ML12341A361

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TMPE-12-0294, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report, 10 CFR 50.54(f) Section 2.3 Seismic Response, Appendix C, Page C-336 Through C-426
ML12341A361
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/2012
From: Harvey W
Detroit Edison, Co, DTE Energy
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NRC-12-0075 TMPE-12-0294, Rev 0
Download: ML12341A361 (91)


Text

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet I of 3 Status: 0 N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P624 Equip. Class1 20, Instrumentation & Control Panels Equipment Description H21-P624 Div. I Bus 64C Dedicated Shutdown Panel Location: Bldg. AB2 Floor El. 613 '-6" Room, Area Room B-11, Col. G-10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Hoffman, Model A-3OH3OBLP Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Not applicable. See August 22, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

See August 22, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

See response to Question 2 above.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See response to Question 2 above.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See response to Question 2 above.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not applicable. See August 22, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

YE N[-

YEI NE UEr N/A%

YE NE UEr N/A*

YEI NEI UE N/A YE NE UE N/A YE-NEI UE1 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-336

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: (

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID)No. H21 P624 Equip. Class' 20, Instrumentation & Control Panels Equipment Description H21-P624 Div. 1 Bus 64C Dedicated Shutdown Panel Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

See August 22, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

See response to Question 7, above.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

See response to Question 7, above.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Not applicable. See August 22, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

YEi NEI UE] N/A~f YE] NEI U3 NIA')(

YE] NI] UE] N/Ad YEI] NEI UE-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The door on the instrument panel was opened to permit evaluating the adequacy offasteners securing components mounted inside. None of the components weighed more than two pounds. No adverse conditions were identified See Photo 1, attached Y4NEI UE TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-337

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sh t 3 of 3 Status: 9 N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P624 Equip. Class' 20, Instrumentation & Control Panels Equipment Description H21-P624 Div. 1 Bus 64C Dedicated Shutdown Panel Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchorage and Interaction Effects were evaluated during an A ugust Walkdown and results reported in a Seismic Walkdown Checklist dated August 22, 2012. However, during the Walkdown, the door on the instrument panel was not opened to afford Seismic Walkdown Engineers an opportunity to inspect anchorage on components inside the panel. A September 18, 2012, NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions about opening cabinet doors led to consider increasing the scope of the August 22 Walkdown. Therefore, the scope of this Walkdown included unlocking and opening the panel door and evaluating fasteners securing components mounted inside.

-)

ei~nic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Qualified Evaluator #1 :

I D( Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-S3Qualified Evaluator #2:

1&

r Date:

Date:

10 et/

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-338

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P624 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description H21-P624 Div. 1 Bus 64C Dedicated Shutdown Panel ES SENTAL BUS 640.

Photo 1, Close-Up View of Inside of Shutdown Panel TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-339

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet Elf 3 Status: Y U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equip. Class' 20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel Div I Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 613 '-6" Room, Area Switchgear Room (B-11)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

N/A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraize

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YTN NIl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

1 welded to embeddedplate and 3 welded to bolted base plate.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YO NI] UI-N/A-]

All base anchorage connections complete. See question No. 5for configuration control issue.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Welds painted Anchor bolts free of corrosion.

(SEPi'1Cm. 4gP-e 03o~3-~

.v 1OCkc112.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Concrete at anchor bolts and embedded plate free of corrosion and cracks in concrete.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing has configuration error - Section G-G is incorrect for the front right leg - As-built condition is as shown on section D-D from H21P626. Verification and drawing update required (ref Dwg.

E-2998-05). CARD 12-26837 has been issued to track drawing configuration error. Welds of unistrut are consistent with drawing and YEP NI] Ul1 N/Al]

Y*] NI] Ul] N/Al]

YI' NA Ul] N/Al]

SC a%

N`

P t

(3 co welding offront legs to equipment is consistent with drawing. s CC-.-,,t,-,

-,-5 I-a-t o11 -41:.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YP NI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ared i. ve; 6V r

JAM 1Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment

  • 'z

--A 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-340

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y (S) U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equip. Class' 20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel Div I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Phone and speaker robustly mounted. Operations green box anchored to the wall with 6 3/8" 0 concrete expansion anchors.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lights on cable and wire. Cable tray seismically supported Y9I NE UD N/Aj YKNO UJ N/Al

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YK1 NO U] N/AO Bottom entry to cabinet flex in 12" radius approx. (See-P;c4,re. D*Sc NOo3)

Ll,,es kov e A~Atoa 4e {-

JAM ID/W~/M~

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YjaNE UO No4-1e T kfis cist+ ;s I ockeAý cio A w~oo Id ret cir e~t,.~

be 6~n 1OC th're~r p*'?.

