivity study.Emergency management officials from Benton and Franklin Counties indicated there is no reliable data on how many workers enter the area during harvest season. This sensitivity study, therefore, considers a varying population of migratory workers from 1,000 to 4,000. A vehicle occupancy of 1.19 employees per vehicle obtained from the telephone survey (see Figure F-7)was used to determine the number of evacuating migratory worker vehicles.M-6 KLD Engineering, p.c.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table M-5 summarizes the ETE for the base (current conditions) case and the various migratory worker cases. The 100th percentile ETE for all cases remains unchanged.

This is due to the fact that trip generation dictates the 1 0 0 th percentile ETE as discussed in Section 7.5. The 9 0 th percentile ETE for all sensitivity cases is 15 minutes shorter than the base case. This is due to the increase in the number of employee vehicles (migratory workers) who mobilize more quickly than the general population (see Section 5.4). Considering there is no congestion in Sections 1 and 2 to inhibit the egress of evacuating vehicles and the migrant worker vehicles mobilize more quickly than resident vehicles, the 9 0 th percentile can be reached more quickly in the sensitivity cases. This anomaly cannot and does not exist at the 1 0 0 th percentile.

Table M-5. Migratory Worker Sensitivity Analysis I Full EPZ 1 2:00 1 1:45 1 1:45 1 1:45 1 1:45 100t Pecnil T Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate M-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 APPENDIX N ETE Criteria Checklist N. ETE CRITERIA CHECKLIST Table N-1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Yes Section 1 should be described.

0. A ma snul oe i*ncue tnat ,Identil ies prmr tetre. 1-igur i 1D. A map should be included that identifes primary teatures of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.Yes1-1 c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be Yes Table 1-3 provided and includes similar information as identified in Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained Yes Section 1.3 during the field survey of the roadway network should be provided.b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, Yes Section 2.1 large employers, and special events should be identified.

Section 3 c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Yes Section 1.3, Section 2.2, Section 9, plans in the analysis.

Appendix G d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Yes Section 1.3, Table 1-3, Appendix B, identified by name and version. Appendix C Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie CrtraCrtro Addrsse Coment e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described.

Yes Section 3 -avoid double counting Section 5, Appendix F -4.5% sampling error at 95% confidence interval for telephone survey 1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 1 that the evacuation should be ordered promptly and no Section 5.1 early protective actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Yes Sections 2.2, 2.3 Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and include the basis to support their use.1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, Yes Tables 2-1, 6-2 should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

1.3.1 Staged

Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Yes Sections 5.4.2, 7.2 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation

Planning Areas a. A map of EPZ with emergency response planning areas Yes Figure 6-1, Figure 3-1 (ERPAs) should be included.b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs Yes Table 6-1, Figure 3-1 considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

.Reie Crtei Crtro Addesse Coment c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

Yes Table 7-5, Table H-1 2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four Yes Permanent residents, employees, population groups, including permanent residents of the transients

-Section 3, Appendix E EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. Special facilities, schools -Section 8, Appendix E 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population Yes Section 3.1 values, or another credible source should be provided.b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for Yes 2010 used as the base year for analysis.

No growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the growth of population necessary.

ETE.c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, Yes Figure 3-2"Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent

Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 Yes 2.37 persons per vehicle -Table 1-3 or justification should be provided for other values.b. Major employers should be listed. Yes Appendix E -Table E-2 2.1.2 Transient Population N-3 KLD Engineering, p.c.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crteio Adrse Comment in E Analysi a. A list ot tacilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, Appendix E b. The average population during the season should be used, Yes Tables 3-4, 3-5 and Appendix E itemize the itemized and totaled for each scenario.

transient population and employee estimates.

These estimates are multiplied by the scenario specific percentages provided in Table 6-3 to estimate transient population by scenario.c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values vary should be provided.e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 Yes Figure 3-6 -transients of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution Figure 3-8 -employees for the transient population.

2.2 Transit

Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit Yes Section 8.1, Table 8-1 dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group Yes Section 8.1, Tables 8-4, 8-9 should be quantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent Yes- Sections 8.1, 8.3 residents should be used in the analysis.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Critrio Addese Comments d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided.

Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.Yes Section 8.4 e. Capacities should be provided for all types of Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 10 transportation resources.

