ML12347A137

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WCAP-17675-NP, Rev. 0, Ameren Missouri Callaway Energy Center Post-Fukushima NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report, Part 5 of 6
ML12347A137
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2012
From:
Westinghouse
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ULNRC-05835 WCAP-17675-NP, Rev 0
Download: ML12347A137 (97)
v • d • e


Text

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-358 Status: Y N 7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK01 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

125 VDC BUS SWITCHBOARD Project: Callaway SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CB, 2016.00 ft, 3408 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchonme

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Unknown Anchorage was not visible.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Unknown Anchorage was not visible.
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Heircrack in floor - not a concern.
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Unknown This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is shown perDWG E-020-00015. Anchorage was not visible during the walkdown and Item was deferred to outage for opening the cabinet perjob 12004989.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Unknown potentially adverse seismic conditions?

WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-359 Status: Y N [F]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK01 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

125 VDC BUS SWITCHBOARD Anchorage was not visible.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from Impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Cabinet NK71 has 1/8*gap to equipment side bolts. CabinetNK01 will oscillate in its strong axis direction. It is assumed to have a high frequency range. CallawayEast SSE Response Spectra is used with 12Hz frequency and a 0.4g is extracted. Using a SF of 1.6, Damping of 3%, the combined responsemaximum displacement for both cabinets will be 0.09"<0. 125'... No adverse conditionexists.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

1-112N gap between pipe (with threadedconnections) on penetration OP41 W0340 and equipment,pipe is flexible in the lateraldirection and free to knock the cabinet. The fundamental Frequencyof the pipe was calculated using the equation fn=(12*p,)*SQRT(48EI/mLA3)=21 Hz, Where L-216", m- (6301bs/386.4), 1-200 inW3. This corresponds to a spectral accelerationof 0.3g. The Maximum top displacementwas then calculatedto be 6. 7E-3 < 1-112. .... No adverse condition exists.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Block Walls in room. DWG A-2325 shows seismic category 104 CMUs within the whole elevation.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-360 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK01 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

125 VDC BUS SWITCHBOARD Evaluated by: Samer EI-Bahey Date: 11116/2012 Randall Wilson 11/19/2012 NK016710 NK016711 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-361 Status: Y N [

Seismic Walkdown Checklst (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NKOI Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

125 VDC BUS SWITCHBOARD NrU1g(10 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-362 Status: Y N FU"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NKOI Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

125 VDC BUS SWITCH NKU15717 KU1 a 11 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-363 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK21 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

Description:

125 VDC NO 1 Project: Callaway SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CB, 2016.00 ft, 3408 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraoe

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

OK perE-051-00059.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-364 Status: Y N []-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK21 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

Description:

125 VDC NO 1 Interaction Effect*

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadcable trays are well supportedto unistrutframes from roof.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Whole room is block walls, DWG A-2325 shows seismic category Il CMUs within the whole elevation.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cabinetinternals could not be accesses during at-power walkdowns.

Internalswill be inspected duringnext bus outage.

Comments Evaluated Samer EI-Bahey Date: 11/1612012 Randall Wilson 11/1912012 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-365 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK21 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Equipment

Description:

125 VDC NO I Photos N

WCAP-1 7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-366 Status: Y N [']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK21 Equipment Class: (16) Inverters Eouioment Descriotion: 125 VDC NO NK216722 NK216723 NZDIZ274 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-367 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK41 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

DIST 125 VDC Project Callaway SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CB, 2016.00 ft, 3408 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space Is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Unknown Anchorage was not visible.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Unknown Anchorage was not visible.
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Unknown This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification Is required.)

Anchorage is shown per DWG E-020-00006.Anchorage was not visible duringthe walkdown and Item was deferred to outage for opening the cabinet perjob 12004989.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Unknown potentially adverse seismic conditions?

WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-368 Status: Y N [l]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK41 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment

Description:

DIST 125 VDC Anchorage was not visible.

Intermction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes 5/A gap between equipment and NK51. Cabinet NK041 and adjacentcabinet will oscillatein theirstrong axis direction. They are assumed to have a high frequency range. Callaway East SSE Response Spectra is used with 12Hz frequency and a 0. 4g is extracted.Using a SF of 1.6, Damping of 3%, the combined response maximum displacementfor both cabinetswill be
0. 09"<0.625'... No adverse condition exists.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

OverheadHVAC is well support.

