ML12339A593
| ML12339A593 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/2012 |
| From: | Meehan E NERA Economic Consulting |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 22161, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12339A593 (15) | |
Text
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
In the Matter of:
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #: ENT000482-00-BD01 Identified: 10/15/2012 Admitted: 10/15/2012 Withdrawn: ENT000482 Rejected: Stricken: Submitted: March 30, 2012 Other:
Eugene T. Meehan Senior Vice President National Economic Research Associates, Inc.
1255 23rd Street NW Washington, DC 20037
+1 202 466 3510 Fax +1 202 466 3605 Direct dial: +1 202 466 9287 gene.meehan@nera.com www.nera.com EUGENE T. MEEHAN SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Mr. Meehan is a Senior Vice President at NERA. He has over thirty years of experience consulting with electric and gas utilities and has testified as an expert witness before numerous state and federal regulatory agencies, as well as appeared in federal court and arbitration proceedings.
At NERA, Mr. Meehans practice concentrates on serving energy industry clients, with a focus on helping clients manage the transition from regulatory to more competitive environments. He has performed consulting assignments for over fifty large electric, gas, and combination utilities in the areas of retail access, regulatory strategy, strategic planning, financial and economic analysis, merger and acquisition advisory services, power contract analysis, market power and market definition, stranded cost analysis, power pooling, power markets and risk management, ISO and PX development, and costing and pricing. In addition, he has advised numerous utilities on power procurement issues and administered power procurements on behalf of utilities and regulators.
Mr. Meehan has experience leading NERAs advisory work on several major restructuring and unbundling assignments. These assignments were multi-year projects that involved integration of regulatory and business strategy, as well as development of regulatory filings associated with the recovery of stranded cost and rate unbundling.
Eugene T. Meehan Education Boston College, BA, Economics, cum laude New York University (NYU), Graduate School of Business, completed core courses for the doctoral program.
Professional Experience NERA Economic Consulting 1999- Senior Vice President 1996-1999 Vice President 1973-1980 Senior Economic Analyst; Research Assistant Deloitte & Touche Consulting Group 1994-1996 Principal Energy Management Associates, Inc.
1980-1994 Vice President Areas of Expertise Restructuring/Stranded Cost Recovery Mr. Meehan has directed several multi-year projects associated with restructuring and stranded cost recovery. These projects involved facilitating the development of an integrated regulatory and business strategy and formulating regulatory filings to accomplish strategy. As part of these assignments, Mr. Meehan facilitated sessions with senior management to set and track filing strategy. Clients include Public Service Gas & Electric and Baltimore Gas and Electric.
Unbundling/Generation Pricing Mr. Meehan has formulated unbundling strategies, with a specialization in generation pricing. He has advised several utilities in standard offer pricing and has testified on shopping credits on behalf of First Energy and Baltimore Gas and Electric.
Power Procurement Mr. Meehan has been involved in power procurement activities for a variety of utilities and regulatory agencies. He has advised utilities in developing and implementing evaluation processes for new generation, with the objective of achieving the best portfolio evaluation. He has helped regulators in Ireland and Canada design and implement portfolio evaluation processes. He has testified before FERC and state regulatory agencies on competitive power procurement. In addition, Mr. Meehan helped to design and implement the New Jersey BGS auction process.
NERA Economic Consulting 2
Eugene T. Meehan Power Contracts Mr. Meehan has extensive experience with power contracts and power contract issues. He has reviewed and testified on the three principal types of power contracts: integrated utility to integrated utility contracts, IPP to utility contract, and integrated or wholesale utility to distribution utility contracts. He has testified in power contracts disputes on behalf of Carolina Power and Light, Duke Power Company, Southern Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, and Tucson Electric Power. He has also advised Oglethorpe Power Corporation in the reform of its wholesale contracts with its distributor cooperative members.
Retail and Wholesale Settlements In addition to his expertise on power pooling issues, Mr. Meehan has significant experience with assignments related to the settlement process. He has focused on the issues of credit management as new entrants appear in retail and wholesale markets and has designed efficient specifications for retail settlement systems, including the use of load profiling, and examined the risk and cost allocation issues of alternative settlement systems.
Risk Management Mr. Meehan has advised several large utilities on price risk management. These assignments have included evaluation of price management service offers solicited from power marketers in association with management of assets and entitlements, as well as provision of price managed service for various terms.
