ML12334A260
| ML12334A260 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/29/2012 |
| From: | Burdick S, Harris B, Jenkins D, Catherine Kanatas, Lodge T, Matthews T, Sutton K FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co, Morgan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, NRC/OGC, FirstEnergy Corp |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 23803, 50-346-LR, ASLBP 11-907-01-LR-BD01 | |
| Download: ML12334A260 (9) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-346-LR
)
FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY )
)
(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) ) November 29, 2012
)
JOINT PROPOSED CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 5-6, 2012 In accordance with 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.323(a) and 2.327(d) and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards instructions on November 6, 2012 at oral argument, the parties to this proceeding, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff, and the Intervenors, hereby jointly file their proposed corrections to the transcript of the oral argument on the Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 4 and the admissibility of proposed Contention 5 that was held in the above-captioned docket on November 5-6, 2012 in Toledo, Ohio. The parties respectfully request that the transcript be revised to incorporate the corrections identified in Appendix A hereto.
Respectfully submitted, Executed in Accord with 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(d)
David W. Jenkins Timothy P. Matthews Senior Corporate Counsel II Kathryn M. Sutton FirstEnergy Service Company Stephen J. Burdick Mailstop: A-GO-15 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 76 South Main Street 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Akron, OH 44308 Washington, DC 20004 Phone: 330-384-5037 Phone: 202-739-5527 E-mail: djenkins@firstenergycorp.com E-mail: tmatthews@morganlewis.com COUNSEL FOR FENOC Executed in Accord with 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(d)
Brian G. Harris Catherine Kanatas U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-1392 E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov COUNSEL FOR NRC STAFF Executed in Accord with 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(d)
Terry J. Lodge (Ohio Bar #0029271) 316 N. Michigan St., Ste. 520 Toledo, OH 43604-5627 Phone/fax (419) 255-7552 tjlodge50@yahoo.com COUNSEL FOR INTERVENORS Dated in Washington, D.C.
this 29th day of November 2012 2
APPENDIX A PROPOSED CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 5-6, 2012 (DOCKET NO. 50-346-LR)
Page Line(s) Delete Insert 276 15 , ESQ. to end of line 279 4 9:00 p.m. 9:00 a.m.
279 8 50346 LRA 50-346-LR 279 23 November 22nd October 22nd 280 6 Southwestern Ohio Southwestern Ontario 285 13 First Energy FirstEnergy 286 9 Southwestern Ohio Southwestern Ontario 289 5 First Energy FirstEnergy 290 8 COI 1208 CLI-12-08 290 10 Mill Stone Millstone 290 16 2.323 Bravo 2.323(b) 290 21 2.309 Foxtrot and 309 Charlie 2.309(f) and 2.309(c) 290 24 to between as and the 291 8 demonstrate demonstrates 295 7 affect our material of fact are material 296 12 then than 299 25 unreasonable unreasonableness 300 18 who 300 21 into not 302 7 interscaled containment inner steel containment 309 4 the for 314 4 transience transients 314 4 melt between core and sequence 315 8 Board broad 315 13 off site offsite 318 1-2 is it a plant-specific metric? it is a plant-specific metric.
319 9 integrative individual 320 20 in and 322 10 in and 339 19 activities between radionuclide and could 341 18 cross-effects dose effects 344 17 using used in 345 20 does goes 348 9 an and 352 8 : Operating License Renewal after Supplement 1
Page Line(s) Delete Insert 352 9 5.111 5.1.1 365 1 anonymous anomalous 367 17 of certain to certain 367 20 NEI - 0501 NEI 05-01 369 1 Professor Mr.
380 9 plan plant 386 16 obviously anomalously 386 18 it after put 387 6 BWRs PWRs 401 7 in kind of modulating in terms of modeling 401 12 melt between core and sequence 402 1 contracts or the SAMA analysis context or the SAMA analysis contracts context 404 5 valuated validated 413 20 Probability risk assessments Probabilistic risk assessments 413 25 step up of hard evidence step up with hard evidence 414 3 probability risk assessment probabilistic risk assessment 420 1 as between knows and well 420 7 source term fees source terms for use 420 11 time and space average time- and space-averaged 421 3 posing opposing 421 9-10 the decision, if sought, 423 8 for or 423 18-19 - between in and containment 424 14 Compared It compared 424 25 the that 427 25 based information based on information 433 11 within well well 433 12 February 2011 June 2011 436 20 is respect is in respect 437 3 2.323 Bravo 2.323(b) 437 20 permitted on the permitted in the 438 17 generic Generic 441 10 preform perform 441 19 opposed restart oppose restart 444 3 structures structures 445 8 state support an 445 14 report. report?
445 17 have the have they 449 3 provide shield provide a shield 450 3 In the The 452 1 there a there are a 2
Page Line(s) Delete Insert 452 6 even event 452 10 admit to the admit the 455 2 that than 457 13 JUDGE FROEHLICH MR. LODGE 457 20 indicate indicated 458 17 The FENOC FENOC 459 9 identified. identified?
461 19 2011. 2011.
461 20 Intervenors Intervenors 461 23 concerns. concerns.
465 6 FirstEnergy FirstEnergys 471 10 wrote read 472 23 information investigation 474 4 phenomenon phenomenon?
474 18 racking cracking 476 15 theyre there are 476 18 it, and it? And 477 19 been been a 478 10 way. way?