POO

'o r104 0PC~k'eJ. l3aSe oco wviSe.s4eri~t' or-id 'eri4~;d~le J. A t'i Wh Vt2.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-341

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 3 of3 Status: Y 1-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Y 12,f6: 16' Equip. Class'

,7(

J

")MFJVT PAA)&L Equipment Description tpTR-Mr_ A:M5

.4 MTedIA/

)

L A

4a/

(pjroL fA Atrr L.._

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) e, 915 U-P6S,,qs NO-&-j-c

,o/,z/,i.

NoW" Per NEI7 Focus GvLpo resfopl

+o Fre+we40, AikeJ QlAes+i'ons (FAQ.)

JAtA MdeJ Sep+e-her-Ig ý09, a s&typlesn't+al 6er%* Walkdop.~ WA*S ConJdc+P-d 6n Oc4cdber-S, 7.o0 P.+ ops, +'he ?.oneI aipd0,',ale inspec+

jos~e. T1he $ppler~eni-oal S'C 4 ollows Whs Swc..

P4 Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Qualified Evaluator# I TQ 4_j ISeismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Quaified Evaluator #2 Date: (214A/

CIzL Date:

(4/YLQ 11_

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-342

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel DIV]

(DSCN0303)

General Mounting Configuration TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-343

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel DIV]

(DSCN0305)

Bolting Configuration to Concrete Floor TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-344

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel DIV]

(DSCN0306)

Bolting Configuration to Concrete Floor (Rear)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-345

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel DIV]

(DSCN0309)

Bolting Configuration to Concrete Floor (Front)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-346

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 1 of 3 Status:YN U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9118/12 NEt Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equip. Class' 20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Panel, Local Control Panel Div. 1 Location: Bldg. AB2 Floor El. 613'-6" Room, Area Switchgear Room B-11, Col. G-10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

N/A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Not applicable. See August 14, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

See August 14, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

See response to Question 2, above.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See response to Question 2, above.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See response to Question 2, above.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not applicable. See August 14, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

YE-NE YE NEI UE N/Az YE NEI UE N/A YEI NEI UE N/AK YEI NE UE N/A%$

Y[-] NEI U3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Appe ndix2 TMPE-12-0294 Page C-347

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEl Focus Group.response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equip. Class1 20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Panel, Local Control Panel Div. 1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

See August 14, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

8. Are overhead ecuipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

See response to Question 7, above.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

See response to Question 7, above.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Not applicable. See August 14, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 8, 2012.

YE NE U0 N/AX YE NE UE N/Aul4 YE NE UE N/A*]

YE NE U0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The door on the instrument panel was opened to permit evaluating the adequacy offasteners securing components mounted inside. None of the components weighed more than two pounds. No adverse conditions were identified See Photos 1, 2 & 3 attached TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-348

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Uý_ N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equip. Class' 20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Panel, Local Control Panel Div. 1 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchorage and Interaction Effects were evaluated during an August Walkdown and results reported in a Seismic Walkdown Checklist dated August 14, 2012. However, during the Walkdown, the door on the instrument panel was not opened to afford Seismic Walkdown Engineers an opportunity to inspect anchorage on components inside the panel. A September 18, 2012, NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions about opening cabinet doors led to consider increasing the scope of the August 14 Walkdown. Therefore, the scope of this Walkdown included unlocking and opening the panel door and evaluating fasteners securing components mounted inside.

Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Qualified Evaluator 1 Date:

Ic'o~ 1-2, N Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Qualified Evaluator #2: 2 J-J Date:

0 /08I2, TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-349

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel Div. 1 Photo 1, Close-Up View of Inside of Panel TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-350

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P628 Equipment Class:

20, Instrument Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown Local Control Panel Div. 1 Photo 2, Close-Up View of Hinge on Left Side of Mounting Plate TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-351

Seismic WalkdoWn1 Pictures Equipment ID No. -2P628 Equipment Class Equipment Descptited Shutdown Local Control Panel Div.

b photo 3, Close-Up View of Welds on Right Side of Mounting plate page C-352 Appendix C

TMPEi2-02 94

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet I of 3 Status:(

N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equip. Class' 20-Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Location: Bldg. RB Floor El.

2 Room, Area A-17, Col C-10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Hoffman Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

All anchorage is present and secure. See pictures 11 and 19.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

The anchorage did not exhibit any corrosion or oxidation!