Marginal Costs Mr. Meehan has provided comprehensive marginal cost analyses for over 25 North American Utilities. These assignments required detailed knowledge of utility operations and planning.
Power Supply and Transmission Planning Mr. Meehan has advised electric utilities on economic evaluations of generation and transmission expansion. He has testified on the economics of particular investments, the prudence of planning processes, and the prudence of particular investment decisions.
Generation Strategy Mr. Meehan has led NERA efforts on a client task force charged with developing an integrated generation asset/power marketing strategy.
Power Pooling Mr. Meehan has in-depth working knowledge of the operating, accounting, and settlement processes of all United States power pools and representative international power pools. He has provided consulting services for New York Power Pool members on a continuous basis since NERA Economic Consulting 3
Eugene T. Meehan 1980, advising the Pool and its members on production cost modeling, transmission expansion, competitive bidding and reliability, and marginal generating capacity cost quantification. In NEPOOL, he has quantified the benefits of continued utility membership in the Pool and the impact of the Pool settlement process on marginal cost. He has worked with a major PJM utility to explore the impact of PJM restructuring proposals upon generating asset valuation and examine the implications of alternative restructuring proposals. He has consulted for Central and Southwest Corporation, Entergy, and Southern Company on issues that involved the internal pooling arrangements of the utility operating companies of those holding companies, as well as for various utilities on the impact of pooling arrangements on strategic alternatives.
Representative Assignments Worked with Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G) to direct a three year NERA advisory effort on restructuring. Facilitated a two-day senior management meeting to set regulatory strategy in 1997. Throughout 1997 and 1998, worked over half time at PSE&G to help implement that strategy and advised on testimony preparation, cross-examination, and briefing. Also advised PSE&G on business issues related to securitization, energy settlement and credit requirements for third party suppliers. During 1999, advised PSE&G during settlement negotiations and litigation of the settlement. PSE&G achieved a restructuring outcome that involved continued ownership of generation by an affiliate and the securitization of $2.5 billion in stranded costs.
Worked on separate assignments for a large utility in the Northeast and a large utility in the Southeast, advising on the evaluation of risk management offers from power marketers. The assignments included reviewing proposals, attending interviews with marketers and providing advice on these, and the developing analytical software to evaluate offers.
Worked with government of Ontario beginning in 2004 to help design the RFP and economic evaluation process for the solicitation of 2500 Mw of new generating capacity. Supervising NERAs portfolio-based economic evaluation on behalf of the Ontario Ministry of Energy.
Testified on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric Company before the FERC in a case benchmarking the PSA between the distribution utility and a soon-to-be-created generating company. This effort involved developing detailed expertise in applying the Edgar standard and a detailed review of DWR procurement during the western power crisis. In addition, this effort involved the review of more than 100 power contracts in the WECC.
Directed NERAs efforts, on behalf of the electricity regulator in Ireland, to design an RFP and implementation process for the purchase of 500 Mw of new generating capacity in 2003. NERA advised on the RFP, the portfolio evaluation method, and the power contract and also conducted the economic evaluation.
Reviewed the economic evaluation conducted by Southern Company Service for affiliated operating companies in connection with an RFP for over 2000 Mw of new generating capacity.
Submitted testimony before FERC on behalf of Southern Company Service.
NERA Economic Consulting 4
Eugene T. Meehan Worked with Baltimore Gas and Electric (BG&E) to conduct a one and one-half year consulting assignment that involved providing restructuring advice. The project began in March/April 1998 with senior management discussions and workshops on plan development and filing strategy.
Advised BG&E in the development of testimony, rebuttal testimony, and public information dissemination. Worked to review and coordinate testimony from all witnesses and offered testimony on shopping credits and in defense of the case settlement. BG&E achieved a restructuring outcome enabling it to retain generation ownership. As part of this assignment, advised BG&E on generation valuation and unregulated generation business strategy.
Directed the efforts of a large Southeastern utility to develop a short-term power contract portfolio and to evaluate the relative value of power options, forwards, and unit contracts to determine the optimal mix of instruments to manage price risk.
Testified for XCEL Energy on the use of competitive bids for new generation needs. Examined whether XCEL was prudent not to explore a self-build plan and the reasonableness of relying on ten-year or shorter contracts as opposed to life-of-facility contracts, in order to meet needs and facilitate a possible future transition to competition. This project addressed the comparability of fixed bids to rate base plant additions.