Block Walls in room, DWG A-2325 shows seismic category 1II0 CMUs within the whole elevation.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comtment Evaluated by: Samer EI-Bahey Date: 11/16/2012 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-369 Status: Y N[F]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: NK41 Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels DIST 125 VDC WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-370 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RP289 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

DC DISTRIBUTION Project: Callaway SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1513 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the Item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Panelis bolted to P1053 top and bottom, 37.5' apart. The P1053is anchoredto the concrete wall at each end (4 anchorbolts). OK per C-2605.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-371 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RP289 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

DC DISTRIBUTION Interacton Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overheadcable trays are well supportedto frame from roof and wall.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cabinetinternalscould not be accesses during at-power walkdowns.

Internals will be inspected during next bus outage.

Comments Evalua Samer EI-Bahey Date: 11/16/2012 Randall Wilson 11/1912012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-372 Status: Y N []

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: RP289 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment

Description:

DC DISTRIBUTION photos WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-373 Status: M-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SGK04A Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment

Description:

CONTROL ROOM ANC UNITS Project Callaway SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1512 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorsue

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Jam nut on one bolt is not full nut engaged-not a seismic concern. No further action was taken as both the primaryand jam nuts appearto be tight. Both nuts are full nuts; haff nut for ajam nut is acceptedper plantpersonnel.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Grout is chipped out nearone comer - not a concern.

Some abnormalityin the concrete pad face around two anchor bolts. No seismic concern; grout extends to outer edge of structuralbase frame; a short section of grout is impacted. No signs of cracks extending to anchorbolts.

Judges not a concern.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies If the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-374 Status: I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SGK04A Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment

Description:

CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS Intertion Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Pipe storage area adjacent.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

HVAC is well supportedon frames from roof.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Commants Evaluated by: Samer EI-Bahey Date: 11/16/2012 11/19/2012 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-375 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo.: SGKO4A Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment

Description:

CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS Phot WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-376 Status: MI-N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SGK04A Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers ipmant

Description:

CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS SGK04A6947 SGK04A6948 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-377 Status: M'] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: SGK04A Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Eouloment Descrxition: CONTROL ROOP SGK04A6949 SGK04AS950 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 A-378 Status: FT N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TEGOIA Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CCW SURGE TANK A Project Callaway SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 It, 1503 Manufacturer/Model:

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae

1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

OK per M-2G024, C-2C1943 PadAP.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?

WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-379 Status: r" N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TEG01A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment

Description:

CCW SURGE TANK A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes 3/4" gap between pipe horizontal support and tank verticalsupport, not a concern.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes Two valves (top and bottom) of tank are connected to a verticalpipe which is supportedat close intervals. The Equipment QualificationReport M-105A-68 (page 4A) specifies that the naturalfrequency of the tank in any directionis greaterthan 33 Hz, from which it is concluded in page 5A that the equipment is rigidly connectedat the support legs. Hence no differential movement will be encountered between the tank and the pipe and the pipe is judged to be adequate for flexibility concerns.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Samer EI-Bahey Date: 11116/2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-380 Status: M* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo.: TEG01A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers SURGE TANK A WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-381 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TEGOIA Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eaulment Descrioton: CCW SURGE TANK A TEG01AS923 TEG01A6924 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure 1 to ULNRC-05835 A-382 Status: I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.: TEG01A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eaui*went Descriotion: CCW SURGE TANK A WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-1 APPENDIX B AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCS)

November 2012 WCAP- 7675-NP WCAP-I17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-2 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 1974, 1112 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-3 Status: v N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 1974,1112

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: I*?

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 1974, 11120230 November 2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-4 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 1974, 1113 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray is mounted on frames that are anchored to the wall and ceiling with adequatefill.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-5 Status: F-] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 1974,1113 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4" Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 1974, 11130283 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-6 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area AUX, 1974, 1114 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

There is a material box at the cornerof the room with one spring nut that is not properly mounted, butjudged adequate.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

Surface oxidation of anchorfor SGL 12A.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Lightly loaded tray, supportedon frame (unistrut) anchored to ceiling.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-7 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 1974, 1114 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: 4*?

