ML12353A222

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev. 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the LaSalle County Station, Unit 2, Part 14 of 16
ML12353A222
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/2012
From: Delaney M
Stevenson & Associates
To:
Exelon Generation Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-12-163 12Q0108.50-R-002, Rev 1
Download: ML12353A222 (38)


Text

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: FY ] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 2-07 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Stored flange near rugged handwheel for valve 2E22-FO34 judged to be acceptable.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder stored near elevator wall and below phone booth judged to be acceptable.

D-127

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 2-07

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 9/412012 Evaluated by:

QI-JW*k David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 A

James Griffith 10/17/2012 Photom D-128

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: EZII N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-129

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: EZIN U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-1 30

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 7 Status: EYII N U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

L La-baiie uya D-1 31

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 7 Status: F-1 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 2-07 L

Lazaome uvi D-132

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 7 of 7 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-133

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 2-08 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder on floor away from soft targets judged to be acceptable.

D-1 34

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: FT] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 2-08

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: D. Carter & J. Griffith - 9/4/2012 Evaluated by:

gJd(Z-David Carter Date:

10/17/2012 0"4 D Ae James Griffith 10/17/2012 L

D-135

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-136

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 2 D-137

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: FYI N. U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-03 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

Minor shrinkage cracking on grout pad judged to be acceptable.

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire piping welded and well-supported. Judged to be acceptable.

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

Small amount of oil absorbent rags judged to be acceptable.

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolds adequately restrained.

D-138

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Fjj N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-03

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk - 9/10/2012 Evaluated by:

James Griffith Date:

10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 D-139

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-140

12QO108 50-R-002 Rev 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status:

-Y-- N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-141

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-142

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: EI-N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 3I D-143

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: FT] N U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-04 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut; therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable. See IR 1406922.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

Gas bottles adequately restrained.

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolds adequately restrained.

D-144

12QO108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: L-.

N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-04

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk - 9/10/2012 Evaluated by:

James Griffith Date:

10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 D-145

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-146

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status:

Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

-by 3-04 D-147

1200108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 3-04 D-148

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: F-* N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-05 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

. Each fixture support point has 2 chains installed at an angle. Chains are taut; therefore, fixtures cannot swing and fall from S-hooks. Judged to be acceptable. See IR 1406922.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

Gas bottles adequately restrained.

Metal oil rag bin with coverjudged to be acceptable.

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolds adequately restrained.

Manlift stored near column and robust pipe. Judged to be acceptable.

HEPA filter with wheel chocked less than 2 feet from junction box 2JB 1368R.

D-149

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: FY-] N U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-05 Junction box confirmed by Operations to be non-safety-related.

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk - 9/10/2012 Evaluated by:

A James Griffith Date:

10/19/2012

/

Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 Photos D-150

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: -

IN U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-1 51

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 6 Status:

Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 3 D-152

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 6 Status: -JI N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-153

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 6 of 6 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-154

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: F N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-08 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Copper air line close to or in contact with flexible conduits in 2 places. Both items are flexible. Judged to be acceptable.

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

D-155

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: r N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-08

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Minor damage to mirror insulation in room. Not a seismic concern.

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk - 9/10/2012 Evaluated by:

James Griffith Date:

10/19/2012 Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 D-156

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: EY N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 3-D-157

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 4 of 5 Status: F-1 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) 3-08 D-158

12QO108 50-R-002 Rev I Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 5 of 5 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

D-159

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-11 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

Minor lack of thread engagement at some anchors judged to be acceptable.

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Contact between conduits, pipes, and tubes in various locations judged to be acceptable due to flexibility of items.

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire piping welded and well-supported. Judged to be acceptable.

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

D-160

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: F-* N U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-11

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk - 9/11/2012 Evaluated by:

ý"4 0 A James Griffith Date:

10/25/2012

/

Michael Wodarcyk 10/25/2012 Photos D-161

12Q*108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: 7 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Blda. Elev. Room/Area):

Area Walk-bv 3-11 D-162

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. 1 Correspondence No.: RS-12-163 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-12 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2.

Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

3.

Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Overhead light fixtures judged to be acceptable.

5.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire piping welded and well-supported. Judged to be acceptable.

6.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

7.

Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

D-163

12Q0108.50-R-002 Rev. I Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-163 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F-* N U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):

Area Walk-by 3-12

8.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Seismic Walkdown Team: J. Griffith & M. Wodarcyk - 9/11/2012 Evaluated by:

James Griffith Date:

10/19/2012 1

I 004Rk Michael Wodarcyk 10/19/2012 D-164