Advised and testified on behalf of First Energy in the Ohio restructuring proceeding on the issues of generation unbundling and stranded cost. Defended the First Energy shopping credit proposal.
Advised Consolidated Edison and Northeast Utilities on merger issues and testified in Connecticut and New Hampshire merger proceedings. Testimony focused on retail competition in gas and electric commodity markets.
Directed NERAs effort to train selected representatives of a major European power company in American power marketing and risk management practices. The project involved numerous meetings and interviews with power marketing firms.
Led NERAs effort to advise the New England ISO on the development of an RTO filing.
Examined performance-based ratemaking for transmission and market operator functions.
Examined ERCOT power market conditions during the period of time from 1997 to 1999 and testified on behalf of Texas New Mexico Power Company for the prudence of its power purchase activity.
Advised a Midwestern utility on restructuring of a wholesale contract with an affiliate. Involved forecasting of the unbundled wholesale cost-of-service and market prices, as well as development of a regulatory strategy for gaining approval of contract restructuring and the transfer of generation from regulated to EWG states.
Performed market price forecasts for numerous utility clients. These forecasts have employed both traditional modeling and newly developed statistical approaches.
NERA Economic Consulting 5
Eugene T. Meehan Examined the credit issues associated with the entry of new entities into retail and wholesale settlement market. These assignments involved a review of current Pool credit procedures, examination of commodity and security trading credit requirements, coordination with financial institutions, and recommendations concerning credit exposure monitoring, credit evaluation processes, and credit requirements.
Oversight of EMAs consulting and software team in designing and implementing the LOLP capacity payment, a portion of the UK wholesale settlement system.
Advised Oglethorpe Power Corporation in the reform of its contracts with its distribution cooperative members and the evolution of full requirement power wholesale power contracts into contracts that preserve Oglethorpes financial integrity and are suitable for a competitive environment.
Developed long run marginal and avoided costs of natural gas service, as well as avoided cost methods and procedures. These costs have been used primarily for the analysis of gas DSM opportunities. Clients include Consolidated Edison Company, Southern California Edison Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, and Elizabethtown Gas Company.
Review of power contracts and testimony in numerous power contract disputes.
Development of long run avoided costs of electricity service and avoided cost methods and procedures. These costs have been used to assess DSM and cogeneration, as well as to develop integrated resource plans. Clients include Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Central Maine Power Company, Duquesne Light Company, and the New York investor-owned utilities.
Advised Central Maine Power Company (CMP) on the development of a competitive bidding framework. This framework was implemented in 1984 and was the first of its kind in the nation.
CMP adopted the framework outlined in EMAs report and won prompt regulatory approval.
Advised a utility in the development of an incentive ratemaking plan for a new nuclear facility.
This assignment involved strategic analysis of alternate proposals and quantification of the financial impact of various ratemaking alternatives. Presented strategic and financial results in order to convince senior management to initiate negotiations for the incentive plan.
Advised and testified on behalf of the New York Power Pool utilities on the methodology for measuring pool marginal capacity costs. This work included development of the methodology and implementation of the system for quantifying LOLP-based marginal capacity costs.
Provided testimony on behalf of the investor-owned electric utilities in New York State, concerning the proper methodology to use when analyzing the cost-effectiveness of conservation programs. This methodology was adopted by the Commission and used as the basis for DSM evaluation in New York from 1982 through 1988.
NERA Economic Consulting 6
Eugene T. Meehan Developed the functional design of a retail access settlement system and business processes for a major PJM combination utility. This design is being used to construct a software system and develop business procedures that will be used for retail settlements beginning January 1999.
Reviewed the power pool operating and interchange accounting procedure of the New York Power Pool, the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland Interconnection, Allegheny Power System, Southern Company, and the New England Power Pool as part of various consulting assignments and in connection with the development of production simulation software.
Summarized and analyzed the operational NEPOOL to examine the feasibility of incorporating NEPOOL interchange impacts with Central Maine and accounting procedure of the New England Power Pool Power Companys buy-back tariffs.
Developed and presented a two-day seminar delivered to electric industry participants in the UK (prior to privatization), outlining the structure and operation of power pools and bulk power market transactions in North America.