Yo NEI Y4 NEI UE N/AO YM NEI U-N/A-

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y;W NEI UI-N/AZ No concrete cracks were observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y]'

NEI Ui N/AE]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration matches the sketches drawn on pages 11 and 14 of calculation DC-5869 Vol IJRev 0. (*a c-,

,-.s t *I I aol 2.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the.anchorage free of Y;4 NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment M

/ps 10/5/,

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-353

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equip. Class' 20-Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

The panel is freefrom impact because all nearby equipment and structures are appropriately restrained

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead equipment, distribution systems, and lighting are adequately restrained There are no ceiling tiles or masonry block walls in the vicinity. See pictures 13 and 18

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines are looped to provide adequate flexibility. See picture

21. In addition, the unistrut will absorb some energy
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YD NEI UEI N/AEI YW NEI UOI N/AEJ YgD NEI UEI N/Al!

YgND un Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC4 NEI UE!

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

MPS TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-354

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist

.Shett 3 of 3 Status: n(N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

-121 PG32-Equip. Class'20-ýr EcAvviwviro-iov¢*, eai( ClI. PA 1

hP.(5 Equipment Description DedLcd.eJ.d ktA~dow MCC 72

-A Local OC-I.

tN.I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A194ei Per NaX FoLtA,

6rPos, rsponse "{o Frqefvoh-Ask,,

'A.es+ions (FAGL) daleS 5cp4em rbes-If I,;-o 12,a re4ple mtn-d, I %k.e 1mic.

aIkJown W 4 s Co,*c~uc4ed o n Oc-4ober-I,A0o12, o open 4he. p&nel ard Vj ui nSpec-f insigle. The trtplene,4+a) SC.L -follows ÷q SLUc.

JAMA 101ALy Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Qualified Evaluator #1 :

RZAC

-U 9 Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53Qualified Evaluator#2: -AcA AA0t AAQ 1 Date:

? S 1.2-Date:

7/5/12 TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-355

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20, Instrumentation & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel (PICTURE # 11)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-356

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20, Instrumentation & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel (PICTURE # 13)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-357

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20, Instrumentation & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel (PICTURE # 18)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-358

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20, Instrumentation & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel (PICTURE # 19)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-359

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20, Instrumentation & Control Panel Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel (PICTURE # 21)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-360

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Location: Bldg.

RB Floor El. 613 '-6" Room, Area: Room A-17. Col. C-1O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Hoffman Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Not applicable. See September 5, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 1, 2012.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

See above.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

See above.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See above.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See September 5, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 1, 2012.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Not applicable. See September 5, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Check-list and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 1, 2012.

YII NEI Y-I NE] UE-N/Ax YE] NE] UE] N/Ad YE] NEI UE] N/Ax YE] Nn] UE] N/A YEI NEI UE]

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-361

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: b*.N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

See September 5, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 1, 2012.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

See above.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

See above.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Not applicable. See September 5, 2012, Seismic Walkdown Checklist and comment on page 3 on this checklist dated October 1, 2012.

YE. NE] UE-N/A YEI NE] U[I N/Alý YE-NEI U-I N/AIX YE NLI UEI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The door on the instrument panel was opened to permit evaluating the adequacy offasteners securing components mounted inside. Only one of the components weighed more than two pounds. No adverse conditions were identified. See Photos 1, 2 & 3 attached.

VgNEI UE]

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-362

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

[Note: This Walkdown's scope was limited to cabinet internals per 9/18/12 NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions.]

Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equip. Class' 20 - Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchorage and Interaction Effects were evaluated during a September Walkdown and results reported in a Seismic Walkdown Checklist dated September 5, 2012. However, during the September 5 Walk-down, the door on the instrument panel was not opened to afford Seismic Walkdown Engineers an opportunity to inspect anchorage on components inside the panel. A September 18, 2012, NEI Focus Group response to Frequently Asked Questions about opening cabinet doors led to consider increasing the scope of the September 5 Walkdown. Therefore, the scope of this Walkdown included unlocking and opening the panel door and evaluating fasteners securing components mounted inside.

Evlug S

E ineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1:

CK Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2: Mk-e 1. 60-Date:

oc( 2.

Date:

/0 01/6-TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-363

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20 - Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Photo 1, Components Mounted Inside Instrument Panel TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-364

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20 - Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel I

I Photo 2, Close-Up of Termination Strips on Panel's Back Mounting Plate TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-365

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. H21P632 Equipment Class:

20 - Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Dedicated Shutdown MCC 72F-4A Local Ctrl Panel Photo 3, Close-Up of Bolts Supporting Panel's Front Mounting Plate TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-366

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y a U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400BOO1B Equip. Class' 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECW Div 2 Plate Frame Hx Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613'-6" Room, Area A-1 7A, Col. E-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Alfa-Laval. MX25-BFD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Anchorage is complete and in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Surface oxidation on some bolts is very minor and acceptable.

