ML12262A415

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Limited Appearance Statement of Blake Rowe Opposing Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML12262A415
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/14/2012
From: Rowe B
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS E-1214
Download: ML12262A415 (1)


Text

Iks r-:

-o Docket, Hearing From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Blake Rowe [blake@blakerowe.com]

Friday, September 14, 2012 4:57 PM Docket, Hearing Indian Point relicensing I would like to go on record as saying I feel Indian Point should not be relicensed. It is too close to too many people in terms of risk, both with the possibility of internal failures and external terrorist threats. I also do not feel the claims of rolling blackouts if IP is decommissioned are valid. We have a 6.3 kilowatt solar system on our roof and pay 0% of electricity charges. It is totally feasible to find other solutions. Please consider the feasibility of living without a nuclear power plant in Westchester.

Blake Rowe blakegblakerowe.com 914-589-6901 DOCKETED USNRC September 14, 2012 (4:57 p.m.)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 1