Bus seating capacity of 50% Sections 3.5, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 should be used or justification should be provided for higher values.f. An estimate of this population should be provided and Yes Table 8-1 -transit dependents information should be provided that the existing Section 8.4 -special needs registration programs were used in developing the estimate.g. A summary table of the total number of buses, Yes Section 8.3 -page 8-6 ambulances, or other transport needed to support Table 8-4 evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, Yes location, and average population should be provided.

There are no medical facilities or Special facility staff should be included in the total special correctional facilities exist within the EPZ.facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility Yes data was obtained.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Cri flron Adrse Com ent I~~~~i -T Analysis a ....I .c. i ne numoer oT wneeicnair ana Dea-Douna naOvMauais should be provided.Yes d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles Yes needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided.There are no medical facilities or correctional facilities exist within the EPZ.e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate.

Yes 2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student Yes Table 8-2, Table E-1 population, and transportation resources required to Section 8.2 support the evacuation, should be provided.

The source of this information should be provided.b. Transportation resources for elementaryand middle Yes Table 8-2 schools should be based on 100% of the school capacity.c. The estimate of high school students who will use their Yes Section 8.2 personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be discussed.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary.

Yes There are sufficient resources to evacuate schools in a single wave. However, Section 8.3 and Figure 8-1 discuss the potential for a multiple wave evacuation Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and Yes Section 3.6 includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient Yes Section 3.6 population should be analyzed in the ETE.c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event Yes Section 3.6 should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow

Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for Yes Section 2.2 -Assumption 5 areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles Figure 2-1 from the NPP.Section 3.2 b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 Yes Section 3.2 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. Figure 3-4 Table 3-3 c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway Yes Section 5 -Table 5-9 network should be consistent with the trip generation time generated for the permanent resident population.

Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.N-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 SReie Crieri Crtro Adrsse Coment 2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass through traffic Yes Section 3.5 is based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be Table 3-6 reduced for nighttime scenarios.

Section 6 Table 6-3 b. Pass through traffic is assumed to have stopped entering Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 5 the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

Section 3.5 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the Yes total populations and total vehicles used in analysis for Tables 3-7, 3-8 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario.3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Yes Section 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadway

Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Yes Section 1.3 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of Yes Section 1.3 the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analysis.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.Yes Appendix K, Table K-1 d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should Yes Section 4 be provided.e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node Yes Appendix K, Figures K-1 through K-35 numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be present the entire link-node analysis provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway network at a scale suitable to identify all Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-

-links and nodes 7002.3.2 Capacity Analysis a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for Yes Section 4 the transportation network should be described in detail and identifies factors that should be expressly used in the modeling.b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information Yes Section 1.3, Section 4 should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection

Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the Yes Appendix K, Table K-2 total number of intersections modeled that are unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections Yes Table J-1 within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle length, and turn lane queue capacity.c. Discussion should be provided on how signal cycle time is Yes Section 4.1, Appendix C used in the calculations.

N-9 KLD Engineering, P.c.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crteio Addese Coment 3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and Yes Table 2-1, Section 2.3 -Assumption 9 the effects of adverse weather on mobilization time Mobilization time -Table 2-2, Section 5.3 should be considered. (page 5-10)b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Yes Table 2-2 -based on HCM 2010. The Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 factors provided in Table 3-1 of should be used or a basis should be provided for other NUREG/CR-7002 are from HCM 2000.values.c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on Yes Section 5.3 -page 5-10 streets and driveways, when applicable.

Appendix F -Section F.3.3 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should Yes Section 5 be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the Yes Appendix F survey, area of survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be Yes Appendix F summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should Yes Section 5, Appendix F be developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent

Residents and Transient Population Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-l0 KILD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 SReie Crtei Crtron Adrese Coment a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times.Trip generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating.

Yes Section 5 discusses trip generation for households with and without returning commuters.

Table 6-3 presents the percentage of households with returning commuters and the percentage of households either without returning commuters or with no commuters.

Appendix F presents the percent households who will await the return of commuters.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method Yes Section 5.4.3 used to notify transients.

The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients Yes Section 5, Figure 5-1 potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during Yes Section 3.6 special events where a large number of transients should be expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population Yes Section 5, Table 5-9 should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the general public.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR .Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes should be used Yes Section 8.3 -page 8-7. Pre-established bus in the ETE analysis.

If new plans should be developed with routes do not exist. Basic bus routes were the ETE, they have been agreed upon by the responsible developed for the ETE analysis -see Figure authorities.

