RS-12-226, Proposed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Decommissioning Funding Plans for Braidwood Byron, Dresden, LaSalle, Limerick, Oyster Creek, Peach Bottom, Quad Cities, and Salem

Proposed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Decommissioning Funding Plans for Braidwood Byron, Dresden, LaSalle, Limerick, Oyster Creek, Peach Bottom, Quad Cities, and Salem

ML12353A488
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden, Peach Bottom, Salem, Oyster Creek, Byron, Braidwood, Limerick, Quad Cities, LaSalle
Issue date:	12/17/2012
From:	Simpson P Exelon Generation Co
To:	NRC/FSME, Document Control Desk, NRC/NMSS/SFST
References
RS-12-226
Download: ML12353A488 (26)

Text

RS-12-226 December 17, 2012 ATTN: Document Control Desk Director - Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, and 72-73 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-454, STN 50-455, and 72-68 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-10 50-237 50-249, and 72-37 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-1 1 and NPF-1 8 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373, 50-374, and 72-70 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-353, and 72-65 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-1 6 NRC Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-12 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-171, 50-277 50-278, and 72-29 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254, 50-265 and 72-53 10 CFR 72.30(b)

J 1

RS-12-226 December 17, 2012 A TIN: Document Control Desk Director - Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-456, STN 50-457, and 72-73 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-454, STN 50-455, and 72-68 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-10, 50-237, 50-249, and 72-37 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-11 and NPF-18 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373, 50-374, and 72-70 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-353, and 72-65 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-12 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-171, 50-277, 50-278, and 72-29 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254, 50-265, and 72-53 10 CFR 72.30(b)

December 17, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Subject:

Proposed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Decommissioning Funding Plans for Braidwood, Byron, Dresden, LaSalle, Limerick, Oyster Creek, Peach Bottom, Quad Cities, and Salem In accordance with 10 CFR 72.30, "Financial assurance and recordkeeping for decommissioning," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) is submitting the proposed ISFSI decommissioning funding plans for Braidwood Station, Byron Station, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, LaSalle County Station, Limerick Generating Station, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, and Salem Generating Station.

This submittal is subdivided as follows.

• provides a description of the proposed ISFSI decommissioning funding plan.

Attachments 2 through 10 provide details of the ISFSI decommissioning funding estimates.

There are no regulatory commitments contained within this letter. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Thomas J. Griffith at (630) 657-2818.

Patrick R. Simpson Manager - Licensing CC:

Regional Administrator - NRC Region I Regional Administrator-NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Braidwood Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Byron Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden Nuclear Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - LaSalle County Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Limerick Generating Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Salem Generating Station December 17,2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Subject:

Proposed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Decommissioning Funding Plans for Braidwood, Byron, Dresden, LaSalle, Limerick, Oyster Creek, Peach Bottom, Quad Cities, and Salem In accordance with 10 CFR 72.30, "Financial assurance and recordkeeping for decommissioning," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) is submitting the proposed ISFSI decommissioning funding plans for Braidwood Station, Byron Station, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, LaSalle County Station, Limerick Generating Station, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, and Salem Generating Station.

This submittal is subdivided as follows.

• provides a description of the proposed ISFSI decommissioning funding plan.

Attachments 2 through 10 provide details of the ISFSI decommissioning funding estimates.

There are no regulatory commitments contained within this letter. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Thomas J. Griffith at (630) 657-2818.

Patrick R. Simpson Manager - Licensing CC:

Regional Administrator - NRC Region I Regional Administrator - NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Braidwood Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Byron Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden Nuclear Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - LaSalle County Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Limerick Generating Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Salem Generating Station

December 17, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 Attachments:

1.

Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan

2. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Braidwood Station

3. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Byron Station 4.

ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Dresden Nuclear Power Station

5. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for LaSalle County Station

6. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Limerick Generating Station 7.

ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

8. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

9. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

10. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Salem Generating Station December 17, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 Attachments:

1. Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan

2. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Braidwood Station

3. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Byron Station

4. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Dresden Nuclear Power Station

5. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for LaSalle County Station

6. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Limerick Generating Station

7. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

8. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

9. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

10. ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Salem Generating Station

ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan 1.0

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION 2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION 2.1 Reasonable Assurance of Funds Availability 2.2 Detailed Cost Estimate 2.3 Assumptions 2.4 Method of Assurance 2.5 Volume of Subsurface Residual Radioactivity Requiring Remediation 2.6 Certification of Financial Assurance

3.0 REFERENCES

Page 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan 1.0

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION 2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION 2.1 Reasonable Assurance of Funds Availability 2.2 Detailed Cost Estimate 2.3 Assumptions 2.4 Method of Assurance 2.5 Volume of Subsurface Residual Radioactivity Requiring Remediation 2.6 Certification of Financial Assurance

3.0 REFERENCES

Page 1

ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan 1.0

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) maintains decommissioning cost estimates (DCEs) for each of its nuclear units, which are periodically updated. Some of these estimates have been provided to the NRC in response to requests for information (References 1 - 3).

Embedded in the DCEs maintained by EGC, are the costs associated with decommissioning the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) co-located at the site. EGC has extracted from these DCEs, and provides herein, information supporting this required response.

EGC notes that radiological decommissioning costs for ISFSIs typically consist of the costs associated with removing and disposing of small volumes of neutron-activated concrete and certain structural steel components. No impact is expected upon soil and groundwater at any of EGC's sites during the storage periods contemplated in the DCEs. EGC also notes that induced radioactivity at its ISFSIs is not expected to result in residual radioactivity in excess of 25 mRem/yr in an unrestricted release scenario, were no action to be taken to remediate the site.

However, since EGC anticipates small, but measurable amounts of induced radioactivity to be present, and release of this material from EGC's sites will require it to be disposed of at a NRC-licensed radioactive waste disposal facility, EGC has included these costs in its DCEs.

2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION 2.1 Reasonable Assurance of Funds Availability EGC's trust fund balances and existing parent company guarantees (PCGs) for each of the nuclear units currently exceed the costs required for radiological decommissioning.

These excess assets will be used to decommission the on-site ISFSIs. Table 1 shows the trust fund assets and PCGs, the costs estimated for radiological decommissioning under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c), and the costs estimated for ISFSI decommissioning under 10 CFR 72.30(b), adjusted for ownership share, as of September 30, 2012.

2.2 Detailed Cost Estimate Attachments 2 through 10 provide excerpts from EGC's DCEs for the subject nuclear units, detailing the costs of ISFSI decommissioning in 2012 dollars. The Attachments show these costs for EGC performing this work (discussed further in the assumptions below), with an adequate contingency factor, to meet the 10 CFR 20.1402 criteria for unrestricted use.

Page 2 ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan 1.0

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC) maintains decommissioning cost estimates (DCEs) for each of its nuclear units, which are periodically updated. Some of these estimates have been provided to the NRC in response to requests for information (References 1 - 3).

Embedded in the DCEs maintained by EGC, are the costs associated with decommissioning the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSls) co-located at the site. EGC has extracted from these DCEs, and provides herein, information supporting this required response.

EGC notes that radiological decommissioning costs for ISFSls typically consist of the costs associated with removing and disposing of small volumes of neutron-activated concrete and certain structural steel components. No impact is expected upon soil and groundwater at any of EGC's sites during the storage periods contemplated in the DCEs. EGC also notes that induced radioactivity at its ISFSls is not expected to result in residual radioactivity in excess of 25 mRem/yr in an unrestricted release scenario, were no action to be taken to remediate the site.

However, since EGC anticipates small, but measurable amounts of induced radioactivity to be present, and release of this material from EGC's sites will require it to be disposed of at a NRC-licensed radioactive waste disposal facility, EGC has included these costs in its DCEs.

2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION 2.1 Reasonable Assurance of Funds Availability EGC's trust fund balances and existing parent company guarantees (PCGs) for each of the nuclear units currently exceed the costs required for radiological decommissioning.

These excess assets will be used to decommission the on-site ISFSls. Table 1 shows the trust fund assets and PCGs, the costs estimated for radiological decommissioning under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c), and the costs estimated for ISFSI decommissioning under 10 CFR 72.30(b), adjusted for ownership share, as of September 30,2012.

2.2 Detailed Cost Estimate Attachments 2 through 10 provide excerpts from EGC's DCEs for the subject nuclear units, detailing the costs of ISFSI decommissioning in 2012 dollars. The Attachments show these costs for EGC performing this work (discussed further in the assumptions below), with an adequate contingency factor, to meet the 10 CFR 20.1402 criteria for unrestricted use.

