ML12306A017
| ML12306A017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/2012 |
| From: | NRC Region 4 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2012-0126, RIV-2006-A-0033 | |
| Download: ML12306A017 (4) | |
Text
SUMMARY
Responsible OB RIV-2006-A-0033 Branch Facility Name Callaway ARB Date:
April 25, 2006 Docket Number 05000483 01 Case No.:
ARB DECISION Purpose of ARB Initial Previous N/A Decisions Today's Decision Concern 1-OB to inspect.
Concern 2- 01 to investigate.
Concern 3-ACES to Offer Early ADR Concern 4-OB to inspect.
Concern 5-OB/RPBB to coordinate and review ECP file regarding Licensee's investigation and OB to inspect.
Basis for Another Involve 01 if Concern 4 is substantiated.
ARB REFERRAL Refer to:
Criteria Reviewed?
Referral Rationale O INVESTIGATION Priority Rationale High-Based on level of management involved.
DOL Deferral Rationale ARB PARTICIPANTS (* denotes ARB Chairman Approval)
JWalker 1
HFreeman KFuller TVegel GJohnston DWhite
=RKopriva KCiayton AHowell RCaniano*
(-,-IQ
CONCERNS LIST RIV-2006-A-0033 Concern (Brief Statement)
Regulatory Requirement Branch Action (Inspect, Refer, Planned Significance 01 Priority Investigate, No Action)
Completion (High, Normal)
(H, N, L)
Potential example of a failure of the licensee's fitness-for-10 CFR 26 duty program in that a (b)(7)(c)
Jallegedly 10 CFR 55.53 was not attentive to his duties for months.
OB Inspect TBD Normal 2
Licensee management was allegedly aware of the condition 10 CFR 26 and took no action until forced by the Employee Concerns 10 CFR 55.53 Program.
01 Investigate TBD Normal High 3
Potential retaliation to (b)(7)(c) for reporting to the SCWE Emplo ee Concerns Program that the subject 1(b)(CJ 10 CFR 50.7
[(b)(7)(C)
Iwas allegedly not fit-for-duty.
ACES Offer Early ADR TBD Normal 4
The operations crew in which the alleged inattentive 10 CFR 55.9 (b)(7)(C)
-resided and other levels of 10 CFR 55.25 licensee management may have been covering for the 10 CFR 55.49 for licensed operator requalification.j 10 CFR 55.53 OB Inspect TBD Normal 5
(NRC Issue) Although the alle ed inattentivel(b)(7)(C) 10 CFR 55.9 IT)()F)'as been purportedly (b)(7)(C)
Ithe 10 CFR 55.25 licensee has not (b)(7)(c) nd the individual may be placed on shif as needed.
L OB Ienspect TBD High5 Revised 5/22/02 f>
Indirect Charges A10304 Support for Allegations (Reactors)
Al 0191 Support for Allegations (Materials)
Direct Inspection Activities AF Allegation Followup BJ2 Allegation Prep/Doc AFT Allegation Travel
ALLEGATION RECEIPT FORM Page 1 Received By:
Michael Peck Receipt Date:
April 13, 2006 Receipt Method (meeting, phone call, letter, Letter left under the Resident Inspector's etc.)
office door FACILITY Facility Name Callaway Plant Location Junction Highway CC and Highway 0, Fulton, Missouri Docket(s) 50-483 CONCERN Summryte of Concerns (be brie
- 1.
Please see attached letter - Issues related to lack of prompt management attention to complaints of a less fully attentive (b)(7)(C)
Obtain concern specifics. What is the concem, when did it occur, who was invotyed. etc-ft the concern involves discrimination. fill in the tast section of the form.
Please see attached. letter What is the potentiai safety irnoact? Is this an ongoinq concern?
Adversely affected plant operation and safety culture. Is not a ongoing concern. The affected L(b)(7)(C) is no longer assigned shift duties What requirement/raouation covems this concern?
10 CFR 50.7, 10 CFR 55 What records should the NRC review?
N/A What other individuals could the NRC contact for information?
Please see attached letter How did the individual find out about the concern?
Other operations personnel and direct observation Was the concern brouaht to manaoement's attention? If so. what actions have been taken, if not, why not?
Yes - Allegation of retaliation Why was the concern brought to the NRC's attention?
N/a
ALLEGATION RECEIPT FORM p
ALLEGER INFORMATION 1
(b)(7)(C)
Ersaeeer At erient Fubl Name
- e. evealed adttteR re and t
b)(7)(C)
Maildng Addre s (Home)IfOthon c
a ge ti Relationship to facility w
Telephone (Daytime)Hoe
- (b)(7)(C)
(Other) was th._dvdulavieodett.Y s(A rl_6 2 Preference for method Call or letter at home, warotetiondvuaadieofdnty Ye Ai2,2 and time of contact works a rotating shift p
ro e tion t elc n e,t a le e' d niy wl o
'Referral Explain that if the concerns are referrdt h
iese htaee' dniywl o be revealed and that the NRC will review and evaluate the thoroughness and adequacy of the licensee's response. If the concerns are an agreement state issue or the jurisdiction of another agency, explain that we will refer the concern to the appropriate agency, and if the alleger agrees, we will provide the alleger's identity for followup.
No -
Does the individual object to releasing No-C1 has discussed to the referral?
their identity?
the issue with CWVY ECP and station management Regulations prohibit NRC licensees (including contractors and subcontractors) from discriminating against individuals who engage in protected activities (alleging violations of regulatory requirements, refusing to engage in practices made unlawful by statues, etc.).
Does the concern involve Yes Was the individual advised of the DOL Yes discrimination?
process?
What was the protected activity?
Nuclear plan (b)(7)(C)
What adverse actions have been taken? When?
Why does the individual believe the actions were taken as a result of engaging in a protected activity?
Yes - Please see letter Revised 9/3/03