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 1974, 11140295 Area #AUX, 1974, 11140296 November 2012 WCAP- I 7675-NP WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-8 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 1974, 1115 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-9 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 1974, 1115 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments

/ý - A 0ý Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 1974, 11150269 Area #AUX, 1974, 11150270 WCAP-! 7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-10 Status: Y] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 1974,1115

/ A Area #AUX, 1974, 11150271 Area #AUX, 1974, 11150272 Area # AUX, 1974, 11150273 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-11 Status: Y F U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 1974,1126 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially No adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Instrument Tubing support with no grout under base plate EMCOOO1 (Permanentlyremoved from service). CAR 20126775 was createdto investigate if there are any safety related items in the room that could have seismic interaction issues with the tubing support.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Instrument tubing and support cuts through insulation. 1-1/2" gap from pipe, judged not a concern. Pipe is laterally supportednearby.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-12 Status: YE U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 1974, 1126 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by:

/ý /;;;z - - Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 1974, 11260302 Area # AUX, 1974, 11260303 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revis ion 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-13 Status: Y 7N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

AriznitAllY 1q174 119snnul Area #AUX, 1974, 11260305 Area iF AuA, -1tl 14, -11 ZOUJUID WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-14 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1301 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays are supported on both unistrut and structure steel frame hanger, judged adequate.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Unsecure tool cabinet on wheels is 21" away from a 1-1/2" pipe, judged not to be a concern.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-15 Status: V N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 2000, 1301 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010315 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-16 Status: M-i N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1301 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010316 Area # AUX, 2000, 13010317 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010318 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010319 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010320 November 2012 WCAP- 17675-NP WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-17 Status: T] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1301 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010321 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010322 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-18 Status: F] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1301 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010324 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-19 Status: [-* N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000,1301 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010326 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010325 Area # AUX, 2000, 13010327 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010328 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 Status: rV N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 2000, 1301 Area #AUX, 2000, 13010330 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-21 Status: [-V N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1310 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-22 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1310 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Tagged ladder is well braced between the wall and the pipe.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: " Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012

  1. 7 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 November 2012 WCAP- 7675-NP WCAP-l17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-23 Status: {-Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1322 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

The ductwork is judged to be well supported. Also, there is a hoist in the area whose chain is judged to be adequately secured.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

Nitrogen cylinder is observed (non-flammable) and well supported.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-24 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1322 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-25 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1322 Area # AUX, 2000, 13220512 Area # AUX, 2000, 13220513 ixrea;FAuA, zuuu, -ijizLuo4 Area #AUX, 2000, 13220516 Area # AUX, 2000, 13220517 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-26 Status: [-* N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1323 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Hoist and chain park - chain in an open Tube Steel member.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-27 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1323 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: t

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 DSCN0332 DSCN0337 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-28 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026,1403 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays are supportedon frames that are anchored to the ceiling and ductwork is mounted on rod hangers. Judged to be adequate.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

1/2" gap between PK52 and PK42, but some panel bolting is in contact.

According to site personnel, both cabinets are Non-Safety related therefore no seismic concern will arise due to contact during vibration.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-29 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1403 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Unsecured breakerlift is near PNO2, RFR #14849A. Also, according to site personnel PN02 is Non-Safety Related therefore not a seismic concern.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments

,4 ,/ -

Evaluated by:

1% ~ Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012

  • ------ŽŽ Same r EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 November 2012 WCAP-I 7675-NP WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-30 Status: F-] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1403 Area #AUX, 2026, 14030377 Area #AUX, 2026, 14030378 Area # AUX. 2026,14030379 Area #AUX, 2026, 14030380 Area #AUX, 2026, 14030381 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-31 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1406 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Hoist is in park position and chain is restrained.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

There is minor surface oxidation on anchor for SGL12A.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays are supported on unistrut frames hangers.

Ductwork is supportedand braced by angle iron.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Instrument and tubing are independentlysupported, but tubing is judged to have adequateflexibility.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-32 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1406 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4 - Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area # AUX, 2026, 14060393 Area # AUX, 2026, 14060394 November 2012 17675-NP WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-33 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1408 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays are supported by unistrut hangersand braced.

Ductwork is rod hung and supportedon angle iron.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-34 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1408 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: '4" ' Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 WCAP-1 7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-35 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1409 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Well supportedcable trays with braced unistrut frames.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-36 Status: [-Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026, 1409 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: ' A Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area #AUX, 2026, 14090519 November 2012 WCAP- 17675-NP WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-37 Status: l N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026,1410 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays supported on unistrut hangerand floor to ceiling Tube Section.

Duct work is supportedon "W'steel section alljudged o.k.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-38 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2026,1410 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-39 Status: Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2047.5,1501 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant No degraded conditions?