Page 2

ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan 2.3 Assumptions EGC has made the following assumptions within the DCEs with respect to ISFSI decommissioning:

1. Decommissioning costs in Attachment 2 through 10 are escalated at 3.5% per annum into 2012 dollars.

2. All values in Table 1 are at ownership share. Costs for ISFSI decommissioning have been equally split between units at dual-unit sites.

3. Costs are expected to be incurred in the year in which DOE has accepted all spent fuel from the site for disposal.

2.4 Method of Assurance In accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b)(4), Table 1 describes the method of assuring funds for ISFSI decommissioning, from 10 CFR 72.30(e). EGC periodically updates each of the DCEs associated with the site specific assurance method and adjusts the funding levels, as necessary, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75.

2.5 Volume of Subsurface Residual Radioactivity Requiring Remediation Per review of site-specific 10 CFR 50.75(g) logs, EGC has not identified any onsite, subsurface material containing residual radioactivity at any of nine ISFSIs identified in this response.

2.6 Certification of Financial Assurance In accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b), financial assurance, for decommissioning, has been provided in an amount that meets or exceeds the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(b). As demonstrated in Table 1, this provides the requisite financial assurance for the ISFSI decommissioning cost.

Page 3 ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan 2.3 Assumptions EGC has made the following assumptions within the DCEs with respect to ISFSI decommissioning:

1. Decommissioning costs in Attachment 2 through 10 are escalated at 3.5% per annum into 2012 dollars.

2. All values in Table 1 are at ownership share. Costs for ISFSI decommissioning have been equally split between units at dual-unit sites.

3. Costs are expected to be incurred in the year in which DOE has accepted all spent fuel from the site for disposal.

2.4 Method of Assurance In accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b)(4), Table 1 describes the method of assuring funds for ISFSI decommissioning, from 10 CFR 72.30(e). EGC periodically updates each of the DCEs associated with the site specific assurance method and adjusts the funding levels, as necessary, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75.

2.5 Volume of Subsurface Residual Radioactivity Requiring Remediation Per review of site-specific 10 CFR 50.75(g) logs, EGC has not identified any onsite, subsurface material containing residual radioactivity at any of nine ISFSls identified in this response.

2.6 Certification of Financial Assurance In accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b), financial assurance, for decommissioning, has been provided in an amount that meets or exceeds the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(b). As demonstrated in Table 1, this provides the requisite financial assurance for the ISFSI decommissioning cost.

Page 3

ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan

3.0 REFERENCES

1.

Letter from P. R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. NRC, "Submittal of LaSalle County Station Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate,"

dated August 27, 2009 2.

Letter from P. R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. NRC, "Submittal of Braidwood Station Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate,"

dated January 11, 2010 3.

Letter from P. R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. NRC, "Submittal of Byron Station Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate," dated November 16, 2009 Page 4 ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan

3.0 REFERENCES

1. Letter from P. R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. NRC, "Submittal of LaSalle County Station Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate,"

dated August 27,2009

2. Letter from P. R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. NRC, "Submittal of Braidwood Station Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate,"

dated January 11, 2010

3. Letter from P. R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U. S. NRC, "Submittal of Byron Station Site-Specific SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate," dated November 16, 2009 Page 4

ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan TABLE 1 Trust Parent Part 50.75 Formula Part 50.75 Site Part 72.30 Site Unit/ License Fund Annual Company Amount Specific Specific Method of Expiration Assets Contributions Guarantee Decommissioning Decommissioning Decommissioning Assurance Cost Cost Cost Braidwood 1 252 465 636 897 2 110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

October 17, 2026 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Braidwood 2 112 277 942 695 2 110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 18, 2027 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Byron 1 281 173 624 563 110 2

10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

October 31, 2024 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Byron 2 272 038 486 678 2 110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

November 6, 2026 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Dresden 2 524 191 615 109 183 2

10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 22, 2029 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Dresden 3 861 535 615 109 2 183 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

January 12, 2031 and 10 CFR72.30e()(1)

LaSalle 1 385 461 707 721 2 239 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

April 17, 2022 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

LaSalle 2 387 846 693 620 2 239 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(1)

December 16, 2023 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Limerick 1 October 26, 2024 287,579 8,232 115,000 647,275 4,932 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(11) and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Limerick 2 297 668 105 13 647 275 4 932 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

