ML12339A520

Official Exhibit - ENT000434-00-BD01 - General Visual Inspection Report for 10-inch City Water Line from Catskill Water Supply (Oct. 2009)

ML12339A520
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	10/29/2009
From:	Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22156, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12339A520 (6)

Text

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

In the Matter of:

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3) c",V'-'A AEG(J~~ ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01

..~~o.".

Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 ENT000434 I" 0 Exhibit #: ENT000434-00-BD01 Identified: 10/15/2012

• 0 Submitted: March 30, 2012

~

~"'+. .

~

,,"I Admitted: 10/15/2012

&'" Rejected:

Other:

Withdrawn:

Stricken:

NOTE: This inspection report form is extracted from EN-EP-S-002-MULTI (Rev. 0 target o effective date 10/31/09)

ATTACHMENT 7.1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 2 H)-inch City Water Line from INSPECTION Piping I Tank Catskill Water Supply DATE: 10/29/09 120' EL.

(approx. 9321-F-41933, ELEVATION: grade) LOCATION DWG: zone 0-5 INSPECTOR: J. Peterson NOTE YES

1. ANY BLISTERING (COATING)? 0 NO ~

YES

2. ANY PEELING (COATING)? 0 NO ~

YES

3. ANY FLAKING (COATING)? 0 NO ~

YES

4. ANY DELAMINATION (COATING)? 0 NO ~

YES

5. ANY EMBRITTLEMENT (COATING)? 0 NO ~

YES

6. ANY EMBEDDED ROCKS (COATING AND/OR METAL)? 0 NO [8J YES

7. ANY CRACKING (COATING AND/OR METAL)? 0 NO ~

YES

8. ANY RUST (METAL)? 0 NO ~

YES

9. ANY CORROSION (METAL)? 0 NO r81 YES

10. ANY FLAKING OR SCALING (METAL)? 0 NO 181 YES 11 . ANY MECHANICAL DAMAGE (METAL)? 0 NO 181 YES

12. ANY NICKS. GOUGES OR ARC STRIKES (METAL)? 0 NO 181 YES

13. ANY TUBERCLES (METAL -IF INTERNAL INSPECTION)? 0 NO 0 NIA-extemal inspection only GENERAL APPEARANCE (Inspector): Exterior pipe coating round in good condition, with no observable discontinuities, peeling. blistering.

separation. embrilliement, flaking. etc. Coating also having good adhesion to the pipe with no bubbled spots (i.e., gaps between pipe and coating.).

Sec aUached photo documentation and Notes. Photo included or the backfill material, showing absence or any large rocks, or roreign material.

DEGRADATION FOUND? YEsO NO r81 CR-FURTHER EVALUATION REQUIRED? YES 0 NO r81 COMM ENTS (Inspector) : I O*inch city water line rrom the C ity Watt r Storage TWlk was inspected at excavated location. Line runs approximately parallel with the 16-inch city water line (also excavation under the same modification, EC (3314). Approx . 8 loot length of pipe inspected.

o INSPECTOR(S) PRINT/SIGNIDATE :

o NOTE: This inspection report form is extracted from EN-EP-S-002-MULTI (Rev. 0 target effective date 10/31/09)

ATTACHMENT 7.1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of2 EVALUATION: ACCEPTABLE I:8J ACCEPTABLE WITH DEFICIENCIES D UNACCEPTABLE D RECOMMENDED ACTION (Program Owner):

Capture the results of this piping inspection in the BPT Program database (IDDEAL Scheduleworks).

FUTURE MONITORING: D None required. Future inspections of this line will be as scheduled and managed under the IPEG Buried Pipe and Tank Program. Based on results of this inspection. any future inspections of this line should be at other locations.

o PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE:

None required.

D CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: D None required.

PHOTOGRAPHIC OR VIDEO RECORDS ATTACHED? YES I:8J NO D o

o o

o

~ \

. .~

)

t

~

~z

/:'.

~

)..

"'l

~

AIJ .

...," 4,

,.~

o *

-,,>::z

,