(see Photos DSCO035 & DSCO043)

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Anchored to steel plate, no cracks in concrete Yb NEI Y$ NEI UL! N/AO Yb NE] U[] N/AE]

YM NEI UE] N/A--

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Bolt material on Dwg. C-4889,*Rev. 0, does not match field condition.

Initiated CARD # 12-26590 to revise drawing. Per Vendor Dwg. #

32299-1862*, Rev 1, bolts, including material, are acceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage is not consistent with Dwg. C-4889.)

YFO NXUE-N/AL

)I k. Iob zh'.

YLI N'4UO 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-367

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet ý,of 3 Status: Y ýT) U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400BOOIB Equip. Class' 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EEC WDiv 2 Plate Frame Hx Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

None identified. Heat exchanger is not a soft target.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No ceiling tiles or masonty block walls. All other equipment is adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment is free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction.

Y*fNEI UM-N/AL Yý NO Ul N/AU Yo NE] UE-N/AL Y0 NEI U[-

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y2 " - Y" clearance between heat exchanger and TubeTrack was evaluated and found not to be a concern. Because TubeTrack is well supported and the heat exchanger is rigid, during a seismic event there will not be enough movement to cause the two components to come into contact with each other. See Photos DSC0046 & DSCO048.

YK NO UL TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-368

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y 0 U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400BOO1B Equip. Class1 21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDiv 2 Plate Frame Hx Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1 :

?

S En eer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

Date:

fd Ti-Date:

Co Ice[/,

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-369

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOO1B Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDIV2 Plate Frame HX "Bolt Configuration" (DSCN 0043)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-370

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOO1B Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDIV2 Plate Frame HX (DCSN 0035)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-371

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOO1B Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDIV2 Plate Frame HX

.I'ITII JlI M

MADE IN 3 U.S.A.IN (DSCN 0046)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-372

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOO1B Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchaneers Equipment Description EECWDIV2 Plate Frame HX C(DSCN 0048)

Clearance TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-373

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet I of 3 Status: 0N U 104 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400B001C Equip. Class' 21, Tanks & Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDiv. I Plate Frame Backup Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. RB FloorEl. 613"-6" Room, Area Room A-17, CoL A-12 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Alfa-Laval, MX25-BFD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Anchorage is in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Some anchorage has mild suiface oxidation, see photo DSC 01345.

Y NEI UO N/AU Y

NEI UD N/AU

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yý NEI UU N/AD No cracks in the concrete.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y* NEI UE-N/A[]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with Dwg C-4888, Rev. A; Vendor Dwg. 32299 1862, Rev. 1; and Index Items 35556.A002, Rev. 0,

& 35556.B003, Rev. 0. N.

AjPPeL*C^A6L-F_

F,,c-i>

,.L-e

/ b -

A641pulir 1eg90ZGijC-4b

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YA NE] UU potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorage is free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions, see photo DSC 01348.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-374

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: 9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. P4400BOO1C Equip. Class' 21, Tanks & Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDiv. I Plate Frame Backup Heat Exchanger Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No soft targets identified on heat exchanger. Nearby piping, conduits are adequately supported YX NEI UEI N/AH

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y' NEI UE1 N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No ceiling tiles, lighting or masonry block walls over this equipment.

All other commodities are adequately supported

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines to heat exchanger have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentialy adverse seismic interaction effects?

The equipment is free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction. See photo DSC 01346 Yb NEI ULI N/AD Yk NEI UH Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YtX NE UEH adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

None identified TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-375

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 3 of 3 NJPR-12-0043 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400BOOIC Equip. Class' 21, Tanks & Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECW Div. MPlate Frame Backzip Heat Exchanger Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I\\Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1
.

X Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator#2: A m-Date:

I ?-

Date:.

2.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-376

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOO0C Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EEC WDiv. I Plate Frame Heat Exchanger (DSC 01345)

Bolt Configuration TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-377

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOOlC Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EECWDiv. I Plate Frame Heat Exchanger (DSC 01346)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-378

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400BOO0C Equipment Class:

21, Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EEC WDiv. I Plate Frame Heat Exchanger (DSC 01348)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-379

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. P4400COOIA Equip. Class' 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emer:gency Eguipment Cooling Water Div.IPump Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613'-6" Room, Area A-17, Col. A-15 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Goulds, Model 3410M Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Anchorage is in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No corrosion is present.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No cracks in concrete pad or floor.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with Dwg. M-2196, Rev. I (no postings); and Calc. DC-30 76, Rev. A (postings Vol. II DCD, Rev. 0, and TCEDP 33703.003, Rev. 0).