June 22, 2029 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Oyster Creek 804 931 581 924 14 202 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

April 9, 2029 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Peach Bottom 2 203 426 323 638 853 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

August 8, 2033 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Peach Bottom 3 218 450 323 638 853 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

July 2, 2034 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Quad Cities 1 327 730 461 332 1 337 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 14, 2032 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Quad Cities 2 371 812 461 332 1 337 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 14, 2032 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Salem 1 184 131 211 399 927 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

August 13, 2036 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Salem 2 155 015 211 399 927 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

April 18, 2040 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Page 5 ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Plan TABLE 1 Trust Parent Part 50.75 Formula Part 50.75 Site Part 72.30 Site Unit! License Fund Annual Company Amount Specific Specific Method of Expiration Assets Contributions Guarantee Decommissioning Decommissioning Decommissioning Assurance Cost Cost Cost Braidwood 1 252,465 636,897 2,110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(i)

October 17, 2026 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Braidwood 2 277,112 695,942 2,110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(i)

December 18, 2027 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Byron 1 281,173 624,563 2,110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

October 31, 2024 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Byron 2 272,038 678,486 2,110 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

November 6, 2026 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Dresden 2 524,191 615,109 2,183 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 22, 2029 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Dresden 3 535,861 615,109 2,183 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

January 12, 2031 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

LaSalle 1 385,461 707,721 2,239 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

April 17, 2022 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

LaSalle 2 387,846 693,620 2,239 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(i)

December 16, 2023 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Limerick 1 287,579 8,232 115,000 647,275 4,932 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

October 26, 2024 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Limerick 2 297,668 13,105 647,275 4,932 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(ii)

June 22, 2029 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Oyster Creek 804,931 581,924 14,202 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

April 9, 2029 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Peach Bottom 2 203,426 323,638 853 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

AUQust 8, 2033 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Peach Bottom 3 218,450 323,638 853 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

July 2,2034 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Quad Cities 1 327,730 461,332 1,337 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 14, 2032 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Quad Cities 2 371,812 461,332 1,337 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

December 14, 2032 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)

Salem 1 184,131 211,399 927 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

August 13,2036 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Salem 2 155,015 211,399 927 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii)

April 18, 2040 and 10 CFR 72.30(e)(3)

Page 5 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Braidwood Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Braidwood Station

Activity ISFSI license termination Small tool allowance Insurance Property taxes Heavy equipment rental Plant energy budget Site O&M costs Security staff cost Utility Staff Cost ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Braidwood Station Braidwood LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial /

Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight (ibs.)

Manhours Manhours 91 2

53 200 1,594 317 2,255 3,406 285,146 5,550 2,560 2

220 22 242 361 35 397 73 568 91 13 104 242 35 277 4,936 326 49 375 3,740 2

492 TOTAL:

585 2

53 200 2,834 545 4,220 3,406 285,146 5,550 11,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Braidwood Station Braidwood LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.}

Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termination 91 2

53 200 1,594 317 2,255 3,406 285,146 5,550 2,560 Small tool allowance 2

2 Insurance 220 22 242 Property taxes 361 35 397 Heavy equipment rental 492 73 568 Plant energy budget Site O&M costs 91 13 104 Security staff cost 242 35 2n 4,936 Util ity Staff Cost 326 49 375 3,740 TOTAL:

585 2

53 200 2,834 545 4,220 3,406 285,146 5,550 11,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Byron Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Byron Station

Activity ISFSI license termination Small tool allowance Insurance Property taxes Heavy equipment rental Plant energy budget Site O&M costs Security staff cost Utility Staff Cost ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Byron Station Byron LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial 1 Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight(lbs.)

Manhours Manhours 84 2

51 200 1,612 317 2,264 3,410 285,192 5,746 2,560 2

220 22 242 361 35 397 486 73 557 91 13 104 244 35 279 4,936 326 49 375 3,740 TOTAL:

570 2

51 200 2,854 545 4,220 3,410 285,192 5,746 11,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Byron Station Byron LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.}

Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termination 84 2

51 200 1,612 317 2,264 3,410 285,192 5,746 2,560 Small tool allowance 2

Insurance 220 22 242 Property taxes 361 35 397 Heavy equipment rental 486 73 557 Plant energy budget Site O&M costs 91 13 104 Security staff cost 244 35 279 4,936 Util ity Staff Cost 326 49 375 3,740 TOTAL:

570 2

51 200 2,854 545 4,220 3,410 285,192 5,746 11,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Dresden Nuclear Power Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Dresden Nuclear Power Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Dresden LLRW Cu. Ft.