Oxidation for anchorbolts of SGKO4B. CAR 201207170 was initiatedto clean the corrosion off the bolts.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Unistruthangers for cable trays are well supported, HVAC ducts are well supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-40 Status: Y
  • U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2047.5, 1501 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold vertical ladders in scaffold rack is not laterallysupported, not a seismic concern. Ladders would not fall on Safety Related equipment. Plant helpers were contacted and will correct following train swap.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: *

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 7 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area # AUX, 2047 Area # AUX, 2047 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-41 Status: Y [7 U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 2047.5,1501 ArRPgXtIJA /t]4/ 1Arp*q=AA IJx J'l1a Area # AUX, 2047 Area #AUX, 2047 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-42 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: CB, 2000, 3302 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Transfer switch NK76 has 1/4" gap to chargerNK26, Cabinetdimensions are 73"L X 46WX 36"D and 72L X 30"WX 18" Deep. CabinetNK76 and adjacentcabinet will oscillate in their strong axis direction. They are assumed to have a high frequency range. Callaway East SSE Response Spectra is used with 12Hz frequency and a 0.4g is extracted. Using a SF of 1.6, Damping of 3%, the combined response maximum displacement for both cabinets will be 0.09"<0. 25", no adverse condition exists.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?

WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-43 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : CB, 2000, 3302

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

270080101 is in front of a block wall, NK78 is between two block walls. DWG A-2325 shows seismic category Il/I CMUs within the whole elevation.

Comments Evaluated by: JK9

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4 / Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area # CB, 2000, 33020538 Area # CB, 2000, 33020539 WCAP-1 7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-44 Status: EY N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : CB, 2000, 3302 Area; ubr, zuuu, 33UZUb4l Area # CB. 2000. 33020540 Area # CB, 2000, 33020544 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-45 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Blda. Elev. Room/Are. Area: CB, 2000, 3302 Area # CB, 2000, 33020546 Area # CB, 2000, 33020547 Area # CB, 2000, 33020548 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-46 Status: Y N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : CB, 2047.5, 3601 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

Anchorage is not visible, but no indication to suspect degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Ceiling tiles and diffusers are seismic category II/I per A-2332 and A 2906.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-47 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : CB, 2047.5, 3601 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4 / Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 November 2012 WCAP- 7675-NP WCAP-l17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-48 Status: Y EiN U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : CB, 2047.5, 3605 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Saw some welding that was exposed, see notes on NFO39A.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

See comment to #1.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray with adequatefill conduits and HVAC ducting support from ceiling and braced.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Observed a 2" pipe with threadedconnection and well supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions No associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- I7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-49 Status: Y W U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: CB, 2047.5, 3605 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

1) Storage Cabinet within 9.5" from RJO5OF. This is Item 8 on Drawing M-2G052. This item was addressedon page 15 of RFR 17572A. Hence, OK.
2) Gap between SAO75A and SAO66A is 1/4". CabinetSAO66A is considered rigid in its strong axis direction. CabinetSAO75A will oscillate it its weak axis direction. Since depth is 24", it is conservatively assumed to have a frequency Of 10.8 Hz (PerNP-7146-SLR1) at Elev. 2047.5'. Callaway East SSE Response Spectra is used with 10.8Hz frequency and a 1.Og is extracted.

Using a SF of 1.6, Damping of 3%, the response maximum displacement will be 0. 15"<O.25"... No adverse condition exists.

3) Plastic OP sign stored next to RJO5OH, judged not a concern.
4) Ladder near RP068 will knock againstcabinet.Ladder will be addressed in CAR 201206775. Restraintwill be corrected,no job required.
5) Three Drawerfiling cabinets againstSBO3OB. This is items 13 on Dwg M-2G052, 6' Supply Cabinetis restrainedwith shallow wall anchors per note on drawing per RFR 15112A. The associatedRFR 15112A states to provide restrainthaving strength of 2.5 times weight of the item and contents. Hence, OK.
6) Storage cabinet (78" tall) is 13" away from RPO53EB. This is item 14 on DWG M-2G052. The Seismic Il/I evaluation on Page 4 of 7, specifically paragraph5 documents the approval to store this item. Hence, OK.
8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: / Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 74-Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 November 2012 17675-NP WCAP- I17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-50 Status: Y FN-] U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area C:B, 2047.5, 3605 Area # CB, 2047 Area # CB, 2047 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-5 1 Status: Y N] U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : CB, 2047.5, 3605 Area # UB, 2047 Area # CB, 2047 Area # CB, 2047 Area ; L;b, Zu41 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-52 Status: Y wI U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

,2047.5, 3605 Area # CB, 2047 Area # CB, 2047 Area # CB, 2047 WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-53 Status: l N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: DGB, 2000, 5203 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Light to medium loading cable trays.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
1) Junction box is totally supportedby a conduit, J-box support on conduit and not wall is judged adequate per Dwg. C-2605, Rev. 1, Note 7.
2) Tool cabinetis unanchoredbut chained 1" away from LEHS97, LEHSO097 is Non-Safety Related. Hence, impact is judged not a concern.
3) Emergency tool box is 5" away from a pipe. Ladder is 18" from NE 107.