YR/NLI Y[NE" UI'- N/AL]

YIf NEI UD N/AD Y[3'NE] U[] N/AD Y[tNEI UE-N/AED

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[L potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage is free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions.

1Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-380

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 2 of 3 Status: @ N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400COO1A Equip. Class' 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Equipment Cooling Water Div.I Pump Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Nearby equipment is adequately supported to avoid interaction with the pump as shown in Photo 015.JPG.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No ceiling tiles or block walls. Light is adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage during seismic event. See Photo 016.JPG for condition ofpump 'sflex hoses.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Equipment and adjacent commodities are adequately supported and free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction conditions. See Photo 01 7.JPG for overall view of nearby commodities.

Y[3/N-I U-I N/Al]

YEAND] U[I-N/ADl Y[9/ND UI] N/AL]

YJ'NDI ULD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI*i/NL UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other conditions found that could adversely affect equipment safety functions.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-381

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 3 of 3 NJPR-12-0043 Status:_y.) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400COOIA Equip. Class' 5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergenc Equipment Cooling Water Div.I Pump Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1 Date:

1 -1 i

- I'Z-

"* Seiic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2 Date:

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-382

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400COO1A Equipment Class:

5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Equipment Cooling Water DIV 1 Pump (016.JPG)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-383

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400COOIA Equipment Class:

5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Equipment Cooling Water DIV 1 Pump (017.JPG)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-384

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400COO1A Equipment Class:

5, Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Emergency Equipment Cooling Water DIV 1 Pump (015.JPG, Bolt to Concrete Pad)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-385

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 1 of 3 Status: @ N U NJIPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400F601B Equip. Class' 8. Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCWDiv 2, Rtrn ISO Mov (EL 600'-0")

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 583'-6" Room, Area Room A-12, ColF-JO Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

POWELL 3023WE/Limit Torque SMB-00 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No bolts to verify. Valve is welded in line with full penetration groove welds.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild corrosion (no noticeable loss of cross-section) on one or two bolts securing operator & valve. Other bolts have no corrosion or very light corrosion. (See Photos DSCO0385 & 386)

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See above. (Item #2)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse conditions were identified.

YO NT YE NEI UE" N/A[l Y*NE UEI N/AD YE] NEI U-N/AX YO NEI U" N/AX Y,

NO U[I 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-386

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: a N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400F601B Equip. Class' 8. Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCW Div 2, Rtrn ISO Mov (EL 600 '-")

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Few soft targets exist and where they do exist, none are near a potential threat.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overhead ceiling tiles and no nearby block walls. Lighting is NOT above valve and is well supported. (See Photo DSC00386)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flex hose is connected to the valve operator/motor and has adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

The valve is free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction Y*A NEI UEi N/AI Ytd NEI Ui] N/AU Ylq NEI UEI1 N/AU Y**N-UD]

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other conditions identified that could be considered adverse seismic conditions.

YNEI UU1 TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-387

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Shtu3of3 Status: (D) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400F601B Equip. Class' 8. Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCW Div 2. Rtrn ISO Mov (EL 600 '-0')

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

ISsic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator#1I Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

Date:

44 t'Z-Date:

? /

I TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-388

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400F601B Equipment Class: 8, Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCWDIV2 Return Isolation MOV (DSC00385)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-389

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400F601B Equipment Class: 8, Motor-Operated & Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCWDIV2 Return Isolation MOV (DSC00386)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-390

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet I of 3 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400F603B Equip. Class' 8, Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCWDiv. H SupplX Isolation MOV Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 583'-6" Room, Area A-12, Col. F-JO Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Powell Gate Valve, 3023 WE. Limitorque Operator SR-O Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No bolts to verify, valve is welded in line with full penetration grove welds.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild corrosion on several bolts (no noticeable loss of cross section) securing operator to valve. Other bolts have none or very little corrosion. See Photo DSC00199.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See response to Question #2, above.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse conditions were identified.

YEI N YE] NEI UE] N/A14 YE] NEI UE] N/AW YEI NEI UE] N/Ab YE] NEI UE] N/Ax YX NNE UE]

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-391

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 She 2of3 Status: *N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400F603B Equip. Class' 8. Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCW Div. II Suppl), Isolation MOV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No impact sources were identified within striking distance of valve.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are no ceiling tiles or lights above this valve. There are no nearby block walls. See Photo DSC 00200.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?.