Burial 1 Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight(lbs.)

Manhours Manhours ISFSI license termination 136 26 92 330 1,720 390 2,694 5,350 448,008 8,428 2,560 Small tool allowance 2

2 Insurance 286 28 314 Property taxes 329 33 362 Heavy equipment rental 273 42 315 Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI fees Emergency planning fees ISFSI operating costs Site O&M costs Security staff cost 252 39 291 3,318 Utility Staff Cost 336 51 387 2,510 TOTAL:

411 26 92 330 2,923 583 4,365 5,350 448,008 8,428 8,388 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Dresden LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.}

Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termination 136 26 92 330 1,720 390 2,694 5,350 448,008 8,428 2,560 Small tool allowance 2

2 Insurance 286 28 314 Property taxes 329 33 362 Heavy equipment rental 273 42 315 Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI fees Emergency planning fees ISFSI operating costs Site O&M costs Security staff cost 252 39 291 3,318 Utility Staff Cost 336 51 387 2,510 TOTAL:

411 26 92 330 2,923 583 4,365 5,350 448,008 8,428 8,388 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for LaSalle County Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for LaSalle County Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for LaSalle County Station LaSalle LLRW Cu. Ft.

Burial !

Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight (lbs.)

Manhours Manhours ISFSI license termination 126 2

84 339 1,661 375 2,588 5,810 488,208 6,996 2,560 Small tool allowance 2

2 Insurance 284 29 310 Property taxes 361 35 397 Heavy equipment rental 463 69 534 Plant energy budget Site O&M costs Security staff cost 235 35 271 4,936 Utility Staff Cost 326 49 375 3,740 TOTAL:

592 2

84 339 2,867 592 4,477,

5,810 488,208 6,996 11,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for LaSalle County Station LaSalle LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingencl1 Costs LLRW Weight jibs.}

Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense tennination 126 2

84 339 1,661 375 2,588 5,810 488,208 6,996 2,560 Small tool allowance 2

2 Insurance 284 29 310 Property taxes 361 35 397 Heavy equipment rental 463 69 534 Plant energy budget Site O&M costs Security staff cost 235 35 271 4,936 Util ity Staff Cost 326 49 375 3,740 TOTAL:

592 2

84 339 2,867 592 4,477 5,810 488,208 6,996 11,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Limerick Generating Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Limerick Generating Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Limerick Generating Station Limerick LLRW Cu. Ft.

Burial /

Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight(lbs.)

Manhours Manhours ISFSI license termination 4,592 18 67 108 1,664 1,437 7,883 1,758 176,788 68,564 2,560 Small tool allowance 71 11 80 Insurance 308 30 337 Property taxes Heavy equipment rental 571 85 659 Plant energy budget 122 18 140 NRC ISFSI Fees 73 7

83 Site O&M costs 94 14 108 Security staff cost 209 32 239 4,978 Utility Staff Cost 291 44 335 3,792 TOTAL:

5,235 18 67 108 2,761 1,678 9,864 1,758 176,788 68,564 11,330 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Limerick Generating Station Limerick LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.}

Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termination 4,592 18 67 108 1,664 1,437 7,883 1,758 176,788 68,564 2,560 Small tool allowance 71 11 80 Insurance 308 30 337 Property taxes Heavy equipment rental 571 85 659 Plant energy budget 122 18 140 NRC ISFSI Fees 73 7

83 Site O&M costs 94 14 108 Security staff cost 209 32 239 4,978 Utility Staff Cost 291 44 335 3,792 TOTAL:

5,235 18 fjf 108 2,761 1,678 9,864 1,758 176,788 68,564 11,330 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Oyster Creek LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight(lbs.)