8-2, Table 8-9.b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents.

c. The number, location, and availability of buses, and other Yes Table 8-4 resources needed to support the demand estimation should be provided.d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief Yes Section 8.3, Figure 8-1 drivers, and initiate the bus route should be provided.e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit Yes Section 8.3 dependent residents to prepare and travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the pickup point.f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load Yes Section 8.3 passengers should be discussed.

g. A map of bus routes should be included.

Yes Figure 8-2 h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4 includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR eiwCiei rtro Addese Co met i. Information should be provided to supports analysis of return trips, if necessary.

Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4 Figure 8-1 Tables 8-10 through 8-12, 8-14 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided.Yes b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes outbound speeds.c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bounds individuals Yes should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided Yes e. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips should be needed.f. If return trips should be needed, the destination of Yes vehicles should be provided.g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility Yes residents are expected to pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

No medical facilities or correctional facilities exist within the EPZ. Schools are discussed below.h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips.Yes Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crtro Adrese Comments 4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization time Yes Section 8.2 should be provided.b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes School bus routes are presented in Table outbound speeds. 8-5.School bus speeds are presented in Tables 8-6 through 8-8.Outbound speeds are defined as the minimum of the evacuation route speed and the State school bus speed limit.Inbound speeds are limited to the State school bus speed limit.c. Time for loading of students should be provided.

Yes Tables 8-6 through 8-8, Discussion in Section 8.3 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.3 -page 8-6 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Yes Return trips are not needed for schools should be provided.f. If used, reception centers should be identified.

Discussion Yes Table 8-3. Students are evacuated to should be provided on whether students are expected to assistance centers where they will be pass through the reception center prior to being picked up by parents or guardians.

evacuated to their final destination.

Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

.R Reie Crtei Critrio Addese Comment g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips.Yes Return trips are not needed for schools.Tables 8-6 through 8-8 provide time needed to arrive at care center, which could be used to compute a second wave evacuation if necessary 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided Yes DYNEV II (Ver. 4.0.3.0).

Section 1.3, Table and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. 1-3, Appendix B, Appendix C.b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE No Not applicable as a traffic simulation calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate model was used.the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic

Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Yes Appendices B and C describe the set of model inputs should be provided, simulation model assumptions and algorithms Table J-2 b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key Yes Appendix A performance measures and parameters used in the Tables C-1, C-2 analysis.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crteio Addese Coment 4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation Yes Appendix B model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be provided.b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided Yes 1. Table J-5.to support review: 2. Table J-3.1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit 3. Table J-1.node. 4. Table J-3.2. Network wide average travel time. 5. Figures J-1 through J-14 (one plot 3. Longest queue length for the 10 intersections with the for each scenario considered).

highest traffic volume. 6. Table J-4. Network wide average 4. Total vehicles exiting the network. speed also provided in Table J-3.5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Yes Figures 7-3 through 7-6 times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, if they occur.4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and Yes Tables 7-1, 7-2 100% of the total permanent resident and transient population Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments.b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated data should be explained.

Yes Section 5.4.1 -truncating survey data to eliminate statistical outliers Table 7-2 -1 0 0 th percentile ETE for general public c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs Yes Tables 7-3, 7-4 similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Yes Section 8.3 special facilities, transit dependent, and school Schools -Tables 8-6 through 8-8 populations.

Transit-Dependents

-Tables 8-10 through 8-12 5.0 Other Considerations

5.1 Development

of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved Yes Section 9, Appendix G the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided.b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic Yes Sections 7, 8, 9, and 11 control plan that affect the ETE should be provided.

Appendices G and M 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Yes Appendix M time should be provided.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Critrio Addese Comment b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be provided.Yes Results of the ETE study were formally presented to local authorities at the final project meeting. Recommended enhancements were discussed.

5.3 State

and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction Yes Table 1-1 with these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues Yes No outstanding issues.that may affect the ETE.5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required Yes Appendix M, Section M.3 to be performed and submitted to the NRC.5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Yes Figure 10-1 should be provided.b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4 discuss a multi-wave return times for buses should be provided.

evacuation procedure.

Figure 8-1 c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 7g are left at the reception center and are taken by separate Section 10 buses to the congregate care center.Columbia Generating Station, Evacuation Time Estimate N-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Technical Reviewer Date Technical Reviewer Date Supervisory Review Date N-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Columbia Generating Station Evacuation Time Estimate N-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1