Electrical connections to valve operator have adequate flexibility. See flex conduit in Photo DSC 00199.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YA NEI UI-N/AE]

Y?9 N[I UE-N/AL]

Yb NI] UL N/AD]

YW NOI UE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse condition were identified that could be considered adverse.

YX NEI UL TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-392

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Shbt 3 of 3 NJPR-12-0043 Status: X N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P4400F603B Equip. Class' 8, Motor Operated and Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCW Div. II Supplv Isolation MOV Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

K Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1 :

A. Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2 :

Date:

6S

  • Date:

2-G-"7 TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-393

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400F603B Equipment Class: 8, Motor/Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCWDiv. II Supply Isolation MOV (DSC00199)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-394

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P4400F603B Equipment Class: 8, Motor/Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description RBCCWDiv. H Supply Isolation MOV (DSCO0200)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-395

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 1 of 3 Status: ý N U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equip. Class' 7. Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECWDiv IHX Outlet Temp Ctrl AOV (Valve)

Location: Bldg. RB FloorEl. 613'-6" Room, Area Room A-17, Col. B-12 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Control Components Inc., JOOD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No bolts, valve is attached to pipe, not to building structure.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No bolts.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No bolts.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

No bolt configuration requiring verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No anchorage configuration issues identified during Walkdown.

YO NtK YE] NEI ULI N/AV1 YE NEI UE N/A'W YEI NEI UE N/Am YE NEI UE N/Au Y '

NE UE 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-396

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Equipment Description EECWDiv I I-X Outlet Temp Ctrl A OV (Valve)

Operated Valves Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve is within the enclosed cage. See Photos DSC 01338 & 01349.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No ceiling tiles, block walls or lighting near this asset.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines have adequate flexibility. No issues.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Southwest leg of cage is % "from pipe containing Valve P44F400A (see Photo 1). Pipe is well-supported to prevent movement toward cage.

Since the cage is light and its frame is rigid (2x2x% structured tubing),

15" above the floor, seismic movement toward the pipe will be negligible. Therefore, clearance is acceptable.

Top of cage is % " below tubing on Valve P44F400A (see Photo 2).

Tubing is well supported to prevent movement toward cage. Since cage is light and attached to floor with eight anchor bolts, sliding or upward movement during an earthquake is not possible. Therefore, clearance is acceptable.

YV NI] UE1 N/AEI YM NEI Ui N/AEl Y6 NE UDl N/AL-!

Y6 NEI U-]

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other seismic conditions found that affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Yr NEI UE-TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-397

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist She9, 3 of 3 NJPR-12-0043 Status:

IJN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECW Div I-X Outlet Temp Ctrl A OV (Valve)

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1:

Date:

P9J 12-.

Sesmic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

Date:

08

ý[

I2.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-398

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECWDiv. I HX Outlet Temp Ctrl AOV (valve)

(DSC 01349)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-399

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECWDiv. IHX Outlet Temp Ctrl AOV (valve)

(DSC 01338)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-400

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECWDiv. IHX Outlet Temp CtrlAOV (valve)

I (Photo 2)

Tubing Close to Cage TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-401

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F400A Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECW Div. I HX Outlet Temp Ctrl AOV (valve)

(Photo 1) 1 Pipe Close to Cage TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-402

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y 0 U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F402A Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Operated Valve Equipment Description V8-2364 Level Control AOV Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613'-6" Room, Area Room A-17, Col. A-15 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Fisher Controls, 667NS-ET Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

This equipment is a valve and is secured to piping, not the building structure. See Photo 006.jpg. Bolts securing valve to pipe are in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No anchorage.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchorage configuration verification is required.)

No anchorage configuration verification required.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No anchorage evaluation required for air operated valve, however bolts securing valve to pipe are in good condition. See photo 006.jpg.

YEI N YL] NEI UE N/A YE-NEI UE-N/AW YE! NE! UE! N/Az YE! NE! UE! N/As.

NEI UE!

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-403

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet3_ýf 3 Status: Y U U NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F402A Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Operated Valve Equipment Description V8-2364 Level Control AOV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve is surrounded by well-built and well-anchored structures and equipment, i.e., Column A15, EECW make-up tank, and instrument rack H21P447. This equipment and these structures will not impact the valve andfunction as a protective barrier around the valve.

YIf NO UEJ N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YP NEI UI-N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light is adequately supported No ceiling tiles and no block walls within 10'-O" of valve.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YX NE UD N/AU YDNE U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NhkU-'

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Unistrut was found to be in close contact with the bottom of valve P4400F122A. See Photo 012.jpg. CARD 12-26921 was initiated to investigate and resolve this matter.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-404

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 3 of 3 NJPR-12-0043 Status: Y U_) U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F402A Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Operated Valve Equipment Description V8-2364 Level Control AOV Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 9Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1.