Manhours Manhours ISFSI license termination 2,971 1,643 1,460 1,372 7,447 19,521 2,578,520 ISFSI LIT cascading costs 1,570 555 319 2,445 Small tool allowance 59 9

68 Insurance 675 67 742 Property taxes 1,176 118 1,294 Heavy equipment rental Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees Site O&M costs Security staff cost 828 124 952 17,193 Utility Staff Cost 1,091 164 1,254 13,043 TOTAL:

4,601 1,643 5,785 2,174 14,202 19,521 2,578,520 30,236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Oyster Creek LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.l Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termi nation 2,971 1,643 1,460 1,372 7,447 19,521 2,578,520 ISFSI Lrr cascading costs 1,570 555 319 2,445 Small tool allowance 59 9

68 Insurance 675 67 742 Property taxes 1,176 118 1,294 Heavy equipment rental Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees Site O&M costs Sec urity staff cos t 828 124 952 17,193 Utility Staff Cost 1,091 164 1,254 13,Q43 TOTAL:

4,601 1,643 5,785 2,174 14,202 19.521 2.578.520 30.236 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ISFS1 Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Peach Bottom LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight fibs.)

Manhours Manhours ISFSI license termination 2

581 88 671 540 960 Small tool allowance Insurance 139 14 153 Property taxes 178 18 195 Heavy equipment rental 229 34 264 Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees 2,510 Site O&M costs 55 9

62 1,901 Security staff cost 149 22 171 Utility Staff Cost 165 25 190 TOTAL:

231 1,266 210 1,705 540 5,371 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Peach Bottom LLRW Cu. Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.l Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense tennlnatlon 2

581 88 671 540 960 Small tool allowance Insurance 139 14 153 Property taxes 178 18 195 Heavy equipment rental 229 34 264 Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees 2,510 Site O&M costs 55 9

62 1,901 Security staff cost 149 22 171 Utility Staff Cost 165 25 190 TOTAL:

231 1,266 210 1,705 540 5,371 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Activity ISFSI license termination Small tool allowance Insurance Property taxes Heavy equipment rental Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees Site O&M costs Security staff cost Utility Staff Cost Quad Cities LLRW Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency 79 16 67 224 1,268 278 2

255 25 149 22 252 37 Cu.Ft.

Burial /

Utility and Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Costs LLRW Weight(lbs.)

Manhours Manhours 1,930 4,005 335,861 5,712 1,920 2

281 172 3,734 289 1,415 TOTAL:

81 16 67 224 1,924 362 2,673 4,005 335,861 5,712 7,068 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Quad Cities LLRW Cu.Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Disposal Other Total Total Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity

~ Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs LLRW Weight {Ibs.l Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termination 79 16 67 224 1,268 278 1,930 4,005 335,861 5,712 1,920 Small tool allowance 2

2 Insurance Property taxes 255 25 281 Heavy equipment rental Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees Site O&M costs Security staff cost 149 22 172 3,734 Utility Staff Cost 252 37 289 1,415 TOTAL:

81 16 67 224 1,924 362 2,673 4,005 335,861 5,712 7,068 0

ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Salem Generating Station 0 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Salem Generating Station 0

ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Salem Generating Station Salem Off-Site LLRW Processed Cu.Ft.

Burial /

Utilityand Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Volume Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activi costs costs costs costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Cu. Ft.

LLRW Weight (lbs.)

Manhours Manhours ISFSI license termination 38 6

12 212 1

633 139 1,041 1,422 25 121,343 1,946 1,090 Small tool allowance 1

1 Insurance 69 7

77 Property taxes 151 16 166 Heavy equipment rental 218 33 251 Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees Site O&M costs 47 7

53 Security staff cost 109 16 125 2,138 Utility Staff Cost 121 18 140 1,619 TOTAL:

257 6

12 212 1

1,131 236 1,853 1,422 25 121,343 1,946 4,848 0 ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Estimate for Salem Generating Station Salem Off-Site LLRW Processed Cu. Ft.

Burial I Utility and Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Tolal Tolal Volume Class A Processed Craft Contractor Activity Costs

~ ~

Costs Costs Costs Contingencll Costs Cu.Ft.

LLRW Weight ~bs.l Manhours Manhours ISFSllicense termination 38 6

12 212 1

633 139 1,041 1,422 25 121,343 1,946 1,090 Small tool allowance 1

Insurance 69 7

77 Property taxes 151 16 166 Heavy equipment rental 218 33 251 Plant energy budget NRC ISFSI Fees Site O&M costs 47 7

53 Security staff cost 109 16 125 2,138 Utility Staff Cost 121 18 140 1,619 TOTAL:

257 6

12 212 1,131 236 1,853 1,422 25 121,343 1,946 4,848