Benchmark analysis and FERC testimony of PGEs proposed twelve-year contract between PG&E and Electric Gen LLC (contract value in excess of $15 billion).
Responsible for NERAs overall efforts in advising New Jerseys Electric Distribution Companies on the structuring and conduct of the Basic Generation Service auctions (the 2002 auction involved $3.5 billion, and the 2003 and 2004 auctions involved over $4.0 billion).
Publications, Speeches, Presentations, and Reports Capacity Adequacy in New Zealand's Electricity Market, published in Asian Power, September 18, 2003 Central Resource Adequacy Markets For PJM, NY-ISO AND NE-ISO, a report written February 2004 Ex Ante or Ex Post? Risk, Hedging and Prudence in the Restructured Power Business, The Electricity Journal, April 2006 Distributed Resources: Incentives, a white paper prepared for Edison Electric Institute, May 2006 Restructuring Expectations and Outcomes, a presentation presented at the Saul Ewing Annual Utility Conference: The Post Rate Cap and 2007 State Regulatory Environment, Philadelphia, PA, May 21, 2007 Making a Business of Energy Efficiency: Sustainable Business Models for Utilities, prepared for Edison Electric Institute, August 2007 Restructuring at a Crossroads, presented at Empowering Consumers Through Competitive Markets: The Choice Is Yours, Sponsored by COMPETE and the Electric Power Supply Association, Washington, DC, November 5, 2007 NERA Economic Consulting 7
Eugene T. Meehan Competitive Electricity Markets: The Benefits for Customers and the Environment, a white paper prepared for COMPETE Collation, February 2008 The Continuing Rationale for Full and Timely Recovery of Fuel Price Levels in Fuel Adjustment Clauses, The Electricity Journal, July 2008 Impact of EU Electricity Competition Directives on Nuclear Financing presented to: SMI -
Financing Nuclear Power Conference, London, UK, May 20, 2009 Testimony Forums Arkansas Public Service Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Florida Public Service Commission Maine Public Utilities Commission Minnesota Public Service Commission Nevada Public Service Commission New York Public Service Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Oklahoma Public Service Commission Public Service Commission of Indiana Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Public Utilities Commission of Nevada Public Utilities Commission of Texas Public Utilities Commission of New Hampshire United States District Court United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Various arbitration proceedings NERA Economic Consulting 8
Eugene T. Meehan Clients Arkansas Power & Light Company Baltimore Gas & Electric Carolina Power & Light Company Central Maine Power Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Dayton Power and Light Company Florida Coordinating Group Houston Lighting & Power Company Minnesota Power and Light Company Nevada Power Company Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Northern Indiana Public Service Company Oglethorpe Power Corporation Pacific Gas and Electric Company Power Authority of the State of New York Public Service and Electric Company Public Service Company of Oklahoma Sierra Pacific Power Company Southern Company Services, Inc.
Tucson Electric Power Company Texas-New Mexico Power Company NERA Economic Consulting 9
Eugene T. Meehan Recent Expert Testimony and Expert Reports Supplemental Testimony on behalf of Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Docket No. 15660, September 5, 1996.
Direct Testimony on behalf of Long Island Lighting Company before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, September 29, 1997.
Rebuttal Testimony on behalf of Texas-New Mexico Power Company, SOAH Docket No. 473-97-1561, PUC Docket No. 17751, March 2, 1998.
Prepared Testimony and deposition testimony on behalf of Central Maine Power Company, United Stated District Court Southern District of New York, 98-civ-8162 (JSM), March 5, 1999.
Prepared Direct Testimony Before the Public Service Commission of Maryland on behalf of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, PSC Case Nos. 8794/8804, June 1999.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Maryland Public Service Commission, on behalf of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, PSC Case Nos. 8794/8804, March 22, 1999.
NORCON Power Partners LP v. Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing, before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, June 1999.
Prepared Supplemental Testimony Before the Maryland Public Service Commission, on behalf of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, PSC Case Nos. 8794/8804, July 23, 1999.
Prepared Supplemental Reply Testimony Before the Maryland Public Service Commission, on behalf of Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, PSC Case Nos. 8794/8804, August 3, 1999.
Direct Testimony on behalf of Niagara Mohawk, Before the New York State Public Service Commission, PSC Case No. 99-E-0681, September 3, 1999.
