ML12339A508
| ML12339A508 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/12/2011 |
| From: | Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 22156, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12339A508 (8) | |
Text
ENT000430 Submitted: March 30, 2012 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit In the Matter of:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 l 05000286 Exhibit #:
Identified:
Admitted:
Withdrawn:
Rejected:
Stricken:
Other:
ENT000430-00-BD01 10/15/2012 10/15/2012 v\\.~P.P.EGV(.q;.
l~\\
0
~
~
~
i
.... /~
0' ENGINEERING STANDARD ENTERGY Buried Piping and Tanks General Visual Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.1 Sheet 2 of 2 Piping I Tank IP3 AFW/Cond Return to CST (8-inch Line 1080) (Ref. WO # 279578-03)
ELEVATION:
pipe centerline
@ EL. 11'-6";
grade @ EI. 18'
-,(=ap=p~ro:..:..;x,-,-.) __ LOCATION DWG:
9321-F-23593 YES
- 1.
ANY BLISTERING (COATING)?
D YES
- 2.
ANY PEELING (COATING)?
D YES
- 3.
ANY FLAKING (COATING)?
D YES
- 4.
ANY DELAMINATION (COATING)?
D YES
- 5.
ANY EMBRITTLEMENT (COATING)?
D YES
- 6.
ANY EMBEDDED ROCKS (COATING AND/OR METAL)?
D YES
- 7.
ANY CRACKING (COATING AND/OR METAL)?
D YES
- 8.
ANY RUST (METAL)?
D YES
- 9.
ANY CORROSION (METAL)?
D YES
- 10.
ANY FLAKING OR SCALING (METAL)?
D YES
- 11.
ANY MECHANICAL DAMAGE (METAL)?
D YES
- 12.
ANY NICKS, GOUGES OR ARC STRIKES (METAL)?
D YES
- 13.
ANY TUBERCLES (METAL -IF INTERNAL INSPECTION)?
D EN-EP-S-002-MUL TI I REV. 0 PAGE 12 OF 12 INSPECTION CHECKLIST INSPECTION DATE:
INSPECTOR:
NO ~
NO ~
NO ~
NO ~
NO ~
NO ~
NO ~
NO D n/a NO D n/a NO D n/a NO D n/a NO D n/a NO D n/a 12/9/2011 J. Peterson NOTE GENERAL APPEARANCE (Inspector): An approx. 16 ft. length of8-inch Line 1080 was excavated, of which approx. 12 ft was exposed for its full circumference. The coating appearance was uniform in color, with no indications of degradation (blistering, peeling, flaking, cracking or separation of coating from the metal surface). The coating outerwrap appeared to be evenly applied, with the edges of overlapping layers wrap sealed with the coal tar enamel. Further, there was no discoloration or evidence of corrosion product under or at the edges of the wrap, and the coating surface was solid to the touch. Photos are attached.
DEGRADATION FOUND?
FURTHER EVAtuATION REQUIRED?
YEsD NO~
YESD NO~
CR-COMMENTS (Inspector): This inspection is a visual inspection of the As-Found condition of the pipe coating. The portion of Line 1080 inspected under this task is shown on the attached dwg. 9321-F-23593 excerpt (attached). The results of this inspection will be evaluated together with the results of direct UT and g1,lided wave ultrasonic inspections, which will be performed under separate tasks.
INSPECTOR(S) PRINT/SIGNIDATE:
J. Peterson
ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MUL TI I REV. 0 ENTERGY Buried Piping and Tanks General Visual PAGE 12 OF 12 Inspection ATTACHMENT 7.1 INSPECTION CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 2 EVALUATION:
ACCEPTABLE ~
ACCEPTABLE WITH DEFICIENCIES 0 UNACCEPTABLE 0 RECOMMENDED ACTION (Program Owner): This visual inspection of the As-Found condition of the pipe coating is one element of a focused inspection of Line 1080, and will be captured in the UPT Program database. The results of this inspection will be evaluated along with the results of UT and Guided Wave inspections under separate tasks (WO #s 279578-14 & 17, respectively), and soil analysis results to assess the condition of the Line 1080 iaw the IPEC Underground Piping & Tank Program.
FUTURE MONITORING: 0 None required.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE: 0 None required.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: 0 None required.
PHOTOGRAPHIC OR VIDEO RECORDS ATTACHED?
YES~ NOO PROGRAM OWNER PRINT/SIGN/DATE:
Robert C. Lee
I
,I I
II
~
~
I-t I
I I
CI\\.
I I
t
-I-...
I KklMO\\Na Ref. Drawing 9321-F-23593 IP3 Yard I NE comer of AFP Bldg WO # 279578 - Excavation/Inspection of Condl AFW Lines 1070 & 1080