\\......

I Date:

2 1 1

I ASei ngineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

Date: Ckll?.,

j V'

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-405

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F402A Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description V8-2364 Level Control A 0 V (Photo 006.JPG)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-406

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F402A Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description V8-2364 Level Control A 0 V (Photo 012.JPG)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-407

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sht t I of 3 Status: *]N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F402B Equip. Class1 7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECWM/U Tank AO02 Div.2 V8-2362 Lvl Ctrl AOV Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613'-6" Room, Area A-1 7. Col D-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Fisher Controls (Actuator Valve), ET-667NS-3582 (valve) & 667NS-ET (a ctuator) iv le 66 NS E

i.......

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No anchorage. Valve is attached to piping, not to building structure.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No anchorage.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verification is not required.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Though an anchorage evaluation was not required, no adverse anchorage conditions were identified. See Photo DSC 01024.

YEI NA Y[] NEI Ur-N/Ag YE] NI] UE] N/A*]

YEI] NEI UE] N/As YEI NEI UE] NIAK YNEI] UE]

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-408

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F402B Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Oper, Equipment Description EECWM/U Tank A002 Div.2 V8-2362 Lvl Ctrl AOV ated Valves Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is no nearby equipment, piping or conduit that could impact the valve.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

HVAC, cable trays, piping, and conduits are adequately supported.

There are no ceiling tiles, lighting or block walls in this area. See Photo DSC 01029.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Lines attached to the valve have adequate flexibility. See Photo DSC 01022.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

KNEI IJE! N/AD1 YA NEI UlD N/AD YM NEI UI N/AD NY lE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The Seismic Walkdown Team noticed a potential seismic clearance issue between the Div. 2 EECW Head Tank's 4" demin water line and its 2 "pressure relief line. It was determined that the line beyond Valve P44F402B @ Elev. 615 '-0" (4" demin water shown on Dwg. M-2152) is Group "D". Also, since the 2" dia. line is Group "D'" i.e., not safety related, there are no seismic concerns.

YAND: liD TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C409

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Vj Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44F402B Equip. Class' 7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECW M/U Tank AO02 DIV2 V8-2362 Lvl CtrlAOV Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1 :

  • ismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

Date:

1,

  • 17-Date:

12.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-410

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F402B Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECW M!U Tank A002 DIV 2 V8-2362 Lvi Ctrl AOV (DSC 01022)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-411

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F402B Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECW M/U Tank A002 DIV2 V8-2362 Lvl Ctrl AOV (DSC 01024)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-412

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44F402B Equipment Class:

7, Pneumatic Operated Valves Equipment Description EECW M/U Tank A002 DIV 2 V8-2362 Lvl Ctrl AOV (DSC 01029)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-413

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y U

NJPR-12-0043 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44K400B Equip. Class' 0. Transducer Equipment Description EECW Div. 2 Pneumatic Converter for Valve F400B Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613 '6" Room, Area Room A-17, Col. D-10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This asset is not bolted to a building structure. It is bolted to Instru-ment Rack H21P448 which is anchored to the Reactor Buildingfloor.

Anchorage of the rack is evaluated in a separate Walkdown Checklist.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Bolts are in good condition. See Photo DSC 00285.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

There are no corrosion issues.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

The transducer is bolted to an instrument rack, not concrete.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Though anchorage configuration verification was not required, the transducer was determined to be bolted to the instrument rack in accordance with Dwg. 1-2516-15, Rev. E, no postings (see Photo DSC 00285).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse seismic conditions were identified.

YEINý'

YO NDI U-] N/AD-Yý NEI U-] N/AD1 YE-NEI UE-N/AP YX NO UL N/AU YO NEI U-1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-414

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Status: U U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44K400B Equip. Class' 0, Transducer Equipment Description EECWDiv. 2 Pneumatic Converter for Valve F400B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No nearby structures. Nearby equipment is well-secured and not considered a threat.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Lighting conduit mounted on a concrete beam above the transducer is not secured at 8 '-0" intervals as required by plant drawings. See Photo DSC00296. CARD 12-26852 was initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flex hoses and instrument tubing has adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Iqgh+ltn7 caid',f 1. fof tde:.

a 1 6I7.p4'.J,

Sae Otm~imr a aboie.

rIN&162.411 Z. -

Y)ýNU UE] N/AEI YE-I NK U[I N/A[l Yt NOi U[I N/AEl YEI N)

UL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YKNE' UJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

None identified.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-415

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y & U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44K400B Equip. Class' 0, Transducer Equipment Description EECWDiv. 2 Pneumatic Converter for Valve F400B Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

For seismic evaluation of surrounding area, see Area Walk-By Checklist for Asset H21P448.

P( Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1 :

Date:

v 12, 12-f' I

Se*i Eng Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

11"1ý Date:

068Ijq-TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-416

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44K400B Equipment Class:

0, Transducer Equipment Description EECW DIV 2 Pneumatic Converter for Valve F400B (DSC 00285)

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-417

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44K400B Equipment Class:

0, Transducer Equipment Description EECW DIV 2 Pneumatic Converter for Valve F400B I (DSC 00296)

Conduit "Unsupported" TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-418

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Sheet 1 of 3 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44N401A Equip. Class' 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EECWHXBOO IA/BOO1C Rtrn T/C (Thermocouple)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613'-6" Room, Area RoomA-17, CoZA-12 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Pyco Inc., 102-3171-20-3.8-10.4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?

Sensor is welded to pipe line and decoupled from conduit with a flex connection (see Photo 003). Pipe line anchorage was evaluated during an Area Walk-by.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No anchorage.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

No anchorage configuration verification required.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No anchorage evaluation required; however, no adverse findings were identified.

YE! N YO NEI UE N/A1 YE NE! UE N/A YE! NE! UE N/Az YE! NE! UD N/AK Y'K NE UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-419

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 5 tuh~ t2of3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44N401A Equip. Class' 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EECWHXBOOI A/BOOIC Rtrn TIC (Thermocouple)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No overhead objects are nearby that could impact the sensor (see Photo 004). Strut and pipe in photo are closest objects and well supported.

Yý(NF UE-N/AEl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI UEI1 N/A[:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No ceiling tiles, lighting or masonry block walls. All other systems are adequately supported (see Photo 005).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Conduit lines attached to thermocouple have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YV NEI ULI N/AU3 YN NE U[

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y " NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

None identified.

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-420

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist Sh 00173 NJPR-12-0043 Status: Q§/) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44N401A Equip. Class' 19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EECWHXBOOIA/BOOC Rtrn TIC (Thermocouple)

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

X Seismic Engineer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #1 :

X ieer Walkdown PSE-53 Qualified Evaluator #2:

Date:

V Date:

TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-421

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44N401A Equipment Class:

19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EECWHXBOOJA/BOOJCRtrn T/C (Thermocouple)

(Photo 003)

"Thermocouple" TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-422

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44N401A Equipment Class:

19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EECW HX BOOJA/BOOJC Rtrn T/C (Thermocouple)

(Photo 004)

TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-423

Seismic Walkdown Pictures Equipment ID No. P44N401A Equipment Class:

19, Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EECW HX BOO1A/BO0IC Rtrn TIC (Thermocouple)

(Photo 005)

"Overview Area" TMPE-1 2-0294 Appendix C Page C-424

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Shet I of 3 Status: 9. N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44P403A Equip. Class' 0, Other Equipment Description N Supply Tank Storage Rack Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 613 '-6" Room, Area: Room A-] 7, Col. B-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

DECO, N/A Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

All anchorage is in good condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No corrosion is present on anchorage.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No cracks in concrete.

YtKNEI YN U[I] N/A[]

Y4* N[O U[] N/Al]

Yl NE] UI' N/Al-

.1*

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YK NEI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is consistent with Dwg. 1-2443-01, Rev. At r Calc. DC-5757 Vol. I, Rev. 0, Appendix 5; and Index Item 30844.B046 Rev. 0. See Photos 005.jpg & 015.jpg.

U] N/A-]

b-*,S V-.*<, I

%0.1241-

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

VX NEIUE 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-425

Fermi 2 Seismic Walkdown Guidance Document Seismic Walkdown Checklist NJPR-12-0043 Status:~ E2ofU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P44P403A Equip. Class1 0, Other Equipment Description N, Supply Tank Storage Rack Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Since nearby equipment and piping is well supported, the possibility of the rack's soft targets being impacted is not a concern.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No ceiling tiles or masonry block walls are in area. Lights are securely supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Since attached lines have adequate flexibiliot, seismic interaction is not a concern (see Photo O04.jpg).

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Storage rack is free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects due to adequate supports and flexibility of attached lines.

YX NEI U[] N/AU1 YX NE] UO N/AU YN NE] UD] N/AU Yý NE UU-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditionsthat could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The N2 tanks are tied off to the rack's structural frame. No adverse seismic conditions identified.

I NE UD TMPE-12-0294 Appendix C Page C-426