Rebuttal Testimony on behalf of Niagara Mohawk, PSC Case No. 99-E-0681 Before the New York State Public Service Commission, November 10, 1999.
Arbitration deposition on behalf of Oglethorpe Power Corporation, last quarter of 1999.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio on behalf of FirstEnergy Corporation, Ohio Edison Company, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and The Toledo Edison Company, Case No. 99-1212-EL-ETP re: Shopping Credits.
Direct Testimony on behalf of Niagara Mohawk, Before the New York State Public Service Commission, PSC Case No. 99-E-0990, February 25, 2000.
Testimony on behalf of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., State of Connecticut, Department of Public Utility Control, Docket No.: 00-01-11, April 28, 2000 and June 30, 2000.
NERA Economic Consulting 10
Eugene T. Meehan Testimony on behalf of Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Fuel Reconciliation Proceeding before the Texas PUC, June 30, 2000.
Testimony on behalf of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Before the New Hampshire Public Service Commission, Docket No.: DE 00-009, June 30, 2000.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado, Docket No.
99A-549E, November 22, 2000.
Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado, Docket No. 99A-549E, January 19, 2001.
DETM Management, Inc. Duke Energy Services Canada Ltd., And DTMSI Management Ltd.,
Claimants vs. Mobil Natural Gas Inc., And Mobil Canada Products, Ltd., Respondents.
American Arbitration Association Cause No. 50 T 198 00485 00, August 27, 2001.
State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, In the Matter of the Provision of Basic Generation Service Pursuant to the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act of 1999, Before President Connie O. Hughes, Commissioner Carol Murphy on Behalf of the Electric Distribution Companies (Public Service Electric and Gas Company, GPU Energy, Consolidate Edison Company and Conectiv) Docket No.: EX01050303, October 4, 2001.
Direct Testimony Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on behalf of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Docket No.: ER02-456-000, November 30, 2001.
Fourth Branch Associates/Mechanicville vs. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, January 2002 (Expert Report).
Arbitration Deposition on behalf of Oglethorpe Power Corporation, March 2002.
Direct Testimony and Deposition Testimony Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on behalf of Electric Generation LLC in Response to June 12 Commission Order, Docket No.:
ER02-456-000, July 16, 2002.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on behalf of Electric Generation LLC in Response to June 12 Commission Order, Docket No.: ER02-456-000, August 13, 2002.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Company, in the matter of the Application of Nevada Power Company to Reduce Fuel and Purchased Power Rates, PUCN Docket No. 02-11021, November 8, 2002 and subsequent Deposition Testimony.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, Docket No. 03-1014, January 10, 2003.
NERA Economic Consulting 11
Eugene T. Meehan Direct Testimony Before the Public Utility Commission Of Texas on behalf of Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Application Of Texas-New Mexico Power Company For Reconciliation Of Fuel Costs, April 1, 2003.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Company, PUCN Docket No. 02-11021, April 1, 2003.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Company, Docket No. 03-1014, May 5, 2003.
Testimony on behalf of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Before the Public Service Commission of New York, Case No.: 00-E-0612, September 19, 2003.
State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, In the Matter of the Provision of Basic Generation Service Pursuant to the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act of 1999, Before President Connie O. Hughes, Commissioner Carol Murphy on Behalf of the Electric Distribution Companies (Public Service Electric and Gas Company, GPU Energy, Consolidate Edison Company and Conectiv), September 2003.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, November 12, 2003.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, January 12, 2004.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, May 28, 2004.
Direct Testimony on behalf of Texas-New Mexico Power Company, First Choice Power Inc. and Texas Generating Company LP to Finalize Stranded Cost under PURA § 39.262, January 22, 2004.
Rebuttal Testimony on behalf of Texas-New Mexico Power Company, First Choice Power Inc.
and Texas Generating Company LP to Finalize Stranded Cost under PURA § 39.262, April, 2004.
State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, In the Matter of the Provision of Basic Generation Service Pursuant to the Electric Discount and Energy Competition Act of 1999, Before President Connie O. Hughes, Commissioner Carol Murphy on Behalf of the Electric Distribution Companies (Public Service Electric and Gas Company, GPU Energy, Consolidate Edison Company and Conectiv), September 2004.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, November 9, 2004.
NERA Economic Consulting 12
Eugene T. Meehan Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, January 7, 2005.
Expert Report on behalf of Oglethorpe Power Corporation, March 23, 2005.