485 23 First Energy FirstEnergy 486 7 pore pour 488 12 Stephen, 488 13 perfect 490 13 Contention 6 Contention 5 492 11 structures AMP structures AMP 495 19 in the and the 497 16 public piece puzzle piece 511 15 , ESQ. to end of line 515 5 First Energy FirstEnergy 516 15 GIEIS GEIS 518 4 account accounted 518 8 they causation the causation 521 13 allegation allegations 521 18 hesitate its power hesitate to exercise its powers 522 20 It as It has 523 7 addressed been addressed 524 4 Intervenors burden Intervenors burden 525 22 and issue an issue 526 18 structure systems structures, systems 529 6 Steven Stephen 530 10 51(a) 51 Subpart a 530 12 Category issues Category 2 issues 531 19 Handling SAMA 532 7 Reports Report 3
Page Line(s) Delete Insert 532 16 providing` provide 533 20 20.14 2014 534 8 Public Performance International Performance Improvement International 536 14 breeches breaches 536 19 breeches breaches 537 3 breeches breaches 537 5 breeches breaches 537 17 materials materials.
538 1 raise raises 538 10-13 Battelle, Sargent and Lundy, both Bechtel, Sargent and Lundy (both of those were the contractors hired of these were the contractors hired to perform the hydro demolition for to perform the hydro-demolition the reactor lid swap out. As well as for the reactor lid swap out), as FirstEnergy and even NRC Staff well as FirstEnergy and even NRC were of the opinion Staff, all were of the opinion 539 5 breech breach 540 22 seem see 541 5 understand understanding 542 12 flue flute 543 5 breeches breaches 543 25 structures monitoring structures monitoring 544 2 structures monitoring structures monitoring 544 8 structures AMP structures AMP 544 17 structures AMP structures AMP 545 11 contention of contention 546 2 structures monitoring structures monitoring 549 18 effect affect 551 12 This is pretty root-cause This is pre-root cause 555 21 And issue An issue 558 16 sent Mr. sent, Mr.
559 9 vice in vice on 559 25 CCSS-099.20056 C-CSS-099.20-056 561 21 10.20 10.1.20 562 16 have unambiguous have been unambiguous 565 7 is going fine is going to be fine 567 15 from 575 5 contingent of the 575 12 easy management aging management 576 8 rotting process wicking process 577 16 concrete is concrete is a 577 22 adequacy of adequacy of the 582 1 warrants a warrants 585 11 environmentally protected environmentally protective 4
Page Line(s) Delete Insert 587 16 following filing 592 9 but December by December 592 12 need to need to be 593 2 well, well well. Well 597 17 would explicated would be explicated 599 17 FSAR FSER 600 18 2001 2002 601 23 challenge as challenge. As 601 23 pointed out. pointed out, 601 24 Its its 602 6 comment it comment on it 605 6 there when there 605 8 mystery mysteries 606 9 breech shot breach shut 606 12 can it expected can it be expected 608 7 plan plant 608 12 prescribed the prescribed by the 612 9 appended dependent 612 10 have shown havent shown 612 21 KASTENBERG FROEHLICH:
616 12 field shield 617 14 Mr. Judge 622 24 and in 623 20 unpolite improper 623 22 from Fifth from the Fifth 624 2 drawing drying 624 4 and filtration infiltration 624 5 highly high 625 23 July 11th 638 25 its it 642 21 material is materially 643 21 July 23rd and the July 23rd 644 1 the materially them materially 652 14 309(f)(2) 2.309(f)(1) 664 2 fluke flute 666 10 last least 667 12 not as many as not many as 674 16 MR. LODGE JUDGE TRIKOUROS 674 21 MR. LODGE JUDGE TRIKOUROS 677 16 three all three 678 22 © (c) 679 10 309 2.309 679 12 2.309(f)(2) 2.309(f)(1) 679 12 Roman I (i) 5
Page Line(s) Delete Insert 680 19 point, point 681 12 Roman sub iv (iv) 681 24 Roman V (v) 681 25 Roman V (v) 682 1 Roman II (ii) 682 2 Roman V (v) 682 5 Roman V (v) 682 17 that I have that they have 683 4 Fasteel Fansteel 683 5 Fasteel Fansteel 683 10 Fasteel, CLI-03-12 Fansteel, CLI-03-13 683 15 material-of-law fact material law or fact 683 23 (f)(2) (f)(1) 687 14 COMMISSION STAFF 692 4 not fast concern not staffs concern 692 4 not fast not staffs 692 8 genuine is genuine issue 692 16 203(f)(1) 2.309(f)(1) 694 3 an increase an increasing 694 24 heeded included 695 3 Admissible Admissibility 696 9 RRBCH RRVCH 696 17 there as there is 698 14 low-grade below-grade 699 22 rebar map rebar mat 701 10 a lie the lie 701 20 2-1 2/1 704 23 equip9ment equipment 709 11 309(f) 2.309(f)(1) 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-346-LR
)
FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY )
)
(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) ) November 29, 2012
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on this date, a copy of the Joint Proposed Corrections to the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on November 5-6, 2012 was filed through the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions E-Filing system.
Signed (electronically) by Stephen J. Burdick Stephen J. Burdick Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004 Phone: 202-739-5059 E-mail: sburdick@morganlewis.com COUNSEL FOR FENOC DB1/ 72087855.2