Emergency Tool Box was investigated and was found to be anchored from inside to the floor.

4) Tool cabinet is 4" away from Getronics. Getronics are Non-Safety Related.
5) Unchained Ladder (Possibledue to TSO). Not a concern.
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-54 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: DGB, 2000, 5203 Overheadpiping with threadedconnections and Victaulic couplings is judged to be adequately supported.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Ladder See note 4, 18" from NE 107.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 4 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-55 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: DGB, 2000, 5203 Area # DGB, 2000, 52030211 Area # DGB, 2000, 52030212 Area # DGB, 2000, 52030213 Area # DGB, 2000, 52030214 November 2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-56 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: ESW, 2000, U104 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Lightly loaded cable trays are well supportedon braced frames, judged not to be a seismic concern.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Couple of permit ladders and scaffolds, no concern.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-57 Status: T N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: ESW, 2000, U104 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012 Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area # I:vv, 2UUU, UIU4U114 Area # tbW, 2uuu, U1 U4U1 1b November 2012 WCAP-l 7675-NP WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-58 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: ESW, 2000, U104 Area* ESW 20O00 mu1O4h Area # ESW, 2000, U1040117

/-*rppi 3x* i-.",*vv /;[ilii11ll41111miri i .rA mn

= n .. ,P I f IflIfI I i11q~11A III Area # bSW, 2uuu, U1U4U12U Area # ESW, 2000, U1040121 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-59 Status: Y] N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: ESW, 2000, U104 Area # ESW, 2000, U1040122 Area # ESW, 2000, U1040123 November 2012 WCAP- 7675-NP WCAP-117675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-60 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: FB, 2000, 6105 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Hoist in parked position and chain is secured.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Lightly loaded tray adequately supportedand braced.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-61 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: FB, 2000, 6105 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: / Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012

  1. Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area # FB, 2000, 61050370 November 2012 WCAP- 7675-NP WCAP-117675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-62 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: UHS, 2000, U301 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduits support with steel tube off wall (Goodsupport) and HVAC is well supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

There is a 3/8" between QJ169A and the adjacent wall, not safety related equipment, therefore not a concern.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-63 Status: N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: UHS, 2000, U301 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Work was in progress, therefore observed craftsman tools in the area.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: I*?

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012
  1. --Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 Area # UHS, 2000, U3010084 Area # UHS, 2000, U3010085 WCAP- 17675-NP XT.""n' A1 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-64 Status: [v N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: UHS, 2000, U301 Area 1; UH,, 2UUU, UiUIUUM5 Area # UHS, 2000, U3010087 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-65 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: UHS, 2035, U306 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?

Motor anchoris mildly corroded; otheranchors around the area have varying corrosionissues. Not a seismic concern.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Well supportedand light cable trays.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-66 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: UHS, 2035, U306 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012

] Samer EI-Bahey 11/16/2012 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-67 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 1989, 1206 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

LEO T-Hanger 2" pipe supported on rod hanger with Victaulic coupling approximately50' run.

Victaulic coupling failure judge not to be an impact concern (no equipment under line) and oily waste is not pressurized therefore not a spray hazard.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-68 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 1989,1206

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: ,*?

  • Apostolos Karavoussianis Date: 11/16/2012

. Curtis Stundebeck 11/19/2012 Area #AUX, 1989, 12060434 Area #AUX, 1989, 12060435 WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0 to ULNRC-05835 B-69 Status: *N U (AWC)

Area Walk-By Checklist Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1326 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-70 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area: AUX, 2000, 1326 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: /9 " " Apostolos Karavousslanis Date: 11/16/2012

( Z,/ic4_1_ Curlis Stundebeck 11/19/2012 WCAP-1 7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-71 Status: M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): Area : AUX, 2000, 1331 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially Yes adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Yes degraded conditions?
3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and Yes HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g.,

condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Yes interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes that could cause a fire in the area?
7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions Yes associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and WCAP-1 7675-NP November 2012 Revision 0

Enclosure I to ULNRC-05835 B-72 Status: [-M N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location (Bldg, Bev, RoomlArea): Area: AUX, 2000,1331 temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments Evaluated by: ,9

  • Apostolos Karavousslanis Date: 11/16/2012 (i*L ,.urti$ Stundebeck 11/19/2012 DSCN0455 November 2012 WCAP- 17675-NP WCAP- 17675-NP November 2012 Revision 0
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12347A137&oldid=2459030"