Arbitration deposition on behalf of Oglethorpe Power Corporation, April 1, 2005.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys December 2005 Deferred Energy Case.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys 2006 Deferred Energy Case, January 13, 2006.
Remand Rebuttal for Public Service Company of Oklahoma before the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma, Cause No. PUD 200200038, Confidential, March 17, 2006 Answer Testimony on behalf of the Colorado Independent energy Association, AES Corporation and LS Power Associates, LP, Docket No. 05A-543E, April 18, 2006.
Cross-Answer Testimony on behalf of the Colorado Independent energy Association, AES Corporation and LS Power Associates, LP, Docket No. 05A-543E, May 22, 2006.
Distributed Resources: Incentives, a report prepared for Edison Electric Institute, May 2006 Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys 2006 Deferred Energy Case, Docket No. 06-01016, June 2006.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Deferred Energy Case, December 2006.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Application for Recovery of Costs of Achieving Final Resolution of Claims Associated with Contracts Executed During the Western Energy Crisis, December 2006.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys Application for Recovery of Costs of Achieving Final Resolution of Claims Associated with Contracts Executed During the Western Energy Crisis, December 2006.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Hawaii, on behalf of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc., Docket No. 2006-0386, December 22, 2006.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Hawaii, on behalf of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc., Docket No. 05-0315, December 29, 2006.
Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys 2007 Deferred Energy Case, January 2007.
NERA Economic Consulting 13
Eugene T. Meehan Declaration Before the State of New York Public Service Commission, on behalf of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.s Long Island City Electric Network, Case 06-E-0894 - Proceeding on Motion of the Commission to Investigate the Electric Power Outage and Case 06-E-1158 - In the Matter of Staffs Investigation of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.s Performance During and Following the July and September Electric Utility Outages. July 24, 2007 Direct Testimony Before The Public Utilities Commission of Colorado, In The Matter of the Application of Public Service Company of Colorado for Approval of its 2007 Colorado Resource Plan, April 2008 Answer Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado on behalf of Trans-Elect Development Company, LLC, and The Wyoming Infrastructure Authority, Docket No. 07A-447E, April 28, 2008 Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys 2008 Deferred Energy Case, February 2009.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys 2008 Deferred Energy Case, February 2009.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Texas, on behalf of Entergy Texas, Inc. Docket No. 33687, April 29, 2009 Direct Testimony Before The Public Utilities Commission Of Nevada On Behalf of Nevada Power Company D/B/A Nevada Energy, 2010 - 2029 Integrated Resource Plan, June 26, 2009 Before the Public Service Commission of New York, Case 09-E-0428 Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Rate Case, Rebuttal Testimony, September 2009 Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on Behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys 2009 Deferred Energy Case, February 2010.
Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys 2009 Deferred Energy Case, February 2010 Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Nevada Power Companys 2010 - 2029 Integrated Resource Plan, Docket No. 09-07003, July 2010 Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Companys Eighth Amendment to its 2008 - 2027 Integrated Resource Plan, Docket No.
10-03023, July 2010 Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada, Application of Nevada power Company d/b/a NV Energy Seeking Acceptance of its Triennial Integrated Resource Plan covering the period 2010-2029, including authority to proceed with the permitting and construction of the ON Line transmission project, Docket No. 10-02009 NERA Economic Consulting 14
Eugene T. Meehan Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada, Petition of Nevada Power Company d/b/a NV Energy requesting a determination under NRS 704.7821 that the terms and conditions of five renewable power purchase agreements are just and reasonable and allowing limited deviation from the requirements of NAC 704.8885, Docket No. 10-03022 Rebuttal Testimony Before the Public Utilities commission of Nevada, Application of Sierra pacific Power Company d/b/a/ NV Energy Seeking Acceptance of its Eight Amendment to its 2008-2007 Integrated Resource Plan, Docket No. 10-02023 Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada, on behalf of Sierra Pacific Power Company, d/b/a NV Energy, Docket No. 11-03 ____ 2011 Electric Deferred Energy Proceeding, February 2011 Direct Testimony Before the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada, on behalf of Nevada Power Company, d/b/a NV Energy, Docket No. 11-03 ____ 2011 Electric Deferred Energy Proceeding, February 2011 February 2011 NERA Economic Consulting 15